The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

1366 Technologies Opens New Factory, Paves Road to Cheaper Solar PV

James Montgomery, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
February 01, 2013  |  17 Comments

Continuing the crusade to lower solar manufacturing costs, this week 1366 Technologies officially opened its new manufacturing site in Bedford, Mass., a 42,000 square foot facility with 25-megawatt capacity. The site just across the road from fellow solar company Spire, is part of the company's ambitious plans to remove a major chunk of costs and processes out of the solar manufacturing chain, beginning at the very start of the process: the wafer itself.

In a speech kicking off the open house event, Massachusetts Lieutenant Governor Tim Murray reviewed the state's renewable energy trajectory: 11% growth in clean energy jobs in 2012, five thousand companies operating, more than 70,000 700,000 workers, over 190 MW of total solar power capacity (well ahead of the goal of 250 MW by 2017), and solar project development in all but 9 of its 350 towns and cities. 1366 Technologies represents the nexus of the state's desire to work with and support a clean energy industry that will bring both jobs and help power its citizens and businesses.

The new facility's 25-MW capacity (1366 execs said it can actually support up to 20 MW) translates to about 6 million wafers/year. Right now 1366 expects 1-MW of output this year (in the "low 10s of thousands" of wafers) as it debugs and perfects its machines, according to company CTO Ely Sachs who led a tour inside the facility. Next year's target is 10 MW, and then 100 MW the following year — at which point it hopes to be moving into a new 1-GW facility.

The Technology

Today's multicrystalline silicon solar wafers are made by melting chunks of the material in a large quartz crucible (~2 foot long and a foot deep); once the material is molded and cooled it is chopped into a rectangular block and sawed into individual wafers, a process that uses a lot of slurry and wires and results in much wasted material. 1366 uses a much shallower container for its silicon melt, according to Sachs, from which a single wafer is produced on the top; it is subsequently laser-trimmed to a standard 156 × 156 mm size. Sachs wouldn't divulge the company's secret to creating a wafer from the shallow melt, but alluded to an "a-ha" moment about overcoming molten silicon's tendency to bead up vs. making it stick to the mold.

1366's value proposition is to "sell the world's best wafer" with added value including texturing, but made at a fraction of the cost, with better uniformity and performance specifications, summed up CEO Frank van Mierlo in an interview following the open-house. Bottom line: the company says it can reduce silicon costs across the board by to just a third of today's costs: 1/3 off of standard processing, 1/3 the labor, and 1/3 the consumables. Even if silicon prices are a fraction what they were a few years ago, any way to squeeze out more costs — while not altering processes or quality elsewhere in the value chain — still resonates.

Much of 1366's processes, and the equipment to perform them, were invented and created in-house: patterning the wafers with a low-cost polymer, and a wet etch chemistry for texturization are both proprietary, for example. (Diffusion processing is standard, as is metallization/screen printing.) There's an in-house machine shop with a fulltime operator, plus the company outsources some equipment work.

The company also has invested in a lot of characterization capabilities, to quickly get information about the cells made on its wafers; qualification information is obtainable within minutes from when a wafer is made, as opposed to sending out product and getting back results in weeks or even months. "That's a big part of what we do," noted Sachs, because it can indicate whether to go slightly heavier or lighter on a particular gas in the process, or raise/lower the temperature by five degrees, to come up with a different electrical characteristic in the final product. Analyzing the wafer's resistivity can lead to adjusting the dopant that goes into the silicon, for example.

Besides helping 1366 learn how to build a better end product, quick in-house characterization feedback also provides "feed-forward" information to the company's solar-cell customers, who typically tune their processes anyway to accommodate even minor variances in wafers; they can "spin less of their wheels and get to a sweetspot" in process efficiency, Sachs said.

1366 says it has created solar cells with 17 percent efficiency in customer trials, which it deems "industry average." During the facility tour Sachs pointed to current examination of one cell at 17.5 efficiency. For historical reference: 1366 achieved 14 percent cell efficiencies in August 2010, 15 percent in July 2011, and 16 percent in March of last year. Having in-house solar-cell-making capabilities, including characterization, is basically a quality-control effort, but it also "has allowed us to progress much faster," he said.

Scaling Up

Right now 1366 is putting "finishing touches" on what it calls its "Generation-1" equipment, improving upon its previous work on early "Generation-0" tools in which many processes are in sequence — for example, a wafer is cooled in the same physical space in which it is made, creating a bottleneck for the next wafer, Sachs explained. Gen-1 improvements will focus on automating the process, with processes done in parallel; as in the previous example, a wafer is created and then moves to a different cooling system. Separating the steps also will let the company better tweak the process control for each step, he added. The company is already putting together design elements for the next Generation 2 equipment (target date: up and running in 18 months) that will have the same production capacity as Gen-1 but with streamlined design elements and fully automated production that is six times faster, Sachs said.

1366 has accumulated roughly $47 million in equity backing, with VC partners including North Bridge, Polaris, and Ventizz, plus an investment from Korea's Hanwha Chemical. It also has had a $150 million DOE loan guarantee in its back pocket since Sept. 2011, but is reserving that money for when it is ready to build its second facility with 1 GW capacity. Among the key criteria for that DOE-backed loan is that the technology "works flawlessly," it has "firm customer commitments at prices which are profitable," and that it gets private investors to match the loan dollar-for-dollar, explained van Mierlo. All those should come together by the first half of next year, he said.

The real yardstick of success will be how 1366's technology translates to a production-environment scale. The new 25-MW facility is basically a "proving ground" — the real proof will be how it scales up in the next 1-GW factory, assuming all criteria are met to get there. van Mierlo lays out 1366's true argument here: Today a fully loaded cost of legacy wafers is $0.29/W, vs. a sales price of only about $0.20/W, i.e. it's a money-losing proposition. Once 1366 ramps in its big 1-GW factory, it will deliver a wafer cost of $0.10/W, a third of today's fully loaded cost, he said.

In his own opening comments at the open house, van Mierlo said the opening of this new facility puts the company on a "three-year runway" to prove its technology and business. In a follow-up interview he declined to offer specifics about the company's actual revenues now, but he did note the company has been cash-flow-positive from operations for the past three years. "We have real cash commitments," he said, which in fact paid for this new $6 million facility. The eventual 1-GW factory would be a profitable operation from the start, he added. "Financially, we're in really good shape."

Lead image: 1366 Technologies wafer after metallization, in the company's new facility in Bedford, Mass.

17 Comments

Register To Comment
Michael Eugene Andrews
Michael Eugene Andrews
February 23, 2013
"1366's value proposition is to 'sell the world's best wafer' with added value including texturing, but made at a fraction of the cost, with better uniformity and performance specifications, summed up CEO Frank van Mierlo in an interview following the open-house. Bottom line: the company says it can reduce silicon costs across the board by to just a third of today's costs: 1/3 off of standard processing, 1/3 the labor, and 1/3 the consumables. Even if silicon prices are a fraction what they were a few years ago, any way to squeeze out more costs — while not altering processes or quality elsewhere in the value chain — still resonates.

Much of 1366's processes, and the equipment to perform them, were invented and created in-house: patterning the wafers with a low-cost polymer, and a wet etch chemistry for texturization are both proprietary, for example. (Diffusion processing is standard, as is metallization/screen printing.) There's an in-house machine shop with a fulltime operator, plus the company outsources some equipment work."

We agree.
Rick Schwerdtfeger
Rick Schwerdtfeger
February 12, 2013
I wonder if it is too much trouble to clear the snow, or too much trouble to do the cost-benefit analysis calculations? They could easily look at data to understand the cost of lost energy from snow cover, and compare it with how much it would cost to hire and train some local un-employed workers at a reasonable rate to clear the snow. Obviously the calculations must take into account the upcoming weather report to know if it would quickly melt off (or blow off) on its own. But these are all very easy calculations to do.
Joe Zorzin
Joe Zorzin
February 12, 2013
Rick, in the case of the solar "farm" near me- it has something like 14,000 panels- covering 17.5 acres, so I suppose they consider it too much trouble to clear the snow.
Rick Schwerdtfeger
Rick Schwerdtfeger
February 11, 2013
Joe-Zorzin: Depending on the PV panel and array wiring design, shading can be a very significant problem, as you stated. And snow cover obviously shades at least part of the panel. If I owned the PV array, I would simply including brooming-off the panels as part of my normal snow removal routine. This is a great example of a situation that industry nay-sayers will use to show why PV is not a good solution... to which I say, "What's the big deal? Just get out a broom (and ladder if needed) and burn off a couple hundred calories clearing your PV array!" What we really need is universal (aka national) laws allowing isolated use of PV arrays during power outages so homeowners/businesses can use the power during a power outage. So let it snow, let it snow, let it snow (then bust out the broom)!
James Montgomery
James Montgomery
February 11, 2013
davidcarl #10 and rick-schwerdtfeger-41165 #11: correct, he meant costs are reduced to a third of conventional costs, i.e. a 2/3 reduction. I've corrected this in the text, thanks for pointing out the confusion.

greg-eisenberg #1 and joe-zorzin #2: No specific numbers about energy efficiency but Frank noted how energy-intensive the typical silicon making process is, and that 1366's energy payback is less than a year. For this new facility they are making what he called a "huge investment" in recycling heat and "moving huge quantities" of hot and cold air, but didn't specify numbers in either case. They also want to have a prominent solar install on the property at some point, with modules using their own wafers of course, but this won't happen until such modules are commercially available.
Joe Zorzin
Joe Zorzin
February 10, 2013
Off topic- but, since some knoweldable people are reading this thread, and I'm not one of them- but I live near a solar "farm"- I'm curious about the technology. My question for the day is- what happens when it snows? After the blizzard, I just walked "the farm" and noticed that about half the surface of the panels is still covered with snow 2 days after the storm. I recall at planning board meetings that the builders said they needed to cut trees at the edge because any shade at all on the panels would be a big problem- any shade would cause the shaded panel to stop working- and all the other panels connected to that pannel would also stop producing. I believe this is older technology- they're wired up like Xmas tree lights. Also, if they're so worried about shade from a tree, what happens if a dark cloud goes over and temporarily shades some panels?
Rick Schwerdtfeger
Rick Schwerdtfeger
February 8, 2013
Davidcarl, the CEO meant the cost can come down to 1/3 of its present value. Hope this clarifies.
David Carl
David Carl
February 6, 2013
At the beginning of the article the 1366 CEO says cost can be reduced by 1/3. The production cost of 29 cents per watt quoted in the article would mean 1366 could produce wafers at a cost of roughly 20 cents per watt. At the end of the article the CEO claims a production cost of 10 cents per watt. Which is correct?
Sheila Rekdal
Sheila Rekdal
February 4, 2013
I understand that Germany is surgging ahead in developing a solar home project. It is obvious that there is a viable Solar capability. I saw it in the 70's at Western Washington State U. Then we got Reagan the Exxon President and we have had Oil money buying the White House ever since. I know the technology exists....the Oil Corps bought it up and now we are having to rediscover the 'Wheel'.
James Montgomery
James Montgomery
February 4, 2013
Anon #3: Indeed I fatfingered the number for workers, should be just north of 70k. (His follow-up quote was "five times the population of Bedford.") But that, and the number of clean-energy companies operating in Mass (5k), are from the Mass Clean Energy Center: http://masscec.com/index.cfm/page/2012-Massachusetts-Clean-Energy-Industry-Report/cdid/13909/pid/11170. Their numbers are qualified as being broadly in "clean energy," defined as involved in or related to "renewable energy, energy efficiency, alternative transportation, and carbon management."
Eric Yue
Eric Yue
February 3, 2013
'1366 says it has created solar cells with 17 percent efficiency in customer trials, which it deems 'industry average.'
17 percent efficiency is not good enough since multicrystalline Si solar cell efficiency has been higher than 17.3 percent on average somewhere.And laser-trimmed to a standard 156 × 156 mm size could be viable for industry manufacturing but probably very slowly.
Sheila Rekdal
Sheila Rekdal
February 3, 2013
"another Massachusetts has been already figured that out with their string ribbon manufacturing process and look where it got them: bankruptcy."
Is there another Massachusetts? I am unable to understand what you are saying. Were you invested in a company that went bankrupt? Well that has happened many times before. Take Arbusto Oil company that George W Bush ran into the ditch and one of the bin Ladens bailed him out. There are also no tax subsidies that are being generously handed out to the Solar Startups like the Oil Corporations still enjoy. It is time to get positive about the Solar Future.
Gilbert Good
Gilbert Good
February 2, 2013
Evergreen, another Massachusetts company has already figured that out with their string ribbon manufacturing process and look where it got them: bankruptcy. They couldn't even sell their idle plant with the wonderful equipment.
Sheila Rekdal
Sheila Rekdal
February 2, 2013
This is the Future. This technology is still in its infancy and to get it up to speed we will have to redo the grid so that all of our buildings become producers rather than just consumers of fossil fuels, we will have to use the fossil fuels to get us there. Then the fossil fuels can be retired and our power can be harvested from the sun. This needs all of our support. Have you taken a look at the Alberta Tarsands....this is the logical realistic alternative if we want to continue living on this planet with the human population that is increasing exponentially.
ANONYMOUS
February 2, 2013
Either there are serious typos in this article, or Lieutenant Governor Murray is feeding the press baloney. There are a total of about 3,250,000 jobs in Massachusetts. It's ludicrous on the face of it to claim that 700,000 of them, or over 1 in 5, are in renewable energy. In fact, there are only some 100,000+ solar energy jobs nationwide. Go back and check your facts, James. Likewise, the assertion that there are 5,000 renewable energy companies operating in Massachusetts is patently absurd.
Joe Zorzin
Joe Zorzin
February 2, 2013
presumably the roof of the facility is covered with solar panels?
Joe
Greg Eisenberg
Greg Eisenberg
February 2, 2013
I wonder what the energy consumption of the new facility is, and where their energy is coming from.

it would be great if the author could add that information.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
James Montgomery

James Montgomery

Jim is Associate Editor for RenewableEnergyWorld.com, covering the solar and wind beats. He previously was news editor for Solid State Technology and Photovoltaics World, and has covered semiconductor manufacturing and related industries,...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 55
    Energy Expert Predicts Solar Could Upend Major Utility in California on Price
  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Solar FlexRack
  • SRECTrade, Inc.
  • Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
  • Fairtrade-Messe
  • 2GreenEnergy.com
  • SolarReviews
  • SolPowerPeople, Inc.
  • Green Power Conferences
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information