The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Monday, May 20, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

2013 Geothermal: Last-Minute PTC Revision Sparks a New Hope

Meg Cichon, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
January 03, 2013  |  27 Comments

The renewable energy industry had quite a bit to celebrate this week as 2013 rang in a PTC extension that many had feared would never come to fruition. Though the extension to January 1, 2014 greatly benefits the wind industry, whose PTC was set to expire at the end of 2012, it also included a provision that could be huge for geothermal development. This provision states that projects under construction by January 1, 2014 would quality for the PTC, rather than the previous rule that required projects to be completed and operational.

A 2013 Development Boom

Karl Gawell, executive director of the Geothermal Energy Association (GEA) expects this provision to significantly boost U.S. geothermal development in 2013. He explained that under the previous provision, companies were already starting to back away from new developments for fear of not being able to finish a project and qualify in time. 

This fear stems from the notoriously long project development time geothermal typically faces – an average of seven years. Therefore, geothermal faces a much earlier drop-off for the PTC than other technologies, explained Paul Thomsen, director of policy and business development at ORMAT. Though the geothermal PTC expires at the end of 2013, most developers had lost hope of taking advantage of the incentive years ago.

“The fact of the matter is with geothermal having such a long lead time, we faced that hurdle two or three years ago because as the PTC stands now, we have to have a project constructed, online, and delivering power to the grid by Dec 31st of 2013,” said Thomsen. “In the geothermal development world that is right around the corner, so people stopped drilling projects a year or two ago because they knew they couldn’t risk missing that deadline.”

But with the new provision, Gawell believes the industry will now be scrambling to get more projects qualified in 2013.

“The Geothermal Energy Association estimates that new geothermal power projects in as many as a dozen states could be stimulated to move forward this year as a result of this change,” said Gawell in a release following the decision.  “Congress’ action will spur significant new employment and sustain geothermal industry growth. Consumers and utilities will benefit, as well, because developers will have greater certainty about whether the credit will be available for their project.”

Thomsen explained that the provision is like the geothermal industry’s “fiscal cliff” – if a project can start construction and still be eligible for the tax incentive, the industry won’t fall. Projects that had previously put on the breaks can now move forward and the industry can expand and take advantage of the vast amount of resources in the U.S.

Renewable Portfolio Standard Push

While the PTC provision is a huge win for geothermal, many in the industry remain bullish on other policies and strive to set geothermal on a “level playing field” with other technologies. Thomsen said that industry advocates will continue to work with energy regulators, particularly in many Western States, to properly value geothermal energy with a focus on its inclusion in renewable portfolio standards (RPS).

Many states will soon see an increase in RPS mandates, and some, like Nevada, are starting to consider removing compliance mechanisms such as energy efficiency. These changes would create more demand for renewable energy, which is where geothermal advocates are trying to state their case: while many states have brought on wind and solar to fill the RPS, those in the geothermal industry believe that states will start to have intermittency issues. Geothermal can be brought on as a baseload power to help stabilize the grid.

“Though [other renewables] they may have gotten a leg-up on us in the past couple of years, we’re catching them. It’s like the tortoise and the hare – wind and solar raced off and created tons of projects that all delivered energy, but with no capacity,” said Thomsen. “We have been a little bit slower because we are building a project that has energy and capacity and now utilities and regulators are starting to say ‘holy cow, capacity is much more valuable to us today than energy.’”

Industry advocates will not only be fighting for a level playing field with other renewables in 2013, said Thomsen, but also for the same treatments that oil and gas companies already receive. Fossil fuels have had some of the same subsidies for more than 100 years, and they don’t expire – geothermal could take advantage of some of these provisions. For example, oil and gas can deduct their well field drilling costs from their gross revenue, explained Thomsen. There are other tax incentives that these industries get in the tax code that could benefit geothermal in reducing upfront capital costs -- a major hurdle to development. 

“We are always going to be pushing policies that create a level playing field and give us an equitable tax position so that we can compete with any technology out there,” said Thomsen. “Give us the certainty in tax provision so we can continue to develop these projects in the future.”

Consider Global Expansion 

While the U.S. geothermal industry struggles with incentives and advocating for a fair playing field, many in the industry recommend shifting some business focus overseas in 2013. Companies like TAS Energy and POWER Engineers have recently opened offices in Turkey and Africa, where development is starting to blossom at a rapid rate.  

Though it may be beneficial to roll the dice overseas, Thomsen warns that the grass isn’t always greener on the other side. While there may be action in the developing world, these countries may be just as difficult to do business in as the U.S. – companies will simply face different hurdles. While the U.S. struggles with incentives, countries like Indonesia face bankability difficulties and in Kenya, companies will be bidding for projects against government-backed companies. However, Thomsen says it is never a bad idea to have an international portfolio, but to just be aware of all possible challenges. 

“While we see the international market robust at the moment, we haven’t given up on the U.S. and we think the U.S. market can be just as robust,” says Thomsen. “It’s an ebb and flow as we go through the years.”

Lead image: Opening door via Shutterstock

27 Comments

Register To Comment
ANONYMOUS
January 23, 2013
Yes, well if you are waiting for armageddon when use of nuclear power is expanded, better start taking precautions. China is about to start building reactors like hot cakes! and doing research into thorium, frosting on cupcakes!

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf63.html

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/30/china-announces-thorium-reactor-energy-program-obama-still-dwelling-on-sputnik-moments/

In the meantime WEF in Davos is working though their Gobal Risk 2013 report and nuclear accidents from power plants are not even on the agenda. Climate change is in the forefront though. Hum...I have a hunch that the anti-nuclear boogaboo is a result of general technical ignorance, vested fossil fuel interests, environmental advocacy staffed by non-scientists and NOW the renewable energy industry.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 18, 2013
Have a nice day Terry....
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
January 18, 2013
Bob_Wallace,

All, as in every single one, geothermal use for power or heating or aquaculture, or greenhouse, uses water for mining heat, including the actual EGS demonstration plants. Other fluids and gases are utilized in theory or reality - even CO2 is being experimented with. Please try to keep some semblance of reality in your postings.



-------------

Nuclear Japan:

"Demonstration for the resumption of the Nuclear Power Plant Operations"

http://global.the-liberty.com/2013/3789.html

"Japan seeks to reverse commitment to phase out nuclear power"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/11/japan-reverse-nuclear-phase-out

"Japan's nuclear cities green-light reactor restart"

http://rt.com/news/nuclear-restart-japan-cities-467/

and on and on

Wind is intermittent and cannot replace baseload power. There is no shortage of renewable baseload power.

Please try to keep real.

----------------------------------

I did indeed mean to show the record-breaking use of low temperature waters and low cost power generation at Chena, Alaska.

The Husavik geothermal power plant in Iceland used low temperature waters and added some heat with a garbage burning facility to squeeze out 32MW of power with advanced Kalina technology. It has been bought by an Australian company developing Kalina's waste heat technology.

Kalina is a Russian emigre to the U.S. who is finally making some headway with his two-working-fluid waste heat technology - and most notably in low entropy geothermal.

Please, please, please try to keep real. Your calculations of power from waste are ludicrous and beside the point. They omit the most efficient uses of waste along with other huge flaws. Even solar can use waste heat power technology.

Best, Terry
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 18, 2013
"The Iceland page you linked was about a small geothermal installed at a hot spring site."

Correction - Alaska page.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 18, 2013
Here, Terry, some biofuel facts for you to chew on...


"If you were to take every gram of crops produced anywhere in the world for all purposes — and that includes every grape, every ton of wheat, every ton of soybeans and corn — and you were to use that for biofuels and essentially stop eating, those crops would produce about 14 percent of world energy," says Timothy Searchinger, an associate research scholar at Princeton University.

G. Philip Robertson and colleagues at Michigan State University's Kellogg Biological Station have been looking at plants that don't require farm fields.

"First, we discovered that the grasses and flowers that take over fields once you stop farming produce a fair amount of biomass, especially if you provide them a little bit of fertilizer," Robertson says.

Robertson and his colleagues surveyed the Midwest acre by acre and identified 27 million acres of marginal farmland where these plants could grow, and where the acreage falls into a compact enough area that someone might want to build a refinery to produce biofuels.

They figured that it would become too expensive to transport this heavy and bulky plant material more than 50 miles, from field to refinery.

"At the end of the day, we discovered we could produce enough biomass to supply 30 or so of these potential biorefineries," Robertson says.

The 27 million acres identified in the latest study would provide less than 0.5 percent of (US) national energy demand,

http://www.npr.org/2013/01/16/169538570/could-some-midwest-land-support-new-biofuel-refineries

So if we gave up eating and used all our marginal land we might obtain up to 20% of our energy from biofuels.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 18, 2013
Japan just announced that they are building the world's largest offshore wind farm - right off the coast from Fukushima.

Japan has no desire to return to nuclear (most Japanese have no desire, obviously those in the nuclear industry don't agree). They might have to fire back up some of their reactors while they get replacement power in place.

--

You realize that you keep on about geothermal but your examples are only in those places where there are significant wet rock resources. The Iceland page you linked was about a small geothermal installed at a hot spring site. Iceland has abundant amounts of very hot water close to the surface.

Much of the rest of the world does not have those resources. Until/if we perfect dry rock/enhanced geothermal then geothermal will not be a major contributor to the world's energy supply.

You are, with both geothermal and biofuel, looking at technologies which do work but are limited and trying to argue that we can use them to power the world. You're not doing your math.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
January 18, 2013
Bob_Wallace,

"Terry, obviously you believe very strongly that somehow the people who are working hard to bring geothermal to the grid lack your superior knowledge."

This is compounded nonsense worthy of the most ignorant tea partier denying global warming.

A few years ago I met an engineer who had been involved in most of the major geothermal power projects around the world. I learned a great deal from him but he was as unaware of much of the thrust of geothermal power as yourself. He was after all an engineer doing a job rather than a scientist locked in his ivory tower.

The engineer thought drilling live volcanoes sounded kind of dangerous but I guess he hadn't thought on the Kilauea Volcano in Hawaii reputed to be the greatest producer of lava in the world and the only producer in Hawaii, which has been bedeviled by superstitious nonsense about offending the Goddess of Fire, Pele. The late Senator Inouye bragged on helping to deter the building of more geothermal power plants in Hawaii by obtaining government funding to stop one in a large celebration much like a celebration in San Jose, CA, that killed a decades-long project for what was then thought to be likely the largest resource in California.

Later the engineer and the entire crew were fired because money men wanted to devote resources to a project that turned into a disaster and nearly bankrupted the company. The perps now advise the world on geothermal power since their horrendous failure.

Germany's determined push for geothermal power with minimal resources faces a tough backlash from the usual ignoramuses but is an example to the world of what is possible.

Your claims are astonishing but the usual trash of denialists.

BTW I agree with you about nuclear power but the Japanese are headed back to nuclear power for a possible third holocaust. Can humans never learn?

Best, Terry
ANONYMOUS
January 18, 2013
Especially China will be chocking on smog for a very long time if it waits for wind and solar to replace the coal electricity.

Nuclear power is the only thing that will eventually stop carbon emissions. Hopefully not too late.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 18, 2013
Anon -

"Let me state unequivocably that I've never met a nuclear plant I didn't like," said John Rowe, who retired 17 days ago as chairman and CEO of Exelon Corporation, which operates 22 nuclear power plants, more than any other utility in the United States.

"Having said that, let me also state unequivocably that new ones don't make any sense right now."

"I'm the nuclear guy," Rowe said. "And you won't get better results with nuclear. It just isn't economic, and it's not economic within a foreseeable time frame."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2012/03/29/exelons-nuclear-guy-no-new-nukes/

Reality is we won't be building many new reactors. Even very pro-nuclear countries such as China are scaling down their plans. Europe is basically done building reactors, they are shutting them down. Even France is installing renewables and plans on closing reactors.

We have cheaper and safer ways to generate electricity.

Reprocessing spent nuclear fuel doesn't deal with all the non-fuel radioactive waste.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 18, 2013
Terry, obviously you believe very strongly that somehow the people who are working hard to bring geothermal to the grid lack your superior knowledge.

Only time will tell if you are prophet or fool.
ANONYMOUS
January 18, 2013
Still I think that the best proven geothermal energy technology is nuclear power. Renewable if we reprocess fuel and sustainable if we just work on breeder reactors. All that molten lava after all is there because of radioactive decay.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
January 18, 2013
Bob,

"Come on Terry. Most of the Earth's hot rock area does not have a supply of water that can be used for steam. You must know that basic fact."

You just keep repeating meaningless, nonsensical slogans like a primitive unable to believe the earth is round. Nearly the whole of the earth consists of "hot rocks" with water suffusing the crust.

Oil prospecting initially consisted of looking for oil leaking out on the ground. Geothermal prospecting for warm aquifers has advanced only little beyond that primitive stage with meaningless pronouncements by your tribe denigrating the terrific abundance of geothermal resources.

When I was young I lived in Klamath Falls, Oregon, where geothermal heating of buildings was pioneered, where the heat was used for melting ice on roads and sidewalks and all manner of geothermal projects but even the now legendary geothermal power pioneer, B. C. McCabe, decreed that power would never be produced in the area. Since then it has been with Oregon Technical Institute powering the university campus with geothermal and becoming a prophet of distributed geothermal power.

But few listen even yet because they just think they know.

Alaska, with all its vast geothermal resources, has produced power only from the tepid waters of Chena's "hot springs" at record-busting low temperatures and cost.

http://www.yourownpower.com/Power/

Even Iceland, the Valhalla of geothermal power, has long been in the game of low entropy geothermal power with even more advanced technology.

What good do you think spreading nonsensical mythology does? Do you have no concern for your planet?

Best, Terry
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 17, 2013
"There is no such thing as dry rock geothermal."

Come on Terry. Most of the Earth's hot rock area does not have a supply of water that can be used for steam. You must know that basic fact.

The countries which are installing geothermal are located on the "Ring of Fire" or other places where exceptional conditions exist. Some of them are poor countries, such as Indonesia, and some are rich, such as the US.

There is not enough available biomass to produce more than a small percentage of our energy needs.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
January 17, 2013
Bob,

"Again, Terry, if/when we solve the engineering problems of enhanced, dry rock geothermal"

There is no such thing as dry rock geothermal.

HDR (hot dry rock) was always a misnomer.

The earth's crust is suffused with water.

All beside the point since there is no need to exploit very deep geothermal resources with the enormous resources available at shallow depths, some that don't even require drilling.

AltaRock and others, including DOE, are attempting to stimulate existing aquifers with inadequate flow as well as create synthetic aquifers.

In the meantime vast resources remain unexploited while you flat earthers chase star shine with pitifully inadequate results while some of the poorest countries on the planet are eagerly embracing geothermal.

And again geothermal is hardly the only baseload renewable.

Thermal biomass is making substantial progress against the mindless opposition of purported environmentalists, who prefer to poison the air, land and water with waste while burning fossil fuels.

Hope humans can survive such stupidity. Mother Earth can be a most bountiful lady as well as a mass murderer of enormous capability. She may yet have an opportunity to evolve an intelligent species when she exterminates the current pretenders.

Best, Terry
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 17, 2013
Again, Terry, if/when we solve the engineering problems of enhanced, dry rock geothermal we can look at the economics and see what role it might play in our energy future.

We've seen some progress lately with fracking technology but there's still the 'large diameter hole' problem to be solved.

If enhanced geothermal can be brought on line for under $0.10/kWh then it can be a major player. Higher than that and cheaper wind + solar + storage will likely dominate.

But until the practical problems are solved enhanced geothermal is simply an unproved idea and not a reality.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
January 17, 2013
"We are at the beginning point for battery storage of grid power."

Uh huh.

And some day solar satellites may be beaming power down to earthlings like Scotty beamed the crew of the Enterprise down to planet surfaces.

But until then it might be best to utilize cheap, available renewable baseload power instead of star power.

>If there was "baseload renewable energy" cheaper than other option, as you claim, then we would be building it<

The most potent energy source on earth is the earth. It was used by proto-Indians some 12,000 years ago, by the Romans in somewhat more recent times, by many others and even our backward country is the number one generator of geothermal power despite decades of neglect and even active hostility, like Hawaiians who worried Pele, the Goddess of Fire, would be offended.

Not easy building a planet but fortunately we don't have to. It is built.

So why do we concentrate on much feebler, sometime power? It is the usual folly of humans who care little for logic and science and prefer mythology, no matter how absurd.

Best, Terry
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 17, 2013
We are at the beginning point for battery storage of grid power. Present technology is in its infancy. Technology will improve and costs will drop, a lot.

Grid storage batteries do not use lots of expensive materials, nor do they require large labor or energy inputs.

Right now batteries are cheap enough to be used for grid smoothing and for firming wind farm output. As economies of scale work their magic prices will fall to where we can use economically use batteries for shifting supply across multiple hours.


If there was "baseload renewable energy" cheaper than other option, as you claim, then we would be building it. We are doing some biomass/gas generation but "plentiful" is where biofuels fail.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
January 17, 2013
>>Well, Aquion is now shipping product. That's one grid storage battery that is not "fanciful".<<

Goody. How many bolts of lightning do these batteries store? How much does it cost? How long do they lost? How much harm do they do to the environment?

Battery storage has been around a very long time but cheap, dependable MW storage aside from pumped storage has not been and is not now from the last information I have.

In any case baseload renewable energy is cheaper, more plentiful, easier on the environment than any and all intermittent and fossil fuel sources combined.

Best, Terry

Best, Terry
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 17, 2013
Well, Aquion is now shipping product. That's one grid storage battery that is not "fanciful".

Electrovaya is also shipping product. They're aiming at end-user storage rather than at the utility end. Another not "fanciful".

There are, as you should know, other lithium-ion manufacturers who have delivered cargo container sized battery packs. Several are on grids at the moment.

Here's a little something to catch you up on storing lightening bolts in boxes...

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2012/04/grid-scale-energy-storage-lux-predicts-113-5-billion-in-global-demand-by-2017
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
January 17, 2013
"Intermittency issues associated with solar and wind are not solved by baseload power but by storage."

Just where might one get one of those bolt boxes to store lightning bolts?

Pumped dam storage has been around for a long time and serves well but has geographic limitations and other limitations. Everything else is as fanciful as the solar satellites that would zap the juice down to earthlings like Scotty used to transport the crew of the enterprise to planet surfaces.

Terrible blunder to put so much emphasis on intermittent power sources when baseload renewable power is plentiful and cheap and environmentally friendly.

Best, Terry
ANONYMOUS
January 6, 2013
WHEN? or IS IT DONE ALREADY?
SOLAR EXTRUSION
When are we going to have a continuous OEM production of solar collector material that IS the box and COLLECTION MEDIA (acting like 3-layered FANTASTIC air-solar boxes ARE ALREADY installed for HALF the cost of water collectors including the fancoil for recirculating the air for 5000-6000 btuh 2pcX3ftX7-to-8ft systems, with flex ducted from collectors to fan units (filtered well) propped relatively normal to the insolation and just in Dayton-Col Ohio areas has been done with window screen collectors since 1980 !?!

I mean an 'exploded frothy high temp plastic foaming with many open holes into as the connected part of a framed solid box that later gets inserted insulation sheeting or foamed into extruded spaces-cavities (iso spray) and is such that a dual pane of PTFE-Clear under the solar glazing (flex or solid-replace-ables-)snapped on top -=--
but extruded for ~` 3000 BTUH per hour per 6ft x 2.1/2 ft wide or 3ft wide INEXPENSIVE mass production!!! when ???
ANONYMOUS
January 6, 2013
With much reason to believe:
It is not just the output of large geothermal, but too the peak reductions and general reduction in KWH by shallow 45-to-75 degree geothermal heat pumps contributing to also 34% reduction in NOX gasses since EPA report went out in 1993; and now even more efficiently (scratching the scratch) than ever before COP's all annually over 4 and some with PRIORITY on Demand (by separate temp control) HW production IN cooling modes for 100% real priority HW
one can find WHY certain (1981 patented) non-WF non-CM non-Trane non-FHP non-Econaire non-Hydron/GeoComforts are beating the closest GT Heat Pump competition with a 12% margin in KY Schools closely tracked since 2004- blasting all with results in ASHRAE 2008 and since::: Hydro - Temp com Hydro-Temp since 1978 the 2nd oldest OEM GT HtP (is not hydro-delta; nor hydro-heat which do not do simultaneous 100% HW on demand in cooling mode)

These results can not be matched with a Water:water plus a forced air "priority" HW as some are claiming--- it MAKES a DIFFERENCE with Hydro-Temp dual compressor; IRD-Palm read-out and programmable 4zone controller (4 zones since 1996 OEM built in...)
And 3 staging to 4 staging compressors of small to larger to both to a second being 2 speed is OUTPERFORMING variables in set up labors and any concerned replacements! and AR, TN . KY and even though attempted blocked... OH commercial and residential get the best ROI - all points considered... with only Hydro-Temp (why is Iq var air ht p, mini's and Daiken-likes comparatively and tracked.. being totally ignored compared to hydro-Temp practitioning in schools, and other applications?
Proprietary GC Red Board Georgia Controls in Hydro-Temp makes for use separately bettering use on other projects with separate staged machines as an installed addition for even under 1200 bucks compared to others 2500+ costs in industrial to commercial staging and heat recovery and reprogramable capabilities !
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 5, 2013
You mean like Sierra Sun Tower which has been on line since 2009?

And Ivanhoe Solar Tower that will be on line this year?

And Crescent Dunes which will be on line later this year or early 2014?
SCOTT ALF
SCOTT ALF
January 5, 2013
With the Spanish Spire receiving focused light so efficently I am missing an USA equivalent. I also feel on a residential scale the evacuated tubes collect heat while they don;t shed the snow and then fail to be efficent, are they potentially an unutilized resource moment.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 4, 2013
Dorothy - geothemal can be dialed back if there is not enough demand for supply. It's semi-dispatchable. I don't know if it's responsive enough to take care of short term changes in load, but it can be cut back if wind or solar are covering much of the demand.

--

Rich, what I've read is that "under construction" will have to be defined by the IRS and that should happen in the next few weeks.

With wind the ITC (as opposed to the PTC) will require that equipment would have to be in service before the end of the year.
Richard Mignogna
Richard Mignogna
January 4, 2013
But the one thing we do not yet know is how the Treasury department will define 'under construction.' Will they use the 5% criterion that was used for the 1603 grant? Will drilling expenditures count? So, while on the surface, the new definition under this tax credit extension seems quite beneficial to geothermal, the details yet to be fleshed out will determine just how much so.
dorothy allen
dorothy allen
January 4, 2013
"Geothermal can be brought on as a baseload power to help stabilize the grid." Not sure, Meg, what you mean here?

Intermittency issues associated with solar and wind are not solved by baseload power but by storage. Geothermal may not have such intermittency issues and may, therefore, be more desirable than wind and solar. More geothermal less solar and wind are better for the grid when a state is trying to meet an RPS target, is that your point?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Meg Cichon

Meg Cichon

As associate editor of RenewableEnergyWorld.com, I coordinate and edit feature stories, contributed articles, news stories, opinion pieces and blogs. I also research and write content for RenewableEnergyWorld.com and REW magazine. I manage...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • US, Australian Companies Taking Giant Steps for Global EGS Geothermal
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 10
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 1
    Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief
  • 1
    EU Should Scrap Energy Subsidies to Fight Warming, Poland Says

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Enerquip
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Geothermal Resources Council
  • Admirals Bank
  • Maritime Geothermal
  • Geothermal Energy Association
  • Ambient Technologies, Inc.
  • CleanEdison
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information