The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 18, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Under the Election-Season Radar, Signs of Bipartisan Support for Clean Energy

Clint Wilder, Clean Edge
October 08, 2012  |  23 Comments

I'm not optimistic that our nation's clean-energy future will suddenly turn into the campaign issue that it should be. But looking beyond the November 6th election, I've seen some recent signs that a more bipartisan push for clean-tech growth might be possible.

The first sign came about a month ago when DBL Investors issued a terrific report called Red, White & Green: The True Colors of America’s Clean Tech Jobs. The report’s early September release date and the theme coincided nicely with the launch of my new book Clean Tech Nation, co-authored with Clean Edge co-founder and managing director Ron Pernick, in which we discuss some of the same themes. The jobs report, by DBL managing partner and veteran clean-tech investor Nancy Pfund and Yale MBA candidate Michael Lazar, details the surprising leadership in clean-tech jobs in several politically conservative southern and western states. Since it’s election season, these are better known as red states and swing states. Of the 10 states with the fastest growth in clean-tech jobs from 2003 to 2010, only two (Hawaii and New York) are solid Democratic blue states. All the others are either solid red (Alaska, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Wyoming) or swing (Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and North Carolina).

“We all need to understand,” write the report’s authors, “that green jobs and clean tech are not merely the idle dreaming of a small group of partisan activists and insiders, but a source of livelihood for millions of Americans, literally in all parts of the country.” The report also highlights the efforts of five current or former Republican governors to attract and grow clean-tech jobs in their states, most notably Mississippi’s Haley Barbour and Kansas’s Sam Brownback.

This is a point I make in nearly all of my public appearances, particularly to call out the inexcusable stance of the national Republican party (and presidential candidate Mitt Romney) in opposing the extension of the federal production tax credit (PTC) for wind power, which expires at year’s end. Brownback, Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, and Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin are among the GOP governors who have spoken out in favor of extending the PTC. Last week, Fallin told the newspaper Tulsa World, "I agree with Governor Romney on 99 percent of the issues. But on this one, I've got to do what's best for our state." Bottom line: this is not about ideology, it’s about jobs. And thanks to the insane political fight over the PTC – Congress adjourned last week without taking action – jobs are already disappearing as wind companies announce layoffs due to the PTC uncertainty.

I saw more support for clean tech from an unexpected corner last week when I attended the opening sessions of Climate Week NYC, produced by U.K.-based non-profit The Climate Group, in New York. Timed to coincide with the Clinton Global Initiative annual conference (I was there as well) and the United Nations General Assembly, Climate Week brings together a diverse group of global leaders, including former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair, World Bank vice president Rachel Kyte, and Prince Albert II of Monaco. But in this august company I found the most compelling speaker to be Deborah Fikes of Midland, Texas, executive advisor to the World Evangelical Alliance (WEA).

I was not familiar with the WEA – it was quite an eye-opener. With roots dating back to 1846, it’s a network of evangelical churches in 129 countries, representing more than 600 million people. “The U.S. is the only country that I work in where climate change is considered ‘controversial’,” said Fikes. The WEA believes it's a moral imperative to reduce carbon emissions with clean energy and efficiency, and Fikes said the group plans to take its message to all four of the national candidates’ debates in the next month, with banners asking Obama, Romney, Biden, and Ryan what they plan to do on the climate issue. Good stuff.

At the end of the week, I was back home in San Francisco and spoke on a clean-energy panel at the Commonwealth Club public affairs forum with Vice Admiral (Ret.) Dennis McGinn, head of the American Council on Renewable Energy, and Renewable Energy Trust CEO John Bohn. Bohn boasts quite a resume, as the former head of Moody’s Investor Services, the Asian Development Bank, and the Export-Import Bank of the U.S. When panel moderator Greg Dalton, founder of the club’s Climate One program, asked us to name the biggest myth about clean energy, Bohn wasted no time.

“I’m a card-carrying Republican,” he said, “and the biggest myth is that Republicans don’t support clean energy!” Poll after poll says that Bohn is correct, and we can see more proof in places ranging from the Oklahoma governor’s office to the banners of evangelicals. As the political season enters full swing and the campaign rhetoric cranks up, let’s be sure to keep that in mind. And even more important, remember it on November 7th.

Lead image: Election podium via Shutterstock

23 Comments

Register To Comment
Erik Kiehle
Erik Kiehle
October 19, 2012
@Penny, You'll be happy to know there are zero Marine Important Bird Areas in Abilene, TX, nor in Oklahoma, nor in Iowa. Even in California and Oregon there are large stretches of the coast where your map shows zero important bird areas.

As a native Californian I would vastly prefer rooftop solar, and second to that utility scale solar and wind farms. When it comes to California's coast I think you'd be hard pressed to find any large number of Californians who'd prefer oil rigs off the coast whereas wind towers in environmentally safe areas likely would be supported. There's a lot of remote coastline in California and Oregon. Anyways, that off topic. Anytime you want to come out to TX I'll give you a walking tour around here. We can go stomping through all the mesquite brush areas you want. Bring boots for the rattlesnakes and heavy clothing or bandaids for the mesquite thorns.
Erik Kiehle
Erik Kiehle
October 18, 2012
http://www.bing.com/maps/?v=2&cp=pcr87w6p0pfh&lvl=16&dir=0&sty=b&where1=Abilene%2C%20TX&form=LMLTCC
Erik Kiehle
Erik Kiehle
October 18, 2012
SandCanyonGal, maybe they build wind farms differently out where you are. Here's a satellite view of a local wind farm just West of me in Abilene, TX. You'll see there was some clearing of brush for gravel roads. Most of the landscape is untouched with native vegetation intact. Gravel roads even allow rain water (what little we get) to percolate into the soil. I see no evidence of herbicide use or clearing of all land for the wind turbines. Please provide some satellite images to back up what you're describing. You make it sound like there'll be nothing around these wind turbines except barren poisoned land but that's just not the case (at least here in TX).
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 18, 2012
My information comes from attending hearings like the North Sky River/Jawbone. They are videoed and documented. The Director of planning stated to expect 100% disturbance of land. You're referring to flat ground disturbance not on hillsides which can be 40 acres or more, plus 10% for roads. You can try to insult or belittle me but it won't fly. A commissioner also asked about fire prevention and the proponent stated that herbicides and pesticides would be used within the boundaries of the 21.3 sq miles. It's also documented in the eir.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 18, 2012
erikkiehle. There is a map to check out in this article that shows all of the sensitive areas for migratory seabirds: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/16/seabird-atlas-ocean-conservation
John Ihle
John Ihle
October 18, 2012
Construction sites on a per turbine basis usually consists of disturbing about 1 - 2 acres per turbine on an average basis and I know of no project that sprays weeds for an entire project footprint.

You're pathetically twisting facts. Where do you come up with this stuff? I've worked in Tehachapi, the Altamont as well as several other places and what you're saying is totally inaccurate. Permitting processes on every project I've worked on are super stringent.

If you don't like Tehachapi move away. Maybe you shouldn't have moved there in the first place. The turbines were there more than 20 years before you came. What's the matter with you?

Maybe if people like you wouldn't move into rural areas there would be more wildlife. The problem is when people like you get to a rural environment you want to impose your idea of how things should be.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 18, 2012
erikkiehle. You are truly ignorant like I used to be ignorant. At what vantage point do you observe this useless scrub? It must be when driving at 65 mph from the freeway. Up close, all land teams with life. Just pick up a rock or watch the ground and movement of life. Those holes with silk webbing over them are tarantula holes. Furthermore, if it were only a few birds died, it would be a non issue. This is not the case. Basically what happens at a construction site is that 100% of that land is "disturbed". Birds and all wildlife are booted off the land -sometimes 21-48 sq miles. When those animals return, the flying ones collide with the blade and the ones on the ground meet wasteland because herbicides and pesticides are used on every inch of the land for the life of the installation to control brush. For perspective, go to wiki and look up your local cities to find one within this range. Visualize 100-300 500 foot tall turbines on that terrain. The biological studies for eirs are samplings in small areas, not a walkthru of the entire land to establish real numbers of what lives there. We've walked our dogs for 8 years on our 28 acres and haven't even scratched the surface of what exists on it. Burrowing owls nests for example are very difficult to spot as are raptor nests on cliffs.

Our closest turbines are 1.48 miles away and some of the turbines locally have been around since the '80s.I've put out feeders to attempt to figure out what is left of the birds - my neighbor said there used to be wildlife and scrub jays everywhere. I attract 3 of them. We meaning you me and everyone are at risk without our life support systems. For example, we'd all be overrun with mosquitoes and other flying bugs if it weren't for birds and bats.

Instead of pushing everything aside it's a matter of survival to become stewards as opposed to listening to politicians and greedy vendors. It's common sense and should be instinctive in all of us.
Erik Kiehle
Erik Kiehle
October 18, 2012
@SandCanyonGal
Not all wind turbines are in CA. Just because you care about a few bird strikes in Tehacapie doesn't mean all wind nation-wide is bad. What about off-shore wind that's not on a migration route? What about on-shore wind in the TX plains? I can see 3 commercial wind farms North West, and South of Abilene, TX where I live. Should they all be shut down? (BTW, the planned local Coal fired plant is in radical danger of not being built because we HAVE NO WATER HERE). Regardless of your excuses about wind farm water usage they need next to nothing /MW compared to a conventional coal, co-gen, NG, or Nuc plant /MW.

If you care about the birds so much, focus on practical fixes. Go donate to Nature Conservancy and purchase some habitat land for the birds. Go fight for classification as a threatened or endangered species. (Are they really? I have my doubts despite your near hysterical rants). Considering wind towers have been in CA commercially for what, 20 years(?) I suspect your "wind turbines will make the birds extinct" spiel is "all hat, no cattle".

BTW, @SandCanyonGal, please answer the question posed to you in #2. In #1 you said "Wind turbines and industrial solar are dinosaurs that have no place on our planet."
The unanswered question from #2 is "And please explain how industrial solar is dangerous to anyone?"

Also from #2 "You do realize that not every plot of land in the world can produce food yes?" Tehachapie isn't an agricultural area. It's cheap scrub land. Same with the rural land in TX. If the land is more valuable for ag it's used that way. If it's unviable for ag it can still (sometimes) be useful for wind or solar.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 10, 2012
#14 It's called free speech.
Mark Smolinski
Mark Smolinski
October 9, 2012
Yup, you'll find whatever you can wrong to denigrate something that, once it's built, doesn't require any more digging. How about fracking- the next great Ponzi scheme to come down the pike. With a nearly 90% drop off of well production after two years (being sold to investors as having a 40 year life), it requires 30,000 wells to be dug EVERY YEAR just to support the CURRENT level of gas production. The Oil Drum people (a site that is PRO fossil fuel) estimates that the underground inventory has been oversold to investors by at least 100%. Another Enron??? And every fossil fuel nut and his brother expects fracking to ramp UP to support MORE of our energy needs. That's 100,000 NEW wells EVERY YEAR at more than TWO MILLION GALLONS of water EACH plus all the fracking chemicals. It's INSANE! You can spin your yarns about carbon fiber being non-recyclable, but the cat is out of the bag. You are trolling on a renewable energy web site, whining about some red tailed hawks, but your real agenda is self evident.
ANONYMOUS
October 9, 2012
It is interesting that almost all the comments now on this site are made by ill-informed and biased commentators who are steadfastly opposed to clean energy. Perhaps you should stick to teaparty.com or kkk.com
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 9, 2012
Don't know if Issa is slimy but he was thorough in his interview. Apparently, enough citizens voted for him to put him in a Congressional seat. Isn't it a basic qualification requirement that politicians are crooks and thieves? The corruption is much deeper like 48 year old Steve Black, Chief Architect for Renewable Energy in the DOI, caught being pleasured by a NextEra 28 year old lobbyist. He fell for the oldest trick in the book - sex for favors. Oak Creek Energy sold all of their running operations in Mojave to American Wind Capital in 2011. They're a subsidiary of Barclay's Bank, yea, the same bank accused of interest rate fixing.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 9, 2012
cleanauthorityguy #2. There are no plans to get off of fossil fuels...Keystone, Powder River, Montana, Ruby Pipeline and Royal Dutch Shell are merely 4 high profile examples that come to mind. A new coal plant opens every week in China.

The affects of industrial wind and solar are dramatic. Coal fired kilns to convert limestone in making of cement, the mining, transportation, iron ore conversion to usable steel and other metal materials, making of composite carbon based fiberglass that is 100% non recyclable (it's buried typically at end of life). When you get all done with the pollution of making the material, then there is the land where the equipment will be placed. A typical wind facility is about 20 sq miles that will be 100% disturbed. This means bulldozing, 10% of the land used for roads, blasting, cutting, filling, using a wetland for use as water to make the concrete and wet down roads. Then for the next 20-30 years, pesticides and herbicides are used to keep the natural brush from accumulating, poisoning the watershed that ends up in aquifers where masses of people get their "fresh" water supply. If this isn't enough, now companies are coming into the wind resource areas to put in 2 tiered dams that run off the grid and are implemented to balance out the energy when the wind doesn't blow, which is at least 50% or more of the time. One that is planned near Tehachapi will use more water to fill up the lower reservoir than the entire greater Tehachapi area uses in an entire year.

The land where turbines are being placed are right on the major artery of the California migration path. Just as insane is that the sites have cultural petroglyphs, cemeteries and holy grounds of 12000 year old aboriginal Indians. My property has ancient grinding stones too. The wind vendor bulldozers scoop up bones from these ancient people with every scoop of the shovel.
Mark Smolinski
Mark Smolinski
October 9, 2012
Darrel Issa is slime of the highest order, with an agenda to match. I watched him torment the director of NHTSA over the (non) issue of the Volt battery fire. Anybody who can quote his name (without vomiting) and claim that they care about birds flying in the air has ZERO credibility. The man would gold plate that last red tailed hawk on the planet if he could make a profit on it. He has no interest in your birds. Read up his bio and you'll find someone who could easily have spent most of his life behind bars. Not that any politician can be trusted, but the current iteration of the GOP took hypocrisy to the next level.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 9, 2012
Comment #8. Darrel Issa questioned representatives from the Department of Labor about what they count as green jobs: http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/08/labor-dept-counts-oil-lobbyists-garbage-men-bus-drivers-as-green-jobs-video/
Kelly de la Torre
Kelly de la Torre
October 9, 2012
Clean tech is a term that is used for more than renewable energy generation. The report defines 'green' or 'clean' or 'low-carbon economy' as the sector of the economy that produces goods and services with an environmental benefit. The difference is also explained in this clip by Caroline Howell, an investment banker with St. Vrain Partners in Denver, CO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhgZuPp_k6A&feature=plcp

As discussed on the Rocky Mountain Energy Blog (http://rmenergyblog.blogspot.com/2012/09/icosa-driving-force-radio-red-white.html), the emphasis in the report is that clean tech is recognized by both Parties as a valuable tool for job creation at the local and state level. "We all need to understand that green jobs and clean tech are not merely the idle dreaming of a small group of partisan activists and insiders, but a source of livelihood for millions of Americans, literally in all parts of the country. What's more, their numbers are growing every day."

Nancy Pfund will be discussing this report and her report on energy subsidies called "What Would Jefferson Do? on ICOSA's Driving Force radio on October 20th. The show will be posted here: http://www.youtube.com/user/ICOSAmagazine. As Vice Admiral McGinn says, business as usual is not the answer.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 9, 2012
Perhaps some of you who are blasting me should read through a wind or solar plant eir sometime and not just get your information from prime time media. Wherever you live, walk outside and look into the sky. I'll bet there is hardly a bird in the skies where you live...sure, maybe sparrows but not the diversity that existed in the past. The reason you don't see them is because they're gone, dead, never to return.

Here in the Tehachapi Pass, 10-20 hawks collide with turbine blades every day in just one spot. In a few months those numbers will drop because the population of eagles, buzzards, red tail hawk will be gone. I'm sorry find that so many of you are so self centered that you can't see past today and where our life support systems are headed. Wind turbines in their present form should all be shut down. The only ones benefitting from them are Barclay's Banks and investors.
Phil Manke
Phil Manke
October 9, 2012
'Sandcanyongal' may be right about industrial solar from the viewpoint thay much of it is done with govt support. The public has little of this. Solar is, after all, distributed energy, and most (conservative) political circles rotate on the money from corporate contributions. So, corporations and ute's would have us believe they have right to capture and sell wind and solar energy. Little support is given in regard to public adoption for investment into distributed solar heat and electricity, even though it is distributed to most of them as well as any corporate entity. For the public to shift their energy dollars to the "income" side of their ledgers would mean potential losses for corporate USA, which determines all resource extractive earnings as their first domain, along with the GOP. So, both right and left must recognize solar, but how and where it is adopted and for "whom" is the current real question.
ROBERT MACARTHUR
ROBERT MACARTHUR
October 9, 2012
3 things would really help build bipartisan support for renewables:

1. Recognize that local, market-based solutions will drive the progress
2. Avoid moralizing the issue
3. Keep the crony capitalism, e.g. Solyndra, out of it
Mark Smolinski
Mark Smolinski
October 9, 2012
Yup, you gotta love the complete tunnel vision (read far right) viewpoints that talk about cleaning up trash, but say we must do away with wind and solar. LUNACY! How's this for cleaning up trash? We own a dental office and have voluntarily installed a filter that collects filling material (READ MERCURY) from old restorations. HALF of Mercury that is in effluent of sewers is from the dental industry, yet the ADA keeps pushing for the sick old amalgam fillings- even to the point of telling our State Dept. to not ratify a UN treaty that restricts Mercury. [We resigned from the ADA over this]. And HALF of all environmental mercury comes from burning COAL. We now have 13 kilowatts of solar panels on that dental office (see www.sensitivedentistry.net) Just a few years ago, we would have called ourselves GOP. Those days are gone. Sorry, but I have seen it as an INSIDER. The far right is DANGEROUS for this planet!
John Ihle
John Ihle
October 9, 2012
I'd like to see less hypocritical and myopic perspectives from those that espouse how much they care about bird kills. There isn't the comparable concern for mercury/heavy metals which end up in our communities' lakes and rivers, or care for health related care problems caused or exacerbated from fossil fuel use and consequent emissions and the business as usual scenario typically advocated from the utiilty industry and the not in my backyard people like sandcanyongal.

It's difficult to take people like her serious.

It's a great article pointing out that clean energy isn't a republican or democrat issue. It isn't just about morally the right thing to do but (it is that), but, all the way around, clean energy also makes for good economic policy.
Christopher Minott
Christopher Minott
October 9, 2012
sandcanyongal - If you want to do something about cancer then support technology that weans us off fossil fuels. You can clean all the trash out of streams that you want but if you don't stop pollutants from falling from the sky or being pumped back into the water you aren't making any progress. The fallacies you promote here are one of the many reasons why people think conservatives (Republicans?) are against renewable energy. Myths are promoted by those who support the status quo of how we get our energy, you Ma'am have been duped. And please explain how industrial solar is dangerous to anyone? You do realize that not every plot of land in the world can produce food yes? Dinosaurs? Hardly. The dinosaurs are these tired diatribes that are continually pulled out to halt the progress of getting rid of the real threats to our planet
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 9, 2012
Jobs at ANY cost, right, like gutting the Endangered Species Act and having laws modified to allow permits to kill our national bird the Bald eagle?

How about pitching for a cause that's sane like keeping the landfills empty and creating jobs thru recycle, reuse and remake, for starters. Another is to bring back all those jobs that have been sent to communist countries that use child labor. 2.5 million jobs are outsourced or operations moved out of the U.S. every years. That management or r&d position that used to belong to you is in China, India or Indonesia now. Instead of wrecking our forests and replacing our agricultural land that feeds us to replace it with open bladed propellers how about using subsidies to train and hire our homeless and jobless to clean up the polluted streams and plastic in our ocean. Just curious if anyone besides me notices that way too many people have cancer and die. So do the fish in our ocean have skin cancer - one of our food sources.

Wind turbines and industrial solar are dinosaurs that have no place on our planet. If you don't believe this live dangerously and take the grills off your home fans to get a sense of the reality of how dangerous they are to human fingers and hair, then give some serious thought about how many innocent birds have their beaks, wings, feet and bodies chopped up by 186 foot turbine blades spinning at 200 mph at the tips.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Clint Wilder

Clint Wilder

Clint Wilder is contributing editor at Clean Edge, a research and strategy firm in the San Francisco Bay Area and Portland, Oregon, focused on the business of renewable energy and other clean technologies. He is the co-author of The Clean...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 55
    Energy Expert Predicts Solar Could Upend Major Utility in California on Price
  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Everblue
  • Admirals Bank
  • Affordable Solar Group, LLC
  • Brightergy
  • Alternative Matters
  • Trojan Battery Company
  • EU PVSEC (European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition)
  • Canadian Solar Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information