The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, May 23, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Secretary Steven Chu Announces Departure, Accomplishments in a Letter to Energy Department Employees

Renewable Energy World Editors
February 01, 2013  |  11 Comments

I want to conclude by making a few observations about the importance of the Department of Energy missions to our economic prosperity, dependency on foreign oil and climate change.

  • The United States spent roughly $430 billion dollars on foreign oil in 2012. This is a direct wealth transfer out of our country. Many billions more are spent to keep oil shipping lanes open and oil geo-politics add considerable additional burdens. Although our oil imports are projected to fall to a 25 year low next year, we still pay a heavy economic, national security and human cost for our oil addiction.

  • The average temperature of our planet is rising, with majority of the temperature increase occurring in the last thirty years. During the three decades from 1980 to 2011, the number of violent storms, floods, droughts, heat waves, wildfires, as tabulated by the reinsurance company Munich Re, has increased more than three-fold. They also estimate that the financial losses follow a trend line that has gone from $40 billion to $170 billion dollars per year. Most of those losses were not insured, and the country suffering the largest losses by far is the United States.  As the President said in his recent Inaugural Address, “some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms.”

  •  The overwhelming scientific consensus is that human activity has had a significant and likely dominant role in climate change. There is also increasingly compelling evidence that the weather changes we have witnessed during this thirty year time period are due to climate change.

  • Virtually all of the other OECD countries, and most developing countries including China, India, Mexico, and Brazil have accepted the judgment of climate scientists. 

  • Many countries, but most notably China, realize that the development of clean energy technologies presents an incredible economic opportunity in an emerging world market. China now exceeds the U.S. in internal deployment of clean energy and in government investments to further develop the technologies.

  • While we cannot accurately predict the course of climate change in the coming decades, the risks we run if we don’t change our course are enormous. Prudent risk management does not equate uncertainty with inaction.

  • Our ability to find and extract fossil fuels continues to improve, and economically recoverable reser­voirs around the world are likely to keep pace with the rising demand for decades. As the saying goes, the Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones; we transitioned to better solutions.

  • The same opportunity lies before us with energy efficiency and clean energy. The cost of renewable energy is rapidly becoming competitive with other sources of energy, and the Department has played a significant role in accelerating the transition to affordable, accessible and sustainable energy.

  • Ultimately we have a moral responsibility to the most innocent victims of adverse climate change. Those who will suffer the most are the people who are the most innocent: the world’s poorest citizens and those yet to be born. There is an ancient Native American saying: “We do not inherit the land from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.” A few short decades later, we don’t want our children to ask, “What were our parents thinking? Didn’t they care about us?”

Serving as Secretary of Energy during such a momentous and important time has been incredibly demanding but enormously rewarding. I’ve been continually impressed by the talent and commitment of the men and women of this Department.

While I will always remain dedicated to the missions of the Department, I informed the President of my decision a few days after the election that Jean and I were eager to return to California. I would like to return to an academic life of teaching and research, but will still work to advance the missions that we have been working on together for the last four years.

In the short term, I plan to stay on as Secretary past the ARPA-E Summit at the end of February. I may stay beyond that time so that I can leave the Department in the hands of the new Secretary.

The journey that I began with you four years ago will continue for many years. I began my message talking about my vision of what I wanted to do with the Department. Some of those goals have been realized, and we have planted many seeds together. Just as today’s boom in shale gas production was made possible by Department of Energy research from 1978 to 1991, some of the most significant work may not be known for decades. What matters is that our country will reap the benefits of what we have started.

It has been a great honor and privilege to work with all of you.

Viewing Page 4 of 4

  • Previous Page
  • View All

11 Comments

Register To Comment
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
February 8, 2013
Cliff - you make strong charges which, when looked at with a rational eye, appear to be creations of your own imagination.

Let me simply point out your claim that Steven Chu is not an intelligent man. That, alone, demonstrates your foolishness.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
February 8, 2013
Chu put politics ahead of science. Ran DOE as a "faith-based" organization whose religion was the President's green energy agenda that failed to produce the promised jobs and fleeced the taxpayers in the process. Publicly admitted his goal was to run up the price of gasoline. Turned DOE into a second EPA, with both running amok and doing more to damage than protect the environment by industrializing vast tracts of land with wind and solar and biomass plantations that decreased rather than increased the efficiency of our electrical grid and the MPG of our cars. We could use one less Nobel Prize laureate in the government. They don't seem to pick them for their intelligence any more.
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
February 6, 2013
I do believe the model will prove out on this design. On the Fringe; they're still at it. Tne latest is LENR. Several working devices with either excess heat or electricity being generated dependant upon configutation. I believe the nickle hydrogen reactions will prove to be the easiest to work with.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
February 6, 2013
Finally, let's give some overdue recognition to the early environmentalists, the long-haired folks who back in the 60s and 70s created a movement from nothing and moved energy efficiency and renewables into public consciousness. Some of them were able to receive funding, but the vast majority have been ignored by government funders because they proffered low-tech solutions or were not associated with research institutions. These frugal innovators are still on the fringe doing great work.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
February 6, 2013
energy4all, there is indeed conceptual overlap between ARPA-E and DARPA programs, one modeled after the other, but they exist in separate agencies with different missions and personnel. Regarding product development timelines, there is no consistency between 'finished products' within the DOE and those funded by ARPA-E, who are often in the private sector. Product development is not really the province of DOE anyway. Maybe you were referring to intellectual property. I read the fusion article, but the mystery has not been unlocked, only understood a little better. As the authors themselves point out, 'We hope that our finding will inspire future theoretical and experimental work...' As a child, I knew one of the fusion pioneers working with the bumpy torus configuration back in the 1960s and later abandoned. Since 1953, fusion research has been a long time brewing, and we spend an average of a half billion dollars a year on it. Imagine that investment applied to energy efficiency and smarter building design?
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
February 6, 2013
Ok Joel. So you know there is no real difference in time frames for FINISHED products between ARPA-e and DOE Labs. As ARPA-e is the sibling of the DODs DARPA and pretty much the same people and government agencies are involved one way or the other. As to your comment on Fusion in particular. Just last week a DOE funded project resolved the problem of the plasma fusion process. Search Science Daily, R&D and Scientific American in the Nuclear Energy technology areas and you will find the data. I even posted the article from Science Daily somewhere on the Renewable Energy Magazine website sometime last week. The title of the article is ' Mystery Surrounding the Harnessing of Fusion Energy Unlocked' Enjoy the read. When it comes to Research deadlines are an act of shear folly. It took a while; but the how to; is finally a known piece of data now.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
February 6, 2013
energy4all, bear in mind, 1-2 years is an allotment for each distinct phase of funding, so the total timeline could run four or more years. The development timeline for ARPA-E just doesn't fit the facts regarding other DOE programs, especially legacy programs. I applied to ARPA-E's first funding opportunity, and although I wasn't among the 1% that received funding, I have been paying close attention. I've participated or presented in ORNL events, am the son of a Manhattan project engineer, and have interacted/debated issues with many other ORNL scientists and engineers through the years. I've seen programs up close that were sponsored by DOE that never deserved a dollar of funding, based on poor efficiencies and outcomes. Fusion energy, in particular, has long outlived public resources. Battery technology also comes to mind as another legacy program that has shown only incremental results. At least, ARPA-E is a step in the right direction, especially regarding battery tech. So, energy4all, I suggest you dig a little deeper into DOE's culture and legacy programs and gauge the outcomes for yourself.
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
February 6, 2013
Joel; I do not know where you get your information from; but all of the recent energy research projects I have seen the DOE fund have have had 1-2 years of research or demonstration time windows. I suggest you research ARPA-e as well. You will find that they work hand in hand WITH the DOE and the National Labs. Take a look at the roster for the ARPA-e Energy Innovation Sumit for 2013 later this month and pay attention to the list of partners.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
February 6, 2013
The ARPA-E program requires of its applicants that they produce disruptive technologies in short time spans, an expectation DOE does not follow internally. In this light, Stephen Chu's strongest legacy will be ARPA-E and perhaps his lesser-known promotion of energy conservation. These are eclipsed, though, by his failure to articulate an energy policy that involves the American people. Instead, he has promoted big-science energy solutions that have not significantly improved our energy portfolio. Results that are years away, mega-expensive, and that generally fail to materialize. There have been some incremental advances on Dr. Chu's watch, but no game-changing technologies. In much of the world, frugal innovation, often by uneducated citizens, is producing results and empowering communities to conserve resources and create renewable systems. A ground-swell approach, citizens are invested in every step of this process. DOE, on the other hand, systematically ignores simple, economical energy solutions in favor of expensive, highly technical one with citizens playing no role in energy policy unless highly-credentialed. The failure of our top-down, mega-expensive, big science energy policy is the eclipsing of passive solar and energy conservation. These two areas could easily have the largest impact on reducing energy needs. It's ironic that Dr. Chu once referred to energy conservation, somewhat quietly, as 'not just low-hanging fruit, but fruit lying on the ground.' Shouldn't that be trumpeted as a national theme?
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
February 2, 2013
It has been my great pleasure to have Dr. Chu as Energy Secretary for the US DOE. He has shown remarkable committment to improvement in the energy and transportation areas as well as the environment. I believe we are all better off as a Nation for his committment to his term in office as Energy Secretary. I thank him for his service to this Nation and wish him well in his Academic and Research pursuits. I belive we all owe him a thank you for putting together the ARPA-e program and getting renewable energy technologies advanced and employed to the degree he has to date. I believe that through his efforts we will relieve ourselves of the dependance upon foreign oil and recoup that annual expense many times over in our future energy related applications through advanced technology Dr. Chu has helped usher into existence.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
February 1, 2013
It certainly has been good to have US government science back under control of someone who is a scientist.

No more 20-somthing-old dudes with a BA in charge, please.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
REW.com Editors

REW.com Editors

Renewable Energy World's network editors help deliver the most comprehensive news coverage of the renewable energy industries. Based in the U.S. and the UK, the team is comprised of editors from Pennwell Corporation's myriad of publications...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • SMA America, LLC
  • Admirals Bank
  • Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
  • Ambient Technologies, Inc.
  • marcus evans
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • 2GreenEnergy.com
  • SolarReviews
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information