The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

First Solar, Intermolecular Pushing Thin-film Solar PV Materials R&D

Speeding up R&D of solar PV materials and processes keeps up the pace for module efficiency gains.

James Montgomery, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
January 08, 2013  |  14 Comments

First Solar is arguably the leader in thin-film solar photovoltaics (PV). It's relentlessly inched up conversion efficiencies of its cadmium-telluride (CdTe) technology, while chipping away at manufacturing costs (now at $0.67, reported in November).

The current NREL-confirmed record holder for CdTe at 14.4% total area efficiency and 17.3% cell efficiency, First Solar's module efficiency in production in November 2012 was 12.7% (average), and its roadmap (last updated Dec. 2011) projects a goal of 14.5%-15.0% average efficiency for production modules by the end of 2015. In the company's 3Q12 earnings presentation, CEO Jim Hughes noted the company has begun "seeing significant progress" in heavy investments in R&D to improve its technology and meet — or beat — its existing roadmap. That includes a new laser scribing process to improve module active area loss (rollout completed by mid-2013); modifications to deposition of semiconductor absorber material (full-volume production beginning in mid-2013); a module design change to reduce active area losses and improve uniformity (rolled out in 2H13); and improvements to the back-contact of the module (high-volume rollout in 2H14).

In the same presentation, CFO Mark Widmar pointed out that the 12.7% module efficiency in 3Q12 was one quarter ahead of schedule, with "best" line module efficiency reaching 13.2%. That efficiency, once moved into FSLR's lowest-cost plant, will push module costs down to $0.59/W.

Note that conventional crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar PV modules generally achieve efficiencies in the high-teens or even low-20% range. Thin-film counters its significantly lower efficiency with better performance in high-insolation environments. Anything thin-film PV manufacturers can do to close that efficiency gap with c-Si would be an immense advantage. And in fact, "there's a lot of headroom" to improve thin-film PV performance, which is "really in its infancy" compared to c-Si, explained Sandeep Nijhawan, VP/GM of Intermolecular's clean energy group.

Improving the technology isn't easy, though. Historically the learning curve for module efficiency improvements has been a tenth of a percent or two per quarter, including at First Solar. To keep on a scale of reducing costs (especially in this pricing-pressured market), the name of the game is to accelerate that learning curve. For First Solar that comes down to improving its manufacturing processes.

"The life of glass is what it is; the incoming CdTe material is what it is; formfactors are what they are; and they already have capacity," explained Sandeep Nijhawan, VP/GM of Intermolecular's clean energy group. "The only answer left is to do materials innovation, and make a better solar cell."

That's where Intermolecular comes in with a promise of much faster R&D evaluation of materials, structures, and processes. Its "High Productivity Combinatorial" (HPC) platform divides a substrate into "coupons" each a few cm square — it says it can process 220 unique solar cells per coupon — to enable "massively parallel experimentation on the same substrate," Nijhawan explained. Multiple sets of solar cells thus can be canvassed and evaluated anywhere from 10× to 100× faster than in conventional R&D.

Without going into the specifics of what it's doing with First Solar, Nijhawan explained that essentially thin-film PV is a diode, a complex marriage of materials and interfaces; Intermolecular and its platform "optimize certain processes within that stack." He also wouldn't specify the acceleration number it's achieved for First Solar, except to say that a 10× faster workflow wouldn't have been worth it. In a PR statement, First Solar CTO Raffi Garabedian said the Intermolecular program "targets disruptive advances in our module performance, which will be additive to our current roadmap," which he said "will bear fruit in the coming years."

First Solar and Intermolecular formally tied up in June 2012. By year's end, just six months into the partnership, they had generated novel IP which First Solar licensed, according to Nijhawan, and have now extended their partnership into a two-year collaboration and licensing agreement.

Aside from CdTe thin-film PV, Intermolecular also is working with the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) to help enhance its copper-indium-gallium-diselenide (CIGS) thin-film PV technology. The company also quietly does some work on crystalline silicon, but most of its efforts are focused on thin-film PV, Nijhawan said. Also within its Clean Energy applications, it is working with Guardian Industries, the largest North American glass company and the world’s largest producer of coated glass products, on improved glass-coating applications to help reduce energy consumed in heating and cooling of residential and commercial buildings. Some other areas of focus it's pursuing are in light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and flat-panel display (FPD) manufacturing, to similarly test out and find key improvements in materials and processes.

14 Comments

Register To Comment
harold Watters
harold Watters
March 12, 2013
Gregors Said
"the standards themselves set by industry seem to also slow down significant rises in most production models"

This goes toward the point I was trying to make! Engineers don't mess anything up - They are TOLD to mess things up.

Industry goal is no longer to produce the better product but to do just BARELY good enough to SLIGHTLY pass the previous model (although engineers know how to surpas it by a large margin)

Society is doomed to progress at a snails pace as long as we rely on the profit motive as incentive.
Gregory L Smith
Gregory L Smith
March 12, 2013
It could be a valid argument, except that every time components get to the testing phase, it is testing that shows manufacturer lacks and the standards themselves set by industry seem to also slow down significant rises in most production models, as warranties and livetimes are on the line, which goes towards bankability under new rules that are critical about long term survivability forecasts. Who will make up the difference if systems fail? The Certifying authority or the producer/manufacturer? What happens if a system is restructured after-market to over-perform? Which activity receives the reward? Just the consumer? Surely not...
harold Watters
harold Watters
March 9, 2013
Daunting registration just to leave a comment? I guess this site REALLY does not want comments. That explains only 11 comments

I want to comment on the phrase "Disruptive Advances" This is a highly technical sounding phrase that really means
"Hide the new advancements until we can not get anyone to buy this current crap"

This is just another clear statement that shows this company is part of a great solar producer company Cartel that allows only a small amount of advancement per year.
This kind of CONSPIRACY seems sensible to the producers because they are afraid that some producer will come up with a 10% advancement and throw it out on the market in large quantity therefore shutting down all other producers.

It is the same strategy as "THE great lightbulb conspiracy"

This is why thin film technology has been in the news for AMAZING advancements for the last 20+ years YET THE consumer NEVER sees these advancements.

PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE comes in many forms and DRAGGING the feet of technology is just one form of it.

There is an exact amount that each solar panel producer is allowed to advance each year and no more - if they do produce more Watts per dollar than their nitch is allowed they will be fined by the organization.

Corporations world wide are controled in this fashion across every industry. It keeps profits stable while slowing technology to the speed of profits.

Watch "LIghtbulb conspiracy" on youtube

if you wonder why lightbulbs never advanced over a life of 1,000 hours
you probably wondered why solar panels throughout the industry advance at a rate that is very very close to the same DOLLAR PER WATT

Advancement is slow because advancement is controled.
Gregory L Smith
Gregory L Smith
March 5, 2013
More and more I believe the issue with most solar cells is the throughput and the cascading electron effect that is somehow being highjacked by heat release instead of absorption as electrons. I saw that Alta New Record of 28% efficiency with their Gallium Aresenide combo waifer, and yet, it seems like they are not getting all the frequency of light they could, so NREL and Berkley NREL as well as MIT, need to offer some more intensive guidance in how to eke-out the next new record breaking production model. We are still seeing more cost and not much gain, albeit, the indoor-outdoor value of solar is definitely the better passive electrical solution to companies that can use it architecturally to add to their bottom line in design and longevity, since the panels last longer inside a closed environment and as a wall cover, could afford value if sunlight is a usual disadvantage for them via sun facing windows and the need for solar passive lighting at night or after hours at least. This definitely can fill some of those nitches of structural benefit and do so attractively both in appeal and in design functions. I just want to see more emphasis in finding the hidden electron cascades we are missing in solar cell production, instead of the trickle that has come fairly easily so far. Concentrated Solar is now in the comfortable 30% range, but the added cost for them still prices them out of many applications for their technology along with the directional needs they have, and the thin films have yet to prove they can effectively last longer than 10 years in severe environments. Just a few Oklahoma winters can destroy most of them, especially followed by blazing summers of high heat and humidity. I wish them all better outputs and a better cell for us to apply.
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
March 2, 2013
They need to be able to stand out from what Alta Devices has coming down the pipeline. And perhaps, this move by First Solar is in response to what Alta is doing with their Galluim Arsenide Solar panels (potential 40 to 60% efficiency).

http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play;_ylt=A0S00MyvmjJR2k0A3Lz7w8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTBvbXQ4Y2xxBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDdmlkBHZ0aWQDVjEzNw--?p=citrus+really+high+efficiency+solar+cells&vid=12a70ec11a949361f8cf59655ec63973&l=27%3A21&turl=http%3A%2F%2Fts3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DV.4595452734472370%26pid%3D15.1&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DgyT8nel0O9E&tit=3.+Really+High+Efficiency+Solar+Cells&c=0&sigr=11absa7k6&fr=yfp-t-200&tt=b
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
February 28, 2013
Forrest Jones raises important questions; the responses illustrate the problem. Almost entirely, PV manufacturers offer their solution; they rarely offer integrated solutions even for obvious cases like ground mount daisies. Imagine Honda, instead of offering portable generators only offered an alternator with an junction box. Solar, in its infancy, is perhaps a little infantile, but then, it took Benz a while to start selling a vehicle with the engine. The BIPV market is virtually unsupported, solar security lights being the sole widely deployed architectural fixture.
With much modern construction utilizing glass wall facades, it can't be hard to incorporate PV. There are a few exceptions e.g. PV elements incorporated into skylights and windows (transit termials & bus shelters). While environmental resistance of interconnects is an issue for conventional panels, glass wall integration could obviate this problem. Note that Forrest is willing to pay a premium for PV sheathing with a healthy portion of cost already committed in the construction budget - glass, sealing, framing and installation already paid for. Merely bolting solar panels to a finished exterior does not constitute building INTEGRATED installation. For rooftop installations, there is frequent discussion of 'penetration' making it patently obvious that integration has nothing to do with it. Forrest has an important point w.r.t. form factor: construction needs sheathing material in dimensions which meet architectural requirements. Note to would-be BIPV suppliers: their house, their rules. Since not all sheathing locations provide an opportunity for PV, BIPV suppliers must supply matching blank and shapeable sheathing. For high-rise and commercial as well as residential in some regions, exterior materials, particularly glazing, must conform to code (strength, breakup properties, etc)(fired any 2x4s at your panel?) and provide suitable R values.
TF may have a play when they can do selective deposition.
Gregory L Smith
Gregory L Smith
January 22, 2013
MIT has done some very interesting things with the silicon portion of the waifers and this could make the efficiency of these cell components much cheaper since the weight and cost of design offers
significant advantages over conventional waifer production.
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/light-trapping-0613.html

This new breakthrough then could increase the efficiency of the Cadmium Telliuride solar cell to about 25-34% efficiency, thus creating a very attractive and easily scalable module for mass production for commercial as well as residential solar modules.

Since the thickness isn't as deep, the components could be attached to Graphene substrates, thus creating the solid surface that Silicon offers without the price of production. Also, the Graphene substrate also will offer a contribution to the efficiency and then you have a super cell of significant efficiencies at a very low price break, perhaps less than $.32 per watt...Making it enormously available in solar markets worldwide...so do not ignore this important breakthrough! Stay tuned! ~ Gregor Smith OFFER SUN
John Nistler
John Nistler
January 10, 2013
Forest, I also wanted to mention there are some new technologies related to c-si that we are incorporating. Biggest change due to the technology is temp coeff of Pmax at only -0.27%/C similar to the - 0.24%/C of thin films technology.

The alpha panels without optical or electronic enhancement start at 18.1% efficiency with Beta panels coming in at 18.1 or 18.4%.
John Nistler
John Nistler
January 10, 2013
Hi Forrest, during 2012 we looked at offering a true BIPV product but decided instead to offer the DIY PVac panel system that would simplify installation significantly and essentially eliminate up front engineering analysis trying to optimize solar power production. The System works as a single or multiple panel setup with DC optimization, electrical storage and DC to AC conversion all on one panel with flush mount capability on pitched roof and low angle for flat roofs. The system utilizes optical and electronic optimization to reduce the impact of solar tilt and East/West sun orientation.

PSIDA is posting data under our photo gallery as we progress and around the 15th will be offering alpha panels through a kickstarter design project for the DIY Rooftop Testbed project. If you are interested in the alpha panels, you can sign up for emails from us as we set up the project. www.psida.webs.com
Forrest Jones
Forrest Jones
January 10, 2013
Thanks for chasing down accurate costs and efficiency numbers. You have better resources than I.

It is my belief that the PV revolution will happen when a new technology is invented. It is possible that it could happen in the c-Si sector, but there is a better chance that it will occur related to the Thin films, since it is still in its infancy. The PV industries all have a minimal margin of profit, and as such, one bad year or a product recall would bury them. Also, if the Federal or local government incentives dried up, then much of the PV market would dry up with it.

So where do we stand? I am an Architect that has a particular focus on High Performance and Net-zero buildings. I would be willing to recommend to a client to use BIPV even if it cost 3 or 4 times the price of regular PV. But I am not finding many BIPV manufacturers that are making products that can be integrated into the building envelope as the actual siding material. I am seeing a lot of ballasted or roof-top mounted systems that are designed, but I can't find a manufacturer that has a realistic BIPV product that I can specify as part of the actual building enclosure. Thin film is closer than c-Si, since c-Si has a standard size and doesn't wnat to change. Unisolar was making a thinfilm product that could be adhesively applied to metal roofs and some windows, but I heard that they have given up on that now. I would be willing to pay 4 times as much for PV if it could function both as the skin of the building, as well as a source of energy. Maybe the manufacturers out there need to focus on BIPV and other products if they want to increase market share and become more profitable.
John Nistler
John Nistler
January 10, 2013
Forrest, perhaps its better to make comparisons at the same price market. First solar's claim to fame has been its low price. They are now at 13.2% @ 0.69/watt USD. C-si is at 15.97% at 0.62/watt USD. Transportation costs are an important factor at these low prices and so it depends on the cost of transportation from the manufacturing facility as to actual cost per watt at the job site.

Sunpower can not get their manufacturing costs below $1.08 per watt and their highest panel efficiency is 20%. But as mentioned previously its cost per watt plus transportation per watt that determines if Sunpower is competitive. At $1.98, they are not highly competitive when the rest of the market is below $1.00 (transportation affects Sunpower also).
Mario Wiradjaja
Mario Wiradjaja
January 9, 2013
comparing USD / Wp, is using thin film is better ?
based on info that i have, it's not.
also rapid degradation makes energy output in the longterm inferior compared to c-si.

edit :
my comment are based on 'old' thin film standard published by my country's utility company.
but now I see there are a lot of advance technology in thin film modules available in the market.
Forrest Jones
Forrest Jones
January 9, 2013
It is great to see the progress and the synergies of several specialized companies coming together to do things a little better. Although I see this as a good sign, I am still a little cautious.

A couple of thoughts:
Don't look at the price at this point. "The manufacturer does not set the price, but rather the Customer determines what they are willing to pay." If the manufacturer can produce the commodity for less than that amount, then there is a product that can be put into production. But caution is advised here, since it is common to stretch the numbers in the short term with creative investors and government grants/incentives (or unrepayable debt). It is possible for companies to function at a loss for several years as long as they have a source of financing. My second thought that comes to bear here is that the real comparison should be with the best of the thin films "in production" with the best of the c-Si products that is in production. My recollection is that SunPower has a c-Si line that is in production at 23% (could someone double check me on this exact number). So what will happen, is that any manufacturer with lower efficiency, will not get any market share unless they sell their products at a substantial discount (sometimes unprofitably), which hurts the whole industry.

I do believe that PV is going to make a break-through with some new technology, but I am not seeing that new technology yet. I also believe that the new technology that we are looking for will probably happen in the Thin-film sectors since I am not hearing any rustlings of new technologies coming from the c-Si sector.

This is a great article, and I am glad to see the progress and manufacturing improvements. Keep up the good work, and keep me posted.
Thomas M
Thomas M
January 9, 2013
Funny how they big guys are jumping on the thin film bandwagon now that the father of thin film is dead. All they did was bash the technology before.....

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
James Montgomery

James Montgomery

Jim is Associate Editor for RenewableEnergyWorld.com, covering the solar and wind beats. He previously was news editor for Solid State Technology and Photovoltaics World, and has covered semiconductor manufacturing and related industries,...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 11
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 10
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Richardson RFPD, Inc.
  • Sol Systems LLC
  • marcus evans
  • SolarFlairLighting.com
  • Apricus, Inc.
  • RBI Solar Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information