Call for Clean, Green and Decentralized Power

According to the conservationist organization, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), shifting to greater reliance on energy efficient and renewable energy technologies, and facilitating development of distributed generation (DG) capacity could dramatically increase the reliability of electrical delivery systems, making Americans less vulnerable to blackouts like the one that recently struck the Northeast.

Washington D.C. – September 5, 2003 [] “While some claim that preventing another widespread blackout simply requires greater investment in the existing and antiquated energy system developed early in the last century, the real solution to our energy problems will require the United States to move on to the next stage of energy development of a cleaner, more efficient and more decentralized system,” said WWF Director of Climate Change Programs Katherine Silverthorne. According to WWF, the national policies that would achieve this transition will help ensure reliable, clean power distribution without interruption throughout the United States. “Not only will such policies solve our electricity problems,” said Silverthorne,”they can help the country achieve a number of other priorities: reducing air pollutants that cause global warming and respiratory diseases; reducing our demand for and, thereby, the price of natural gas; and saving consumers money.” The problem cited by WWF originates from an antiquated energy system currently used that is based on an energy grid with large capacity, centralized power plants sited far from the consumers that need them. WWF identified two inherent problems with this system: The large plants that run the existing system are extremely inefficient-wasting up to 70 percent of fuel energy and causing significant levels of damaging pollution; and a problem in any portion of the massive generation, transmission and distribution chain can leave customers in a wide geographic area without power. “With persistent air pollution problems causing significant harm to the environment and public health and access to uninterrupted power resources an essential element of modern life, these flaws are unacceptable,” said Silverthorne. WWF maintains that increased investments in our current energy system will not solve these problems and that clean energy is a central part of the solution. According to studies cited by WWF, investing in the status quo may make the United States more vulnerable, not less for the following reasons: -A system which relies on a few, large, exposed generation facilities and an extensive transmission system is highly vulnerable to attack, accident and natural disaster. And problems anywhere along the chain can affect a large number of customers in an unrelated area. -Grid improvement is expensive — Pacific Northwest National Laboratory estimates that keeping up with expected growth in demand through 2020 will cost as much as $450 billion if we invest in the traditional infrastructure route. -Efficiency of the current system is extremely low. Centralized fossil fuel plants waste about 50 percent to70 percent of fuel energy by using inefficient generation technologies, losing heat energy that is produced when electricity is generated, and losing power through transmission and distribution systems-necessitating greater fuel inputs and causing more pollution. -Because generation is added in large blocks, companies must rely on long-term needs forecasts, rather than adapting growth as demand requires. The smaller size of DG units allows them to be added to meet demand, preventing unnecessary investment in excessive generation capacity. -Transmission across long distances requires potentially contentious rights of way through farms, communities, rural areas, wildlife habitat and cities. According to WWF, clean energy holds the solution for long-term safety and reliability for the following reasons: – Attacks on renewable energy resources, if they do occur, will not result in the devastating impacts that could occur if nuclear plants, large centralized fossil fuel plants, and pipelines are targeted-as they do not burn volatile fuels or produce radioactive fallout. -While electricity generated from DG units such as fuel cells, microturbines and solar panels cost more than currently available grid power, producing power locally can avoid costs of upgrading transmission and distribution networks. These avoided costs can tip economics in favor of DG. -Other countries are miles ahead of the United States in utilizing DG and renewable energy resources. Denmark, the Netherlands and Finland each produce more than 40 percent of their current generation from DG, and use less primary energy per $1000 of gross domestic product than the United States.
Previous articleFuel Cell Power Plants Installed on Campus
Next articleAustralian Wave Energy Plans
Renewable Energy World's content team members help deliver the most comprehensive news coverage of the renewable energy industries. Based in the U.S., the UK, and South Africa, the team is comprised of editors from Clarion Energy's myriad of publications that cover the global energy industry.

No posts to display