Sign-In  or  Create a Free Account
Sign-in with:
 
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
 
Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

A Cooler Way to Protect Silicon Surfaces

By David Chandler, MIT
February 13, 2013   |   5 Comments
New room-temperature process could lead to less expensive solar cells and other electronic devices.

Do you like this research?

 
 
5 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 5
February 13, 2013
One problem with the article that seems to permeate many articles about solar, and that is grid parity. People are getting sucked into thinking clean energy has to be cost competitive when the companies running the grid are allowed to destroy the environment. Charge them the $50 billion to clean up after Sandy and solar will be much more competitive. Capitalism will ensure that research in the solar area continues because capitalism requires companies to look for better ways to do things.
No image available
Comment
2 of 5
Anonymous
February 14, 2013
One problem with v-bruce-stenswick's remark is that no credible scientist would stand behind the assertion of a clear cause-effect between the storm Sandy and what conventional power companies do. Only political climate-activism accounts for such claims.
Comment
3 of 5
February 14, 2013
Anonymous,
Would you make the same assertion regarding medical conditions like Asthma for example? It isn't a coincidence that a relatively unknown medical condition 50 to 60 years ago is now rampant. I'm sure my health insurance company would be happy to have just 25% of Asthma ER visits and medications paid by the local utility.

I'm not a credible scientist but I'm certainly a credible engineer who has produced excellent product decisions based on 99% certainty.

By the way did you work for the tobacco industry 40 years ago?
Comment
4 of 5
February 14, 2013
LeeCalhoun, It is a non-sequitur, wrt the present point, to bring in other possible economic externalities, but my answer is, 'No, I would probably not and neither do I need to.' A similar lack of logical reasoning attaches to your parting question; it is logically irrelevant to the point at hand. But for the record, I am a retired electrical engineer who practised in the field of semiconductors, such as the technology discussed above for silicon solar cells. rogerw , aka, anonymous above
Comment
5 of 5
February 14, 2013
Goodness, you don't need to drag in Sandy (though I applaud the effort). There are quite enough indisputable effects of fossil power generation to go around. Coal-fired power is the largest source of airborne mercury, you've got coal mining operations destroying ecosystems, including rivers, slurry ponds creating toxic hazards of leaching and dam failures, and oh my what a source of CO2! Don't even work up a sweat, v-bruce-stenswick. "Hidden" externalized costs are absolutely legitimate concerns, and the reason that many/most renewables are already at grid parity. Just because faulty accounting is traditional doesn't make it accurate. Fossils gotta go.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

SolarEdge Technologies Natural Power Festo Schletter Inc. Westinghouse Solar OnGrid Solar American Solar Energy Society
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters