The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 25, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Biomass Industry 2012 Review: A Mixed Bag

Tim Probert, Contributor
December 24, 2012  |  30 Comments

The U.S. biomass industry suffered a frustrating year in 2012, with EPA regulatory uncertainty the dominant theme. The Presidential Election heavily influenced the pace of EPA regulation and the time of writing the long-awaited Boiler MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) Rule and its companion the Non-Hazardous Secondary Material (NHSM) Rule, which are still incomplete, while the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule may not be completed until 2014.

Yet the most important factor impacting biomass in 2012 was not Washington, D.C. but natural gas prices. As a result of an abundance of natural gas from shale gas fracking, several coal plants – which may otherwise have been potential candidates for biomass co-firing or conversions – were closed, often to be replaced with combined-cycle gas turbine power plants.

USA’s Largest Biomass Plant Operational

A number of major biomass projects made significant headway in 2012. Southern Company’s 100 MW Nacogdoches plant in Texas began commercial operations in mid-July, making it the USA’s largest dedicated biomass facility.

The $500 million plant supplies all of its power to Austin Energy in a $2.3 billion, 20-year PPA. The entire facility utilizes just one boiler, making it the largest biomass bubbling fluidized bed boiler unit in the world. The plant, however, has not run since September, unable to compete with cheaper natural gas-fired power plants.

In December, Cate Street Capital took delivery of a steam turbine for its $275 million, 75-MW Burgess BioPower plant in Berlin, New Hampshire. The plant, which will supply power to the New Hampshire Public Service under a 20-year PPA, is expected to become operational by the end of 2013. Meanwhile, the 100-MW Gainesville Renewable Energy Center in Deerhaven, Florida is expected to be commissioned in Fall 2013.

Massachussets Out on a Limb

In May the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources released a set of strict standards that require all qualifying biomass plants to generate power at 50 percent efficiency to qualify for one-half Renewable Energy Credit (REC) per MWh, and 60 percent for one full REC. These new standards are up from the previous 25 percent efficiency requirements. Plants will also be required to analyze lifecycle emissions to demonstrate at least 50 percent reductions over 20 years.

This will have the effect of disqualifying large-scale combustion from biomass without CHP and some fear this decision will influence the EPA decision regarding biomass Boiler MACT regulations. But Massachusetts continues to be the only state that is opposed to the sufficiency standard, said Bob Cleaves, President of the Biomass Power Association.

“Not only have no other states followed Massachusetts lead, but in some cases – Washington state in particular – there has been a 180° turn and legislatively declared biomass to be carbon neutral. Massachusetts is an outlier.”

Strong European Demand for US Feedstock

The biomass supply industry continued to see positive developments emanate out of Europe, which is investing heavily in biomass pellet production facilities to secure fibre for a boom in coal-to-biomass conversions.  In December, British power generator Drax - which is converting 50 percent of its six-unit, 4 GW coal plant to biomass  - expects to begin construction of two pelletization plants in Louisiana and Mississippi, as well as storage and loading facilities at the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, during the first half of 2013.

The manufacturing facilities, Amite BioEnergy in Mississippi and Morehouse BioEnergy in Louisiana, are expected to start full operations in 2014 with a combined capacity to produce 900,000 tonnes/year of biomass pellets using fiber from sustainably managed forests. The Greater Baton Rouge facility, due to be operational in 2014, will be able to store approximately 80,000 tonnes of pellets.

European Biomass Plant Goes Off with a Bang

Driven by the European Union’s Renewables Directive, several coal plants have converted to biomass. Worringly, however, a number of fires beset these facilities in 2012. In February a fire occurred in a fuel storage area at RWE’s 742 MW Tilbury plant – the world’s largest biomass power station - barely two months after commissioning, causing extensive damage to two of the three units.

In August, GDF Suez’s 590 MW Gelderland coal-to-biomass power station in Belgium also saw a major fire, while Danish utility Dong Energy closed biomass operations at its 810MW Avedore plant in Copenhagen following a fire in the conveyor system.

Mixed Year for Biofuels, Too

It was also a mixed year for biofuels. An October report by the Energy Information Administration said that bioethanol accounted for some 10% of US gasoline consumption last year, up from 1% in 2001, but the year started badly when the federal tax credit for ethanol expired on 1 January, ending a 30-year era in which the federal government provided more than $20 billion in subsidies for usage.

A drought hit corn starch ethanol production and records showed investment in the biofuels had shrunk to their lowest level in nearly a decade. In September, the EPA increased the target volume for biomass-based diesel for 2013 under the Renewable Fuel Standard from 1 billion gallons to 1.28 billion gallons a year, which was later challenged by the American Petroleum Institute in the U.S. Court of Appealsfor being “overzealous” and likely to raise diesel prices to unacceptable levels.

Advanced biofuels, however, enjoyed greater support, in particular from the U.S. military. The U.S. Navy pledged to use non-fossil fuel sources for 50 percent of its liquid fuel requirement by 2020 and signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Energy to develop cost-competitive advanced biofuels.

In August, Congress allocated $170 million to support the development of military biofuels, voted to extend key tax credits for advanced biofuel producers, and granted algae producers tax credit parity with other feedstock pathways. 

Lead image: Paper bags via Shutterstock

30 Comments

Register To Comment
Jonathan Maguire
Jonathan Maguire
January 1, 2013
Hi Erich

No web presence is part of our frustration!

In fairness they have kept their head down developing the technology alongside the Advanced Chemical Dept at the University of Rome. Their intentions are to hold the technology in a new co.

If you want further info then email me and I will happily oblige.

Best for 2013.

jon
erich knight
erich knight
December 31, 2012
Is there a web page?
I went to Orion Eco of Canada; http://www.orionecotech.com/index.html
and they only speak of under floor heating.

Thanks
Jonathan Maguire
Jonathan Maguire
December 31, 2012
Hi Brandon
I am no energy expert by any means so treat me gently when I add the following.
We have followed low temperature/catalytic pyrolysis to convert biomass to diesel. this 'works' at temperatures below 300C so you don't get the nasty gases. This is why it doesn't work for petrol because the temperature required is higher. I have seen the technology turn straw to diesel - quite breathtaking really.
Alphakat of Germany have tried to industrialise this but cannot show an operational plant. Orion Eco of Canada now have succeeded in continuous run on the technology.
I like it a lot because rural East Africa is littered with biomass - if this really can turn into diesel then hallelujah! I do understand how to deliver the feedstock and secure a site for a plant.
If you want the 'science' I can send some docs - then, hopefully, you can explain them to me.
Kindest Jon
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 30, 2012
Thanks, Bill.

I wonder if that isn't the same problem that has kept biobutanol out of gas tanks?

Best, Terry
Bill Brandon
Bill Brandon
December 30, 2012
A brief comment for those who expressed interest in the Cool Planet bio-gasoline. First it should not be considered a 'tank ready' fuel and second 'gasoline' has no specific specifications for the molecules it may contain. Cool Planet and others who have similiar approaches to produce 'green gasoline' all produce a high volume of aromatics, some of which we have no knowledge as to their health implications. All of these 'green' fuels have more aromatics than allowed by EPA and so can only be used as blend stock with other hydrocarbons. It seems impossible to extract the complsition of their product from these companies, maybe they don't know what they are going to get. I did, however, get the CEO of Cool Planet to admit to me at a conference that there product is limited to a blend stock.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 29, 2012
mike-holly,

We live in present and future, not in the past.

If we don't make better use of our resources, we may not be living at all.

You didn't address what I sent you. Is there something that frazzles your brain about it? Or did you even bother looking at a single video?

I have nothing whatever against co-generation. In fact I am very enthusiastic about it. I would send you information on a weird cult that is on the forefront of multiple use heat energy but I suppose that would make you angry too.
Mike Holly
Mike Holly
December 29, 2012
@ Terry I really don't understand what your problem is. This is all well known throughout the electricity industry.

When a power plant burns wood only about 25% of the fuel value goes into creating electric energy. When the waste heat is captured and used for heating the total energy efficiency can increase to 50-60%.

If you need to learn more you can consult:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration
I really don't have the time to teach you the basics.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 29, 2012
Mike Holly,

"@ Terry If you read this article you will see the standard for biomass is 25% and that cogeneration brings it up to 50%+."

An asthmatic woman stood by business end of a giant blow torch. She could not bear to be in the same room as pot belly wood stove but she suffered no discomfort whatever near the blowtorch burning micronized wood.

http://www.summerhillbiomass.com/videos.html

What would you expect was the more efficient system?

Any engineer knows that efficiency has some kind of meaning, such as useful work per gallon or pound of fuel.

When I was very young, all of us kids had a potbelly stove in every bedroom in family home. Took no time at all to have the stoves red hot and often showering the roof with sparks.

And how much use were the stoves? Not much. Like with the campfire, one could be uncomfortably hot facing the fire, and the rear end freezing.

What that micro particle burner did was burn nearly every micro-particle of the wood "flour." Sure you could jerry rig all manner of extra uses of heat as it cools. Geothermal engineers have become particularly adept at that. One small hamlet in Iceland uses a trash burner to add heat to tepid waters in order to generate some 3MW of power.
Mike Holly
Mike Holly
December 29, 2012
@ Terry If you read this article you will see the standard for biomass is 25% and that cogeneration brings it up to 50%+. Power plants burning solid fuels like coal and biomass without cogeneration typically burn at about 30%.

Most of Europe has used low-cost, high efficiency CHP fueled by local cheap biomass wastes. But applications have run low. Instead of developing new applications, the large utility Drax is converting their old coal plants to biomass on a massive scale (4000 MW). There isn't enough biomass in the UK, so they are densifying forest residues around the world (Canada, US etc). This increases the cost of biomass from about $40 per dry ton to almost $300, not even including warehousing and ocean transport costs of another $50. Drax can afford to pay much more for fuel and burn it inefficiently because the UK allows renewable energy to increase their wholesale price from 3 or 4 cents to 10 cents.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 29, 2012
Erich,

In the meantime, how's the Chesapeake Bay doing?

I hear not so well.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 29, 2012
"@Terry If you had made any effort at all to compare the costs of using free biomass waste on-site in CHP applications at 50-60% efficiency with paying money to grow a crop, densifying it and shipping it across the ocean to burn in a utility plant at 25% efficiency,"

I am not a fan at all of agriculture used for growing energy crops. Your claim of 25% efficiency is not supported and unlikely IMO.

I am a fan of local CHP if modern technology is brought to bear.
erich knight
erich knight
December 28, 2012
FibroWatt attempted to get two different 50 MW combustion stations here in the Shenandoah Valley. I, with many others convinced local authorities and the poultry farmers of the higher value of their chicken litter. They are going forward on the Delmarva Peninsula, but they have become more ecumenical with their technology, building an anaerobic digester for methane transport fuel for their chicken litter trucks.

Poultry manure makes a high phosphorus Biochar, holding the phosphorus 10 times better than spreading raw manure (or combustion ash) on the fields, it also has even higher value for in situ binding of heavy metals for remediation applications in Brownfields.

DuPont is showing great success with a pilot study in Waynesboro Virginia binding Mercury at a legacy rayon plant on the Shenandoah River. Over the last two years each new bio assay shows increased binding, the first year 40%, the last assay 65%, In vitro, on the lab bench with total mixing into the sediments they got 95% reductions of Mercury traveling up the food chain.
they are planning to expand these trials to forest and field beyond the current study of a single pond.
Mike Holly
Mike Holly
December 27, 2012
@Terry If you had made any effort at all to compare the costs of using free biomass waste on-site in CHP applications at 50-60% efficiency with paying money to grow a crop, densifying it and shipping it across the ocean to burn in a utility plant at 25% efficiency, you wouldn't be writing nonsense.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 27, 2012
mike-holly-17241

"it is downright crazy to grow, densify and ship biomass fuel from the US to large utility monopoly power plants in the EU"

Pontificating on subjects you know nothing about might be close to insanity.

Much pestilence needs no tending. It volunteers. Emergy crops are mostly weeds. On the other hand, palm plantations have a large burden in disposing of empty fruit bunches and other debrish that makes up to some 4/5 of the volume left in the wake of harvest.

The solution: convert the very wet waste to a dry powder that can then be compacted to energy pellets or briquets.

It would be grand if there were no rainforest cut for palm oil plantations but it has already been done. Maximizing the utilization of the enormous waste byproduct is the highest form environmentalism.

And profitable as well.

By the way, "processing" and "refining" are very different words.

Best, Terry
Mike Holly
Mike Holly
December 27, 2012
The article should have noted that generation from biomass is actually falling in the US. And applications in the EU are neither competitive nor sustainable. In fact, it is downright crazy to grow, densify and ship biomass fuel from the US to large utility monopoly power plants in the EU that burn inefficiently.

The key to competitive and sustainable bio-energy production is the use of bio-energy crops to produce value-added products (like liquid fuels, chemicals, paper, biodegradable plastics, etc.) and using the unprocessed biomass waste as free fuel for on-site power production and the free co-generated waste heat (CHP) for processing the main products.

The model has already been achieved by the global paper and sugar cane industries. Typically, they were allowed to dispose of their excess biomass waste but new laws require expensive landfilling. Still, new industries could be developed if the excess biomass waste could be used for generating electricity for sales.

But there is little incentive to develop new applications as long as the US continues to allow the monopolization of the power industry and the EU has no real venture capital market. These policies are also preventing the development of all new power technologies.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 27, 2012
Erich,

"Genetic hybrids are not GMOs, no new species are introduced."

Tell that to the nitwits that have succeeded in preventing commercialization of super hardy elF5A hybrids. It appears the elf5 gene is conserved in all plants and animals and many archaea but not in bacteria.

As you perhaps know all bananas and plaintain are sterile hybrid descendants of 2 different species and are threatened with extermination by a single disease as happened to "Big Mike," a predecessor to the Cavendish. Creating a superbanana with splicing of the elf5a gene might prevent that disaster but so far... Endless trials continue as with numerous other plants.

For the record, Big Mike is said to be alive and well in Jamaica but I suspect that rather than surviving the global wilt a new replacement was found. Whatever...

As you might suspect, elf5a hybrids have been "naturally" bred [nothing is natural about the hybrid process] since the gene is ubiquitous in plants and animals but the stigma remains apparently.

Polyploidization is allowable though it does create new species. Perhaps there are too many syllables for the fright mongers to deal with.

Viruses that are a very real threat are constantly being bioengineered.

Crazy, mixed-up world.

Best, Terry

Best, Terry
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 27, 2012
Impressive List, Paul. Admittedly somewhat surprising to me.

Would have loved to see a poultry litter power plant or two like the ones an English company has stopped building in the U.S. because of hostility of us Yanks. Out east we prefer to use such to fertilize the waters of Chesapeake Bay and make it a stinking mess.

A few 100MW+ plants would be nice but you gotta start somewhere I guess.

Thanks,

Terry
Paul Ervin
Paul Ervin
December 26, 2012
Terry,
Let's see if this helps:
California Biomass Power Plants

Wheelabrator Shasta Biomass - 50 mw - in service
Williams Energy - 25 Mw - in service
Rocklin Constellation - 25 Mw - in service
Woodland Biomass -25 Mw - in service
Buena Vista Power - 25 Mw - in service
Burney Power - 18 Mw - in Service
Tracy biomass - 20 Mw - in service
El Nido - 18 mw - in service
Chowchilla - 12 mw - in service
Covanta Mendota - 25 mw - in service
Fresno Constellation - 25 mw - in service
Chinese Station Constellation - 25 Mw - in service
Dinuba Energy 15 Mw - in Service
Terra Bella 15 mw - in service
Delano Energy - 50 Mw - in service
Mt Poso DTE - 50 mw coal fired -co firing biomass - in service
Colmac Biomass - 50 Mw - in service.

I may have missed a few.

All of the above facilities burn a combination of urban derived, forest and agricultural wastes.

regards,
Paul Ervin
Biostream
erich knight
erich knight
December 26, 2012
"frankenstein(?) miscanthus"
Genetic hybrids are not GMOs, no new species are introduced. Rather, dormant genes can be identified from the deep library all organisms have,and expressed for productivity and efficiency. Plus perennial biomass crops pump carbon sugars back to the soil.

The owners/Inventors at CP are using their "Big Brothers" money to roll out the technology the way they fit, small-scale, village and farm scale reactors. The doors for this reactor assembly-line open in 2013 with a planned production of 100,000 units.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 26, 2012
Erich,

Not everyone has been entranced with even liquid or vapor fuel, with hydrogen or electric cars - nor with the internal combustion engine. The iron horse was an improvement on the actual horse for obvious reasons and the internal combustion engine was a wayward drift backwards to the old hayburners.

But I admit to some fascination with the added inducement of biochar that need not be part of the ICE at all as well as the frankenstein(?) miscanthus which has some counterparts.

In any case I thank you again for some rays of hope in the awful darkness

Indeed I will spend more time looking at material and leads but I am not overly encouraged by the like of GE and other predators being interested.

Thanks again.

Best, Terry
erich knight
erich knight
December 26, 2012
Over the years everyone seems to have taken a stab at Gas ? to ? liquids, and failed. Several pyrolysis companies have claimed a 'magic catalyst' to convert bio oil to tank ready fuel, all have turned out to be smoke and mirrors. If it's good enough for Google, Good enough for me. The nano material catalyst that seems the family jewels of cool planet, some of which are described in the patents, which I described on the links I've given in my report above, have passed the muster of General Electric, Conoco and British Petroleum, again, good enough for me. If you have any additional questions, after reading the threads on the Yahoo Biochar discussion forum; 'A Cool 4,000 Gallons Per Acre,'(a record on record, edge of the envelope claim starting with 25 ton/ac genetic hybrid Miscanthus feedstocks - with additional natural gas) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar-production/message/926 please give me a call Erich 540 289 9750
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 26, 2012
Thanks, Erich.

I have a couple thousand questions and a similar number of doubts but you are sure speaking my language for a change.

Say how is Cool Planet going to grow anything on 1% of desert soil when every square inch is covered by solar panels and dead birds and bats from the wind turbines? LOL!

Best, Terry
erich knight
erich knight
December 26, 2012
California's CoolPlanet Energy System's Carbon Negative Gasoline:
Their pilot scale reactor is now online, they have attained approval from California's gasoline authorities for full blending, Cool Planet is on track to Produces 2,000,000 gallons of Bio–Gasoline, 9K Tons of Biochar in 2013
Please take a look at this YouTube video by the CEO of CoolPlanet Biofuels, guided by Google's Ethos and funding, along with GE, BP and Conoco, they are now building the reactors that convert 1 ton of biomass to 75 gallons of bio – gasoline and 1/3 ton Biochar for soil carbon sequestration.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkYVlZ9v_0o

To give you an idea of how this technology can scale up I extrapolated the rosy scenario below;
Wee-Beastie Real estate, The Rosiest Scenario;

Total Biomass Harvest in the US; 1.6 Billion Tons

If All was processed by CoolPlanet Biofuels the Yield would be;

120 Billion Gallons of tank ready fuel , (The US uses 150 Billion gallons per year)

0.3 Billion Tons of Biochar, with a Surface Area of 600 Square Meters per Gram

One Ton has a surface area of 148,000 Acres! 148,000 Acres is equal to 230 square miles!!

300 Million Tons of Biochar equals 69 Billion Square Miles, or 348 times the Entire Surface of the Earth!


Please review my Sonoma Biochar conference report;
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar-policy/message/3921
CoolPlanet Biofuels in particular seems, by all accounts, to have a game changing technology, carbon negative bio-gasoline, (production cost of $1.25 per gallon & $2.00/gal Jet-fuel), rolling out this year.

The CEOs have already taken the lead sponsorship for the University of Massachusetts 2013, fourth, USBI Biochar Conference, October 13-16, 2013

Please review my Opening presentation at the 2012 USBI Biochar Conference;
"Carbon Conservation for Home, Health, Energy & Climate"
http://2012.biochar.us.com/299/2012-us-biochar-conference-presentations
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 26, 2012
Hi Jchristie,

"The fast catalytic process has three main advantages. 1. It is scalable down to 250 kw or even less, so it can be economic in small remote off grid communities. Combustion processes are large scale, high cap, and in competition with cheap natural gas so at some risk today."

You sure?

How many kilowatts of energy does a home heating furnace using biomass dust in Maine generate? Europeans specify KW in thermal units using subscript "t" for both geothermal and biomass but I have never seen that done in this country.

Summerhill Biomass [see:

http://www.summerhillbiomass.com/index.html

has high hopes yet for replacing natural gas with its "biomass used as natural gas" but I would not like to bet on them in our current environment where baseload green energy has become a dirty word.

Best, Terry
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 26, 2012
You sure, homeboy?

"California has the most biomass fueled facilities in the nation with the most effective infrastructure to manage the flow of materials. We dealt with the issues of fires 20 years ago"

Seems to me there were a whole bunch of trees burning up last year and the year before that and the year before that along with critters and people and homes and farms. Did I miss out somewhere there?

Undoubtedly California has a number of shuttered biomass burning facilities but a closed facility is not of great use and probably a fire hazard itself like the new 100MW Nagadoches plant in Texas that has already been closed down.

I guess firefighters need work too along with the kind of environmentalists, like the Sierra Club, who think it better to burn coal.

"Best in the nation" is far from best in the world in looking out for the environment, the people and life on the planet.

One spectacular and bizarre word is that California's ancient sequoias are still growing vigorously according to a report in the National Geographic. I guess the sequoias are doing their best to ingest as much as possible of all those polluting greenhouse gases you guys and ourselves are putting in the air and water through misguided environmentalism. They can't do it all by themselves but it's nice they are trying.

I don't pretend by the way that all forest fires can be ended. That is too much to ask for but no point in obstruction of efforts that I can see.

Best, Terry

Best, Terry
John Christie
John Christie
December 26, 2012
The fast catalytic process has three main advantages. 1. It is scalable down to 250 kw or even less, so it can be economic in small remote off grid communities. Combustion processes are large scale, high cap, and in competition with cheap natural gas so at some risk today.
2. The process can produce large quantities of hydrogen inexpensively so it can provide clean combustion for power generation in small communities or it can provide inexpensive H2 for the biochemical industry or to make green diesel or gasoline. Scalable so the plant can be sited near the source of feedstock and the product used locally. No transportation cost.
3. It has a valuable by product biochar with a value of $500/tonne. This enhances the green story and the bottom line. Biochar revenue can pay for the cost of diesel production.
4. Yields are so high (per T biomass) that the industry can better work within the availability of waste rather than infringing upon food crop farmland to grow feedstock.

All of this (1 to 3) can also be applied to the municipal solid waste business, another future success story in itself.

Co-firing with biomass is great because it displaces coal, but so can natural gas and for several years it is going to be a tough competition for biomass combustion
Paul Ervin
Paul Ervin
December 26, 2012
It always amuses me when I read these articles on the "Biomass Industry" in the US and the writers seldom mention the biggest players in the "industry". California has the most biomass fueled facilities in the nation with the most effective infrastructure to manage the flow of materials. We dealt with the issues of fires 20 years ago and modified the infrastructure to manage this problem. California has been co-firing biomass with coal for several years now and I have personally been a part of three of these projects with several more in process.

Come on guys do your research!
John Christie
John Christie
December 26, 2012
JP. I'm interested in the technology you speak of. 2013 will be the year to see clean fuels from biomass become economic. I'm working with one that produces green diesel at under $.50/L. Investment IRR 30%. It will supply a trucking company with fuel below regular cost without subsidy thereby making the company more competitive. That is truly transformational and along with the green fuel benefits will be what makes the process take off. What will be critical is how it actually works out in the real world over time...Always interested in learning more so will email you for details.
terry hallinan
terry hallinan
December 25, 2012
Bizarre that biomass power from waste has to fight purported environmentalist regulators to replace coal, most especially in Massachusetts. The good news is that biomass is winning despite the enormous resistance in North America. The really good news is that thermal biomass that requires no conversion is making progress however haltingly. The most spectacular example I know of is Okinawa where waste to energy and fertilizer is very advanced because of the peculiar circumstances of that island which must pay a heavy cost to ship its garbage out and dare not dump its waste in its surrounding ocean because of the value of its fisheries. When fuel for engines as well as power plants is sold by the pound rather than the gallon, we will be closing in on a cool, green planet.
Jonathan Maguire
Jonathan Maguire
December 25, 2012
On a brighter note we have been following catalytic pyrolysis. A number of firms have been trying to move to industrial scale, converting biomass to diesel. A Canadian firm allied to the University of Rome have now succeeded with a continuous run process. Having witnessed straw turn to diesel I continue to be gripped by the transformational nature of this technology - my interest is East Africa but the application is clearly global. Production costs about $1 per litre. If you are interested in this please contact me jpmaguire@hotmail.co.uk Happy Christmas.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Tim Probert

Tim Probert

Tim Probert is an NCTJ-qualified freelance journalist, based in the UK, specializing in the electric power industry. Recent commissions include African Review of Business & Technology, Arabian Business, Asian Power, Batteries & Energy Storage...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets
  • 1
    Goldman Sachs to Invest $486 Million in Japan Renewable Energy
  • 1
    Outlook for US Energy Independence Gaining Confidence

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • The Stella Group, Ltd.
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Natural Power
  • RussTech Language Services, Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information