The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Solyndra Has No Impact on US Public Support for Solar

Marsha W. Johnston, Contributor
October 03, 2012  |  13 Comments

Print

The media feeding frenzy over government support for now-bankrupt Solyndra has had no apparent impact on public impressions of solar energy or even of government support for solar, says a new poll from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Hart Research.

“Despite a news environment that has not always been friendly, it has not inflicted any real drop in solar energy’s measure of public support,” said Hart senior analyst Molly O’Rourke in an online conference to announce the findings.  “We got an array of very favorable findings, broad support and breadth of constituency.” 

Of 1,206 “likely” voters surveyed online nationwide between September 4 and 9, 92% said it was very or somewhat important for the U.S. to develop and use solar.  The percentage was 93% among the survey’s swing voters, which constituted its majority (762) and were defined as “ticket-splitters or who vote for candidates of either party.” 

Solar energy rated favorable by large majorities, regardless of political affiliation, with 94% of Democrats, 89% of independents and 75% of Republicans in support of it.

“On the eve of the first presidential debate, public support for solar energy has never been stronger. Nine out of 10 Americans surveyed feel the US should develop and use more solar power,” said Rhone Resch, SEIA president and CEO, in an online conference to announce the findings. “We were joking in the office that we couldn’t think of anything that had more support, and we looked—baseball, apple pie and chocolate—but nothing was more popular!” he quipped.

Furthermore, O’Rourke said, unlike other sectors with favorable public ratings, approval of solar translates into a feeling that government should do more to encourage its growth, with 7 in 10 of all voters surveyed saying so.  Slightly more swing voters, 72%, think government should do more as well.  Even 50% of Republicans agreed. 

Specifically, survey respondents, by a margin of 4 to 1, said they want the government to support solar with tax credits and other financial incentives.  “What is so impressive is that a majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents all agree on this issue as a being a specific role for government,” O’Rourke said.  The breakdown was 91% of Democrats, 78% of independents and 63% of Republicans.

The only negative points survey respondents raised about solar energy were high cost and practicality.  “The strengths and advantages of solar far outweighed the concerns for voters,” O’Rourke said.  Resch noted that consumer public opinion is likely lagging a bit behind the market reality, as the cost of installing solar came down 33% in the second quarter.  Large commercial users of solar, such as Walmart, for example, he said, are convinced.  “Walmart is number one, with 65 MW installed, and intends to install solar in many more locations,” he said.

Of the 1200 respondents, 42% identified themselves as Democrats, 37% as Republicans and 21% as independents with no party affiliation. 

Lead image: Views of people in a group via Shutterstock.

13 Comments

Register To Comment
Iggy Dalrymple
Iggy Dalrymple
October 5, 2012
For your calculation, did you use the retail costs of materials and installation? How did you extrapolate future costs of retail electricity?
Delroy Leslie
Delroy Leslie
October 5, 2012
Dividing the cost of the system by the amount of kwh generated is not creative accounting, it is call arithmetic.
Iggy Dalrymple
Iggy Dalrymple
October 5, 2012
Creative accounting. You brought up the 'H' word. 'H'ers usually do. I don't H renewables. I bet your panels won't be there in 25 yr and neither will you. You're in the business and I understand your enthusiasm. BTW, how's business?
Delroy Leslie
Delroy Leslie
October 5, 2012
A 10 KW system that I had installed is costing me less than $0.05 per Kwh calculated over 25 years without incentives and $0.038 per Kwh with the FTC.

It is ironic that the people that are criticizing the investment in renewable energy in favor of non-renewables, are the same ones that do not think twice about spending the same amount of money on an automobile instead of more economical public transport.

How long does it take to recover your investment for an automobile which cost as much if not more than a solar system, and has a much shorter lifespan?

We need to stop showing our hate for renewable energy and look at things from a practical point of view. Most people do not think twice about financing an automobile that they keep for 3 to 5 years, but complain about the upfront cost of a solar system that is guaranteed for 25 years.
Iggy Dalrymple
Iggy Dalrymple
October 5, 2012
IMO a 40 yr payback is no payback....it's an illusion. In 40 yr, chances are you won't be there, you won't be paid back when you sell, and the likelihood is that the panels won't be there either.

If you(or more likely, the taxpayers) have money to burn, you will only get psychic payback.
Peter Bradshaw
Peter Bradshaw
October 5, 2012
"Monthly breakthroughs for over 40 years and it's still not practical".

There were some breakthroughs in the '70s, but that essentially stopped in the '80s and '90s. I recently found an IEEE journal from 1980 (pre-election of Reagan), and there were a lot of new ideas about to be tried, but progress stopped for decades. Now similar ideas are being pursued again.

Not practical? Our house gets 70% of it's annual electricity use from 15 solar panels on a not-perfect-orientation roof, installed for <2% of the value of the house, that should last 40 years or more, during which time they will pay for themselves several times over. What's not practical about that?
Iggy Dalrymple
Iggy Dalrymple
October 4, 2012
I've watched solar closely since the '70s. Monthly breakthroughs for over 40 years and it's still not practical, except for emergency lamps and yard ornaments. Some real competitor is going to emerge some day and blow solar and wind off the map.
Delroy Leslie
Delroy Leslie
October 4, 2012
Travis, to your first question, he is lying. As his campaign manager said during the primaries, he is like an etch-a-sketch, he changes his tune based on the audience.

Oil and gas will not last very long, even Saudi Arabia, the country that has the largest deposit of crude oil, is investing heavily in solar because very soon it will not be economical to drill for oil.
TRAVIS SAGERT
TRAVIS SAGERT
October 4, 2012
I DID watch Mitt Romney, and heard him say he loves solar. So, either he's lying and you can read his mind, or you're equating not giving truckloads of government cash to solar as 'hating'? Not really sure what you're saying...

I hate solar in some regards; when installed in the north as much as I hate windfarms on the moon. That said, I live in the north and use solar myself (Solar-certified electrician, so I know the physics and realistic expectations of it). I just know its a minuscule amount of power compared to what I use, and not one DIME of tax money should be given to any homeowner wanting a $125k solar install on his house if he will be using electric heat on a poorly insulated house with single pane windows, incandescent bulbs and 30-year old appliances.

That said about the "good and honest non-scandalous renewable energy" companies...I highly doubt they do it for good and a low paycheck. Thats putting WAY too much "Captain Planet" into real life. It just isnt that way. My company makes solar panels as well as windmills, we have 2000 panels on the roof of our HQ (funny; NOT made by us, hahahaha!), and we're in a "4.4 hour" usable solar area. The output is NOT impressive even in the summer, and doesnt even put out enough to run HALF the new dual T-8 ballast lighting on the main floor.

Another way, if you REALLY disagree with me and think there is a huge conspiracy, fine. Lets use up all the oil and coal. Then we HAVE to go 100% renewable, dont we? :)
ANONYMOUS
October 4, 2012
Oh well. You have a B instead of an M. It is $500M, not $500B wasted...

But, you are missing the point. The right in this country, which is funded by the Oil, Coal and Natural Gas coalitions is using this scandal, or whatever you prefer to call it, in order to incite people against advanced renewable energy. They use the natural fear of new (technologies), with the love of the familiar (Oil) and the rejection of the use of taxpayer money (especially when it fails) to scare people away from those new technologies.
If you watched Mitt Romney, you can put him on the list of those who hate Solar.
TRAVIS SAGERT
TRAVIS SAGERT
October 4, 2012
How anyone thinks public disapproval of the Solyndra scandal (yes, I call it a scandal when they get THAT much money, still fail, and the owners run off with the cash) is about SOLAR is beyond me, or from sightless extremists on the left trying to cover for a blunder (or scandal, whatever your belief) by the President.

Its NOT about solar; its about throwing money down the toilet.

Solar or not, if you need to subsidize a business forever, it cant survive on its own. Why should the taxpayers pay for a poor business model just because of the nature of the product? Why also should the government say "THIS solar company will get help, but not THAT one"?

I cant name ONE person that dislikes the Solyndra "incident" and also dislikes solar because of it.

This article is like saying people still like cars after GM was bailed out by the government. Its just a silly observation, with ridiculous comments about how it's somehow a "political tool against solar".

Logic: Would the people upset at the 500B wasted on Solyndra be any less upset if Solyndra was a fast-food chain? A dry-cleaning business? A furniture outlet? No. The solar connection is null.
Peter Bradshaw
Peter Bradshaw
October 4, 2012
Wonderful that the public is smart enough to see that the Solyndra political football is largely a non-real-issue, and that solar power has such massive support. Let us hope that that will lead quickly to a renewable of the wind energy credit system.
Delroy Leslie
Delroy Leslie
October 3, 2012
Solyndra is just being used as a political football until after the election next month.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Marsha Johnston

Marsha Johnston

Marsha W. Johnston is a freelance writer based in the DC area, specializing in all areas of sustainable development, from renewable energy to agriculture and wildlife conservation.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 9
    Country-Based Action to Achieve Universal Access to Energy
  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 2
    Big Apple Anticipates Solar Explosion for 2013
  • 2
    Is the IRS Considering Solar REITs?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • RevoluSun
  • AltE
  • Array Technologies
  • Motech Industries, Inc.
  • Solar Energy International (SEI)
  • Solar Electric Power Association
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information