The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 25, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Solar Energy Fee Fuels Debate in Louisiana

Todd C. Elliott, The Eunice News
October 09, 2012  |  8 Comments

The road to "America's Energy Independence" – which both Democratic and GOP candidates have spoken about in this election year's presidential campaigns – is, much like Louisiana roads, destined to have a few bumps in it.

Dianne Michon, of Sunset, LA, checks her net meter on her solar powered home. She said the her last electric bill was $50 dollars, half of which was fees for electricity.

Many in the Louisiana solar energy industry may see Clyde Holloway, Public Service Commissioner for District Three, as one of those bumps.

He has proposed that property owners who install and use solar energy panels to generate electricity for their home should pay a monthly fee back to utility companies like Entergy and Cleco.

Amid rumors of a proposed $50 monthly “utility charge” to solar users, Holloway recently said that amount is too high.

“Twenty-five dollars is my limit, I won’t vote for a $50-dollar charge on solar customers,” said Holloway. “What I am trying to do is put a monthly fee on just solar homes that have the system, they would be the only ones that get these charges added. But what amount should that solar customer pay to offset the amount to Cleco, Entergy or whomever for those solar customers being on the grid.”

Holloway said that if solar isn’t working, due to cloudy or rainy weather, solar customers need to use electricity generated from the utility company grid.

Special meters installed on solar homes help to utilize “net metering” – which has been in place in Louisiana since 2003 and allows sunlight-generated electricity from the homes to be generated back onto the grid.

Some are calling Holloway’s proposal an “increased net metering fee”. Most utility companies already have a monthly fee for the special meters, often calling them a monthly interconnection fee.

Holloway contends that people who don’t use solar will be paying for people who do use solar.

Louisiana solar users qualify for a 50 percent, one-time, refundable, state income tax credit for the purchase and installation of the system under provisions of the Wind and Solar Energy Systems Tax Credit created by state legislation in 2007.

Combined with a 30 percent Federal tax credit, some Louisiana solar customers can receive an 80 percent credit. In Louisiana only homeowners can receive the 50 percent credit while state businesses can qualify for the federal incentive.

Back in February, it was reported by the Associated Press that Holloway wanted to ask Louisiana lawmakers to do away with the state’s solar incentive program altogether.

“I don’t want to kill solar,” Holloway said in a recent interview. “I hope it survives...but on its own. We’re the highest solar- subsidizing state, it’s the highest amount of the (solar) subsidy in the nation.”

Some think Holloway’s proposed utility charge could have crippling effects on Louisiana’s burgeoning solar industry.

C. Tucker Crawford, chairman for the Gulf States Renewable Energy Industries Association – a non-profit organization that represents solar and renewable energy firms in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama– said that the entire Louisiana industry could be affected.

“I think Holloway has misinterpreted some of the data that he has been given,” he said. “He’s a little overly concerned right now.”

Crawford said that there is no such thing as “alternative” energy, only energy.

“Maybe 15 years ago, solar could have been called ‘alternative’ energy,” he said. “Now, it’s considered renewable energy. With respect to oil and gas and other forms of energy, solar is a complimentary solution to our much-greater energy demand. We’re going to need all forms of energy. The beauty of solar is that it’s clean and the fuel source is infinite.”

So clean in fact that Crawford said a number of oil and gas companies, like Shell and Chevron, are investing in solar companies.

“Because oil companies aren’t oil companies anymore, they consider themselves ‘energy companies’ now,” Crawford said. “So they’re diversifying wherever they see fit. They’re hedging their bets as well. They’re considering it an ‘energy play’, not an ‘oil and gas play’.”

Robert Suggs, Chief Executive Officer of South Coast Solar – a Louisiana-based company – said that they are doing their part to bring revenue into the state of Louisiana.

To Suggs, this is the real “going green.” He said the solar industry has a great environmental and economic impact to Louisiana.

“Nearly 40 percent of all of our revenues generated come from non-state, taxpayer dollars,” he said. “We do work for the Federal government and the US State Department, including work that we have done and continue to do at Fort Polk in Louisiana and the Andrew H. Wilson Elementary School in New Orleans.”

As solar usage has expanded into the federal and state level of government – which has decreased energy costs and saved taxpayer dollars – the oil and gas industry has expanded their use of solar as well.

Suggs said that not only are those companies investing in solar, they’re using solar as well.

“Solar is absolutely being used on telemetry devices for well pumps in the oil field,” he said. “There are a lot of telemetry devices that are put in place on remote pumps where you have wellheads in the middle of a marsh somewhere.”

Suggs said that solar brings with it a new, burgeoning industry for the state. He said that the number of licensed, solar panel installation companies has spiked in recent years, from about 7 companies in 2008 to 196 companies to date. He said these companies seem to be hiring and growing, with some companies even working in other states and bringing the money back to Louisiana.

The Public Service Commissioner of District 5 and commission chairman, Foster Campbell, said a proposed fee on solar panel homeowners is an example of Holloway “putting the cart before the horse.”

“We need to not worry about the 1/10th of 1 percent of people in Louisiana who are using solar power to save money, they’re not the problem,” Campbell said. “We need to be more concerned with the rest of the state who is paying too much in electric utility rates. Holloway needs to be concerned with companies like Cleco, which he represents in his district and which nets 11.75 percent in allowed earnings annually.”

If there is a battle for “America’s Energy Independence,” then Louisiana homeowners are on the frontline.

According to most solar customers, solar is big and easy. Those who have solar energy systems are saving big on utility bills and the usage and installation of the solar panels is easy.

With that, it is not surprising that this “battle for the sun” takes place in New Orleans, a city now abuzz with those who have “seen the light” when it comes to solar energy.

Rashad Ketchens, manager of the LSU Health Sciences Bookstore in New Orleans, said that he had solar panels installed in his East New Orleans home. He said that now he shows off his electric bill any chance he gets.

“Solar panels actually cut my electric bill almost by half,” said Ketchens. “I have three small children at home. And now that I am able to start saving more, that extra cash goes a long way. I’ve been taking some of that money and putting it in to a savings account for the kids to go to college.”

He said that he believed that energy costs will steadily increase over the years and only recently, with advent of the solar panels, has he ever seen a utility bill go down.

“Because I’m generating my own electricity, I’m not feeling the heat, as much, to pay that bill every month,” he said. “Is Clyde Holloway really doing the public a service? Am I supposed to pay because I save money? I’m saving money, you don’t charge people for that.”

Chris Schultz, a founder of a New Orleans business incubator called Launch Pad, said that he installed solar panels two-years ago on his uptown New Orleans home. He said that he believed that the addition of solar energy systems to a home can increase the property value of a home.

“The tax credits were totally what drove that and what did incentivize us and our electric bill is now two-thirds of what it used to be,” said Schultz. “And that’s significant for Louisiana. The tax incentives were what made it economically viable to get the solar panels.”

“The company that did the installation work for us actually did the paper work and prepared what we needed to give to our accountants to submit for our taxes,” Schultz said. “We didn’t have to do anything.”

Holloway said that the fee decision will be made in a vote of the five-member PSC sometime in 2013.

“It’s small now, but Entergy said that there is going to be 1,000 systems installed in New Orleans by the end of the year,” said Holloway. 

According to Tucker, there are currently about 1,500 systems for solar power installed in New Orleans.

Thomas Neyhart, president of Green Grants – which is an organization that developed a leasing program to help homeowners cover the up-front cost of a solar energy system – said that Louisiana is “trailblazer” compared to other states.

“Louisiana is definitely one of the most aggressive programs for renewable, solar and wind energy,” Neyhart said. “It’s focused just on allowing the residents, and homeowners of Louisiana to become energy independent.”

“The energy companies of the world need to see that they are going to need ‘renewables’ and that it needs to become part of their portfolio,” he said. “Renewables is energy independence. At a macro level, it’s the country not buying oil from the Middle East, not being reliant on countries. On the micro level, it’s that single homeowner, that consumer, being allowed their independence. You don’t want to take that choice away. If somebody wants to invest their money and become energy independent, it’s a right just like anybody else’s right.”

As the road towards “energy independence” winds from Washington to Baton Rouge and to New Orleans, it then leads to Acadiana in South Louisiana, to find new solar customers who would be affected by Holloway’s proposal.

The home of Dianne Michon – which is located, ironically, in Sunset – is the only one in her neighborhood whose roof is laden with solar panels.

Michon, an Entergy customer, said she is a new solar power user who installed a system on her home this year. 

“I’ve always wanted solar,” she said. “My husband used to live in California and they had major incentives for using solar power in that state.”

Houses with solar panels that generate electricity also come outfitted with a net meter, something that Michon said is her “declaration of energy independence”.

“They’re actually purchasing electricity from me right now,” she said. “When the arrow is going backwards, Entergy is purchasing electricity from me.”

Hearing about Holloway’s proposed, additional “utility charge,” Michon said made her angry.

“Why should I have to pay more for net metering? I don’t understand the purpose of raising the net metering fee,” she said. “Holloway said that the Public Service Commission’s job is to make sure that the electric companies keep their costs low so that we can afford to buy electricity. Well, it doesn’t look like (Holloway) is looking out for my best interest if he is going to allow the electric companies to go up on a net metering fee.”

Michon said that since using a solar power system on her home, her Entergy utility bill has shifted from what she expected for her last billing cycle. September’s average bill for her home – which last year was at around $185 – dropped to $50 this September, according to Michon.

“My total energy use for the month is probably around $25,” she said. “All these other fees that are tacked-on, made my bill $50. There’s a hurricane fee, I pay a customer fee. They add on all these things that make up half of my bill. But in reality, my bill is $25.”

Michon said that she sees Holloway’s proposal as a new tax that penalizes people who want to be responsible with their energy consumption and to the environment.

This article was originally published on EuniceToday.com and was republished with permission.

8 Comments

Register To Comment
Thomas M
Thomas M
October 21, 2012
Comment 6, not sure if that is true. Even at 25 a month that is 300 a year. If that rate doubles, which it no doubtably will, I am sure you can purchase some decent batteries that will make you independent of the grid.
And realize that the grid doesn't store power, the power you make with your PV that they give you 10 cents for, goes right to your neighbor who pays 25 cents.
Erik Kiehle
Erik Kiehle
October 11, 2012
@DavidCarl

Please review the demand chart at http://www.caiso.com/Pages/TodaysOutlook.aspx#SupplyandDemand

There is a slow curve up in the morning, not a peak. During peak summer demand the peak usage is mid-day all summer as air conditioning systems work hardest. Today's chart at the link shows a peak in the evening at bedtime as people run dishwashers, clothes washers, watch tv and surf the net. Temperatures are moderate in CA this time of year generally requiring little or no heating/cooling.

Solar production generally matches the demand curve.

Scroll down the above page and the second graph shows interconnected renewable generation production! If any customer should have an additional fee it should be highly variable wind! Solar ramps with demand!

Frankly, the utilities have a basic monthly fee for being connected to the grid. That used to be justified by paying for a meter read and local distribution and company overhead. Now with smart meters (which are a new add-on fee!) there's no meter reading by people, so it's basically an inconsequential cost to the utility. So that base monthly fee IS WHAT YOU PAY TO MAINTAIN THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION NETWORK and pay overhead for the utility company to exist. You shouldn't have to pay yet again for something everyone is already billed for.

Now, on my bill I'm charged for the generation I consume, and then charged additionally for the transmission to get those watts to me. That's money paid to the long-haul transmission "pipeline" carriers who move power from the big generation sources OVER TO the local utility distribution network. If I'm not purchasing that far-away generation why should I pay for using their pipeline?

When you buy a more fuel efficient car, and visit the gas station less often, should you have to pay Shell another fee to pay for your reduced usage of their fleet of tankers and refineries?
Delroy Leslie
Delroy Leslie
October 11, 2012
Paying $25.00 per month to store excess electricity on the grid is a reasonable price to pay in comparison to buying your own battery to store the electricity.
Robb Benson
Robb Benson
October 10, 2012
What I would like to know is what kind of fee they will want to charge for the homes and business that go off grid as there is a company in Canada testing a small retrofit home system that has had an 18 moth trial for total home consumption that will cost about the same as a new dishwasher and about the same size with wireless capability. If the predictions are right within 5 years you may be able to go down to your local Walmart and buy a system have it installed and not see another utility bill again. Then what are they going to do tax you for what you don't use?
David Carl
David Carl
October 10, 2012
tim-gulden, you are missing the point. The kwhr charge has more than just generating costs in it. When you generate your own power you avoid paying the generating cost and the other cost. The only servgice you avoided was the generating cost, so you receive the others for free.

If you want to argue that peak power costs are higher and are partially avoided when I generate my own electricity shouldn't the power company be allowed to not send me peak power? Before you answer, remember that most utilities have peak loads as the sun comes up (we are getting out of bed) and late afternoon (when we come home from work and start cooking). Solar does not work so well at those times.
Tim Gulden
Tim Gulden
October 10, 2012
Yes, this looks to me like prejudice against anyone who is not the utility company by a monopoly that sees lower future profits on the horizon (greed). You can also see who has the Louisiana Public Service Commissioner in their back pocket! A little known secret...the utility will not tell you that solar PV compliments their power load curve which helps the utility by reducing the need to buy power from a Peaker Plant which charges dollars per kWh which is then passed on to the consumers. My lifelong education had 'Monopolies' pegged as illegal. I do not think that a 'Monopoly' should have much to say nor should be able to corrupt other influential people...'Monopolies' should be happy with whatever they get. Maybe a higher level in the State of Louisiana can step in and remind these 'Monopolies' of there place? As far as comment #2...look at electric coops and how they operate. They have fewer customers per mile while having and maintaining the same equipment as larger electric utilities. The Coop business model is to charge the actual costs to their members. If you query their websites you will find charges from $9.95/month to $19/month to maintain the transmission system. Their cost per kWh also ranges from $.03/kWh to $.10/kWh depending upon what part of the US they are located in. Now add 10% on that for the typical profit and you are well under what you state for charges. Again, maybe the state needs to step in and identify possible excess utility charges that already exist. When will people evolve past greed to help move our society in a positive direction resulting in a better future for all?
David Carl
David Carl
October 10, 2012
The majority of a persons bill is from the cost to maintain transmission lines and other functions not directly related to the generating cost. As long as you are hooked to the grid you want these functions to continue. So the person who used to pay $185 a month was paying $90 or more to maintain the transmission system. Since they are now paying $50 a month someone else has to subsidize them.

If accelerating the installation of renewable systems is your goal continue as you are. The cost will rise for those not using renewable energy, increasing their incentive to change. If you want to maintain a reliable grid someone will have to pay for it and that means charging for connection to the grid.
ANONYMOUS
October 10, 2012
We can't achieve energy independence with fees like these. Based on average retail energy prices in LA, customers in New Orleans need to install a 3 kW PV array—that is optimally oriented and unshaded—in order to generate an average of $25 worth of electricity per month. That's a big investment just to break even.

Run your own simulations here:

http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/version1/US/Louisiana/New_Orleans.html

These fees will put small business job creators out of business.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • SolarReviews
  • CivicSolar
  • Quick Mount PV
  • Sol Systems LLC
  • Green Power Conferences
  • Panasonic Eco Solutions North America
  • Trojan Battery Company
  • DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information