The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 26, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Concentrated Solar Power: Next-Generation Technologies Poised to Ramp up Utility-Scale Production

Emilio Iglesias Sola, Yara International ASA
January 03, 2013  |  15 Comments

As 2013 begins, the concentrated solar power (CSP) industry in the U.S. is on the brink of a major turning point. After years of hesitancy to invest in CSP due to required increases in efficiency and cost reductions, a wide market acceptance of solar thermal power plants is knocking at the door, driven by the development of next generation technologies in thermal storage, heat transfer and plant components. These developments, along with the current U.S. political and solar power market, will drive lower costs and make utility-scale CSP commercially viable for the first time.

First, let’s look at recent developments in solar thermal storage and heat transfer. Significant technological breakthroughs have been made in molten salts, the technology that allows utility-scale CSP plants to generate baseload power and differentiates CSP from other renewable power sources. Next generation ternary molten salts using potassium calcium nitrate (CN-K) have an expanded temperature range, enhanced storage ability and improved safety over current salts and thermal oils. The lower melting point means the salts require less energy to reach their effective range, providing improved heat transfer and storage performance for plant operators. The lower melting also reduces the risk of damage or accidents from salts freezing in circuits, a serious issue for the continuous operation of a plant.

There have also been significant improvements to components of CSP plants such as receivers and collectors due to new coatings and improved design. New coatings being used on vacuum-insulated receivers, which convert the rays of sun into heat, are now able to operate with a 95.5 percent degree of absorption. Further improvements to the design of receivers have expanded the active surface to 96.7 percent of the length, which also increases absorption capacity. Research continues to create new reflective films, reflector panels and adaptive optics for solar collectors, in order to increase the performance of solar collectors over existing designs as well.

More importantly, these same technologies have also decreased the capital and operating expenditures for utility-scale CSP projects, making them more profitable for investors and plant owners. To start, the price of new ternary molten salts is more competitive than current binary salts, a trend that will likely increase over the coming years. Additional cost savings are due to the salts’ lower temperature range, which means less salts need to be purchased overall and these are less expensive to heat during the melting process. In addition, purer and less-corrosive synthetic molecules have been developed which help reduce corrosion of plant components, as well as related maintenance costs and safety issues. 

Improvements and efficiencies are also being made in other areas of CSP plant technology, including mirrors, receivers and tubes. For instance, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has developed less expensive CSP collectors by replacing glass-based models with a silver polymer sheet that has the same performance as the heavy glass mirrors, but at much lower cost and weight. Improving collector designs and using advanced optical materials that have lower cost and higher performance will continue to reduce the cost of collectors, which can comprise up to 40 percent of the total CSP system costs.

In addition to technological improvements, the U.S. solar industry can take advantage of favorable state and federal policies, which continue to drive developments and cost reductions in renewable energy technologies through a mix of tax incentives, government loans, loan-guarantees and grants. One notable example is the federal government’s SunShot CSP Research and Development program, which recently announced a $55 million investment in 21 projects at various companies, universities and federal agencies to address the technical barriers all four major CSP subsystems: solar fields, receivers, power plants and thermal storage. The program seeks to reduce the cost of CSP from a current price of $0.21/kWh to a goal of $0.06/kWh.

Factors other than government policies also make the U.S. perfectly positioned for the rapid development of competitive, clean and renewable utility-scale solar thermal power. First, the country’s geography provides natural advantages for developers. Some of the world’s best irradiation locations are located in the U.S. Southwest, where high-land availability also means plant managers can develop larger, more-efficient CSP plants which will lower costs and produce better yields. Additionally, the size of the U.S. economy, coupled with the size and depth of its financial markets, puts the country in position to dramatically ramp up utility-scale CSP capacity. 

The time for utility-scale CSP has never been better. Technological breakthroughs in thermal storage, transfer and collection, coupled the current U.S. political and solar power market have the potential to provide affordable and reliable solar thermal power for generations to come. Now for the easy part: seizing this unique opportunity. 

Lead image: CSP plant via Shutterstock

15 Comments

Register To Comment
Dennis Smith
Dennis Smith
March 13, 2013
Okay but what about this method that focuses sun ray beams to a point where it generates electricity indirectly ?

Look here ( http://t.co/faPgTyqqGD ) but am not sure if it works as well as other methods.
Alison Mason
Alison Mason
January 7, 2013
As 'garyrich2000' correctly speculates, much research and development has been done on silvered polymers since 1981, and the issues to which 'Anonymous Ben' refers, which were primarily experienced by 3M's original ECP 305+, have by now been addressed (http://www.reflectechsolar.com/published-technical-papers.html) – hence the author's conclusion that they constitute a breakthrough. While it is true that ReflecTech has been available for several years, there are a few reasons why it is appropriate to include it in the list of why CSP is 'Poised to Ramp Up'. For one, the silvered polymer has been under continuous development since its first commercial availability in 2007, and the current version is now treated with an abrasion resistant top coat, allowing wet contact cleaning with brushes after pressure washing. Second, it has taken the industry some years to accept the film as equivalent to glass mirrors, and therefore it is only in 2013 that we will see commercial installations of concentrating collectors using ReflecTech®PLUS mirror film (http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/skyfuels-parabolic-trough-to-save-fuel-in-the-gas-city-1709238.htm). The industry's acceptance of ReflecTech mirror film as a cost-effective alternative to glass mirrors is evidenced by ReflecTech's selection for the 2012 Solar PACES Technology Award (http://www.csp-world.com/news/20120919/00486/skyfuel-honered-solarpaces-2012-technology-award).
Bernhard Scheffler
Bernhard Scheffler
January 7, 2013
Joel, it will reduce the total reflectance. How much, will depend on the absorption through 2 passes (to & fro) and on the less than perfect reflectance of the silver (especially for short wavelength). The article shows that for the longer wavelengths the calculated reflectance is near 98% – see fig 3. My original post (#8) erred by ignoring the less-than-perfect reflection of the silver at short wavelengths. Silvered mirrors are not much used in the laser fields I am familiar with.

Considering all secondary, tertiary . . mechanisms I can think of, it seems the reflection at the air-glass interface when the rays enter may have roughly the same sized positive effect as the negative effect of reflection on leaving the glass. So applying an antireflection layer would not have a large effect either way (as it definitely does on a PV panel or solar water heater)

Metallized polymer film would likely be similarly weak in reflecting the short wave part of the solar spectrum. They may also be vulnerable to oxidation, attack by H2S gas and other degradation mechanisms to which back-silvered glass mirrors would have better resistance, as the reflective surface is not exposed to air.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
January 7, 2013
Bernhard, I wasn't aware of the glass-air reflectance, but wouldn't the glass-air boundary for outgoing rays reduce reflectance overall? Maybe that's in the article you referenced, but I believe the link you provided was for the article we're responding to.
Bernhard Scheffler
Bernhard Scheffler
January 7, 2013
Joel, The article at http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/01/concentrated-solar-power-next-generation-technologies-poised-to-ramp-up-utility-scale-production#comm119068 is perhaps a better source than what I had said in #8 and #10.

It shows for crown optical glass and low iron solar glass reflectivities in the high 90%s – but not quite as high as I stated earlier. NREL certified total reflectances for the solar spectrum at 91.6 - 95.4%

The texts (in #10) on Optics also describe dielectric mirrors for lasers, their reflectances and the need for 99.9+% reflectances in some types of laser.
Bernhard Scheffler
Bernhard Scheffler
January 7, 2013
Joel, you ignored reflection of light by the air-glass interface, which for good low-iron glass of a few millimetres thick is far more important than absorption of light inside the glass.

As seen below, at normal incidence the reflectance is 8% for a pane of glass. Even without any absorption inside the glass, this limits transmittance to a value below 92%.

At oblique incidence, reflectance is typically much higher. This is why good solar glass for PV includes anti-reflection layers, which increase the light incident on the PV cells under the glass.

But there is usually no need to reduce reflectance on a mirror.

Light incident on the interface between air and glass is partly reflected, and partly transmitted. In passing through the thickness of the glass, part is absorbed. I am sure you have seen that even an unsilvered / unmetallized glass pane reflects light.

The Fresnel relations (which you may find in any good University text on Optics such as those by Eugene Hecht, by Grant Fowles or by Pedrotti & Pedrotti) determine what fractions are transmitted and what reflected. The values depend on the angle of incidence and the refractive index of the glass and is moreover dependant on the polarization of the light (it differs for the 2 orthogonal polarizations).

For normal incidence the equation for the reflectance for light incident from air (with refractive index 1.0) on glass with a refractive index of 1.5 is given by the square of (1.5 - 1.0)/(1.5 + 1.0), which gives exactly 4%. For a pane of glass, there is a further 4% reflectance at the second glass-air interface (where the light leaves the glass). Thus even without any absorption, pane reflection at normal incidence is about 8%.

This leaves transmittance in a pane of glass at 92% even with perfectly clear glass. But for such clear glass, reflectance can approach 100%.

Check the spec (reflectance) of real low-iron glass solar mirrors!
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
January 7, 2013
Bernhard, I was under the impression low-iron glass transmission was in the low 90s, and that any glass mirror involves two passes which puts its reflectance down in the 80s. Mirrorized film would therefore appear far superior. That said, my own experience with ReflecTech, specifically in prototypes, is the material is overly sensitive to airborne contaminants which can compromise albedo. On a related subject, I see you are well versed in non-imaging optics. I put up an article on this site last year relating to a non-imaging solar roof and would welcome your comments. www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2011/10/concentrating-solar-buildings-an-introduction
Bernhard Scheffler
Bernhard Scheffler
January 7, 2013
Gary, the ScienceDaily article you refer to deals with dielectric mirrors, which are used in lasers and optoelectronics, and rely on wavelength dependent Brewster Reflection.

It is well-known in those fields (in which I have supervised several Masters and PhDs) that these mirrors can have extremely high reflectances (99.99+%) within a very narrow wavelength band.

Such high reflectances are essential in laser mirrors for many types of gas laser, where a photon can on average be reflected thousands of times before emerging. Without 99.9+% mirrors many of these lasers (specifically lasers with low amplification per pass) cannot work at all.

Dielectric mirrors are delicate, and usually carefully handled and most often mounted in vacuum, where they are protected from contaminants. The light pipe application of the ScienceDaily article will also typically involve thousands of reflections – demanding 99.99+% reflectance and possibly a vacuum. They are not suited to solar concentration.

In the solar collection field, where low-iron solar glass mirrors have reflectances around 99% (and where light is reflected once and not bounced to-and-fro thousands of times) it will make only an insignificant 1% difference to increase the reflectance from the 99% of standard low-iron glass mirrors to 99.99+%.

Indeed, because dielectric mirrors reflect only a narrow wavelength band, their reflectivity for the solar spectrum will probably be well below 10%, and in some cases below 1%.
Bala Subramanian
Bala Subramanian
January 5, 2013
The summation of the six foregoing comments would suggest, in not distant a future, a full switch to electricity use for transportation, industry and residential needs could be met from just renewable sources, thus eliminating any shortages of energy. Without such shortage, it will be possible to desalinate oceans to eliminate water shortages. Without energy-shortage and water-shortage could humanity not recycle its sewage to bring about cleaner environment and aspire for healthier life-styles and improved standards-of-living, without the need for wars?
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
January 5, 2013
Despite the fact that silvered polymer films have been in use since 1981, I would not doubt that improved designs haven't been developed since then. Even as far back as the year 2000 have plastics taken the crown as the most reflective mirror material.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/04/000404205617.htm

Wouldn't it stand to reason then that improvements in silvered polymer mirrors have come to fruit and continue to advance as we speak?
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
January 5, 2013
In some parts of the Southwest USA, CSP may also benefit from grids tied to hydropower on the Colorado river. In turn, excesses in power generation not absorbed by thermal storage, consumers, thermal-industrial processing or pumped hydro can address fish/game, and water shortage issues already present there.

Since these two concerns are high priority for their livelihood and has priority to keep in abundance, it mates well with times that CSP can't be a baseload source.
ANONYMOUS
January 5, 2013
Most of this article rings true:- The Southwest USA solar radiation source, and the US economic, scale and market advantages . . . So too are some of the advantages of a lower melting point of the heat transfer/storage medium.

But I tend to agree with Joel that the author's grasp of the technologies is another matter:- Heat transfer salt used as early as 1981 included quaternary as well as ternary mixes of sodium/ potassium nitrate/nitrite. The much used sodium/potassium nitrate is as ternary (NOT binary) as the calcium/ sodium nitrate mentioned in the article.

Further, no molten salt is composed of (neutral) MOLECULES, as claimed. Instead, salts comprise electrically charged entities known as IONS.

Silvered polymer film reflectors/collectors have been used at least since 1981. They cost less, but have serious issues with dimensional stability and durability in high winds -- and with wind-driven sand.

Ben
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
January 5, 2013
The reflective film mentioned in the article, ReflecTech, has been available for several years so is not a current breakthrough. Siemens had been making the highly efficient evacuated tube collectors mentioned, but announced in October 2012 they were suspending CSP operations. There is a Chinese EVAC tube equivalent, but it's not clear if these are still available in the US. In this light, how is the CSP industry going to survive while squeezing out significant cost savings to become competitive with fixed PV? I hope there are some good answers out there!
ANONYMOUS
January 4, 2013
Mr Anonymous's suggestion was put forward by Buckminster Fuller in the 1950's or 60's
Complicated but worthy for our future
ANONYMOUS
January 4, 2013
All these efforts should also be directed globally so that interconnection of grids can generate 24 hours a day without the need for storage. Such utilities can bring down the cost of generation and transmission without even the need for subsidy.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Emilio Iglesias Sola

Emilio Iglesias Sola

Emilio Iglesias Sola is an agricultural engineer and current nitrates sales manager at Yara International ASA. Since 2003, he has focused on developing calcium nitrate applications for various industries throughout the world including waste...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Rotork plc
  • Upsolar
  • Reed Exhibitions
  • Solectria Renewables LLC
  • Trojan Battery Company
  • Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut)
  • Solar Energy International (SEI)
  • Greenpower Capital
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information