The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? ×

Powering Half the World with Wind by 2030

Ysabel Yates, Contributor
October 08, 2012  |  7 Comments

Last year, nearly 200,000 wind turbines met 2.5 percent of global energy needs. These numbers are impressive, but wind energy has the potential to pack an even bigger punch — according to a new study, wind could power half the world with clean energy by 2030.

Wind power is now the fastest-growing (and one of the cheapest) renewable energy sources — a status that had brought more rigorous investigation of its potential. The industry is growing so rapidly that 40.5 gigawatts (GW) of new wind power was brought on line in 2011, bringing the global total capacity up to 238 GW and helping to offset over 600 million tons of CO2 annually.

Given this growth, the authors, who published their study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, were curious about how much energy can wind produce?

A Wealth of Wind Energy

“More than we’ll ever need,” said Cristina Archer, co-author of the study and professor of geography and physical ocean science and engineering at the University of Delaware.

The study she worked on with Mark Z. Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, calculated the saturation potential of wind turbines, defined as the point at which adding new turbines becomes counterproductive because, by extracting power, each additional turbine decreases the overall average of every turbine.

For wind, the study found, that point is very high, around 250 terawatts (TW) of power, which is tens of times greater than the entire world’s average power use.

After getting the saturation point, the researchers focused their attention on a more realistic scenario: how many wind turbines would be enough to meet half of our energy needs, which the authors estimated at about 5.75 TW, in a clean economy by 2030?

Four Million Turbines

According to their results, 4 million five-megawatt (MW) turbines operating at a height of 100 meters could provide over 7.5 TW of power, at no risk to the environment. “With four million turbines, the climatic effects are negligible,” Archer said, “which means that wind power is very safe.”

“As climate scientists,” Archer continued, “we are concerned about the environmental impacts of anything. We want to know what the consequences are, and we are very confident that of all the sources of energy, wind is one of the sources of energy with the least environmental impact.”

The study concluded “there is no fundamental barrier to obtaining half or several times the world’s all-purpose power from wind in a 2030 clean-energy economy.”

The calculations were done without regard to societal or economic considerations, and with parameters representing a mixture of onshore and offshore wind turbines — the latter of which Archer sees becoming more important to the future of wind.

Offshore wind “has all these hidden benefits that we need to tap into, which will make it more common in the future,” she says.

Although it’s more expensive now, using more offshore wind will lower costs in the future, because “it’s right there on the coasts, where the people are. It also tends to correlate better with the demand: offshore wind tends to peak in the afternoon, which is when people peak with demand for electricity.” Offshore sites also tend to be windier than onshore sites, “and this extra wind is extra dollars that can come in.”

Top image courtesy of GE Energy Financial Services.

7 Comments

Register To Comment
Peter Bradshaw
Peter Bradshaw
November 17, 2012
The efficiency (energy recovery) of pumped-storage systems (in the late 1950s) is about 88%. Few (if any) battery systems will give that much recovery, and the only numbers I have seen for fuel cells are about 45% in the generation direction only, so must be lower overall. The only common disadvantage of pumped storage is that there will be transmission losses between suitable sites and the source & sink of the power. Two examples, used precisely to even out demand vs. supply unevenness, that are known to me are
1. The Helms Pumped Storage power plant associated with the Diablo Canyon nuclear power station; Google says you can drive from one to the other in 222 miles, so for a crow it is probably about 200 miles, and for a power line somewhere in between. The distances from either to Silicon Valley, the biggest nearby energy sink, are about the same
2. The Trawsfynydd nuclear power plant, now decommissioned, and the pumped storage facility near Tanygrisiau, both in Wales, UK. These are about 8 miles apart, and the nearest big energy sink would be Chester, about 55 miles away.
Most hydro-electric power stations could be converted fairly readily to have pumped-storage capabilities. In California, where something close to 20% of the electric energy comes from hydro-electric stations, and there is virtually no rainfall for over half the year, and that half with the greatest energy usage rate, getting enough storage to last a week or two should be no problem, and the extra environmental impact would be minimal; in fact, river flow patterns below them would be closer to the original flow patterns.
I believe the Chinese are building a large number of pumped-storage facilities. Of course, in their political system, which I usually dislike, they lack undue influence from ill-informed opposition groups. Hmmm
Richard McIver
Richard McIver
October 20, 2012
Peter Bradshaw, the problem of storeage and intermitent wind/solar
is more easily solved with grid (large battery) and fuel cells for
when wind is not blowing and no sun. This was proven in Europe so
it works. I use the electric subway here and then do not burn fossil fuel in a car and it is much more cost effective.
I found live/work/bicycle lifestyle, telecommuting, and mass transit are very effective to avoid buring gasoline in a car so
no electric car needed.
Richard McIver
Richard McIver
October 20, 2012
I would like to see vertical axis with funneled wint (much like a sail on a sail boat) to concentrate wind to a smaller turbine. Here you would use concentrated wind to a small turbine (easy to manage) versis large turbines that extract small wind power.
Chas Marischen
Chas Marischen
October 18, 2012
Peter-Bradshaw: I hate to see wildlife killed also. Do you think 18 wheelers should be banned? I drove an eighteen wheeler for a few years, in that time, more than a dozen birds died flying INTO MY truck.
Note: A given food supply sustains a certain number of birds; less birds more food for those alive; thus more off-spring. Nature always wins in the end.
Andrew Kazantsev
Andrew Kazantsev
October 18, 2012
@peter
Namely, by Air Hydropower we could get not only a minimal cost for generation, but also for storage ~ $36-40/kWh (with 2 km head & balloon hydrogen price $2/kg) + base for additional troposphere wind&PV co-generation with 100% CF - "a good reliable low-impact electric power system"
Peter Bradshaw
Peter Bradshaw
October 18, 2012
Although wind power avoids the climate change effects of the CO2 production of fossil fuel burning (and other environmental effects of coal mining and burning, and methane leaks from natural gas production, etc), there is a small environmental effect from bird kills, etc., which may be small, but should not be ignored.
And wind power is not consistent from hour to hour, or day to day, so some power storage system (eg pumped storage) is needed.

The combination of PV power (with very low environmental problems, especially for Distributed Generation) and wind power, with pumped storage/hydropower combinations, should make for a good reliable low-impact electric power system.
Andrew Kazantsev
Andrew Kazantsev
October 18, 2012
IMHO, Air HydroPower (http://airHES.com) would do it considerably faster + fresh water supply + cheap accumulation. Patent disclosed, go ahead!

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 6
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School
  • 6
    Ireland Keen to Hit 2030 Renewable Targets, Says EU Ambassador

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • GoGreenSolar.com
  • ASME - American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • AltE
  • AllEarth Renewables
  • Renewable Energy World Asia
  • Karbone
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • marcus evans
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information