On the back of 2010’s record demand, there are growing concerns that photovoltaic (PV) module supply is set to outstrip demand throughout 2011, leading to significant oversupply in the industry. But are these concerns well-founded? And if they are, what impact might the oversupply have on the global PV industry?
Andrew Williams, contributor, Renewable Energy World Network
March 4, 2011 — On the back of 2010’s record demand, there are growing concerns that photovoltaic (PV) module supply is set to outstrip demand throughout 2011, leading to significant oversupply in the industry. But are these concerns well-founded? And if they are, what impact might the oversupply have on the global PV industry?
According to analysts at IMS Research, PV module production capacity increased by nearly 70% over the course of 2010, reaching nearly 30GW by the end of the year. Looking ahead, IMS anticipates that 35GW of annual capacity will be reached within the first half of 2011, despite installations in the same period being predicted to reach no more than one fifth of that amount.
“Demand for PV grew quickly throughout the second half of 2009 and 2010, driving installations in 2010 to reach more than double the previous year. Most suppliers implemented aggressive capacity expansion plans throughout the year,” says Sam Wilkinson, research analyst at IMS. Also read: PV module capacity growing faster than demand: Trouble for tier-2 suppliers? from IMS Research
“Following some reductions and amendments to incentive schemes in Europe, installations will not continue to grow at this rate and demand will not be sufficient to support all of this new capacity,” he adds.
Although in general agreement about 2011’s prospects for oversupply, other analysts are more cautious about its likely extent. Adam Krop, VP of equity research at Ardour Capital Investments, believes that the bankable supply of modules will be around 25GW by the end of 2011, compared to a conservative estimate of 17-18GW of demand.
“While this appears to be a significant oversupply, these numbers are not a great ‘apples to apples’ comparison,” says Krop.
“The 25GW of supply is based on statements of capacity build from individual companies, but keep in mind these are year-end goals, so ramp timing plays a big role. While nameplate capacity for the industry could be 25GW, we should discount that number for an adjusted annual run-rate as the lines ramp,” he adds.
Krop also expects some higher-cost capacity to be decommissioned in Europe and says that some Chinese capacity plans could be postponed or scaled-back as well. Also read: PV capacity in China faces tough 2011 from Wind Info.
“[The] real question is how much a supply/demand imbalance will affect pricing and margin structures. We are incorporating 10-15% price declines for module manufacturers based on a more competitive pricing environment,” he says.
Although the chances of a global oversupply of PV modules occurring in 2011 will depend on multiple factors, ongoing levels of government financial support for the sector in key markets is the biggest. In particular, policy developments in Germany, Italy, France, Spain and other European countries have the potential to significantly affect overall global demand. Given recent trends in policy, it is a fair bet that, as the cost of solar continues to drop, we can expect some additional feed in tariff (FIT) reductions.
“If [there is] an oversupply situation in 2011, it will be due to lower demand [as a result of] subsidy cuts in Europe. The supply side is easier to control as it is a matter of cutting capital expenditure. Neither is good for stock prices,” says Krop.
“We also need to take into consideration the anticipated growth in China, the US and other markets,” adds Gil Forer, global cleantech director at Ernst & Young. “But, the retroactive limiting of the number of hours [for which] PV can receive incentives in Spain [and] the retroactive taxes in the Czech Republic, have damaged investor confidence in those countries and caused banks to become more cautious on the sector overall. This could potentially have long lasting negative effects on financing cost, which is a key input variable for the industry,” he adds.
Forer’s prediction is that, as more supply comes online, it is likely that prices for modules will moderate further, improving the economics in countries with stable incentive schemes, low cost of capital and/or high insolation.
“Overall, there is not one global answer, [instead it] will vary market by market,” he says.
For Forer, any growth market is likely to experience frequent, and often rapid, supply and demand adjustments. However, what makes PV unique is that it relies heavily on policy support, which can change according to political priorities and ability to absorb costs.
“As more segments and geographies enter grid parity, we would expect the market to become less volatile over time. That said, the increase in capacity, especially coming on-line in Asia, is quite large,” he says.
What impact might the widely predicted oversupply have on the global PV industry? For Forer, while any oversupply is likely to be temporary, it will be enough to hurt high cost producers.
“Companies with strong brands and strong customer channels will be less affected. Most at risk are high-cost producers that are not operating at scale and with weak brands,” he says. “As we saw during the financial crisis, which was followed by oversupply, bankability was key and could again become a more differentiating factor.”
Further up the supply chain, Tier 1 suppliers, typically favoured by the market, remained sold-out throughout much of 2010 — meaning that Tier 2 suppliers were able to capitalize and grow shipments significantly. As a result, both Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers have quickly added new capacity going into 2011. The outlook continues to be good for Tier 1 suppliers, who continue to see high demand for their products in 2011.
“With a greater proportion of demand served by these Tier 1 suppliers in 2011, Tier 2 suppliers are likely to see less demand for their products. This is likely to result in some competitive pricing and lead to price declines across the industry,” says Wilkinson.
It is quite possible that oversupply, and the ensuing drop in prices, will drive out some of the smaller, higher-cost players.
“Low-cost leaders such as Yingli, Trina, and First Solar should be in the best position, but again, an oversupply situation would bring multiples and stock prices down across the board,” says Krop.
“Consolidation and mergers of capacity is not likely in my opinion. Capacity will continue to be built and shifted into China, Malaysia, and Taiwan, while technology and branding will be focused in key regions [such as] Europe and the US,” he adds.
Andrew Williams is a freelance journalist based in Cardiff, Wales, UK. His work has been published in a wide range of publications.
This article was originally published by RenewableEnergyWorld.com (http://RenewableEnergyWorld.com) and was reprinted with permission. The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Website and other publications.