The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

What Do Struggling Gas-Fired Plants Mean for Renewables?

Tino Andresen & Tara Patel, Bloomberg
March 13, 2013  |  14 Comments

Print

Three years ago, Germany's largest utility spent 400 million euros ($523 million) building a natural gas-fired power station. Later this month, the company may close the plant because it's losing so much money.

EON SE’s Irsching-5 in Bavaria last year operated less than 25 percent of the time as slumping power prices made burning natural gas unprofitable by record margins. As Europe’s weak economy holds back electricity demand, cheaper coal, requirements to buy renewable energy and the collapsing cost of carbon permits are undercutting gas-fired plants.

The pattern is repeated throughout Europe as utilities including France’s GDF Suez SA and Centrica Plc mothball gas plants. The impact is both environmental and commercial. Switching to coal increases emissions, while it lowers profit for gas plants, which generate almost a quarter of European power, and shrinks the market for suppliers led by OAO Gazprom. (GAZP)

“Gas-fired plants are stopped three days out of four,” Gerard Mestrallet, chief executive officer of GDF Suez, France’s former gas monopoly, said at a briefing on Feb. 28. “The thermal industry is in crisis. There is overcapacity.”

The difference between the cost of fuel and the price paid for the power generated reached a record low today. The so- called spark spread for the month ahead is minus 18.35 euros a megawatt-hour ($23.87). Gas plants are also unprofitable in France, the Netherlands, Spain and the Czech Republic, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. In the U.K., they’re barely breaking even.

At the same time, spark spreads for coal plants are profitable in every European market tracked by Bloomberg as prices for the fuel drop.

Idling Stations

The idling of power stations built to last a generation is holding back Europe’s consumption of the fuel. The region’s demand will drop 3.5 percent to 550 billion cubic meters in 2015 from 2010 levels, according to International Energy Agency forecasts. Russia’s Gazprom lost its position as Europe’s largest gas supplier to Norway last year as shipments slid, Societe Generale SA said.

“The switch from gas to coal in Europe is a very serious retrograde step from a climate change perspective,” Dieter Helm, an energy policy professor at the University of Oxford, said by e-mail. “In Germany it is worse — building new coal power stations which will be locked in for decades.”

RWE AG (RWE), Germany’s second-largest utility and Europe’s largest carbon dioxide emitter, churned out 11 percent more greenhouse gases last year as coal-fired plants increased production, according to the company’s annual report. Their profitability has been increased by the collapse in carbon permits to record lows, cutting the cost of burning coal.

‘Good for Climate’

The share of natural gas in Germany’s electricity output fell by 2.3 percentage points to 11.3 percent in 2012 from a year earlier, according to BDEW, a Berlin-based lobby group.

“Under these conditions it is not possible to operate gas- fired power plants however clean, efficient and good for the climate and the country they may be, neither old nor new,” EON Chief Executive Officer Johannes Teyssen said in January. “We are not willing to run loss-making plants where we don’t see any chance of a recovery.”

EON, which reports annual earnings tomorrow, and GDF were both forced to scrap 2013 profit forecasts because of prospects for gas-fired generation. Turning the situation around will probably require more plant closures, according to UBS AG

EON shares, down 6.9 percent so far this year, dropped 5 cents to 13.11 euros in Frankfurt trading at 10:48 a.m. local time. GDF Suez (GSZ) fell 9 cents, or 0.6 percent, to 14.67 euros in Paris.

Shut Plants

Utilities in Europe need to shut more than 30 percent of fossil-fuel fired stations to counter increasing production from wind turbines and solar, UBS analysts led by Per Lekander said in a note last week. Gas-fired plants will lead shutdowns, they said.

Electricity output from French gas-fired plants dropped 24 percent in 2012, according to grid manager Reseau de Transport d’Electricite, or RTE, the French power grid operator owned by Electricite de France SA. GDF plans to close or mothball 10,000 megawatts of capacity across Europe, mostly gas plants, Mestrallet said.

Centrica Energy Plc is considering permanently closing at least one gas-fired facility in the U.K. this year. EON has already withdrawn two gas plants from the grid, reserving them only for periods of peak demand. RWE, where plants are operating near half their capacity, has said it will idle two units for six months of this year.

In Spain, the under-use of gas-powered plants is “outlandish,” said Antonio Llarden, chairman of Enagas, the operator of the country’s natural-gas transportation network. Gas-fed plants were only used 19 percent of the time in 2012, compared with 51 percent in 2008, he said.

Cloudy Days

The troubled gas-generation market is an issue for policy makers, who need the flexibility gas offers when windless or cloudy days cut renewable production.

In the U.K., the regulator Ofgem said last month the country may face a power capacity shortfall as the lack of gas-fired capacity combines with the withdrawal of coal units because of environmental regulations.

Germany “needs” flexible gas plants to underpin a greater share of renewable sources if the country’s exit from nuclear power is to succeed, Environment Minister Peter Altmaier said in January.

The remedy may be so-called capacity mechanisms, where generators are paid to keep plants on line even when they aren’t used. The U.K. plans a new system to encourage investment and may start payments in 2018, under changes to the energy industry making their way through parliament.

EON’s Teyssen has called for incentives to keep capacity available in Germany.

In the meantime, plants are likely to keep closing until the mismatch between power and gas prices ends, analysts said.

“The market is signaling that some power plants should be turned off and there should be no investment,” said Josef Pospisil, head of utilities at Fitch.

Copyright 2013 Bloomberg

Lead image: Gas plant via Shutterstock

14 Comments

Register To Comment
Gregory L Smith
Gregory L Smith
March 19, 2013
With the uptick of Oklahoma Natural gas production to levels un-thought-of decades ago, it is obvious that natural gas has a place in Oklahoma electrical production for decades to come. Why is this? Because the unreal economics of solar have lagged because of efficiency, not because it is a interim fuel of daytime production and can be significantly affected by weather changes, unlike wind or coal or natural gas. However, if the efficiencies of solar get over 40% efficient at a price break of about $.50 per watt retail, then a lot of people in Utility companies will be out of a job, because they will be fired for being short-sighted and missing the lines of companies in Independent Utility companies, that will create bi-fuel processes that are both renewable and solar, because of the price break and long life of products. It will ruin coal and natural gas plants and the results will be serious and devastating to the US. It is therefore wise to go the Fuel cell and solar route, where hydrogen is made in the daytime via excess capacity, and stored for use at night when capacity is near zero for solar. Bi-fuel systems also can repurpose CO2 using Methane or Hydrogen and produce similar products that both would be cleaner than either natural gas that has more impurities or coal that is simply dirty burning. Bi-fuels will be adaptable and able to use various fuels, but will have a requirement to burn at least 70% Hydrogen unless the sun has taken a vacation for a week of rain and solar is down for days instead of for hours...The laws of the future will be complex and yet have clear ways to reduce greenhouse gases and repurpose CO2, whereas coal has no other use as a fuel stock and is dangerous for the long run, even more than for the cheap short run it might enjoy for 5 years at most...So why aren't people shifting to the bi-fuel approach? Because it currently doesn't exist, and just like coal, it takes water to run them.
V G SHENOI
V G SHENOI
March 16, 2013
Although gas fired combined cycle plants operate at higher efficiencies, coal fired stations are much older, their capital costs have been paid off and the cost of operation and maintenance comes out much less than for newer CCGT stations within the freemarket auction system for generated electricity. Europe also has considerable coal reserves compared with gas from the North Sea (Norway) or Russia - higher cost. New technologies, such as pulverised coal stored in silos, also allow low turn down ratios making large coal fired stations respond better to the intermittant renewable regeneration. There is surplus capacity and selling base load electricity from the older coal fired stations more competitive.
V G SHENOI
V G SHENOI
March 16, 2013
Although gas fired combined cycle plants operate at higher efficiencies, coal fired stations are much older, their capital costs have been paid off and the cost of operation and maintenance comes out much less than for newer CCGT stations within the freemarket auction system for generated electricity. Europe also has considerable coal reserves compared with gas from the North Sea (Norway) or Russia - higher cost. New technologies, such as pulverised coal stored in silos, also allow low turn down ratios making large coal fired stations respond better to the intermittant renewable regeneration. There is surplus capacity and selling base load electricity from the older coal fired stations more competitive.
Chris Yorke
Chris Yorke
March 16, 2013
It is strange that a Europe so obsessed with carbon emissions is building coal plants in preference to natural gas.
Strange that coal can compete at a time when gas prices are so subdued.
It seems that taxing carbon fails when your economy is performing so badly, as marginal demand for carbon credits drops (like the price of stocks!)
Surprising that coal can compete at a time when gas prices are so subdued.
Regarding the current and future subsidy regime for renewables, Germany is the only big EU country that can afford to continue it, though even Germany's future ability to sustain those subsidies is parlous. Still, while their own unemployment is low, Germans can indulge "Green" nostrums and vote for Green parliamentarians. Indirectly, renewables receive additional subsidy when they force the under-utilisation of expensive plant, as is occurring. It is not the price of gas that matters so much, but rather, the idling of plant, as the article suggests.
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
March 16, 2013
These thermal plants would be better built on supertanker structures and tied into grids at locations easy to modify. This way of supplying power makes better use of a power plant economics by moving it to which ever place can gain financially from it. The development of dispatched gas, coal, etc. also aids in disaster relief, helps pay for offshore grids and can reduce transportation costs.

Shipbuilding revenue would increase and also indirectly lower offshore wind costs.

A similar strategy may work with a modular and scalable rail based system as well. By capturing as much use out of equipment as possible, this also makes cost of upgrading more affordable.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
March 15, 2013
The political failure is only that politicians were convinced by special interests that pricing carbon would be a sure fire way of curtailing use of fossil fuel. There's a Brer Rabbit tale (please don't throw me in the briar patch) which illustrates the fallacy. Whenever politicians rely on advice from 'industry experts', meaning players in the current industry, don't be surprised if the future is a reprise of the past. Optimists like carbon markets as a mechanism particularly because the fossil fuel industry provides little more than token resistance. Perhaps now you know why. But that won't stop politicians in the US and other places from pinning their hopes on the same mechanism (of course they'll say they're doing it different than the Germans so it's sure to work).
Anatoly Arov
Anatoly Arov
March 15, 2013
Dear responders with comments 2 & 3
I have solution for energy storage with my Invention allowing conversion of pressure into energy output with rate of 5MW @ 5bar pressure per every cubic meter of device size.
Even more, this invention allows also use deep water pressure in lakes and ocean for energy production and supply energy for islands and offshore communities.
No support in Canada, even more, they shut down my development because I do not have money for commercialization and other stupid reasons.
I designed also new device for kinetic energy utilization which is 2.6 times more effective (tested) than the best method currently used (for wind and water), the same effect of resentment "do not have money do not invent"
Still looking for support and understanding.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
March 15, 2013
In the article we see the disastrous results of ignorant but cocksure politicians trying to run energy and markets--they get exactly the opposite of what they want--more coal use. So to answer this self-created problem, Davis Swan advocates we double down on political meddling by the politicians guiding us down this well-paved road to hell by elevating and expanding their scope of authority to an "ISS style international effort." Wow. The magnitude of that folly is mind-boggling. Give the idiots a bigger stick to beat you with. Good luck with that. For the sane world, how about we end all the subsidies and market-distorting policies that are accelerating coal use and needlessly raising prices and slowing economies? Solar and Wind will wither as they should until the energy storage problem is solved and we'll all stop needlessly creating extra entropy and accelerating the heat death of the universe.
V G SHENOI
V G SHENOI
March 15, 2013
davis-swan1 - you have set out the dilemma - re-nationalise the power sector - or liberate the market entirely, cut out the renewables subsidies.
Davis Swan
Davis Swan
March 14, 2013
It is important to recognize that renewable sources have been implemented IN ADDITION to existing thermal generation assets. By definition that means there is excess capacity in the system when renewables are generating. So the question becomes "when are the existing thermal assets required and how can we influence which of those assets is used?".

If renewables are producing almost no electricity (say on a calm night) then all thermal assets will be required and input costs are irrelevant.

If renewables are producing electricity but not enough to meet the demand then some thermal assets will come into play. Here is where a carbon tax would take effect. A carbon tax would be one way to influence a decision to use gas-fired rather than coal-fired plants. However, given the price elasticity in coal and the fact that most coal-fired plants have been paid for long ago any carbon tax would have to be very draconian in order to have a significant impact.

My personal approach would be more radical - I think it is time to abandon the deregulation of the electricity industry. It has been an utter failure and has not resulted in lower consumer prices anywhere that I know of. Utilities cannot and will not make huge investments in long-term generation assets without some price certainty (renewable projects are ALL supported by some sort of taxpayer or ratepayer subsidies).

It is time we went back to having utilities make decisions based upon the public good. So we can stipulate that coal-fired plants can only be brought on-line when more efficient and lower CO2 producing gas-fired plants cannot meet demands. And we can implement some regulated price support mechanisms in the short term to eliminate market distortions being caused by renewables. For example, wind producers in Texas are paying the grid to take their electricity about 10% of the time. They can only do that because they are subsidized and that is definitely unfair to thermal producers.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
March 14, 2013
This doesn't say anything positive about the ability of carbon credits to drive the market away from coal - yet another theory up in smoke.
Davis Swan
Davis Swan
March 14, 2013
I totally agree that energy storage, smart grid, and load management (through responsive demand and residential and commercial geoexchange) need to be the focus now and that is what I have been arguing in my blog posts for a long time. For a humorous take on the situation check out my Christmas blog 'The Fright Before Christmas' http://debarel.com/blog1/?p=23

We need an 'ISS' style International effort to address these issues - renewable rollout will have to slow down so that we can focus R&D and implementation on the other parts of the system that will support a complete conversion to renewables.
Todd Flach
Todd Flach
March 14, 2013
The problem is cheap coal, not that natural gas is expensive. The EU has a cap and trade system for CO2, they just need to use it. Lower the cap, the price of CO2 emissions goes up, and natural gas can compete with coal again. The point is some stakeholders will lose no matter what now. It is better for most of society if coal loses than if natural gas loses. Increasing intermittent renewables in the mix is unstoppable. But at some point the system can only work if sufficient energy storage and smarter, more active load management are implemented. This is where power utilities need to be, and if they wait too long, other players will move in and hasten their demise.
Davis Swan
Davis Swan
March 14, 2013
What most green energy advocates don't seem to understand is that renewables ONLY work today because all the thermal generation assets (coal, gas, and nuclear plants) are still running, providing on-demand backup power. But preferential treatment for renewables is utterly destroying the economics of running these plants so that they will, in the end, be shut down. At that point we will be reliant upon unreliable renewables and there will be major grid failures. That in turn will lead to a backlash from the general public against renewables. I covered this in detail in my blog posts of Jan. 1, 2013 http://debarel.com/blog1/?p=20 and Feb. 24, 2013 http://debarel.com/blog1/?p=70

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 9
    Country-Based Action to Achieve Universal Access to Energy
  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 2
    Big Apple Anticipates Solar Explosion for 2013
  • 2
    Is the IRS Considering Solar REITs?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Solar Energy International (SEI)
  • PLANSEE SE
  • SolarReviews
  • REC Solar
  • Planet Solar Inc
  • Green Power Conferences
  • KACO new energy, Inc.
  • DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information