The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Is Japan Squandering Opportunity for Renewables after Fukushima Crisis?

Iain Wilson, Bloomberg
March 11, 2013  |  31 Comments

Japan is wasting the opportunity of the Fukushima disaster by failing to use the crisis and public opposition toward nuclear reactors to form an energy mix more reliant on renewable energy, Canadian author, environmentalist and geneticist David Suzuki says.

“Fukushima gives the opening that if they really want to get off nukes, then they really have to go and do something else,” said Suzuki, who joined the board of the Japan Renewable Energy Foundation last year at the urging of Softbank Corp. founder Masayoshi Son.

Suzuki’s comments echo a common refrain among critics of nuclear energy that leaders could have used the atomic meltdown to push alternative forms of energy. That effort suffered a setback last month when Prime Minister Shinzo Abe told lawmakers he’ll restart Japan’s reactors once safety measures are in place.

“There’s a huge opportunity that the government, because it is so tightly tied to the private energy sector, has refused to acknowledge,” Suzuki said in an interview. “It is an opportunity being squandered in the drive to get the reactors up and running again.”

Two years after the March 11, 2011, earthquake and crisis in Fukushima led to the closing of all except two of Japan’s 50 nuclear plants, Japan gets only a fraction of its energy from clean sources. About 7.4 percent of primary energy came from renewables in the year ending March 2012, with 3.4 percent from hydro and 4 percent from others such as solar, geothermal and wind, according to data compiled by Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Incentives for Renewables

Still, Japan has moved to bolster clean energy. The nation began an incentive program in July, increasing solar capacity and prompting investment interest from companies such as Softbank and Orix Corp. Officials also are considering cutting the time needed for environmental assessments for wind projects.

Aided by solar incentives, Japan may become the world’s third-largest market for solar power in 2013 behind China and either the U.S. or Italy, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Domestic shipments of solar cells and modules more than doubled to 1,003 megawatts in the three months to Dec. 31, the Japan Photovoltaic Energy Association said on Feb. 26.

“Japan has a real opportunity now to confront its long-term energy future, and the Japanese are such that if a man like Mr. Son is able to get an organization to come up with a blueprint, they well might be a country to say, ‘Yes, let’s do it,’” Suzuki said in the telephone interview Feb. 21 from his office in Vancouver.

Geothermal Potential

Japan’s best hope may be its geothermal resources, said Suzuki, subject of the 2010 film “Force of Nature,” a synopsis of the geneticist’s views on his life’s work as a science communicator and advocate for environmental preservation over economic expansion.

“Geothermal can be a huge source of energy very quickly,” Suzuki said, adding that Japan is also well-positioned to take advantage of developments in tidal power.

“Japan is a model already to the lie that economic growth is the key to our future,” he said. “If they can really show an alternative to nukes and fossil fuels, then they will be the poster boy for the renewable energy for the future.”

Geothermal Advantages

For a nation steeped in the traditions of a bathing culture fueled by geologically-active hotsprings, Japan has a dearth of projects harnessing the reserves of energy stored underground to produce electricity.

Japan has 539 megawatts of geothermal capacity currently operating, a quarter of its wind capacity and almost 14 times less than solar, according to data compiled by Bloomberg New Energy Finance for 2012.

One advantage to geothermal energy is that it offers a relatively constant supply of energy, unlike wind and solar, which fluctuate with breezes and clouds.

“The benefit is that it is baseload energy, unlike wind and solar,” said Yugo Nakamura, an analyst at Bloomberg New Energy Finance in Tokyo. “Japan should take reasonable measures to boost geothermal, but the country also needs to take every measure to boost energy supply from all sources.”

Japan has the potential to produce 23,000 megawatts of geothermal power, according to a report on the global market prepared by the Washington, D.C.-based Geothermal Energy Association in May.

“I know the PM is under huge pressure from the energy sector to get those reactors back up and running again,” said Suzuki, who took the top spot as Canada’s most trusted individual in a 2011 survey conducted by Reader’s Digest magazine. “It is unfortunate because the grassroots in Japan are desperate to get off nukes.”

Copyright 2013 Bloomberg

Lead image: Opportunity sign via Shutterstock

31 Comments

Register To Comment
William Fitch
William Fitch
March 16, 2013
Hi:

".... next generation (safe) nuclear. Not ...."
Safe Nuclear!! Now there is a good laugh for my Saturday morning...

The Golden rule applies on planet earth no matter what country you wish to talk about. "He who has the gold makes the rules", and in Japan its the business of radioactivity over people...

.....Bill
EDWARD DYKES
EDWARD DYKES
March 14, 2013
Here is a touch of reality concerning Methane Hydrates:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/12/japan-tries-to-unlock-the-worlds-biggest-source-of-carbon-based-fuel/

The decisions may be more about nuclear power vs methane hydrates.

That's a lot of global warming gas ...
ANONYMOUS
March 14, 2013
If the horse does not drink water, it can strike.
A horse can show their beauty on the other side of the water.
Keith Woodward
Keith Woodward
March 13, 2013
you can only lead a horse to water...
Vyacheslav Mammadov
Vyacheslav Mammadov
March 13, 2013
All brilliant - easy! Candid interviews Vyacheslav Mamedov.
We see the addition of math where 2 + 2 = 4 and 2 + 2 = 4 exactly the singular 4 with the addition of two options.
2 + 2 = 4
2 = 2 = 4 in the vertical well by adding the number 0
And 2 + 2 = 4
2 + 2 = 4, the addition of a vertical shift in time is equal to the number 8
This means: Formula: Touching on points accumulation of several energy, time, and speed of change.
Please help to show the model of the kind of free energy.
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
March 13, 2013
Keith, you are getting desperate -- using diversionary tactics to change the subject away from the original authors premise. Which was "Is Japan squandering opportunity for renewables after Fukushima crisis?" And I believe the answer to the authors question is NO. Japan is working through the details and adapting their grid to the needs of the populace.

I can assure you that the citizens of Tokyo also saw the fires at Chiba, they experienced the dimmed lights -- but they also immediately experienced vegetables and fish being pulled from the markets because the farms that supply Tokyo were near the power plants and the crops were contaminated.

The Japanese people are the only nation that lived through atomic bombs being dropped on them. They saw the impacts of the fallout on neighboring villages and cities. Those long term effects are ALWAYS in the backs of their minds and it makes a big difference on the public policy. The plant accidents at Fukushima opened up old wounds and is causing a very active discussion about the role of nuclear in their society. Their choice will not be done out of ignorance as you have been suggesting.
Michael Howe
Michael Howe
March 13, 2013
We're on a bit of a tangent here with our biases. For the record I've read the article and for every article with "facts" I can counter with other studies showing different.

The base of the conversation here is Japan has a tremendous opportunity to lay out a great long term energy plan without having to bow to typical pressures. Everyone knows that creating all will take years. Nuclear - 10 years + shown historically. If other technologies are implemented through a type of PPA scenario the overall power replacement would be much quicker (using private capital) and without the traditional cost overruns experienced when government tries to build and maintain. Lets just leave the opinioned "safety" concerns as a bonus and not specifically the key driver.

Solar has come down to well under $1/Watt where only 2 years ago it was $2.50/Watt. Price is still falling as are other technologies being commercialized. My point is why commit to a 10 year cost overrun on a nuclear power plant where other technology will surpass sooner than later and at better pricing?
Keith Woodward
Keith Woodward
March 13, 2013
Michael, Dennis, please see this article on Radiation Superstition: http://atomicinsights.com/2013/03/radiation-superstition.html
Andrew Kazantsev
Andrew Kazantsev
March 13, 2013
I am a Nuclear engineer too, however I am the inventor of Air Hydro Power that will be in close future the main alternative both standard energetics (Nuclear and Heat) and traditional renewable sources (Solar, Wind, usual Hydro Power). The huge energy in each cloud over us (each km2 - NPP unit), we must only take it cleverly to be happy :)
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
March 12, 2013
Japanese government (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) place the cleanup costs at $195-305 Billion in the directly effected areas of the plants. That is an average of $250 Billion, that does not include the costs to individuals outside the evacuation areas, the farmers, the fishers. The long term costs and damages from those areas is just now starting to be argued in courts.

The current design of most nuclear plants require that they be close to a large source of cold water so they can dump the excess heat. Several years ago (2006,2010) with heat waves in France - the operators needed to reduce power output of the plants because the rivers used for cooling were also running low...

We nearly had the same problems with plants in the US (2008)

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22804065/#.UT-kdNafKSo

And of course there is the issue with the Ft. Calhoun Nebraska plant. Still offline two years. It was nearly flooded during the Missouri river floods a couple of years ago - had that happened AND the generators swamped - we could have seen a similar "Fukushima" accident occur in the US midwest... on a river that flows into the Mississippi. The Missouri and Mississippi is used as a source of drinking water for many cities...

There are VERY (if any) few energy sources that can claim to be absolutely clean and without risk. That is why public discussion and policies become important - the discussions set the expectation and acceptance levels, the policies then codify them as regulations for the industries to follow.

The public discussion, policy review and changing national direction is the stage that Japan is currently going through. They will find a system of energy sources that will work for them.
Keith Woodward
Keith Woodward
March 12, 2013
Michael, do you even know what radiation is? for god's sake it's sunshine, it's the red glow from a log fire, let's put this in perspective:
...about Chernobyl. The accident at Chernobyl was a horrid industrial accident which taught engineers valuable lessons and nobody builds reactors like that anymore. The radioactive plume from the accident increased natural radiation levels in large areas of what are now Russia, Ukraine and Belarus and they have been eating plenty of food with higher than normal radiation levels in those three countries for 25 years.
And the result? Three tenths of a half of a sixth of bugger all.
During this 25 years the three countries have had about 14 million cases of cancer (rough estimate based on Globocan data) with about 6,000 likely due to Iodine-131 emitted in the first days of the accident. It was a predicted problem and avoided elsewhere, but the Soviets stuffed up. Nevertheless, these extra cancers were treatable thyroid cancers with just a couple of dozen deaths.
You need to get off that soapbox, start understanding the grim situation this planet is in due to climate forcing.
Michael Howe
Michael Howe
March 12, 2013
Point taken Keith. If it's not that bad perhaps you'd like to buy some property and move to Fukishima...apparently it isn't as bad as those renewable guys make it out to be?

The other breaches can be repaired but nuclear takes millions of years to become safe again. North America has been affected ecologically from Fukishima. You can't reverse nuclear fallout. I say throw out the nuclear mentality and if renewables arent' there yet, fine - use natural gas as a substitute until the other technology catches up. Your passion for nuclear leads me to believe you work for a nuclear company...
Keith Woodward
Keith Woodward
March 12, 2013
Michael you say $260 billion, I've heard that number thrown about, I've also heard $100 billion, also 10s of billions, so you pick the number you like best, it doesnt matter, mo one should have put that particular plant in that place and no one will agian no doubt, same Cherynobl, stupid design, bad idea. Same with the British at Windscale. What do you think the final cost will be for BP oil's DeepWater Horizon. In Chernobyl 55 people were killed in the meltdown event, in TMI none, in Fukushima although the earthquake and subsequent tsunami killed at least 16000, none have died as a result of the nuclear failure there. In 1975 171,000 people died when the Banqiao Dam failed, did you propose that all investment in hydro-electric dams be halted? Thousand of people die each year from the effects of polution from coal in India and China, the costs worldwide are many billions of $s. This will only end when these "fosil fuel" plants are no longer used. Nuclear is the only hope to replace this massive amount of power gerneration, see the analysis above in the notes, current renewable are not adequate to make a real difference.
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
March 12, 2013
The link below is from the IEA (International Energy Agency) website that summarizes energy production in Japan shortly after the earthquake.

http://www.iea.org/media/news/Japanese_update_250311.pdf

An report of the Fukushima plant, why the damage was as bad, and the impact from it by the IEA:

http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/japan_may11.pdf

New emphasis on energy efficient buildings...

http://www.iea.org/media/workshops/2013/energyuseandgreenbuildingsjapan/20130116DraftAgendaEnergyUseandGreenBuildingsafterGreatEastEarthquakeinJapan.pdf


When you have a great disaster, like the earthquake in 2011. It takes time clear the debris and deal with the IMMEDIATE needs of the populace. Afterwards you can do an assessment of the damage and start the planning of the long term solutions. It has only been two years since the quake. Japan has made remarkable progress in their recovery, assessment, long range plans and the beginning to implement alternative solutions.
Michael Howe
Michael Howe
March 12, 2013
"I always advocate for diversity in generation."

I will support you 100% in that statement. When one looks at any grid there is baseload power and of course peak power. Japan is in need of everything and the standard reactor takes up to 10 years to build and connect. The point we're making is that technology is coming along quite nicely. Investing in nuclear today is short sighted and unnecessary. There are other highly viable options to be used. Natural springs through geothermal, biogas etc...proven techologies that can be effectively used for baseload power requirements. It's vital to have an energy mix but why continue to increase the risk by using nuclear again. What's the definition of insanity? "doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result"

When you consider the cost of nuclear Keith, does it include the $260 Billion of clean up? It may not show up on the electricity bill but the taxpayer, "we" will be paying it without choice.

This doesn't even include the water impact to the environment. We could be forsaking our water supply to meet nuclear requirements.

I don't have an issue with natural gas or some of the cleaner burning fuels, the problem is the environmental impact of obtaining it and distributing it. Renewables make more sense from a risk management perspective. If you're forced to live next to a wind farm or a gas powered plant what would you pick? I've never heard of a solar or wind explosion or meltdown...have you? Solar meltdown is technically - a nice day.
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
March 12, 2013
Keith, not everyone around the world pays $0.03/kWh that we have in some regions of the US. Even in Japan with nuclear it was well above that. France with most (80%+) of it's electrical generation by nuclear is above $0.15kWh (consumer rates).

Geothermal and wind are capable of producing power less than $0.15kWh without subsidies. Solar is approaching that point in the next year.

There are active pilots using carbon capture, the link you provided is for ONLY LARGE SCALE capture - very large plants.

I have not tried to say one type of renewable energy source is all that is needed for Japan. I always advocate for diversity in generation. Whereas in your original post you had argued "that nuclear power is there only hope for actual cost effective clean baseline energy". I disagree with that. The size of "baseline energy" is something that can be significantly reduced with improvements in energy efficiency. Industrial processes can be re-engineered such that the waste heat becomes the input energy for other processes, etc.

Prior to 2011 major improvements were not as critical for the Japanese - the events two years ago changed their priorities.

The answer to the author's original premise "Is Japan squandering opportunity for renewables after Fukushima cris" is NO. The are indeed adapting and evolving their energy mix. But it will take time.

For the doubters, watch and follow the evolution of Japan's grid and generation capability over the next two or three years. There are many "novel" solutions being developed.

Nuclear may have a future in Japan - but it never be as large as it once was.
Keith Woodward
Keith Woodward
March 12, 2013
Edward, try not to resort to name calling, you no nothing re the shape of my head, current renewables are not cost effective, and probably will never be, geothermal in Japan might be viable but has issues not the least is noted by Anomymous above.
EDWARD DYKES
EDWARD DYKES
March 12, 2013
I am tired of listening to leftist pinheads argue nuclear vs renewables as though there is some incompatibility. The one needs the other. We do not get from here to there without both nuclear and renewables.

In the case of Japan, it would be wonderful if they would abandon nuclear power altogether. Long term, that is committing economic hari-kari. All competitors of corporate Japan would like to see that happen and eliminate a tough industrial competitor. More jobs in the USA would be a wonderful windfall. The Chinese would be grateful as well.
Keith Woodward
Keith Woodward
March 12, 2013
Dennis, please look at http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/browse input: ACTIVE, OPERATE, then under industry: Pwr Generation.
Vyacheslav Mammadov
Vyacheslav Mammadov
March 12, 2013
Japan looking for the free energy, which is a place to make money.
Not hard to notice, businessmen destroy Japan's economy.

There is a way. Refer to Vyacheslav Mammadov
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
March 12, 2013
The author of the story explains the general direction on the renewables, they will be deployed - at issue is how fast can they move out and make it happen - because they are also still trying to recovery from the damage of the earth quake.

The reactors they are trying to bring up are NOT the damaged ones. Those are being slowly decontaminated and mothballed forever. The article is referring to most of the other plants that were shutdown afterwards for safety checks, repairs and updates so they could with stand similar earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
March 12, 2013
I've been to Japan, and while they have cloudy days in some parts, others are bright Sunday days. "Tiny Japan", is much larger than most people realize. Its most northern part (east Japan) is up near Siberia, and the western part is down along China. They have many hot locations where geothermal would work well. It can provide much of the base load with solar providing additional energy.

A common misconception for many that do not believe in solar as a possible option is that you need clear days seven days aweek. Seattle Washington - where it is also cloudy and rains all the time - is able to produce considerable amount of solar and it breaks even.

As I mentioned before, with the previously installed nuclear plants - Japan hadn't been very careful about their energy use. Since the tsunami - they have adapted and even with many of the plants shutdown for safety checks - they were able to keep the economy going, get lights back on and survive the heat of summer and ocld of winter.

As for carbon capture - you need to dig deeper, Vattenfall in Germany has been running a CCS plant for several years now. Pilot - small peaking size plant - but it is running. The US has one in operation in the south and a larger plant being built in IL.

Last fall I sat through several hours of presentations by speakers from the Japanese government, universities, and science academy explaining their new direction and how they believe they can meet they will transform their grid. They understand the problems and they are working on them.
Keith Woodward
Keith Woodward
March 12, 2013
Dennis Heidner, I don't know where you are getting your info but some of this is not making much sense to me, see Cliff Claven above, and I would suggest you get a copy of "The Carbon Crunch" Dieter Helm. I would point out that there is no power plant anywhere in the world that is using CCS, so we really don't know what the costs would be and obviosly would vary depending on location etc. Geothermal in Japan has some potential, I'm sure all of the "low hanging fruit" in this arena has been plucked. I would advocate new generation nuclear with MSR technology like LFTR which would defeat this perceived problem with the cost of materials. see **Takashi Kamei https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxiG-Vlt7C4 Your comment on the grid problem in Japan is salient and would need to be addressed.
Andrew Kazantsev
Andrew Kazantsev
March 12, 2013
Yes, Cliff, for PV & wind.
But Air Hydro Power will give from 2 W/m2 (by data of fog collectors) till 500 W/m2 (by maximal meteo possibilities), and this m2 is not horizontal on land, but vertical in clouds as PP mesh for $0.25/m2. This is real decision for Japan!
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
March 12, 2013
The only conspiracy against solar and wind (and geothermal) power is one of unflinching logic and mathematics. Japan's annual electric power consumption is 997,399,000,000 kWh per 2010 World Bank report--let's just call it an even 1 trillion kWh. Dividing that number by the hours in a year gives a continuous power demand of 113 GW. Solar in cloudy Japan will deliver about half of the 6.0 W/m2 it delivers in the cloudless US southwest deserts. Wind will generate about the same 1.1 W/m2 it does in the US's largest wind farms. That equates to 3.0 MW/km2 and 1.1 MW/km2 respectively at maximum deployment density. That means, tiny Japan has to build 19,000 square kilometers of solar farm or 103,500 square kilometers of wind farm. That's a 138 x 138 km square of PV solar or a 322 x 322 km square of wind farm. Anybody price land in Japan lately? The fantasy of abandoning nuclear for solar and wind breaks down as soon as people are forced to break out their calculators (something that should be required for any discussion on this forum). It's a battle of power density v. population density, and solar and wind simply can't meet the needs of dense urban populations--and the world's population is becoming more urban every day. The flippant suggestion that everyone can just put solar panels on their own roof doesn't work for high-rise apartment dwellers. Japan is the canary in the coal mine and we will all learn what is possible and what is not watching this valiant and resourceful people struggle to solve this challenge.
Andrew Kazantsev
Andrew Kazantsev
March 12, 2013
IMHO, by climate zone an ideal renewable alternative for Japan is Air Hydro Power (http://airhes.com)
ANONYMOUS
March 12, 2013
Japan is not a favorable location for renewables. Because central Japan is at the same latitute as California, many people think Japn can use solar. However, Japan has some of the highest year-round cloud cover in the world. There are wind resources but not relative to the demand for electricitty due to the high population densities. There is some geothermal but its in the middle of Japanese national parks. Putting geothermal plants in those locations is about as popular as suggesting geothermal plants in the middle of Yellowstone National Park. Those hard engineering realities imply that Japan will remain with nuclear power but with more caution.
David King
David King
March 12, 2013
There are Japanese people who want no more nuclear. There is actually a great opportunity for Japan to wean itself off nuclear and oil. Japan was a pioneer in PV, and as you point out it has plenty of geothermal sites. Why they do not develop at east these two options to their maximum is difficult to understand.
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
March 12, 2013
Keith, if you look at the US governments (FERC) long term assessments of energy - they actually predict rate increases if a significant number of nuclear plants are built.

The cause? Material shortages. Nuclear plants use more special iron/steel, more concrete, in general more materials to build than other thermal plants. Plus the nuclear fuel requires special handling before, during and after.

When the run the numbers -- even fully scrubbed, carbon captured sequestered (CO2), coal cost less. Wind costs less, geothermal costs less and finally solar has been dropping so fast it is projected to cost less than nuclear!

Japan is on the ring of fire, they have SIGNIFICANT access to geothermal that could EASILY replace much of the nuclear power.

Improving energy efficiency within Japan would (and has shown) that it makes VERY LARGE differences in their needs.

One of the biggest problems the electrical grid in Japan is that the country is split west/east with the west running 60hz for the AC and the east running 50hz. That makes it difficult to ship the energy around the country to the markets that need it. Japan is working on very large frequency converters that will allow the bi-direction transfer of power... but those systems are not likely to be ready until late 2013 or 2014.
Michael Howe
Michael Howe
March 11, 2013
Nothing could be further from the truth Keith. Now that nuclear is finally getting under the microscope people are asking the tough questions about it. Cost to build (always goes overbudget)cost to operate, cost to decommission, cost to insure. No one ever looks at the entire suite of costs. BTW - Cost to clean up Fukishima $260Billion.

Big business is pushing back for the simple reason that they won't make as much money and they won't have the influence that they have now. If we create our own power we don't need the big companies. This scares the crap out of shareholders so they spend millions/billions in fighting against renewables. In spite of all the noise - renewables will win out. One reason - independency and cost. Site all the bogus stats you wish, holistically speaking renewables come with it much less overall cost. Oh...and still dropping. How many nuclear sites have declining costs?

Care to dispute? Show me one non-renewable technology that is GUARANTEED not to increase again. You may see a market blip (natural gas) decrease temporarily but costs will eventually rise.
Keith Woodward
Keith Woodward
March 11, 2013
Japan might be knowledgeable of the fact that nuclear power is there only hope for actual cost effective clean baseline energy, they are moving toward restart on their existing shut down nuclear plants and development on next generation (safe) nuclear. Not to disallow geo, wind, solar but current newables are not cost effective.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 11
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 10
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • KACO new energy, Inc.
  • Northern Lights Solar Solutions
  • ASME - American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • marcus evans
  • Reed Exhibitions
  • EcoFasten Solar
  • Renewable Energy Corporation
  • Quick Mount PV
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information