The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Secretary Steven Chu Announces Departure, Accomplishments in a Letter to Energy Department Employees

Renewable Energy World Editors
February 01, 2013  |  11 Comments

  • During the past four years, the Department reclaimed the lead in high performance supercomputing. Much more importantly, we are working harder use the extraordinary capabilities to achieve our nuclear security, scientific research and industrial competitiveness goals. In the last several years, the DOE has collaborated with industry to eliminate expensive and time consuming engineering prototyping in applications as varied as simulations that have been used to optimize diesel and jet engines, tire treads and the safety of nuclear reactor fuel assemblies. This work adds directly to our industrial competitiveness and job growth in America. In the past two years, we have held several additional workshops specifically to foster industrial collaborations.

  • We mobilized experts from the Department and our National Laboratories to play a key role in times of national need. The President personally tasked me to help BP stop the massive oil leak the resulted from the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Beginning with a small team of scientists and engineers that worked many long hours each day for three very intense months, we assessed the damage to the blowout preventer, and significantly mitigated many risks in the effort to cap, seal and ultimately kill the runaway well. Well over a hundred national lab employees toiled days, nights, weekends and holidays to perform detailed analyses that earned the respect and admiration of the BP engineers and undeniably changed BP’s plans for the better. In the course of these actions, the Department also played a major role in estimating the amount of oil that was released into the Gulf. Two and half years later, this estimate has stood the test of time and scrutiny. 

  • After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown, other teams of DOE scientists, engineers, and emergency responders acted with admirable competence, commitment and composure.

    In the wake of Hurricane Sandy, the Department assisted FEMA to help speed the response effort. As the result of our collaboration during Sandy, FEMA has asked for the Administration to support the creation of a 24/7 energy emergency response center.

    • The President tasked the Department of Energy Advisory Board to form a sub-committee to bring together a team of industry, environmental, and scientific leaders to recommend a path forward with industry and regulators to recover our vast shale gas resources in a safe, environmentally responsible manner.

    • The Department played the crucial role in launching the Clean Energy Ministerial, in which more than 20 countries with more than 80% of the world’s GDP come together not to argue, but to share best practices.  We are working to improve energy efficiency, speed the spread of renewable power and mobilize talent from around the world to advance the clean energy revolution.  With the help of a dedicated team in the Office of Policy & International Affairs, we held the first meeting in Washington, D.C. The second and third meetings were in Abu Dhabi and London, and this coming April, the fourth will be held in New Delhi.

    • We also fostered cooperative agreements that resulted in three US-China Clean Energy Research Centers announced by President Obama and President Hu Jintao. The agreements focused on (i) developing cost-saving building efficiencies, (ii) the development of clean coal technologies such as carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration, and (iii) clean vehicles. The program of $150 million is equally funded equally by China and the U.S., with half of the investments made by industry in each country.

    • In keeping with Congressional direction to develop appliance efficiency standards, we have greatly accelerated the development and finalization of standards on more than 40 household and commercial products – standards that are conservatively estimated to save consumers a total of $350 billion through 2030.

    • Our nuclear security teams have removed 1,340 kilograms of highly enriched uranium and 35 kilograms of plutonium from vulnerable sites throughout the world—enough material for approximately 55 nuclear weapons – including cleaning out 8 countries of all highly enriched uranium.

    • The President secured ratification of the New Start Treaty, under which the U.S. and Russia agreed to further reduce the number of deployed warheads to lowest level since the 1950s – an 85 percent reduction from the darkest days of the Cold War.  And over the last four years, we have worked with our partners to downblend more than 100,000 kilograms of weapons grade uranium from the former Soviet Union, converting it to peaceful purposes like U.S. civilian nuclear reactors.  In fact, roughly 10 percent of America’s electricity comes from uranium that once threatened the United States as part of the Soviet nuclear arsenal.

    • We made historic progress in cleaning up nuclear contamination leftover from the Cold War, reducing the total footprint by nearly 75 percent and permanently cleaning up 690 square miles of contaminated land—an area more than 30 times the size of Manhattan.

    Despite this progress, the environmental clean-up projects still have considerable technical and project management challenges. As an example, the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at Hanford is the most complex and largest nuclear project in history. For the past 6 months, I have been working with six extremely talented people, typically devoting 5-10 hours a week that include nights and weekends. We have also been working intimately with a restructured EM management team to overcome remaining challenges. We have invited ecologists in the State of Washington to join in our frank discussions and the DOE team is rebuilding trust that had broken down over the past decade. I am especially appreciative of Governor Gregoire for her trust and support over the past six months.

    This team will continue working with EM and Washington State for months and possibly years. The scientific, engineering and management reform of the Waste Treatment Plant will continue, and I am optimistic that many of the issues that have been plaguing this project for over a half a dozen years will soon be resolved. We are also bringing in the scientific talent and commitment of many scientists and engineers that will allow us to fulfill our obligations more quickly and safely. As a consequence of this renewed effort, I predict that our country will potentially avoid hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs over the coming decades.

    Viewing Page 3 of 4

    • Previous Page
    • View All
    • Next Page

    11 Comments

    Register To Comment
    Bob Wallace
    Bob Wallace
    February 8, 2013
    Cliff - you make strong charges which, when looked at with a rational eye, appear to be creations of your own imagination.

    Let me simply point out your claim that Steven Chu is not an intelligent man. That, alone, demonstrates your foolishness.
    Cliff Claven
    Cliff Claven
    February 8, 2013
    Chu put politics ahead of science. Ran DOE as a "faith-based" organization whose religion was the President's green energy agenda that failed to produce the promised jobs and fleeced the taxpayers in the process. Publicly admitted his goal was to run up the price of gasoline. Turned DOE into a second EPA, with both running amok and doing more to damage than protect the environment by industrializing vast tracts of land with wind and solar and biomass plantations that decreased rather than increased the efficiency of our electrical grid and the MPG of our cars. We could use one less Nobel Prize laureate in the government. They don't seem to pick them for their intelligence any more.
    Jessee McBroom
    Jessee McBroom
    February 6, 2013
    I do believe the model will prove out on this design. On the Fringe; they're still at it. Tne latest is LENR. Several working devices with either excess heat or electricity being generated dependant upon configutation. I believe the nickle hydrogen reactions will prove to be the easiest to work with.
    Joel Fairstein
    Joel Fairstein
    February 6, 2013
    Finally, let's give some overdue recognition to the early environmentalists, the long-haired folks who back in the 60s and 70s created a movement from nothing and moved energy efficiency and renewables into public consciousness. Some of them were able to receive funding, but the vast majority have been ignored by government funders because they proffered low-tech solutions or were not associated with research institutions. These frugal innovators are still on the fringe doing great work.
    Joel Fairstein
    Joel Fairstein
    February 6, 2013
    energy4all, there is indeed conceptual overlap between ARPA-E and DARPA programs, one modeled after the other, but they exist in separate agencies with different missions and personnel. Regarding product development timelines, there is no consistency between 'finished products' within the DOE and those funded by ARPA-E, who are often in the private sector. Product development is not really the province of DOE anyway. Maybe you were referring to intellectual property. I read the fusion article, but the mystery has not been unlocked, only understood a little better. As the authors themselves point out, 'We hope that our finding will inspire future theoretical and experimental work...' As a child, I knew one of the fusion pioneers working with the bumpy torus configuration back in the 1960s and later abandoned. Since 1953, fusion research has been a long time brewing, and we spend an average of a half billion dollars a year on it. Imagine that investment applied to energy efficiency and smarter building design?
    Jessee McBroom
    Jessee McBroom
    February 6, 2013
    Ok Joel. So you know there is no real difference in time frames for FINISHED products between ARPA-e and DOE Labs. As ARPA-e is the sibling of the DODs DARPA and pretty much the same people and government agencies are involved one way or the other. As to your comment on Fusion in particular. Just last week a DOE funded project resolved the problem of the plasma fusion process. Search Science Daily, R&D and Scientific American in the Nuclear Energy technology areas and you will find the data. I even posted the article from Science Daily somewhere on the Renewable Energy Magazine website sometime last week. The title of the article is ' Mystery Surrounding the Harnessing of Fusion Energy Unlocked' Enjoy the read. When it comes to Research deadlines are an act of shear folly. It took a while; but the how to; is finally a known piece of data now.
    Joel Fairstein
    Joel Fairstein
    February 6, 2013
    energy4all, bear in mind, 1-2 years is an allotment for each distinct phase of funding, so the total timeline could run four or more years. The development timeline for ARPA-E just doesn't fit the facts regarding other DOE programs, especially legacy programs. I applied to ARPA-E's first funding opportunity, and although I wasn't among the 1% that received funding, I have been paying close attention. I've participated or presented in ORNL events, am the son of a Manhattan project engineer, and have interacted/debated issues with many other ORNL scientists and engineers through the years. I've seen programs up close that were sponsored by DOE that never deserved a dollar of funding, based on poor efficiencies and outcomes. Fusion energy, in particular, has long outlived public resources. Battery technology also comes to mind as another legacy program that has shown only incremental results. At least, ARPA-E is a step in the right direction, especially regarding battery tech. So, energy4all, I suggest you dig a little deeper into DOE's culture and legacy programs and gauge the outcomes for yourself.
    Jessee McBroom
    Jessee McBroom
    February 6, 2013
    Joel; I do not know where you get your information from; but all of the recent energy research projects I have seen the DOE fund have have had 1-2 years of research or demonstration time windows. I suggest you research ARPA-e as well. You will find that they work hand in hand WITH the DOE and the National Labs. Take a look at the roster for the ARPA-e Energy Innovation Sumit for 2013 later this month and pay attention to the list of partners.
    Joel Fairstein
    Joel Fairstein
    February 6, 2013
    The ARPA-E program requires of its applicants that they produce disruptive technologies in short time spans, an expectation DOE does not follow internally. In this light, Stephen Chu's strongest legacy will be ARPA-E and perhaps his lesser-known promotion of energy conservation. These are eclipsed, though, by his failure to articulate an energy policy that involves the American people. Instead, he has promoted big-science energy solutions that have not significantly improved our energy portfolio. Results that are years away, mega-expensive, and that generally fail to materialize. There have been some incremental advances on Dr. Chu's watch, but no game-changing technologies. In much of the world, frugal innovation, often by uneducated citizens, is producing results and empowering communities to conserve resources and create renewable systems. A ground-swell approach, citizens are invested in every step of this process. DOE, on the other hand, systematically ignores simple, economical energy solutions in favor of expensive, highly technical one with citizens playing no role in energy policy unless highly-credentialed. The failure of our top-down, mega-expensive, big science energy policy is the eclipsing of passive solar and energy conservation. These two areas could easily have the largest impact on reducing energy needs. It's ironic that Dr. Chu once referred to energy conservation, somewhat quietly, as 'not just low-hanging fruit, but fruit lying on the ground.' Shouldn't that be trumpeted as a national theme?
    Jessee McBroom
    Jessee McBroom
    February 2, 2013
    It has been my great pleasure to have Dr. Chu as Energy Secretary for the US DOE. He has shown remarkable committment to improvement in the energy and transportation areas as well as the environment. I believe we are all better off as a Nation for his committment to his term in office as Energy Secretary. I thank him for his service to this Nation and wish him well in his Academic and Research pursuits. I belive we all owe him a thank you for putting together the ARPA-e program and getting renewable energy technologies advanced and employed to the degree he has to date. I believe that through his efforts we will relieve ourselves of the dependance upon foreign oil and recoup that annual expense many times over in our future energy related applications through advanced technology Dr. Chu has helped usher into existence.
    Bob Wallace
    Bob Wallace
    February 1, 2013
    It certainly has been good to have US government science back under control of someone who is a scientist.

    No more 20-somthing-old dudes with a BA in charge, please.

    Add Your Comments

    To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

    • Create a Free Account!
    • Sign-In
    REW.com Editors

    REW.com Editors

    Renewable Energy World's network editors help deliver the most comprehensive news coverage of the renewable energy industries. Based in the U.S. and the UK, the team is comprised of editors from Pennwell Corporation's myriad of publications...
    • About
    • Articles
    • Contact
    • FOLLOW
    • CONTACT
    Stay Connected
             
    To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

    Editors' Picks

    • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
    • The Future of Solar in Latin America
    • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
    • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
    • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
    • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

    Most Commented

    • 8
      San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
    • 6
      Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
    • 3
      Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
    • 3
      French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

    Total Access Partners

    Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
    • Photovoltaics World
    • Richardson RFPD, Inc.
    • Affordable Solar Group, LLC
    • Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut)
    • Active Communications International
    • Solmetric Corporation
    • Panasonic Eco Solutions North America
    • DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability
    News
    • Renewable Energy
    • Solar Energy
    • Wind Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Geothermal Energy
    • Hyrdo Power
    • Blogs
    • Video
    • Finance
    Resources
    • Companies
    • Products
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Webcasts
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
    • Press Releases
    • e-Newsletters
    Company
    • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Services
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Site Map
    Network Partners - Magazines
    • Hydro Review Magazine
    • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
    • Renewable Energy World Magazine
    Network Partners - Events
    • Power-Gen International
    • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
    • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
    • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
    • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
    • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
    • HydroVision International
    • HydroVision Brazil
    • HydroVision India
    • HydroVision Russia
    © Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
    RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information