The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Secretary Steven Chu Announces Departure, Accomplishments in a Letter to Energy Department Employees

Renewable Energy World Editors
February 01, 2013  |  11 Comments

Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced his departure from Department of Energy (DOE) today in a letter addressed to DOE employees. He highlights the many DOE accomplishments over the past four years, with a heavy emphasis on renewable energy developments, energy efficiency and addressing climate change. Read the entire letter below:

Dear Colleagues:

Serving the country as Secretary of Energy, and working alongside such an extraordinary team of people at the Department, has been the greatest privilege of my life. While the job has had many challenges, it has been an exciting time for the Department, the country, and for me personally.

I’ve always been inspired by Dr. Martin Luther King, who articulated his Dream of an America where people are judged not by skin color but “by the content of their character.” In the scientific world, people are judged by the content of their ideas. Advances are made with new insights, but the final arbitrator of any point of view are experiments that seek the unbiased truth, not information cherry picked to support a particular point of view. The power of our work is derived from this foundation.

This is the approach I’ve brought to the Department of Energy, where I believe we should be judged not by the money we direct to a particular State or district, company, university or national lab, but by the character of our decisions. The Department of Energy serves the country as a Department of Science, a Department of Innovation, and a Department of Nuclear Security.

I have worked each day to move the Department in a direction where the political leadership and highest levels of career managers have the intellectual curiosity and wisdom to learn from the people who reported to them and where the subject matter experts – which should include managers at the highest levels – as well as employees at our national laboratories welcome their counsel and help. I grew up and matured in organizations where a graduate student or staff scientist could have a discussion with a company department head, a professor, a national lab director and be heard, not because of their rank in the organization, but because of the quality of their ideas.

I came with dreams, and am leaving with a set of accomplishments that we should all be proud of. Those accomplishments are because of all your dedication and hard work.

  • Four years ago, ARPA-E was a vision described in the report, Rising Above the Gathering Storm. I was a member of that committee, but never dreamed that I would be asked to take the concept to reality. ARPA-E was designed to support high-risk, high reward technology development; to swing for game-changing home runs that can fundamentally transform energy technologies. The program has earned the respect of industry and academia for its outstanding funding choices, and active, thoughtful program management.

    • Its success was the result of the assembly of an extraordinarily talented group of individuals. This team would engage in active discussions that spilled into the evenings. They challenged each other with honest and frank discussions over their competing programs, and created an ARPA-E fellows program that was able to recruit some of the best recent graduates.

    • What have been the early results? ARPA-E was described by Fred Smith of Fed Ex in his ARPA-E Summit Keynote address that in his opinion, ARPA-E  was best government funding program he has ever seen. In the first few years, 11 of the companies funded with $40 million dollars have attracted more than $200 million in combined private investment. While it is too early to tell if we have home runs like ARPA-net, there are a number of investments that have certainly rounded second base.

  • The spirit of ARPA-E is now being disseminated in other parts of the Department. The first transplant was a completely revitalized solar photovoltaic program that was dubbed SunShot. A small cadre of enthusiastic individuals led a transformation. Unsolicited feedback from industry and academia alike noted the dramatic increase in the quality of the program with essentially no increase in budget. One of the founding members of ARPA-E is now the Assistant Secretary of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). Remarkably, arecent Forbes article described the changes now in progress with the lead, “quiet clean energy innovation revolution at the Department of Energy,” and noted “a leap in the right direction and absolutely critical to creating a more flexible, innovation-focused DOE mission.”

  • I would love to describe what has been happening in many other specific areas of the Department, but my message would fill many more pages. In the last two years, we have issued two Grand Challenges to innovators in industry. The SunShot Challenge called for reducing the full cost of utility scale solar energy to $1/watt, which roughly equates to a levelized cost of electricity (LOCE) of 6 cents/kWh without additional subsidies created for the solar industry. This is close to the projected EIA cost of natural gas and the anticipated LOCE on a new natural gas electricity generator a decade from now. When we first discussed this goal, industry did not take it seriously. Today, they tell me that our input challenged them to rethink their road maps and now agree that it is an achievable goal.

  • The President announced an EV Everywhere Challenge, with the goal to achieve plug-in hybrids or EVs with a 100 mile range at the same cost of owning and operating a comparable sized internal combustion engine car with 40 miles/gallon for 5 years.

  • The batteries developed for plug-in EVs will also revolutionize the electrical distribution system and the use of renewable energy. Wind energy is already expected to reach grid parity in less than a decade. Unless we develop new business models with utility companies and other stake holders, we will not be able to take full advantage of the accelerating pace of technology.

  • We’re also forging stronger partnerships with industry to give America’s innovators and entrepreneurs a competitive edge in the global marketplace. We have held workshops with industry in materials, computation, solar PV, plug-in electric vehicles, and many other areas to actively engage companies to take better advantage of the Department’s capabilities -- from our extraordinary user facilities to our scientists and engineers. In addition, numerous industry leaders have told me of a new found appreciation of our “convening” role in many areas of energy innovation, including innovations in energy finance. Going forward, this convening role and intellectual brainstorming sessions with industry will be increasingly valuable.

Viewing Page 1 of 4

  • View All
  • Next Page

11 Comments

Register To Comment
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
February 8, 2013
Cliff - you make strong charges which, when looked at with a rational eye, appear to be creations of your own imagination.

Let me simply point out your claim that Steven Chu is not an intelligent man. That, alone, demonstrates your foolishness.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
February 8, 2013
Chu put politics ahead of science. Ran DOE as a "faith-based" organization whose religion was the President's green energy agenda that failed to produce the promised jobs and fleeced the taxpayers in the process. Publicly admitted his goal was to run up the price of gasoline. Turned DOE into a second EPA, with both running amok and doing more to damage than protect the environment by industrializing vast tracts of land with wind and solar and biomass plantations that decreased rather than increased the efficiency of our electrical grid and the MPG of our cars. We could use one less Nobel Prize laureate in the government. They don't seem to pick them for their intelligence any more.
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
February 6, 2013
I do believe the model will prove out on this design. On the Fringe; they're still at it. Tne latest is LENR. Several working devices with either excess heat or electricity being generated dependant upon configutation. I believe the nickle hydrogen reactions will prove to be the easiest to work with.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
February 6, 2013
Finally, let's give some overdue recognition to the early environmentalists, the long-haired folks who back in the 60s and 70s created a movement from nothing and moved energy efficiency and renewables into public consciousness. Some of them were able to receive funding, but the vast majority have been ignored by government funders because they proffered low-tech solutions or were not associated with research institutions. These frugal innovators are still on the fringe doing great work.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
February 6, 2013
energy4all, there is indeed conceptual overlap between ARPA-E and DARPA programs, one modeled after the other, but they exist in separate agencies with different missions and personnel. Regarding product development timelines, there is no consistency between 'finished products' within the DOE and those funded by ARPA-E, who are often in the private sector. Product development is not really the province of DOE anyway. Maybe you were referring to intellectual property. I read the fusion article, but the mystery has not been unlocked, only understood a little better. As the authors themselves point out, 'We hope that our finding will inspire future theoretical and experimental work...' As a child, I knew one of the fusion pioneers working with the bumpy torus configuration back in the 1960s and later abandoned. Since 1953, fusion research has been a long time brewing, and we spend an average of a half billion dollars a year on it. Imagine that investment applied to energy efficiency and smarter building design?
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
February 6, 2013
Ok Joel. So you know there is no real difference in time frames for FINISHED products between ARPA-e and DOE Labs. As ARPA-e is the sibling of the DODs DARPA and pretty much the same people and government agencies are involved one way or the other. As to your comment on Fusion in particular. Just last week a DOE funded project resolved the problem of the plasma fusion process. Search Science Daily, R&D and Scientific American in the Nuclear Energy technology areas and you will find the data. I even posted the article from Science Daily somewhere on the Renewable Energy Magazine website sometime last week. The title of the article is ' Mystery Surrounding the Harnessing of Fusion Energy Unlocked' Enjoy the read. When it comes to Research deadlines are an act of shear folly. It took a while; but the how to; is finally a known piece of data now.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
February 6, 2013
energy4all, bear in mind, 1-2 years is an allotment for each distinct phase of funding, so the total timeline could run four or more years. The development timeline for ARPA-E just doesn't fit the facts regarding other DOE programs, especially legacy programs. I applied to ARPA-E's first funding opportunity, and although I wasn't among the 1% that received funding, I have been paying close attention. I've participated or presented in ORNL events, am the son of a Manhattan project engineer, and have interacted/debated issues with many other ORNL scientists and engineers through the years. I've seen programs up close that were sponsored by DOE that never deserved a dollar of funding, based on poor efficiencies and outcomes. Fusion energy, in particular, has long outlived public resources. Battery technology also comes to mind as another legacy program that has shown only incremental results. At least, ARPA-E is a step in the right direction, especially regarding battery tech. So, energy4all, I suggest you dig a little deeper into DOE's culture and legacy programs and gauge the outcomes for yourself.
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
February 6, 2013
Joel; I do not know where you get your information from; but all of the recent energy research projects I have seen the DOE fund have have had 1-2 years of research or demonstration time windows. I suggest you research ARPA-e as well. You will find that they work hand in hand WITH the DOE and the National Labs. Take a look at the roster for the ARPA-e Energy Innovation Sumit for 2013 later this month and pay attention to the list of partners.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
February 6, 2013
The ARPA-E program requires of its applicants that they produce disruptive technologies in short time spans, an expectation DOE does not follow internally. In this light, Stephen Chu's strongest legacy will be ARPA-E and perhaps his lesser-known promotion of energy conservation. These are eclipsed, though, by his failure to articulate an energy policy that involves the American people. Instead, he has promoted big-science energy solutions that have not significantly improved our energy portfolio. Results that are years away, mega-expensive, and that generally fail to materialize. There have been some incremental advances on Dr. Chu's watch, but no game-changing technologies. In much of the world, frugal innovation, often by uneducated citizens, is producing results and empowering communities to conserve resources and create renewable systems. A ground-swell approach, citizens are invested in every step of this process. DOE, on the other hand, systematically ignores simple, economical energy solutions in favor of expensive, highly technical one with citizens playing no role in energy policy unless highly-credentialed. The failure of our top-down, mega-expensive, big science energy policy is the eclipsing of passive solar and energy conservation. These two areas could easily have the largest impact on reducing energy needs. It's ironic that Dr. Chu once referred to energy conservation, somewhat quietly, as 'not just low-hanging fruit, but fruit lying on the ground.' Shouldn't that be trumpeted as a national theme?
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
February 2, 2013
It has been my great pleasure to have Dr. Chu as Energy Secretary for the US DOE. He has shown remarkable committment to improvement in the energy and transportation areas as well as the environment. I believe we are all better off as a Nation for his committment to his term in office as Energy Secretary. I thank him for his service to this Nation and wish him well in his Academic and Research pursuits. I belive we all owe him a thank you for putting together the ARPA-e program and getting renewable energy technologies advanced and employed to the degree he has to date. I believe that through his efforts we will relieve ourselves of the dependance upon foreign oil and recoup that annual expense many times over in our future energy related applications through advanced technology Dr. Chu has helped usher into existence.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
February 1, 2013
It certainly has been good to have US government science back under control of someone who is a scientist.

No more 20-somthing-old dudes with a BA in charge, please.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
REW.com Editors

REW.com Editors

Renewable Energy World's network editors help deliver the most comprehensive news coverage of the renewable energy industries. Based in the U.S. and the UK, the team is comprised of editors from Pennwell Corporation's myriad of publications...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 13
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • US Solar Institute
  • Solar Site Design
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Martifer Solar USA, Inc.
  • Navigant
  • Parker Hannifin - Precision Cooling Systems
  • ReneSola
  • Apricus, Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information