Clean Energy Patents continue strong showing in 2d Quarter- Clean Energy Patent Growth Index

The CEPGI tracks the granting of patents in the Clean Energy sector and monitors important technological breakthroughs in this field.  Victor Cardona, Co-chair of the firm’s Cleantech Group stated, “we are pleased to announce that the Clean Energy Patent Growth Index was at its third highest total ever in the 2d quarter–lagging only the previous two quarters-and was up 100 patents over the second quarter of 2010.  Wind patents were up and  GE took  the quarterly Clean Energy patent Crown from GM, winter of the two previous quarters and overall 2010 leader.  Japan led California followed by a wind patent surging New York.”

The Clean Energy Patent Growth Index (CEPGI) provides an indication of the trend of innovative activity in the Clean Energy sector since 2002 in the U.S., along with Leading Patent Owners and Leading Country and State information.  Results from the second quarter of 2011 reveal the CEPGI to have a value of 537 granted U.S. patents which is the third highest quarter since tracking of the CEPGI began, lagging only the immediate two preceding quarters by 3 and 35 patents respectively, along with being up 100 over the second quarter of 2010.  Quarterly results are illustrated below:

The components breakdown of the CEPGI shows fuel cells to be down 45 relative to the 1st quarter at 205 and down 43 relative to the year before. Granted solar patents (122) continued to top the remaining components of the CEPGI, and in particular its closest competitor, wind (113), by 9.  Solar patents were down 16 compared to the 1st quarter while up 46 relative to a year prior.  Wind was up 27 over the first quarter and up 58 over the second quarter of 2010.   Hybrid/electric vehicle patents (47) were up 9 relative to the 1st quarter and up 14 compared to the second quarter of the year before.   Biofuel patents (27) were up 10  from the 1st  quarter and up 15 relative to the 2d  quarter of 2010.  Hydroelectric patents were at four patents topping by three patents the first quarter and the same period of the year prior.  Tidal patents were up 6 at 15 from the1st quarter and up 5 over the year before.

General Electric took the quarterly Clean Energy Patent crown with 44 granted clean energy patents in the second quarter of 2011, ending General Motors’ streak of  two quarterly wins and having won the annual contest in 2010. GE’s win was based primarily on its wind patents (37) along with small numbers of patents in Fuel cells (1), Hybrid/Electric vehicles (2), solar and a pair of others. GM fell to fourth place while Toyota climbed back up into second place with 33 granted clean energy patents followed by Samsung with 28.  Toyota’s patents were in fuel cells (21) and Hybrid/Electric vehicles (12).  Samsung coupled a large fuel cell (23) turnout with an assist from solar (5).  GM’s patents were primarily in Fuel Cells at 24 and GM led all others in this category in the second quarter.  Also, Hybrid/Electric vehicles (3), as one would expect from a car company, added to GM’s tally.  Vestas had 22 wind patents and trailed GE by 15 in this category while taking fifth place.  Honda followed with an uncharacteristically low 14 clean energy patents in fuel cells (12), hybrid/electric vehicles (2) and solar (1).  Panasonic had 9 fuel cell patents in seventh place while five entities tied with 5 granted clean energy patents.  Applied Materials was second in solar patents to Samsung, having 4 solar patents and one fuel cell patent.  Car companies Nissan and Ford had patents in fuel cells (4 and 3, respectively) and hybrid/electric vehicles (2 each).  Canon had patents exclusively in fuel cells (5) while Siemens scored wind (3) and fuel cell (2) patents.  

Geographically, Japan was the first quarter leader among non-U.S. holders of U.S. clean energy patents and the individual U.S. states with 114, down 17 from the 1st quarter and  down 7 from the same period in 2010, to again claim the geographical clean energy patent crown.  California was in second place for the third consecutive quarter at 65 clean energy patents, up 6 over the second quarter and up 16 compared to a year prior, leading new third place finisher New York which leapfrogged Michigan due to its largest quarterly finish ever at 52 granted clean energy patents, up 17 over the 1st quarter and up 30 over a year prior.  Korea followed with 41 patents matching last quarter’s total and up 4 over the same quarter in 2010.   Longtime second place holder (and longtime US states leader ) Michigan fell to 5th place, down 14 from the previous result and up two over last year’s.  Denmark (26) and Germany (29) trailed with Germany up 5 over last quarter and tieing the results of a year ago while Denmark was up 9 over last quarter and 17 over last year’s second quarter.  (Others having significant clean energy patent totals were Massachusetts (13) with a total identical to that of the first quarter, while Canada and Colorado had 9 and Connecticut had 7 (identical to the last quarter).

Further information regarding the CEPGI is available at www.cleanenergypatentgrowthindex.com.  Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C. is dedicated exclusively to representing clients in the protection and commercialization of intellectual property, both domestic and foreign, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. 

The components breakdown of the CEPGI shows fuel cells to be down 45 relative to the 1st quarter at 205 and down 43 relative to the year before. Granted solar patents (122) continued to top the remaining components of the CEPGI, and in particular its closest competitor, wind (113), by 9.  Solar patents were down 16 compared to the 1st quarter while up 46 relative to a year prior.  Wind was up 27 over the first quarter and up 58 over the second quarter of 2010.   Hybrid/electric vehicle patents (47) were up 9 relative to the 1st quarter and up 14 compared to the second quarter of the year before.   Biofuel patents (27) were up 10  from the 1st  quarter and up 15 relative to the 2d  quarter of 2010.  Hydroelectric patents were at four patents topping by three patents the first quarter and the same period of the year prior.  Tidal patents were up 6 at 15 from the1st quarter and up 5 over the year before.

General Electric took the quarterly Clean Energy Patent crown with 44 granted clean energy patents in the second quarter of 2011, ending General Motors’ streak of  two quarterly wins and having won the annual contest in 2010. GE’s win was based primarily on its wind patents (37) along with small numbers of patents in Fuel cells (1), Hybrid/Electric vehicles (2), solar and a pair of others. GM fell to fourth place while Toyota climbed back up into second place with 33 granted clean energy patents followed by Samsung with 28.  Toyota’s patents were in fuel cells (21) and Hybrid/Electric vehicles (12).  Samsung coupled a large fuel cell (23) turnout with an assist from solar (5).  GM’s patents were primarily in Fuel Cells at 24 and GM led all others in this category in the second quarter.  Also, Hybrid/Electric vehicles (3), as one would expect from a car company, added to GM’s tally.  Vestas had 22 wind patents and trailed GE by 15 in this category while taking fifth place.  Honda followed with an uncharacteristically low 14 clean energy patents in fuel cells (12), hybrid/electric vehicles (2) and solar (1).  Panasonic had 9 fuel cell patents in seventh place while five entities tied with 5 granted clean energy patents.  Applied Materials was second in solar patents to Samsung, having 4 solar patents and one fuel cell patent.  Car companies Nissan and Ford had patents in fuel cells (4 and 3, respectively) and hybrid/electric vehicles (2 each).  Canon had patents exclusively in fuel cells (5) while Siemens scored wind (3) and fuel cell (2) patents.  

Geographically, Japan was the first quarter leader among non-U.S. holders of U.S. clean energy patents and the individual U.S. states with 114, down 17 from the 1st quarter and  down 7 from the same period in 2010, to again claim the geographical clean energy patent crown.  California was in second place for the third consecutive quarter at 65 clean energy patents, up 6 over the second quarter and up 16 compared to a year prior, leading new third place finisher New York which leapfrogged Michigan due to its largest quarterly finish ever at 52 granted clean energy patents, up 17 over the 1st quarter and up 30 over a year prior.  Korea followed with 41 patents matching last quarter’s total and up 4 over the same quarter in 2010.   Longtime second place holder (and longtime US states leader ) Michigan fell to 5th place, down 14 from the previous result and up two over last year’s.  Denmark (26) and Germany (29) trailed with Germany up 5 over last quarter and tieing the results of a year ago while Denmark was up 9 over last quarter and 17 over last year’s second quarter.  (Others having significant clean energy patent totals were Massachusetts (13) with a total identical to that of the first quarter, while Canada and Colorado had 9 and Connecticut had 7 (identical to the last quarter).

Further information regarding the CEPGI is available at www.cleanenergypatentgrowthindex.com.  Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C. is dedicated exclusively to representing clients in the protection and commercialization of intellectual property, both domestic and foreign, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets.