The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? ×

New Approach Aims to Slash Cost of Solar Cells

Bill Scanlon, NREL
March 07, 2012  |  15 Comments

Solar-powered electricity prices could soon approach those of power from coal or natural gas thanks to collaborative research with solar start-up Ampulse Corporation at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

Silicon wafers account for almost half the cost of today's solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, so reducing or eliminating wafer costs is essential to bringing prices down.

Current crystalline silicon technology, while high in energy conversion efficiency, involves processes that are complex, wasteful, and energy intensive. First, half the refined silicon is lost as dust in the wafer-sawing process, driving module costs higher. A typical 2-meter boule of silicon loses as many as 6,000 potential wafers during sawing. Second, the wafers produced are much thicker than necessary. To efficiently convert sunlight into electricity, they need only one-tenth the typical thickness.

NREL, DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and Ampulse have teamed on an approach to eliminate this waste and dramatically lower the cost of the finished solar panels. The aim is to create a less expensive alternative to wafer-based crystalline silicon solar cells.

By using a chemical vapor deposition process to grow the silicon on inexpensive foil, Ampulse is able to make the solar cells just thick enough to convert most of the solar energy into electricity. No more sawdust — and no more wasting refined silicon materials.

Straight from Pure Silicon to High-Quality Crystal Silicon Film

NREL developed the technology to grow high-quality silicon.

ORNL developed the metal foil that has the correct crystal structure to support that growth.

And Ampulse is installing a pilot manufacturing line in NREL's Process Development Integration Laboratory (PDIL), where solar companies test their latest materials and processes.

With knowledge and expertise acquired from the PDIL pilot production line, Ampulse plans to design a full-scale production line to accommodate long rolls of metal foil.

The Ampulse process "goes straight from pure silicon-containing gas to high-quality crystal silicon film," said Brent Nelson, who runs the PDIL at NREL. "The advantage is you can make the wafer just as thin as you need it — 10 microns or less."

Most of today's solar cells are made out of wafer crystalline silicon, though thin-film cells made of more exotic materials like gallium, arsenic, indium, arsenide, cadmium, and tellurium are making a strong push into the market.

The advantage of silicon is its abundance, as it is derived from sand. Its disadvantage is that purifying it into wafers suitable for solar cells is expensive and energy intensive.

Manufacturers add carbon and heat to sand to produce metallurgical-grade silicon, which is useful in other industries, but not yet suitable for making solar cells. This metallurgical-grade silicon is then converted to pure trichlorosilane (SiCl3) or silane (SiH4) gas.

Typically, the purified gas is converted to create a silicon feedstock at 1,000 degrees Celsius (°C). This feedstock is melted at 1,414°C and recrystallized into crystal ingots that are finally sawed into wafers. Think of it as the Rube Goldberg approach to creating a solar cell.

Instead, the Ampulse process backs up two steps. Rather than create a feedstock, it works with the silane directly and grows just the needed silicon right onto a foil substrate.

Combining NREL's Deposition Technique with ORNL's Textured Foil

A team of NREL scientists including Howard Branz and Chaz Teplin had developed a way to use a process called hot-wire chemical vapor deposition to thicken silicon wafers with perfect crystal coatings. Using a hot tungsten filament much like the one found in an incandescent light bulb, the silane gas molecules are broken apart and deposited onto the wafer using the chemical vapor deposition technique at about 700°C — a much lower temperature than needed to make the wafer. The hot filament decomposes the gas, allowing silicon layers to deposit directly onto the substrate.

Armed with this new technique, Branz and Teplin searched for ways to grow the silicon on cheaper materials and still use it for solar cells.

They found the ideal synergy when visiting venture capitalists from Battelle Ventures asked them whether they could do anything useful with a breakthrough at ORNL called RABiTS (rolling assisted biaxially textured substrate). It was just the opportunity the two scientists had been seeking.

If metal foil is to work as a substrate, it must be able to act as a seed crystal so the silicon can grow on it with the correct structure. The RABiTS process forms crystals in the foil that are correctly oriented to receive the silicon atoms and lock them into just the right positions.

NREL and ORNL worked to combine their technologies using a small amount of funding from Battelle Ventures. Using the right intermediate "buffer layers" to coat the foil substrates, the researchers were able to replicate the desired foil crystal structure in the silicon layer grown over metal foil (epitaxial growth).

Establishing Ampulse Corporation

With a commitment to develop the new technology in cooperation with the two national labs, Battelle Ventures and Innovation Valley Partners joined forces to form Ampulse. Initially, Ampulse had very few employees and no offices — just a name, an idea, and a commitment to develop the technology via the unique instrumentation and scientific expertise at the two national labs.

The company then established a $500,000 cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) with NREL and a similar agreement with ORNL.

Ampulse also received a total of $900,000 from DOE's Technology Commercialization and Deployment funds at NREL and ORNL. Because Ampulse was started as a company with very low overhead, nearly all its initial funding went toward research efforts at NREL and ORNL.

"Our initial technology success from those funds enabled Ampulse to raise two rounds of venture capital," Branz said.

The company now has 13 employees and six full-time consultants and is currently working with 22 sponsored researchers from two national labs. The first employee at Ampulse, Steve Hane, remains its CEO.

A Giant Step Toward the $1 per Watt Goal?

"We have the potential to produce a 15%-efficient solar cell at less than 50 cents per watt with a fraction of the capital investment of other venture-funded PV companies," Hane said. "And that's due to our R&D collaborations with the national labs." Hane said the unique relationship between the national labs and venture capitalists should be a model for future technology transfers to the private sector.

Recently, with its SunShot Initiative, DOE challenged researchers to lower the cost of solar energy by two-thirds to $1 per watt installed. By eliminating costly silicon wafers — but still using silicon as the core material — the Ampulse approach has the potential to meet this target.

"The trick is to get as good material quality as you have in a wafer," Teplin said. "We're using our existing knowledge of how to grow silicon directly from a gas phase onto these metal foils."

Production Line Features Vacuum Chambers and Quartz Lamps

The production line being installed at NREL's PDIL consists of a half dozen cube-like vacuum chambers where foils are overcoated with buffer and silicon layers to fabricate solar cells. It was built to Ampulse's specifications by Roth & Rau Microsystems of Germany.

The new production system will also exchange samples with other NREL research and analysis equipment in the PDIL. NREL's "wafer replacement tool" will be connected to the Ampulse system and will have a robot that can retrieve samples while maintaining vacuum, preventing exposure of the sample to air.

To fabricate solar cells, metal foils are loaded into the Ampulse system, where quartz lamps heat them to a temperature of 850°C. First, the foils are coated with the necessary buffer layers. Then, the samples are transferred to a specially designed chamber where the key silicon layers are grown. The silicon is then exposed to atomic hydrogen to improve its electronic properties. Finally, solar cell junction and electrical contacts are developed.

"With this new tool, we will be able integrate NREL and ORNL technologies seamlessly and quickly," Teplin said. "Further, with access to all of NREL's other PDIL capabilities, we really expect technological progress to accelerate."

Branz summed up: "The main thing is that we can grow high-quality silicon layers very fast and without putting much energy into the process. That means the solar cells can turn out much cheaper than the wafer-based cells."

"Our process goes directly from gas to the epitaxial silicon phase, bypassing the growth and sawing phase," Ampulse's Director of Planning and Logistics, Mike Colby, said. "We made it large because we needed to demonstrate the scalability of the system."

"To accelerate time to market, we need to maximize the cycle speed," Colby added. "The goal is to achieve the crystal silicon performance that until now focused on thicker wafers — and without having to use a 1,400°C furnace."

As skilled technicians tweaked the knobs of the potentially game-changing prototyping line, Colby said, "We've had good luck and a good relationship with NREL. The aim of NREL, and of the PDIL, is to work with the needs of business and help accelerate commercialization of new technologies. This definitely does that."

This article was originally published on NREL and was republished with permission.

15 Comments

Register To Comment
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
March 19, 2012
Dear ynot:

I mentioned countries where the main research is going on. I do agree there are other countries which are working to reduce the cost of solar power but not at the pace of the countries I mentioned first.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
bruce gladstone
bruce gladstone
March 18, 2012
The Ampulse and the Twin Creeks developments are really exciting, and this high-tech part of the equation is sexy. But once again, it brings attention to the BBM and BOS issues. It seems that we need a concerted effort (and forum) to attack these issues and the policy/regulatory issues that shape our installation process. We have to move to a less labor intensive approach, but we still need safety and accountability.
Yotam Ariel
Yotam Ariel
March 18, 2012
Dear Anumakonda,

You forgot to mention research in China, India, Singapore, UAE, Australia, Israel, and many more countries..

They deserve credit too, and shouldn't be ignored.

Thanks,
Yotam
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
March 18, 2012
Thanks to sustained research in solar PV in US,Germany and Japan the cost of Solar PV is expected to come down soon.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
E-mail:anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Deep Patel
Deep Patel
March 15, 2012
@Anonymous (Comment 8), In addition, your micro-inverter is rated at 215 AC watts while your solar panels are rated in DC Watts. So in fact, with an Enphase M215 inverter you can actually install a solar panel that has a STC DC rating up to 260W.
James Montgomery
James Montgomery
March 13, 2012
GeraldR and Jaysenergy: Ask and ye shall receive? See our writeup today on Twin Creeks which promises $0.40/W cells at c-Si efficiencies, and they're flexible to boot...
Jan de Boer
Jan de Boer
March 12, 2012
@Anonymous (Comment 8). If module manufacturers increase the STC power of their modules micro-inverter manufacturers will follow and will develop new models that match the new module types.

It should also be noted that the inverter only limits the peak power output of the system. In moderate climates peak insolation happens only for a few hours in summer and a little undersizing of the inverter won't hurt the overall annual yield very much.
ANONYMOUS
March 9, 2012
I may be neophyte in this statement, but our company installs mostly micro-inverters, if the maximum a panel can generate is 215W governed by the size of the inverter output, what differnce is the extra effeciency going to make? Does the extra effiency expense balance the output through the micro-inverter? I this changes if we are talking central inverters.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
March 9, 2012
It seems to be easy to ignore the simple detail of cell matching. Even with conventional cells, the demonstrable difference in module efficiency from an ordinary cell sorter to a high precision cell sorter exceeds 2% absolute. This is incredibly important as this is a gain achieved at virtually no cost and consequently represents a 2% increase in margin. No matter how you slice it, higher efficiency is better - increasingly so as the BBM (balance of bill of module materials) and BOS (balance of system) costs become an increasing fraction of the LCOE. In fact, there is a slight selling price premium for higher efficiency as a result.
All cells have a natural variability in efficiency while a string of cells is only as good as it's weakest cell. The resulting module is always slightly worse than what that would predict as the weaker cells run hotter than the rest and have their efficiency reduced. The way to mitigate this is to accurately match cells in a string bringing the efficiency of modules closer to the efficiency of cells. This increases the spread between cost of cells and selling price of modules which translates into a blend of increased margin and reduced selling price in $/Wp. Any form of module assembly that is essentially monolithic has no way of avoiding this penalty and may only strive to minimize process variability but precision costs money.
For web based production,the only option is to excise the web into individual cells which puts one on the same manufacturing track as conventional cells.
Jay Gr.
Jay Gr.
March 9, 2012
You beat me to it GeraldR!
Right now I currently have German made 18% efficient solar cells I'm selling for 54 cents a watt....that's with my profit & the factory's profit in it. So what, exactly, is Ampulse all excited about? Sounds like they're already behind the competition, and they haven't even launched production yet! Talk about reinventing the wheel.....
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
March 8, 2012
'We have the potential to produce a 15%-efficient solar cell at less than 50 cents per watt with a fraction of the capital investment of other venture-funded PV companies,'. 1) they haven't done it yet. 2)conventional solar cell manufacturers are meeting and exceeding that performance. We have c-Si suppliers providing 16% modules (not cells)at less than 0.90 $/Wp. Tell me something exciting like 20% efficient cells at 0.45 $/Wp.

Cells are no longer the killer commodity. Try glass, structural components, encapsulant and back sheet.

One of the big plus/minus issues for module performance is cell matching - easy to do with individual cells, not possible with monolithic construction.
ANONYMOUS
March 8, 2012
It will be interesting to see how many installers and wholesalers pass this potential savings on to their customers. While the cost of modules continue to cheapen, I don't see the same happening when it comes to cost of labor and hardware. We have focused on the module cost, but what about the inverters, micro-inverters, racking, etc... I never see any articles about the hardware. Until we see reasonable costs in those technologies, I don't see solar getting cheaper. I do see the module manufacturers working harder for less profits though.
Tom Ferraro
Tom Ferraro
March 8, 2012
This is very exciting! Reducing costs that much would bring pricing down to a point that would further entice fence-sitters to make the decision to go solar.

Any idea on when this might hit the market?
Yotam Ariel
Yotam Ariel
March 8, 2012
Interesting!
thanks for this post.

Is this similar to what Evergreen did?

I understand that wafer prices are already at -
us$0.29 to us$0.48 (according to PVinsights)

Perhaps this technology would be useful for newly established
production facilities...

I am serving the off-grid markets in developing countries (like in Africa),
and actually the cost of products are not such an issue.

The more costly items are logistics (transportation), and trade regulations (taxes).

So closer to end user is where more cost saving space exists..

Thanks again,
Yotam
http://www.bennu-solar.com/
William Fitch
William Fitch
March 7, 2012
Hi:

Tweak that and get economies to scale and WATCH OUT! That really has the potential to drop the end market price... grid parity everywhere...
Just make sure an O&G company does not make you an offer you can not refuse, other wise the product will just fade away like a hundred others..

.....Bill

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 11
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 10
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • 3TIER
  • The Stella Group, Ltd.
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • SRECTrade, Inc.
  • Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut)
  • Enecsys
  • Renewable Energy Corporation
  • Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information