Denver Nicks, Associate Editor, Power Engineering
January 22, 2013
|
10 Comments
In a wide-ranging inaugural address that touched on themes from income inequality to gay marriage to Medicare, President Obama devoted a substantial segment to reaffirming his commitment to combating climate change and investing in the development of what he termed "sustainable" sources of energy.
Insisting that the failure to respond to the threat of climate change “would betray our children and future generations,” the president invoked economic necessity in calling for renewed American investment in “sustainable energy” sources.
“Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms," he said. "The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition; we must lead it. We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries – we must claim its promise. That is how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure — our forests and waterways, our croplands and snowcapped peaks."
The focus on “sustainable energy” could please some environmental activists, many of whom have been disappointed with a perceived lack of action on climate change by the president followed by a presidential campaign in which climate change was hardly mentioned as an issue. The emphasis on “sustainable energy” may, however, raise some eyebrows in the energy sector, as the language could be interpreted as a departure from the president’s stated “all of the above” energy strategy.
This article was originally published on Power Engineering and was republished with permission.
Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options
January 27, 2013
It is called d a Thorium Liquid Reactor
Can't Melt Down>> Fuel can't burn
Can't be diverted for Bombs
Extremely simple, no heavy redundancy,
Small size
Very cheap to produce
Virtually all the fuel is burned instead of 1% current reactors
Can be used to burn existing radioactive material
Thorium very cheap and very abundant
By products produced needed for medical and NASA explorers produced etc
No additional mining needed
Thorium Co located with rare earths currently cannot be mined due to thorium presents
Solves green house gas issues
$30K Thorium = 1/2 billion in electricity
Thorium enrichment not needed
Thorium reactors work at ambient pressure i.e, no explosions
Technology proven with working reactor in 1960s
Go to this link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecoci4vEbzo
Brief overview from 17 out of 32 presentations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWUeBSoEnRk&list=PL098D071EE5755361
We have the solution but the coal and oil and existing reactor industries will fight it.
We are falling behind cause China and India are going full blast on this technology
Congress is setting on its butt while the world moves forward