Boost for Renewables Transmission: DOE Transmission Siting Authority Upheld

Over the last several years, Clean Line Energy Partners LLC has been pursuing development of long-haul high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission lines, primarily to deliver energy created by wind and other renewables in lower populated areas to high-demand areas of the country. In 2016, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) selected Clean Line’s Plains & Eastern Clean Line Project for its first public-private partnership for development of transmission facilities pursuant to a never-before-used section of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

DOE’s authority to engage in transmission line siting and development has now survived its first legal challenge, but the future of the Plains & Eastern project remains uncertain.

Previously Unused EPAct 2005 Section 1222: Department of Energy Partners with Clean Line

In 2016, we described in an article in Renewable Energy World DOE’s transmission siting activities pursuant to a previously unused section of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), Section 1222 — “Third-Party Finance.” We predicted then that the DOE’s authority to engage in activities that have traditionally been left almost exclusively to the states would be challenged in court. That prediction proved accurate, and last month a federal district court affirmed the DOE’s interpretation of Section 1222 as authorizing it to “build transmission lines with private money,” even where a state utility commission has not authorized the transmission siting.

Historically, the siting of electric transmission facilities was the exclusive province of states. In Section 1222 of EPAct 2005, Congress gave the DOE, acting through two of its federal power administrations (Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) and Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA)) the authority to upgrade existing transmission facilities owned by WAPA or SWPA to develop new transmission facilities within any state in which either operates. The statute permits the DOE to “accept and use funds contributed by another entity for the purpose of carrying out” a transmission project.

Section 1222 thus broadly expanded federal involvement in transmission siting and development, either independently or in partnership with a third party.

As we previously reported, the DOE first approved a Section 1222 project in March 2016. That project was Clean Line’s Plains & Eastern Clean Line Project. Plains & Eastern is a planned 705-mile, 600-kV HVDC transmission line capable of delivering up to 4,000 MW of energy from the panhandle of Oklahoma to the Arkansas-Tennessee border. While Clean Line obtained public utility status from the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, the Arkansas Public Service Commission denied regulatory approval. In the absence of that state authorization, Clean Line sought DOE’s assistance in gaining authority for the project. Six years after Clean Line requested the DOE’s participation, DOE found that the project met Section 1222’s requirements.

Challenge to DOE Transmission Siting Authority

Two groups of landowners in Arkansas challenged the DOE’s authority to approve the project (Downwind LLC v. United States Department of Energy, No. 3:16-cv-207-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 21, 2017)). The landowners claimed that:

  1. The project must be approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission
  2. Section 1222 did not authorize the DOE to take property for the project by condemnation

In a Dec. 21, 2017 order, the District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas dismissed the landowners’ claims.

Holding: States Cannot Veto DOE Transmission Line Approval

In Downwind LLC, the landowners claimed that the Plains & Eastern project required approval by the Arkansas Public Service Commission; since it had no such approval, the landowners argued, the project could not proceed.

The court held that the DOE did not act beyond its statutory authority in approving the Plains & Eastern project pursuant to Section 1222 because, consistent with the statute, the “Department identified a grid shortcoming and, through a deliberative process, designed a new power line to address it.” Though Clean Line’s private investment “dollars will pay for the line,” the project “is the United States’ sovereign action.”

If Congress had intended for a state such as Arkansas to have veto power over whether a transmission line approved by the DOE pursuant to its Section 1222 authority could be built, the statute would have to “make unambiguously clear that the federal government, which is usually exempt from state control, is subject to that control when building electrical lines paid for by third parties.” Section 1222 contains no waiver of sovereign immunity, so Arkansas Public Service Commission authorization was not required for the project to go forward. 

Furthermore, the court held that Section 1222 does not authorize the DOE to “preempt . . . the many existing state regulations about transmission lines and facilities.” Rather, the statute “makes clear, by authorizing the Department to build interstate transmission lines with the help of non-federal funding, that the federal government can take on a larger role in electrical transmission.”

Holding: Objections to DOE’s Condemnation Authority Are Not Ripe

Landowners also objected to the DOE’s authority to acquire easements by condemnation for transmission line siting.

The court held that, because no condemnation claims had actually been initiated, the landowners could not show a “concrete injury, actual or imminent.” A landowner who in the future does not “convey an easement will have the opportunity to contest any resulting condemnation.” That future opportunity, then, “makes any decision about condemnation now advisory.” The landowners’ condemnation claims were therefore dismissed without prejudice. 

Holding: DOE Acted Reasonably and Carefully

In approving the Plains & Eastern project, the DOE “acted reasonably and carefully, not arbitrarily and capriciously,” as evidenced in the 95,060-page administrative record. The court held that the DOE appropriately addressed the five required statutory factors: necessity of the project to meet actual or projected demand; consistency with transmission needs identified by an appropriate entity; the project’s conformity with prudent utility practices; the operation of the project by the appropriate transmission entity; and the project cannot duplicate existing or proposed transmission facilities.

The court also held that the landowners had not been deprived of due process with regard to the acquisition of easements for the project, even though, as the court noted, there is “no question that this project casts a shadow” on the landowners’ property. The DOE satisfied due process requirements through the issued notice of proceedings; 15 public hearings in Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, and Tennessee; and consideration of the more than 700 comments it received.

Challenges in Clean Line Prospects

Two developments after the court’s Downwind LLC decision signal possible shifts in prospects for successful completion of the Plains & Eastern Project.

First, as announced on Dec. 22, NextEra Energy Resources acquired Plains and Eastern Clean Line Oklahoma LLC and all of the assets for the Plains & Eastern Project in Oklahoma. Clean Line Energy retained project assets east of Oklahoma—in other words, the portion of the project at issue in the Downwind LLC legal challenge. No details about the transition from Clean Line to NextEra Energy Resources have yet been made available.

Second, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) signed a memorandum of understanding with Clean Line in 2011 to consider a long-term agreement to purchase at least some of the energy delivered by the Plains & Eastern Project to TVA in Memphis, Tenn. As of the end of 2017, though, TVA determined not to commit to such a long-term purchase, citing “flat” or “declining” future power demand. At this time, Clean Line is not pursuing an interconnection agreement with TVA for the Plains & Eastern project, and has said that it will shift its focus to its other transmission projects.


Regardless of the fate of the Plains & Eastern project, the viability of Section 1222 as a tool to facilitate the construction of transmission for renewables has been validated. It remains to be seen whether the DOE and developers will attempt to make use of it going forward.  

Lead image credit: CC0 Creative Commons | Pixabay

Previous articleBP Weighs Bid for $1.8BN Italian Solar Company
Next articleArgentina Moves to Increase Lithium Production
David Perlman (left) is a partner in the energy practice in Bracewell LLP's Washington, D.C. office. Jessica Miller (Right) is a member of Bracewell's energy and litigation sections. David Perlman represents and counsels clients in regulatory and compliance matters concerning the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission and state public utility commissions, energy-related transactions and financings, and in the establishment of compliance programs and training. His clients include utilities, commodities merchants, oil and gas pipeline companies, electric generators, energy marketers, industrial customers, generators, lenders and financial institutions, and oil & gas producers. He can be reached at   Jessica Miller counsels U.S. and international energy-industry clients involved in regulatory, compliance, and litigation proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and state public utility commissions, as well as related appellate litigation in federal and state courts. She can be reached at

No posts to display