The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 25, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Making Biomass Part of the Energy Mix

Julian Critchlow and Arnaud Leroi, Bain & Company
February 15, 2013  |  23 Comments

RWE has also invested in several energy crop plantations to secure a long-term supply. In the UK, Drax has built its own straw pellet facility with a 100-kiloton per year capacity near one of its plant sites. Drax has also actively secured long-term contracts with pelletizers in North America and has built dedicated transport, unloading and storage facilities for its pellet supply chain.

Investments like these signal the start of a truly global biomass supply chain, and they would not have been likely without the safety net of sufficiently high and long-term committed subsidies yielding an appropriate rate of return (an internal rate of return greater than a general hurdle rate of 10%). We don’t expect this vertical integration to last: Within the next five years, we expect the entire biomass industry to mature, resulting in specialization across the supply chain that will push generators back downstream — a trend we have seen in the development of other renewables, including wind and solar photovoltaic.

Prepare to Win in Biomass

To make the most of the biomass opportunity, utilities need a clear strategy and a deep understanding of operations. Based on our work with large and small utilities, biomass generators need to get these four things right.

Embed biomass strategy into overall strategy. Leading utilities define the role biomass will play in reaching their renewable targets. They calculate how biomass affects their overall abatement cost and carbon emissions footprint. They also evaluate and compare potential investment opportunities, including converting existing plants and finding the best locations for new plants.

Secure feedstock supply. Securing a reliable and affordable supply of feedstock to keep plants running cost-effectively isn’t easy. But utilities cannot afford to wait for subsidies to stimulate the market; they should start to secure their sources today. Where possible, they should limit involvement and investment by contracting for spare capacity from existing or planned pelletizing plants. When necessary, utilities can invest in new pelletizing plants or even, as a last resort, purchase or build pelletizing plants.

A balance of local and global suppliers can help utilities ensure a reliable supply. Local suppliers offer several advantages that complement the economic benefits of a large global supply. They can help insulate against global price fluctuations, since local farmers and foresters have fewer options for distribution. Maintaining a local supply also helps with community relations, generating local jobs and business, thus increasing the perception of being socially and locally responsible. Dalkia, the biomass leader in France, set up regional entities for sourcing exclusively with local suppliers and developed several local facilities to transform raw wood residue into wood chips to feed its biomass plants.

Build up operational capabilities. Utilities will need to supplement their current skills with new capabilities. Pellet storage, for example, represents a significant risk that must be managed carefully. The fire that damaged RWE’s Tilbury Power Station in the UK in February 2012 started in a storage area containing more than 4,000 tons of wood pellets. As utilities ramp up larger plants, storage requirements will grow and so must their capabilities for managing this storage safely. For plant engineering and operations, utilities can employ former coal engineers to run biomass plants, though they will need to be trained in upgrading and maintaining biomass boilers.

Improve communication with regulators. Two issues tend to dominate communications for utilities working in biomass: subsidies, and local supply and generation. For subsidies, utilities should work with regulators to ensure the right incentive schemes are put in place. They can learn lessons from wind and solar, where lower subsidies would have been more effective. In several countries, such as Germany and Italy, too much support caused bubbles that ultimately damaged long-term development and the public’s perception of those sectors, which undermined governmental energy objectives.

In supply, strong relationships with local authorities are the key to securing local feedstock supply from forest owners and farmers. Utilities should clearly communicate that biomass creates more local jobs than wind or solar. The sustainability of biomass is also important to emphasize: Responsible feedstock growing poses no competition with food crops or fuel regeneration.

The unique advantages of biomass to reach governmental energy objectives yield an opportunity for utilities to create value for their shareholders. Securing a reliable and cheap supply of feedstock sufficiently early is the critical requirement for utilities to win.

Julian Critchlow leads Bain & Company’s Utilities practice in Europe. Arnaud Leroi is a Bain partner in Paris.

This article was originally published on Bain & Company's website and was republished with permission. 

Lead image: Biomass pellets via Shutterstock

Viewing Page 2 of 2

  • Previous Page
  • View All

23 Comments

Register To Comment
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
February 20, 2013
Nigel,

Thank you for your feedback.

My interest has been in equipment that disintegrates all manner of biomass into rather uniform microparticles that is described as dust. The heat of the process dries and disinfects in one step though obviously very wet material must be pretreated to remove excessive moisture.

I can only tell you the purveyors of the equipment beg for standardization of products made from the "dust" so their process will shine but for now all pellets and briquettes are not created equal.

As I mentioned on introducing the article on briqueting, I was not even aware how far the process had advanced nor how long it had been done.

I know of many looking at various products from micronized material but know of few in mass production.

Best, Terry
Nigel Morris
Nigel Morris
February 20, 2013
Terry,
thanks for that.

My experience with briquettes is that they are not immune to weather. I'd be interested in a reference that demonstrates their weatherability. I didn't get it from the Acclaim material. In the Acclaim material there was no binder, only natural lignin from within the wood was the binder/surface treatment, and I think that's common to pelletisation. So, unless the briquetting is at a significantly higher temperature and pressure such as to make that lignin weather proof I still struggle to see the material difference. But willing to learn.

Yes, pellets that we use here in Northern Ireland from the local sawmill Balcas, won't stand up to rain, but are very convenient for transport, storage and use in automated hoppers into furnaces, and seem to be functional in our wet climate.

Any time you make briquettes more durable it would appear that you do so at the cost of higher energy and CO2 expenditure in the processing, which needs to be added into the whole of life energy/CO2 accounting of the biomass derived energy. I guess it will usually be a trade off of one thing against another, and in some niches briquettes will work best and in others pelletised sawdust or chaff or stover will work out the better route.

But I agree with you, the whole life-cycle cost of energy, fossil fuel, land effects, CO2 emissions etc need to be addressed for each scenario, rather than simplistic statements like "It's biomass, it's green, so we don't need to worry about tracing the CO2 emitted".

Yours, in furious agreement.
Cheers.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
February 20, 2013
Nigel Morris,

The briquettes are denser and hardened. They can withstand rough handling and exposure to elements. They can replace coal in coal-burning plants with little or no modification.

Pellets are relatively fragile. Many here are probably familiar with presto logs made from sawdust for wood stoves or furnaces that serve their purpose very well but can crumble with exposure to the elements.

Pellets can supplement coal in power plants but cannot replace coal from my understanding in most or all coal-burning power plants.

Best, Terry
Nigel Morris
Nigel Morris
February 20, 2013
@ Terry Hallinan
Terry, what is the difference between the briquetting process and pelletisation?
They both seem to address similar issues of bulk, uniformity, energy density, transport etc. Both use heat and pressure to convert the biomass to the compressed form.
The energy and CO2 costs of both processes need to be set against the energy saved by easier transport and more effective combustion in modern furnaces to see whether either is a net benefit.
Like all things, there will be niches open for just about every form of energy generation where its particular characteristics fit a specific niche. We need to look at the energy and CO2 and fossil fuel costs and benefits over the whole life cycle of each form of generation and assess their relative merits.
Municipal waste has a role, it seems to be an easily obtained resource and combustion seems to be a better use than waiting for it to turn into methane and lose heat and other energy possibilities along the way.
Nigel Morris
Nigel Morris
February 20, 2013
@ Terry Hallinan
Terry, what is the difference between the briquetting process and pelletisation?
They both seem to address similar issues of bulk, uniformity, energy density, transport etc. Both use heat and pressure to convert the biomass to the compressed form.
The energy and CO2 costs of both processes need to be set against the energy saved by easier transport and more effective combustion in modern furnaces to see whether either is a net benefit.
Like all things, there will be niches open for just about every form of energy generation where its particular characteristics fit a specific niche. We need to look at the energy and CO2 and fossil fuel costs and benefits over the whole life cycle of each form of generation and assess their relative merits.
Municipal waste has a role, it seems to be an easily obtained resource and combustion seems to be a better use than waiting for it to turn into methane and lose heat and other energy possibilities along the way.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
February 19, 2013
Richard Rodriguez, MJMIZERA;

You and I are biomass. Some crematoriums are utilizing some of heat of cremation to generate electricity to help run the crematorium.

Even the act of cremation may offend some and I see no reason to offend but all living things are biomass.

I also think it grand to grow giant grass or willows or other "junk" trees for firewood but wouldn't it be even more desirable to burn (with or without gasification) trash, solid waste to sewage, rather than returning more sequestered carbon from fossil fuels to the surface to continue heating the planet?

I couldn't object more to the Sierra Club preferring to burn coal and other fossil fuels rather burn biomass no matter how inefficiently, to let whole forests and woodland creatures and firefighters burn and heat the planet more instead of gathering the kindling and thinning out the forests which nature itself would do over eons had it the chance to produce a mature rainforest.

Briquetting of biomass, rather than pelletizing, is more advanced and venerable than I had thought. See for instance:

http://www.acclaimcleanenergy.com/Presentation/Briquetting.pdf

The briquettes, which also can be made from even dried, disintegrated and sterilized raw sewage, could easily substitute for coal without modification in power plants.

Take care, people. You are on the side of the angels but the Sierra Club is often on the other side with the fossil fuel purveyors.

Best, Terry
Richard Rodriguez
Richard Rodriguez
February 19, 2013
Please review Viaspace Inc and their biomass grass Giant King Grass. Several deals are already under way to supply 6 mw and other power plants with a dedicated feedstock. A sister company under the name Viaspace Green Energy is also located in Guangdond China BTW. Biomass grass can certainly compete with wood and corn stover as a dedicated feedstock in many regards.
email me at richard@richrodriguezcpa.com
MARTIN MIZERA
MARTIN MIZERA
February 19, 2013
Terry,
It's up to us how long we let ourselves be manipulated.
A part of the Sierra Club stance is the fact that the biomass is being incinerated through the steam process. If we use it, let's use it wisely, so that we don't get painted with a broad brush.
And - cutting trees vs. biomass ? You guys have quaint ideas.
MARTIN MIZERA
MARTIN MIZERA
February 19, 2013
John, write us at info@bioleux.eu
John Christie
John Christie
February 19, 2013
Anumakonda... What are the China sources of biomass to power systems? Contacts? For that matter, to all readers, who has commercial biomass to power systems available in the 0.5 to 2.0 mW range? I'm looking for capex, yield by feedstock type, and operatin costs...This all changing fast, as does the demand especially in off-grid hydro and natural gas areas....
Best to all...John
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
February 19, 2013
MARTIN,

"Terry, Not to be a pest, but no one worries about CO2 from biomass. It's called renewable."

Were it so.

Here in the Northeast U.S., a study supported by the Sierra Club fueled a crisis over biomass power that is still ongoing.

The originators and authors of the Manomet study now say they didn't really, truly mean biomass was worse than coal but that is what they said it could be. And not only was construction held up and permits held in abeyance but the EPA got involved and and disinformation goes on.

In Syria today, large old trees are cut down for fire wood in their dire emergency but no sane person in Massachusetts or New Hampshire or Vermont or wherever is going to cut down valuable stately old trees for firewood.

And so more coal is being burned because of that dreadful biomass. And so more natural gas is being burned because biomass is dreadfully awful and we need peaking power for the unreliable wind and solar. Need I go on?

Be a pest. :-)

I think it better people discuss differences of opinion rather than talk only to themselves and their fellow cultists. Obviously we have considerable areas of agreement but what's the point of singing from the same hymnal if we want to learn anything?

JMO.

Best, Terry
MARTIN MIZERA
MARTIN MIZERA
February 19, 2013
Terry,
Not to be a pest, but no one worries about CO2 from biomass.
It's called renewable.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
February 19, 2013
MJMIZERA,

"The point is, you can't clean flue gas efficiently but you can lean the intermediate medium - syngas. When you burn that, you don't have to worry about emissions."

You never heard of CO2? Lots of people worry about that.

Besides the little matter that only J.C. and his mother were absolutely pure but he wrote the book on that.

And that gasification is a venerable technology that is incorporated into most all biomass power plants last I heard.

"you can't clean flue gas efficiently"

I don't want to. Worst job I ever had for a short time was cleaning dirty barges. I was not efficient at all. Anybody would be better. I took way too much work home with me.

Take care, M. I think you are on the wrong track but time will tell.

Best, Terry
MARTIN MIZERA
MARTIN MIZERA
February 19, 2013
Dear Terry,
The article is about burning/incineration and the 300 year-old steam cycle.
The gas is immediately cleaned and burned (yes, burned) in efficient gas turbines or gensets.
The point is, you can't clean flue gas efficiently but you can lean the intermediate medium - syngas. When you burn that, you don't have to worry about emissions.
Regards, m
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
February 19, 2013
MJMIZERA,

"Another misguided summary from the "what else we can burn" crowd.
Put it through your head that burning ANYTHING is BAD...Now try to compare burning biomass (what a waste !) to simple & clean distributed gasification methods and hang your head in shame."

What do you do with the gas?

Gasification is a standard feature of most biomass power plants.

And emissions remain a problem if not addressed appropriately.

Best, Terry
MARTIN MIZERA
MARTIN MIZERA
February 19, 2013
Another misguided summary from the "what else we can burn" crowd.
Put it through your head that burning ANYTHING is BAD.
On the attached costs vs. benefits diagram - where are EMISSIONS ?
And, compared to alternative technologies, you obtain only a fraction of electricity that you can get otherwise.
Being a technology superior to burning coal is not that virtuous any more, it's not the 80's. Now try to compare burning biomass (what a waste !) to simple & clean distributed gasification methods and hang your head in shame.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
February 19, 2013
as-aha,

"exactly if anyone uses pellet in many MW plant most likely they loundrying some tax money"

I know of not one large biomass power plant that burns only wood pellets. There are many that burn only wood chips.

The wood pellets have traditionally been used to supplement coal.

Newer torrified briquettes may entirely replace coal but the technology is new.

Wood is far from the only biomass but gets most of the press.

The city dump or landfill is a more desirable source of biomass than agriculture but politicians are beholden to large agricultural interests.

Best, Terry
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
February 19, 2013
Randy Krillion,

"Solar is the most sustainable form of energy generation"

Solar is an expensive fop compared to geothermal.

Bill Gates had some acid comments on solar power. The interviewer asked Gates if that meant there would be no solar panels on the Gates mansion. The reply was that the rich could do what they wished. Seemed it was a matter of prestige rather than environmentalism or economic wisdom to show off the solar installations.

Lowered costs and government intervention have changed the picture for homeowners but solar remains a weak sister - a hindrance to environmentalism rather than a help since it blocks renewable baseload initiatives and encourages use of dirty fossil fuels.

The same is true of Gates' favored wind power.

Best, Terry
Randy Krillion
Randy Krillion
February 18, 2013
Solar is the most sustainable form of energy generation in the midterm,followed by some wind, geothermal and Hydro if done right, so lets focus on how to bring those to the market. Biomass can be added to this mix only when waste and strictly managed forestry is considered. cultivation of land, even "marginal" is not sustainable. These mix is more than enough to provide for all our energy needs, so lets focus on that.
Richard Rodriguez
Richard Rodriguez
February 16, 2013
More likely to evolve will be direct combustion converted coal plants with adjacent plantations such as is
being offered by Viapsace and their highly touted biomass Giant King Grass TM. Subsidies have a long way to go but a biomass like GKG harvestable the first year planted and capable of celluistic ethanol production has the potential to compete and maybe replace corn stover as the ethanol of choice. Believe me pellets are viable but just more costly with additonal shipping costs and pelletizing equpment. Already in the Caribbean and growing in Hawaii keep your eye on Viaspace Inc.. Watch it grow!
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
February 16, 2013
Apart from Biomass,Biofuel has a major role in Energy Mix.
Hitherto Ethanol and Biofuel are obtained from Sugarcane and Corn. There is a debate on Food Vs Fuel. The Alternative is Biofuel from Agave which is a care-free growth plant and which can be raised in Waste Lands without affecting acreage of Corn and Sugar cane. More over Agave is a CAM Plant. Another option is growing 'Opuntia'in Vacant lands for Biofuel and subsequent power generation. Commercial Biogas generators for power are available from China.
Especially developing countries can benefit much by growing 'Agave' and 'Opuntia' in waste lands in a big way.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
As Aha
As Aha
February 15, 2013
exactly if anyone uses pellet in many MW plant most likely they loundrying some tax money
Paul Ervin
Paul Ervin
February 15, 2013
Again...another article on this website that totally misses the gains made in Biomass use in California. CA burns more than 2,000,000 tons of biomass annually to produce power and and offset coal. We have been co-firing with coal for many years now. And pellets? Really? Pellets increase the price of this fuel to the point where you need subsidies. This biomass industry has been surviving on recycled wood wastes (yes I said wastes) since the late eighties with little public support.

If you would like the inside story on the real biomass industry already established here in the states contact me.

Again before posting these "new ideas" do your research.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets
  • 1
    Goldman Sachs to Invest $486 Million in Japan Renewable Energy
  • 1
    Outlook for US Energy Independence Gaining Confidence

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • The Stella Group, Ltd.
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • RussTech Language Services, Inc.
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Rotork plc
  • Stoel Rives LLP
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information