Paul's Comments

I have seen the technology and know the manufacture.

This product has been sold for about a year mostly in Africa and Europe. They are currently looking for dealers.
Contact me if you are intereted in being one.

Thier newest product is a 100% solar powered bike it will carry 5 people all day long at full speed as long as it has sunshine.
In Cambodia and everywhere else this could be an excellent form for transportation for local trips.

This off grid product as been sold worldwide and is becoming a popolar product due to its low cost and ease of installation.
see it here at http://www.electric-energy-today.net

The lack of smart VC's is a under statement.
Viable smart technologies exist today but if they were put into action these same VCs will loose billions for the products they have invested in have not provided a return on their investment as of yet. They want to make a good return on an investment before a disruptive technology eliminates them.

Real technologies exist today that are under funded because of the nature of their product. With investors, they can become game changers and "Disruptive Technologies" or without the funds to put them to use they become worthless ideas even though they have merit.

What if a technology exist today that can make solar, windpower, coal and gas fired electrical generation, chemical reaction, storage systems, hydro electric and geo thermal all obsolete. That would be disruptive technology and destroy many VC investments.

If you were an investor in one of these technologies, would you invest in a disruptive technology that would eliminate all of your other investments in green energy?
I think not.
The answer is true for the DOE as well why invest in NEW technology when they need more bang for their buck on the old stuff.

NEW technology that makes all these other power sources and products obsolete exist today yet when exposed to the DOE and to some VC investors it gets no attention.
Is this smart or just business as usual?

Read more about this "Disruptive Technology" here
www.electric-energy-today.com

Clean energy is not the burning of so called clean coal or algae. No matter how you make it burning fuels is not clean energy it is the opposite. Look at the coal ash created when burning coal where does it go? How can you burn it without making CO2?
CO2 sequestering is expensive and unreliable. This so-called clean energy will not lower our overall cost for power. It will only cost more.

Not even solar is clean energy when you think of the by products created. Look at the manufacturing going on in China. Go outside a solar manufacturing plant there and see the huge piles of toxic waste they put right into the community surrounding these plants and tell me its clean energy. Tell the people who live there its clean energy.

"Clean energy" is the production of energy producing equipment with minimal impact on the environment and this equipment when in operation does not burn fuel to make energy. This equipment must perform as any other dirty energy device in the production of energy without making any CO2. And without filling up landfills with toxic by products.

Only a few products can make the claim "Clean Energy Producer"
It is not a dream or a some day product it is reality you can read about the cleanest energy made today here at this website. www.electric-energy-today.com

Compare this to any other so-called clean energy product.
This company will install and own the "CLEAN ENERGY" equipment right on your property and sell you CLEAN ENERGY at a 50% discount from what you are paying now with no upfront money. Think about this company when you pay your next dirty energy bill.
www.electric-energy-today.com

Ever hear "Business is War"
We are at war with China.
China takes advantage of the fact America can not or will not do anything to stop them.
We are at war and we are not defending ourselves.
We try to provide incentives to spur American job creation only to see American distributors of solar products buy from low cost Chinese manufactures instead of spending those funds here buying American made products.
We are sending billions of tax dollars earmarked to make jobs here to China. What do we get as taxpayers subsidizing this mass movement of our money overseas?
To stop the madness solar and windpower installers must take the first step and not offer foreign made components and use the energy tax credits for what they where designed to do and that is make American jobs. You see it everywhere alternative energy installers sending American tax dollar overseas making jobs there instead of here. We need to stop this. A quick fix would be make a law that insures the use of energy tax credits or American borne incentives, that 100% of the components used must be made in America. Another would be put a tax or disallow energy credits on foreign components thus making American products more appealing. Here is a point to ponder as well, Americans are the best when it come to industrialization and Americans when pushed hard enough will dig deep to find solutions. American ingenuity is at work! Already 100% USA made products that will make Solar and Windpower obsolete are in testing. These fantastic products cost less and are 3000% more productive eliminating the need for any incentives what so ever. Preliminary testing shows a Cost of Energy index of less then $0.0001 per kwH VS Solar power cost of $0.10 per kwH. Just this alone would make anyone take a second look at subsidizing an obsolete product like solar or wind power.
read more about this product here
www.electric-energy-today.com

Did you notice that they do not tell you how much these 258 Windmills will cost.

40% of the cost will be subsidized by US tax payers.

Consider this if 30% to 40% of the components are made overseas then most if not all the Tax Payer subsidies go to create jobs overseas.

How much does it REALLY cost for a 2.3 MW Siemens windmill?

www.electric-energy-today.com

The solution to Hawaii energy problems is Distributed Generation.

Technologies are being introduced in Hawaii next year that will take any user of electricity off the grid, this product makes Solar and Windpower obsolete.

This application will cost 1/10th the cost of solar and will never need to be replaced as solar panels do. This application will provide 100% of electricity needs 100% of the time. it will do it without using any fuels, it will use No solar and it will be completely CO2 Free

Imagine all industrial and commercial users of electricity coming off the grid in Hawaii.

Within 5 years, this company will become the largest producer of green electricity in Hawaii.

They will sell power retail to consumers for 50% less then what consumers are paying now without any upfront investments.

No Investment and no government incentives needed for this product.

So let me get this clear for you.

Solar cost you money and needs government incentives to buy it and it does not take you off the grid, In 20 years the solar system will cost more then it cost in the first place to repair and maintain.

Or

You get a no cost GREEN solution that needs no investments or incentives one that eliminates the grid all together and you lower your electricity cost by 50% with no maintenance costs ever.

no brainer!

www.electric-energy-today.com

"DOE" is what Homer Simpson says when he makes a mistake

This 1.45 Billion dollar investment will Never Ever Lower your Energy Costs. This is a scam on the American Public.

The people running this "DOE" outfit should be tarred and feathered for throwing away this money.

Current technologies are being tested that will make solar obsolete. Yet when the DOE is shown this technology they ignore it.

A proven technology exist that cost less then $50 million to make 250 megawatt power plant or $200,000 per megawatt

Compare that with $5,800,000 per megawatt at this solar plant.

At $200,000 per megawatt this proven technology would make over 7000 megawatts.

Thats is why they are running around saying "DOE" or is it "Dough"

Heads are going to roll over this one.

www.electric-energy-today.com

CPV at best has a $0.10 Kwh levelised cost of electricity (LCOE)

New technologies are being put in place that have a $0.01 Kwh levelised cost of electricity (LCOE)

I would say CPV future is not so bright.
CVP will always need incentives to compete.
When these new technologies become main stream solar applications will be no more then novelty items sold at surplus stores.
www.electric-energy-store.com

I find it interesting that none of the winners are energy producers. Many fine alternative energy producing products that will revolutionize the industry are not on the list.

For instance our product which was entered into the contest make electricity on demand where you consume it. It's not a fuel cell or solar panel. It can make from 13KW all the way up to 3 megawatts. All without fuels or storage systems, NO CO2 no need for smart grid technology with our equipment since it had the power to remove you from the grid. Our equipment can also be used to make hybred electric trucks that need no fuel.

We already won with our product.

http://www.electricenergystore.com

The company (Google) failed to find potential breakthroughs with low enough risk. The project, which started in 2007, will now focus on less revolutionary technologies.

I find it interesting that Bill Weihl, who heads Google's renewable energy team, would say such a thing.
Many revolutionary technologies exist today that will make windpower obsolete that are less risky.

Our company for instance has many times tried to show our so called revolutionary technology that makes windpower obsolete to Google and the Google VC company. It is as if they were Giants and they cannot see us little guys running around their feet.

Here is their comment to me in an email

Thank you for your note. While we are not able to personally respond to
all proposals, please be assured that we review every email we receive. If
your proposal matches our current business and technology development
needs, a Google representative will be in touch with you shortly. If your
email is not related to business development, we encourage you to submit
your message through the online contact form at
http://www.google.com/support/

If you are reading this Bill, here is our deal we make electricity on demand on location at 100% of capacity. Our 240 kW 320 amp three-phase unit cost less then 10 cents an hour to run, uses no solar or wind power, need no storage systems, uses no chemical reactions and it makes no CO2. Imagine our systems all over the east coast on land where power is consumed. Who would be buying windpower electrons when it cost 2 to 3 times more then our electrons made on location where consumed?
Talk about risk.

Bill if Google is looking for investment start at home. With no investment from Google we will install and maintain our equipment at your facilities and take your offices off the grid completely.
We will charge you 50% of your current charges and be your new power company.
It that low enough risk?
see it here

www.electric-energy-store.com

"With few other renewable energy options ideally suited for the Atlantic coast, the AWC backbone helps states meet their renewable energy goals and standards by enabling a local offshore wind industry to deploy thousands of megawatts of clean, cost-effective wind energy"

Cost effective it is not, at best those units will produce 40% of capacity and over 1/3 of those Billions will go to overseas companies to build components. The same amount supported by our renewable energy tax incentives effectively goes to employ people overseas.

The renewable energy tax incentives are to help spur our economy not some foreign company. A FEW other renewable energy options exist that do not send our tax dollars overseas that are suitable for the Atlantic Coast. I do not think windmills are suitable in areas that have hurricanes especially when alternatives exist that are a fraction of the cost. Employing Americans is one of our goals when we as Americans approved the renewable energy credits and incentives.

There are companies here in the US offer great renewable energy options that do not require windmills littering our oceans. We can make the same energy on land for a fraction the cost and not have to send a billion renewable energy tax dollars overseas.

Five Billion for 6 GW and we pay 1/3 or more in tax incentives as tax payers.
I wonder if the power they make with this investment will lower our personal costs for energy. I doubt that very much.

Few companies actually claim to use this tax incentives wisely creating long-term green jobs in America and then offering the power at a reduced price directly to consumers. You can find one at http://www.electric-energy-store.com

They claim not only to have a solution that makes windmills obsolete they also provide energy to consumers at 50% of their current costs with no upfront investment.

With option like this why buy from the local utility high priced power?

The cost of energy will be reduced if not eliminated from our monthly expenses. Mark my words!

Well put Daniel.

It is happening now distributed generation is just a few years away.

RE companies with good products and financial strength will eliminate the need to use the grid altogether.

Imagine Utility companies dealing with loosing the top 20% of the highest payers. When that happens, we will see a landslide of events.

It is starting now companies that are making it and going beyond that Valley of Death are getting huge contract for Distributed Energy.

Our company for instance we have thousands of prospects all with huge utility bills clamoring over the prospect of being off the grid.

I see that once products like ours become readily available that the utility companies and big energy will try again to circumvent this activity.

If your company can save 50% on your electric bill and not have to conserve anymore with no investment on your part you would move in a second.

That is what the Utility companies are going to have in their laps very soon and they are not ready for it.

We have that solution and its only weeks away from final testing.

as Daniel stated

"The cost of energy will be reduced if not eliminated from our monthly expenses. Mark my words!

www.electric-energy-today.com

The race is over.

OBM Global MAFG Reactors make 240kW DC three phase 440 600 amp installed for under $0.50 cents per watt.

Over a 20 year period the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) is only 1 penny per kilowatt hour created over a 20 year period.

Solar prices today over a 20 year period Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) is $0.40 cents per kilowatt hour produced for a simular invested energy dollar.

its simple solar is far away from not needing goverment incentives for installationn and if it was not for the incentives Solar would be dead in the water.

The OBM Global MAFG Reator needs no goverment incentives nor do you need any investments to buy it.

Electric Energy Store is offering it at no cost to consumers who qualify providing them with a 50% reduction in power cost from day one of installation.

No investment needed, no goverment incentives needed just a straight 50% of past bill turned into a flat fee per month.

What solar manufactures will need to do it become progressive otherwise the new alternative power providers like the MAFG Reactor are going to make solar over priced and obsolete.

see more at www.electric-energy-store.com

The monopolistic nature of big energy is to place roadblocks at every corner for RE. The way we take back our energy dollars is to remove ourselves from the grid. A lot of new RE products are coming out that will allow anyone to become independent of the grid.

Even today, many products if people would just use them would save them money and eliminate the government from spending our tax dollars on useless ventures. I say that because no matter what they do they will not reduce the cost of energy we consume if we buy it from them. That alone will create a Big Business for RE companies and incentive for consumers of Electricity to find a final solution.

Our company offers that final solution and with it takes any consumer of electricity off the grid. We offer it without any up front costs, no government assistance and no future investments needed. Our service is selling Electricity Generated onsite where consumed for 50% of current charges effectively removing the consumer off the grid completely.
Its completely green product, no solar panels, no windmills, uses no chemical reactions, needs no storage systems, has a small footprint and provides 100% power on demand 100% of the time. With a product like this, you do not need the grid.

The current situation requires a different thought process and approach. Our product eliminates these issues and creates jobs. RE creates jobs when entrepreneurs seek solutions despite the efforts of big energy to squash them. If they will not allow us to sell power like they do by allowing easy access to the grid why should we support their activities and pay for useless transmission lines when technology allows for onsite production of power. RE manufacture will just to become creative to become competitive. It is the current situation!

www.electric-energy-today.com