The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Onshore Wind Drives Germany's Renewables Revolution, but Is It Too Much of a Good Thing?

The debate over onshore wind in Germany is more than a superficial tiff: it's a fundamental showdown. The government says there's no way back, yet the nation appears unprepared to accept implications.

Paul Hockenos, International Correspondent
February 14, 2013  |  8 Comments

Print

Onshore wind power is the wunderkind of Germany's path-breaking clean energy transition. Stretching from the gusty coasts of the North and Baltic Seas all the way now to the Alps, the nation's land-based wind turbines (23,000 as of 2012) account for virtually all of Germany's 30-plus GW of wind-generated green electrical capacity. This generates nearly 40 percent of the country's entire carbon-free electricity production, roughly equal to 40 nuclear reactors. By expanding its supply ten-fold since 1998, it has exceeded the rosiest forecasts of green-thinking optimists -- and costs have plummeted, too. It is no exaggeration to say that onshore wind has turbocharged Germany's Energiewende, the epic transition of Europe's foremost industrial heavyweight to an all-renewable power supply.

Indeed, without the punch of onshore wind Germany would never have shattered the records it did in 2011 and then again in 2012: 22% of Germany’s electricity supply now stems from renewables. On sunny and windy days, onshore wind and photovoltaic meet over 85 percent of Germany’s mid-day electricity needs. Rather than importing nuclear-generated power from its unapologetically pro-atomic neighbors since Germany shut down a third of its reactors in spring 2011, it exports electricity to France – and indeed sold more abroad in 2012 (23 gigawatts) than ever before. Germany’s renewables industries provide now 386,000 domestic jobs, over a third of those in the onshore wind sector. These are the kinds of acolytes that, despite rising energy costs, secures the Energiewende broad and consistent popular support. A recent independent poll showed 93 percent of Germans solidly behind the clean energy switch.        

“It’s clear now that onshore wind and PV will be the backbone of Germany’s energy supply, with the rest of the power system being optimized around them,” explains Rainer Baake, director of the Berlin-based NGO Agora Energiewende. (Solar power production has also dwarfed projections of just a few years ago, hitting a record high last year by adding more than 7.6 gigawatts of capacity to Germany’s power supply, thus boosting supply in 2012 to over 28 gigawatts, a jump of 51 percent over 2011.) Baake argues that by 2015 the total cost for power produced by wind and photovoltaic plants will be roughly 7–10 euro cents per kilowatt hour, thus about the same as electricity generated by new gas and coal powered plants. 

“In 2000 a competition was opened up to the whole array of renewables,” Baake says, referring to landmark legislation that provided green energy – from wind to geothermal – with feed-in priority to the energy mix and compensation for high investment costs in the form of high-than-market-price tariffs. “And we can now say that onshore wind and PV have won it. No other renewable energies can generate electricity in sufficient quantity at such low costs. Wind and PV are the most essential pillars of the Energiewende,” explains Baake, who was a high-ranking official in the 1998-2005 center-left government responsible for the seminal clean energy laws.

But even in energy-progressive Germany, this conclusion – that two such weather-dependent sources as onshore wind and PV can supply the needs of German industry and heat homes through frosty winters – is fighting an uphill battle for acceptance, not least in the current administration of Chancellor Angela Merkel. Moreover, although there are convincing arguments that onshore wind could do significantly more than currently projected by official sources, this is a proposition with opponents far beyond the NIMBY movement. Germany’s center-right government says it want to “slow down” the Energiewende, which it claims has been too successful for Germany’s own good. After scaling back photovoltaic’s feed-in incentive last year, onshore wind, the undisputed prize pupil, is now also at the heart of this simmering conflict in election year 2013.     

Among the current scenarios for the transformation of Germany’s energy mix  there are vastly diverging prognoses for onshore wind’s role. In all, green energy will provide at least 40 percent of Germany’s electricity supply by 2020, according to a recent government update reflecting the expanded output of onshore and PV. But how much of this will be onshore wind? The government’s official 2010 energy concept pegs onshore wind to account for 36 gigawatts of installed capacity in 2020, a low-ball, now outdated figure that has been overtaken by burgeoning supply. The German Renewable Energy Federation (BEE), an umbrella organization of renewable energy associations, has onshore ramping up by half by 2020 to 45 gigawatts a year and then, together with offshore, providing a full half of Germany’s electricity by 2050. Other more bullish scenarios, such as one prepared by Germany’s 16 federal states, or Länder, predicts that onshore could account for as much as 86 gigawatts by 2023. 

“The government’s numbers, even the newest ones, are very conservative,” says Andree Böhling of Greenpeace Germany. “The figure of the Länder, though, is most probably too high, possible only if all the chips fall in place.” Greenpeace wants to shoot for 50 gigawatts of onshore by 2023 and a 45 percent share of renewable electricity in Germany’s power supply in 2020. “This is doable,” says Böhling, who adds that increased onshore capacity in the south would obviate the need for expensive new transmission grids planned to bring on and offshore supply from Germany’s north to its industrial south. 

“We can reasonably expect that a combination of repowering in the north and new [onshore wind] parks in southern Germany will contribute about 2 GW [of installed capacity] a year for the foreseeable future,” explains Rainer Hinrich-Rahlwes, a former environment ministry official and currently BEE board member. Even though the furious pace of onshore wind’s expansion has slowed since the late 2000s, Hinrich-Rahlwes argues that this steady, powerful contribution its annual growth is nevertheless extremely impressive – as well as unrivaled in terms of bang for the buck compared to other renewables. He also says that onshore has a lot more potential than government officials are currently willing to acknowledge, depending, he underscores, on the policies toward renewable energy that Germany settles upon – most probably after the national elections in autumn this year, which Merkel’s poll-leading conservatives are likely to dominate.

There are others in-the-know who put the case for more onshore even more bluntly. The renowned Fraunhofer Institute, one of the world’s leading applied clean-energy research institutes, estimates that if 2 percent of Germany’s available landscape were approved for wind park development, the capacity could supply Germany with a full two-thirds of its electricity needs (198 gigawatts of capacity). 

Viewing Page 1 of 2

  • View All
  • Next Page

8 Comments

Register To Comment
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
February 21, 2013
Germany will be adding a large number of offshore wind farms in the next couple of years. The major challenges they've had including working out placement with their neighbor states and developing a suitable electrical grid to support the offshore wind.

Many of the turbines are expected to be around 100kM offshore. The transmission infrastructure to handle the massive power is generally further inland. That means they need to move the power they generate perhaps 200kM.

Even with a 50hz power grid that is a problem, so they've been spending quite a bit of time developing HVDC to move the power onshore. Many of those pieces are now coming together with ABB, Siemens, DNV KEMA and others now testing/producing HVDC breakers needed.
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
February 21, 2013
Siemens has a 6MW turbine that is being deployed. Most of the turbines deployed the last couple of years in Germany are already larger than 3MW in size. The number of turbines that have been popping up the last few years has been staggering! Sometimes you can even see the forest through the windfarms.

In most of the European stats (by the German governments) when they refer to 45GW or 60GW that is the max production capacity for an instant... not over the year. When they talk of adding 45GW a year they are adding additional 45GW of generating capacity each year not total production.

I sat through a number of very technical presentations last fall in Germany and it was pretty common for alternating slides to be shown in which they would show total energy produce for the year in TWh and then new capacity planned in GW.
Jan de Boer
Jan de Boer
February 21, 2013
It is sad that an author of an article in a specialised energy magazine cannot get his basic units right:

"...has onshore ramping up by half by 2020 to 45 gigawatts a year and ..."

This would mean that per year 15000 wind turbines of 3MW would have to be build in Germany. This is a bit steep, even for Germany. I guess you mean a cumulative capacity of 45 GW.

Please learn the following:

Wh, kWh, MWh, GWh, TWh: units of electrical energy

W, kW, MW, TW: units of power, i.e. the rate with wich electrical energy is produced or consumed. Can also be the unit of power capacity, e.g. a 3MW wind turbine can produce electrical energy at a maximum rate of 3MW.

MW/year makes only sense when speaking of capacity increases. For example: Wind turbine capacity in Germany keeps increasing with more than 2 GigaWatt per year.
ANONYMOUS
February 16, 2013
Forget Germany, 100% of the new wind capacity in the US during the same period was from onshore installations. Remember that there is still essentially no offshore wind generating capacity in the US.

The reason Germany has been adding onshore wind capacity has to do with the fact that onshore is currently far cheaper than offshore, and also that Germany has limited coastline space available for offshore installations.
ANONYMOUS
February 16, 2013
The author writes: " the nation's land-based wind turbines (23,000 as of 2012) account for virtually all of Germany's 30-plus GW of wind-generated green electrical capacity. This generates nearly 40 percent of the country's entire carbon-free electricity production, roughly equal to 40 nuclear reactors."

Two more mistakes. Germany has only 9 operational reactors but they produce considerably more energy than is generated by wind power. Wind turbines may produce ~40% of renewable electricity, but NOT 40% of carbon-free electricity, once one properly includes nuclear generation in the carbon-free category wind's percentage of generation is closer to 20%.

The author also writes:
"Solar power production has also dwarfed projections of just a few years ago, hitting a record high last year by adding more than 7.6 gigawatts of capacity to Germany's power supply, thus boosting supply in 2012 to over 28 gigawatts, a jump of 51 percent over 2011."

It is nominally true that this boosted generation capacity to over 28 GW, but one could also say it boosted capacity to over 32 GW. As written, the phrase " a jump of 51 percent over 2011" would seem to apply to the capacity additions, but this was only about a 30% increase.

Steven
ANONYMOUS
February 16, 2013
The author writes: "Rather than importing nuclear-generated power from its unapologetically pro-atomic neighbors since Germany shut down a third of its reactors in spring 2011, it exports electricity to France – and indeed sold more abroad in 2012 (23 gigawatts) than ever before."

The claim might be more believable if the author used the correct units: electricity exports are measured in units of energy (such as TWh) rather than units of power. Also, the correct quantity to discuss is net exports, because both countries routinely import and export power as market conditions change. If would also be fair to note that German use of coal fired generation increased in 2012 compared to the prior year.
Steven
Dennis Heidner
Dennis Heidner
February 15, 2013
I believe that there is a big difference between capping renewables and requiring a diverse mixture of renewable technologies and their geographic placement. Too many wind farms or solar plants in one region can certainly play havoc on the grid. Deploying a widely dispersed technology mixture reduces the risk of grid instability. Part of the solution was to lower the FIT for solar to 90% of the retail for smaller plants and encourage self consumption. Changing the FIT for wind is yet another adaptation.

Germany is very active in promoting biomass/fuel generation, district energy, and grid sized storage. Reducing emphasis on wind and solar allows them to add focus onto biomass/fuels, grid storage and overall energy efficiency.

It is important to remember that Europe has a well established electrical transmission network. When additional baseload for Germany is required they are able to import hydro energy from Norway, wind from Denmark, nuclear power from France.

Goals for Germany are based on the EC "20 by 2020". 20% renewables, 20% reduction in CO2 and 20% improvement in energy efficiencies. Germans are nearing their 20% renewables goal, but they have been struggling on the energy efficiency improvement. CO2 is a challenge as they phase out nuclear - much of the lost capacity has been made up by coal -- EVEN while they are trying to shutdown lignite coal mining within Germany.

Paul's article does a good job explaining why some of the shift in priories is underway. There is now a renewed emphasis on thermal efficiency (boiler tuneups for homes), lighting improvements for buildings, better building science, more research on storage and fuel cells. I don't believe Germans are giving up on solar or wind renewables - it is more an adjustment as they try to speed up on other areas that have had lower priorities. By improving their overall energy efficiency they need less traditional baseload. Storage addresses the grid security issues.
Nigel Morris
Nigel Morris
February 15, 2013
It seems logical that capping renewables should be acceptable only on a grid stability basis (and only then where there are clear plans to adapt the grid to meet stability needs without capping). However, incentives are in part designed to get developing technologies through the high cost, early stages until it can compete with existing technologies and incumbents on a reasonable even playing field.

It sounds from the article that wind and PV in Germany have gotten over the initial cost hump. Therefore, it may now be perfectly appropriate for incentives to be cut back if the cost and hooter factors benefiting incumbents have fallen. There's no point giving subsidies that are higher than necessary to achieve their stated goals. Once the goals have been achieved it is usually appropriate to wind back the subsidies to the minimum required under the new cost base.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Paul Hockenos

Paul Hockenos

Paul Hockenos is a Berlin-based author who has written about Europe since 1989. Paul is the author of three major books on European politics: Free to Hate: The Rise of the Right in Post-Communist Eastern Europe, Homeland Calling: Exile...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 4
    Women in Power – It’s a Natural Fit
  • 4
    Renewable Energy in Myanmar: Not Just Clean, It’s Necessary
  • 2
    Sir Richard Branson unleashes Plan B for the planet

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • PLANSEE SE
  • Karbone
  • Fairtrade-Messe
  • Delta Rigging & Tools
  • Rotork plc
  • Midwest Renewable Energy Association
  • AEG Power Solutions
  • Navigant
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information