The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, May 23, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Ernie Moniz: An Inspired Choice for DOE Secretary

Barry Cinnamon, Solar Freedom Now
March 04, 2013  |  17 Comments

Our industry should rally behind anyone who knows how to spell "photovoltaic." Especially at the DOE, which is a large, complex, slow-moving, virtually radioactive bureaucracy. Not only can Dr. Moniz spell photovoltaic, he's demonstrated the engineering, policy and management skills that it takes to succeed at the head of the DOE. And if his track record is any indication, he'll be terrific for the next stage of the solar industry's growth.

Editor's Note: Multiple sources are reporting that Ernie Moniz is to be nominated as the next energy secretary.

According to the DOE website, their mission is "...to assure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions." Of the DOE's $27.2 billion 2013 budget request, 66% is directed towards nuclear energy. Specifically, $11.5 billion is for the National Nuclear Security Administration, $5.8 billion goes towards nuclear waste clean up, $5 billion is directed towards "Science" and $2.3 billion is for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

With their budget and DNA so closely tied to the nuclear industry, it's no surprise that Dr. Moniz is a nuclear physicist. He also has the right policy credentials; he served as DOE Under Secretary from 1997 to 2001, and Associate Director in the Office of Science and Technology from 1995 to 1997. As Director of the MIT Energy Initiative, he's successfully combined multidisciplinary research with technically sound policy. He's practical, and knows we need technologies such as fracked natural gas as a bridge to a renewable future.

Enough of the formal bio. What does Dr. Moniz know about solar? He's on the Board of Advisors of the Fraunhofer Center for Sustainable Energy Systems. He's advised a number of solar finance and technology companies. He's actively supported solar technology projects alongside hydrocarbon production within the MIT Energy Initiative. He "gets" the practical realities of solar R&D. Although more research is needed into solar, what we really need is development — and especially deployment. 

Four years ago solar panels were $4/watt. At the time we needed cheaper solar equipment to make the economics work for customers. Now, with panels less than $1/watt and likely to stay that way, the emphasis in the solar industry has shifted towards getting glass on the roof. Of course, there are still plenty of opportunities for technology R&D. Sunshot funding initiatives are looking at clever ways to reduce soft costs — as well as driving panel and inverter prices even lower. But the focus now must be on deployment, where the obstacles are more political than technical.

Obsolete or simply inappropriate policies are the biggest barrier to widespread solar adoption in the U.S. We need to solve financing problems, permitting problems, and interconnection problems for systems of all sizes. Secretary Chu did a yeoman's job on behalf of the solar industry as solar panels went from expensive to cheap (and he’s got the scars to prove it). Now we need someone who has extensive engineering knowledge to stand up to incumbent energy providers when they complain that solar doesn't work, is unsafe or simply too expensive. Dr. Moniz has the right combination of DC political skills coupled with practical energy technology knowledge. He has the demonstrated ability to put the right policies in place — policies that won't require a huge new funding initiative for the solar industry.

17 Comments

Register To Comment
Gary Vesperman
Gary Vesperman
March 6, 2013
As I explained in my compilation of "95 Cases of Energy Invention Suppression" www.padrak.com/vesperman the U.S. Government's massive support of hot fusion is a public relations stunt.

A couple of months ago Judicial Watch ranked Energy Secretary Steven Chu the second most corrupt federal official in 2012. http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-announces-list-of-washingtons-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-for-2012/

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/01/lawsuit-alleges-cronyism-in-obama-administration-green-energy-loans.php


http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2012/11/20/startup-electric-car-company-accuses-energy-department-corruption-negligence/


http://capoliticalnews.com/2012/05/04/lkatos-green-corruption-department-of-energy-%E2%80%9Cjunk-loans%E2%80%9D-and-cronyism/


http://www.humanevents.com/2012/11/01/house-oversight-investigation-reveals-politics-and-corruption-at-the-energy-department/


http://emergingcorruption.com/2011/06/department-of-energy-ignoring-safety-issues-to-save-time-and-money/

http://www.onecitizenspeaking.com/2013/02/energy-secretary-steven-chu-resigns-things-are-about-to-get-worse.html

http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/green-corruption-department-of-energy-junk/

http://michellemalkin.com/2013/02/01/steven-chu/

I myself wrote and posted last year a compilation of "130 Electrical Energy Innovations" www.padrak.com/vesperman. To my knowledge, NONE of them have received any support from the Department of Energy.



Gary Vesperman

Boulder City, Nevada
Ken Higgs
Ken Higgs
March 6, 2013
Good guy. Maybe he can change this quote, first paragraph:
"Specifically, $11.5 billion is for the National Nuclear Security Administration"

What a JOKE. But Iran is not allowed to do what the Ammies and
Biny Nut-and-Yahoo don't want.

Oh, the loves in America. ME ME ME
Anatoly Arov
Anatoly Arov
March 6, 2013
What DOE really should do - is to establish an Award for new source of RE energy development for our Planet with clear evaluation criteria (price per watt, environment, storage, distribution, etc.)
I would like DOE to post REAL numbers "cost per watt" for every of today available sources for comparison and not max. performance figures used for Government in their capacity installed.
And the most important "Who are the judges", I do not see DOE capabilities to do this alone, based on my experience.
ANONYMOUS
March 6, 2013
The Nuclear Power Industry should pay for its own cleanup. This is just another way that the so called free market is skewed in the favor of a dangerous enterprise.

Bill
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
March 6, 2013
The potential to permanently burn-up (fast-neutron reactor), recycle, and separate a large portion of nuclear waste in our environment, storage sites, and disaster areas will most likely be tried in 2017.

This option may prove safer and cheaper than trying to bury all of it in some salt cavern and hope it doesn't spread into our environment. A few years ago, someone shared with me that what remains after burning the waste is veeeeerrrryyyy nasty stuff but I haven't found information related to that yet. There is alot of nuclear research papers out there and they take a very long time to comb through and verify and validate.

Converting the fuel from it's present form into nano-fuels are worth looking into for increasing the efficiency and safety of processing the 95% nuclear waste in our reactors.

Hopefully, there will be push to recycle 100% of existing 1st and 2nd Generation sites for the new 4th Generation sites while minimizing the addition of raw materials

(I think this could be done and would be a wise decision when looked back on by future generations.)
Besides, these moves to burn and recycle would also prepare us for an eventual dirty-bomb incident.

Offshore wind still has it's place to power shipping. They could also compete with nuclear hands down once paid for the way that hydro does now.
Paul Roden
Paul Roden
March 6, 2013
Dr. Moniz is the wrong choice for Secretary of Energy for a renewable energy strategy or "soft energy path", but he is consistent with President's "all of the above" strategy for energy in the United States.

He is too pro-nuclear and pro-fracking for my tastes. Hopefully the economics of nuclear power and fracking, will settle the policy debate. Because once upon a time we were told that nuclear power "would be too cheap to meter." That it was safe and economical. Well we had Three Mile Island Chernobyl, and now Fukushima. We still don't know what to do with all of the nuclear waste. Just like we don't know what to do with all of the fracking waste water and drill tailings. I don't the wastes from making wind turbines and solar panels are as dangerous to the environment and as vast as nuclear power and fracking. I hope Dr. Moniz sees the light of a safe energy path, before he feels the heat of global warming and the rising tide of the sustainable energy movement.
Patrick O'Leary
Patrick O'Leary
March 5, 2013
What we need to know is whether the Administration sees DOE as a conduit to repay campaign contributors or as a tool of public policy.

We have seen Solyndra, et.al, we have heard the rhetoric, nexta-rooni!
Barry Cinnamon
Barry Cinnamon
March 5, 2013
Rupp-brent -

My numbers are correct; perhaps you did not read the text of the budget.

You can see DOE's 2013 Budget Request at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/energy.pdf

The budget table is on page 16, clearly indicating $11.5b for the National Nuclear Security Administration. The explanation of the $5.6b for nuclear cleanup is on page 8 of the budget.

To paraphrase: "...The FY 2013 budget includes $5.65 billion for the Office of Environmental Management (EM) to protect public health and safety by cleaning up hazardous, radioactive legacy waste from the Manhattan Project and the Cold War..."

I agree that we're spending less than a billion on new nukes. But the numbers are clear that we are spending $17b on old nukes, both reactors and weapons. My key point is that Dr. Moniz is well qualified to understand these expenditures -- as well as bridge us to a more renewable future.

Interestingly, I couldn't find a line item for cleaning up renewables.
ANONYMOUS
March 4, 2013
No further proof is need to demonstrate that DOE is a completely useless organization if it can be managed by Dr. Moniz.
BRENT RUPP
BRENT RUPP
March 4, 2013
While the main point of this article may be valid, it does no one any good to be so disingenuous in presenting the information. The statement, "Of the DOE's $27.2 billion 2013 budget request, 66% is directed towards nuclear energy." is just plain false. The DOE 2013 budget request includes a line item of $770M for nuclear energy, not $18B as the article states (66% of $27.2B). Additionally there is $200M for non-defense environmental cleanup and I would assume that some of the $5B "Science" line item is for nuclear energy, however that line item touches all facets of energy ranging from the Smart Grid to solar to energy storage to weapons research. Whether or not it makes sense for the nuclear weapons program to be part of the Dept. of Energy, it is included there and makes up a major part of the budget for that department. But the bottom line is that the non-weapon or non-defense portion of the DOE budget request for 2013 is more like $10B, of which approximately 10% is for nuclear energy related expenditures.
Sheila Rekdal
Sheila Rekdal
March 2, 2013
2.3 Billion out of 27.3 Billion for renewables. Wow! I can hardly contain my elation! This guy comes from the nuclear part of this equation. There is no safe way known to store Nuclear Waste. (Hanover WA...take a look) To keep generating the stuff hoping that it will dissipate or go away is fairy tale land.
Kimberly Davis
Kimberly Davis
March 2, 2013
The DOE is also responsible for nuclear weapons, so that is a good part of its "nuclear" budget (someone could look it up if they'd like):

DOE Responsibility for nuclear weapons

The DOE/NNSA has federal responsibility for the design, testing and production of all nuclear weapons. NNSA in turn uses contractors to carry out its responsibilities at the following government owned sites:

o Design of the nuclear components of the weapon: Los Alamos National Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
o Engineering of the weapon systems: Sandia National Laboratories
o Manufacturing of key components: Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Kansas City Plant, and Y-12 National Security Complex
o Testing: Nevada Test Site
o Final weapon/warhead assembling/dismantling: Pantex
Pranab Duttaroy, PE, CEM, MBA
Pranab Duttaroy, PE, CEM, MBA
March 2, 2013
It is so sad to read that 66% of DOE's current year budget of $27 billion is on programs related to Nuclear power; when countries like Germany, Japan and many others are on a path to totally abandon nuclear power, DOE's budget should allocate much more than the half towards R & D and deployment of renewable projects.

Dr Moniz has wonderful credential in nuclear industry and also he is really a supporter of shale gas fracking. However, these are really the major disqualifications why he should not even be considered for the position of secretary of DOE.
ANONYMOUS
March 1, 2013
What the renewable energy market needs is a price on carbon. That will drive finance and technology. To get that, the new secretary has to understand how to legislate and horse trade inside the beltway. I think Senator Dorgan would make the best choice because he has been there and done that where Prof. Moniz has not. Legislators would see Sen. Dorgan as one of their kind. We need someone who can grind the legislative sausage to get a price on carbon. That trumps everything else.
Cliff Goudey
Cliff Goudey
March 1, 2013
Scott, you are right about his apparent fondness for fracking. You often get what you pay for, and nowadays that applies to academia. The fossil and nuclear industries paid well for the leanings of the MITEI under Ernie's leadership. It was a good investment even though science and the planet suffered. Who knows what is really on his mind.
SCOTT MEADOWS
SCOTT MEADOWS
March 1, 2013
Spelling photovoltaic is hardly a qualification to head this behemoth of a bureaucratic agency. His advocacy or anyone's advocacy of fracking is bordeline insanity and fails to understand the earths turgor and dynamics of preserving the earth among planets or stars. It is a reckless and abandonment of scientific and common sense. We must quit fracturing the earth and pumping its bowels dry. Photovoltaic, wind, and known and unexplored renewable source of energy must be the driving mantra of DOE's leadership.
ANONYMOUS
March 1, 2013
The first question that comes to mind is that if the US DOE is supposed to have a major focus on nuclear power, why hasn't there been any new commercial nuclear generating facilities built in the US over the past 3 decades?

And while appreciate Dr. Moniz's technical proficiency as a physicist, the type of person we really need to head the DOE is someone with a proven grasp of market economics.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Barry Cinnamon

Barry Cinnamon

Westinghouse Solar founder Barry Cinnamon is a widely recognized expert on solar power, and a long-time advocate of its use. He holds a BS Degree in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and an MBA degree in Marketing from Wharton. His work on...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • US, Australian Companies Taking Giant Steps for Global EGS Geothermal
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Met Office
  • Navigant
  • Greenpower Capital
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • SolarEdge Technologies
  • Photovoltaics World
  • Solar Wholesalers
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information