The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

New Wind Farm Is Nation's Largest, Means More Clean Energy, Jobs

Mary Anne Hitt, Director, Sierra Club's Beyond Coal Campaign
October 01, 2012  |  25 Comments

Print

Last week marked the opening of the largest wind farm in the U.S. -- a site that will power 235,000 homes. The Shepherds Flat Wind Farm near Arlington, Ore., is a just the latest example of our nation's clean energy industry powering our homes, businesses, and economy.

Work on the Shepherds Flat project began in 2009 and brought with it more than 400 construction jobs. The Shepherds Flat project will continue to provide 45 full-time jobs for Oregon's Gilliam and Morrow Counties, in addition to agricultural jobs that will continue on the farmland at the project site.

The cherry on top is that the Shepherds Flat turbines were built by an American manufacturer and installed by American workers. And because this wind project is sited on previously-disturbed and actively-used farmland near existing transmission lines, the project will have lower impacts on local wildlife.

As someone who spends the vast majority of my time battling coal pollution, it is inspiring and exciting to see clean energy continue to grow and replace the dirty fossil fuels that are making Americans sick and pushing our climate to the brink. This massive wind farm is just one of dozens of clean energy projects that have gone onto the grid in 2012, which is shaping up to be a record year for clean energy, as coal use has dropped to record lows. 

Nationwide, wind energy capacity has doubled since 2008 and now generates more than 50,000 megawatts, enough to power 13 million homes. By way of comparison, the total coal retirements announced since January 2010 equal 45,000 megawatts. 

Unfortunately, gridlock in Congress threatens to bring this progress to a screeching halt, not to mention putting 75,000 American wind industry jobs at risk. Congress needs to renew the Production Tax Credit for wind, and its dithering and delay has already resulted in thousands of layoffs in the crucial manufacturing sector.

At a time when we hear story after story about wind companies laying off workers, we need Congress to take action to help save and create more jobs in the wind industry. When we've got federal and state policies helping create such a powerful economic clean energy boom in the U.S., why would Congress let it die?

Even beyond the jobs, wind farms like Shepherds Flat are meeting energy demand that would otherwise have required power plants to burn dirty fossil fuels like coal, releasing toxic pollutants into our air and water and poisoning our communities.

According to estimates from the developers, power generated at the Shepherds Flat wind farm will avoid about 1.5 million tons of carbon dioxide from being emitted per year, roughly equivalent to the emissions from 260,000 passenger vehicles.

This new wind farm opening is emboldening -- our nation can transition away from fossil fuels and power our communities with clean energy that creates jobs. Let's keep up the progress by renewing the wind production tax credit.

This article was originally published on Huffington Post and was republished with permission.

Lead image: Wind turbines via Shutterstock

25 Comments

Register To Comment
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
February 9, 2013
Ahhh, I see.
Your story about the noise levels are very enlightening.
I would wish that those who benefit would be required to have a GPS collar tied around their neck and made to live in those conditions while they reap whatever rewards they claim. If they try to leave the area, an electric shock is applied as punishment.
I think that would be the fastest and most effective way of finding a solution to the noise problem. Unfortunately our laws prohibit such activities on our investors.
From what I've read, these windmills were built in the 1980's and are very old. More modern turbines I hear don't require as many, are more spread out, run slower, run quieter (gear less), etc.... Plus their payback period is 4 years. Such a persuasion may be viable since these existing machines are very old. The problem is that these turbines are certainly already paid for and why stop the revenue if they continue to bring in more money. Hopefully some organization can impose a tax or other incentive to change them out.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 8, 2013
http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html Bald and Golden eagles are protected.

Lots of human generated objects kill birds. I worked in the penthouse suite of a building and for 2 years birds crashed into the windows. The building manager had special shielding put over the windows. So do cell towers, cats and Walmart lighting (Utah) where over 5000 grebes fell to their deaths confused that the sheen was a lake. Wind turbines are placed on ridge tops and places where birds migrate, breed, nest and forage. To make a point here, cats kill birds but I'm sure that no cat has ever killed a raptor but the opposite is true. By the way I'm not angry. My goal is to have the turbines shut down unless protective shielding is retrofited over them. We're only one species on this planet and a small part of the whole.
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
February 8, 2013
Besides, there is counter evidence to suggest that it is the feline population that may be responsible for low bird counts.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/cats-kill-billions-animals-annually-study-finds/story?id=18357853

Sure, the wind farm you mention is an older type that has less efficient and faster moving blades. These may have had some impact on bird populations. However, Larger and slower moving windmills may not significantly impact these birds and probably would reduce feral cat populations that may exist out there. Another step to take, like my mother did was to cat proof her bird houses and would take care of feeding them and monitor their nesting activity. I believe that if all the windmills were torn down, you'd still have a concern of declining bird population anyway and believe that animal control measures will have higher impact.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 8, 2013
@garyrich2000 To get a better understanding, a suggestion is to read through a draft environmental impact report, look over the comments pro and in opposition and responses, biological studies, mitigation measures and Staff Report. Attend the hearings. It is probably be jobs vs the environment. You can judge for yourself. In Kern County, the developers like Terragen are getting 30 year 'TAKE' permits for endangered species like the federally protected Mojave Desert tortoises, and applying for permits for Bald and Golden eagles. Some developers are installing telemetry devices because California condors share the territory. What was not divulged is that less than 50% of the condors are fitted with GPS devices. At a recent hearing this was stated by the Center for Biological Diversity. In clear terms, politicians are lying or omitting information. Their focus is purely focused on property tax revenues. Don't know if you're a city or rural dweller, but notice the lack of birds and diversity of birds gracing your skies. Near wind turbines, the number of them is zero. In the case here in the Tehachapi Pass, 30 years of blades slaughtering birds and bats has been devastating. I've seen 1 Cooper's hawk in 8 years, 1 California condor that I reported, 2 scrub jays, 1 road runner and some seaonal grosbeaks and quails. A night bird was here for a few years but it's been gone for a year. I am very rural but surrounded on 3 sides by wind turbines.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 8, 2013
for garyrich2000 in Kern County, CA the setback is 1 1/2 times the height of the turbine, including the verticle propeller. 486 feet = 729 foot setback. The closest turbines to where I live are 1.48 miles and due to their cumulative affect and being in the mountains, when the wind blow and in many atmospheric conditions, the outdoors sound like living next to a major airport where the jet engines are always running, other times the sound is like an outdoor steel mill with metals grinding, whining, heavy pressure waves hitting the structures, going through the body and in the house through the ventilation and windows. At these times the unique noise is audible above all indoor sounds. Sometimes for days, the outdoors is like a impending tsunami coming over the hill, contantly. From another direction, about 4 miles away the noise is like a train rolling down the tracks as a low hum. Indoors, it causes me sleep deprivation.
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
February 8, 2013
I watched the eagle nest video.
You claim they are endangered but I found this....

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/06/070628101017.htm

So I don't see what your concern is.
Over here in the Pacific Northwest I see them everywhere as well.
If bird populations are in danger, there will be action taken to stop their decline.
I don't see any evidence (yet?) and hope not to but I'm willing to support action against windmills in their current state if there is true evidence.
Sorry, I don't see your arguement making a strong case.
Angry outbursts don't make it any more authentic either.
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
February 8, 2013
What's considered a person's back yard?
50 feet away?, a couple of miles?, within your county? the state?
Regardless, someone who lives very close (an adjacent property) can spew out the same negatively biased commentary but only do so because they don't like having to look at it and will say anything to try and get the windmills removed. When this type of neighbor is confronted with this type of accusation, they vehemently deny having a self interest motive and continue to demonize those who decided to install these machines. As a result, the complaint is primarily emotional and has little or no sincere objective exploration.
If a bird population is in danger of elimination then yes I think something must be done about it. However, I'm not going to jump to arms and fight some battle based on hearsey and emotionally laden lingo. You gotta do better than that!
Colleen Plummer
Colleen Plummer
February 7, 2013
Dear Gary.... I am not sure just what your insinuating, but, unless you live with an industrial wind farm in your backyard, NOBODY can give a truly educated opinion on this subject. Most people aren't even aware of the small area actually gleaned for dead birds near industrial wind turbines. A few hundred feet... Or who counts them? this one is even better... The property owner with the turbines.. Y a know it's kinda like when I was rearing my children. If you look the other way when there is a problem, it only gets worse.... That is why we discipline our children and a civil society is just that... civil.. #1. Who wouldn't want a cleaner planet???? We all do! Who would like to see our country invest and come up with cutting edge alternatives? Be the leader again... were part of the flock now. Were better than this.. This crap there spewing now is all about $$$. Once you open your mind and start thinking out of the box the sky or depth of our oceans lakes and rivers could be part of an acceptable answer. SO many of the people I know young and old think this is a bad joke. Demand better folks...
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 7, 2013
In early December a Sierra Club solicitor called me to attempt to get my support for the Production Tax Credit. The person said that the birds need to be sacrificed for us so we have renewable electricity. Yes, these were the words out of the mouth of a Sierra Club representative. I'll put them out of business if I can.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 7, 2013
http://www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/downloads/SierraClub-CleanEnergyUnderSiege.pdf

Read this grossly jaded article that us citizens are being funded by oil and coal companies. They've spent millions attempting to hush people like me who respect and protect our wildlands. Please don't ever donate a nickel to them. Any group that turns their back on their ethics is corrupt to their core.

I am not a proponent of coal, oil, fracking or scraping the floors of our desert, slaughtering birds and bats.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 7, 2013
http://www.tehachapinews.com/news/local/x918350531/Condor-sightings-in-Tehachapi-area-expected-to-become-more-common
California condors are some of the rarest birds on this planet and they're on a collision course with 8500+ unshielded wind turbines less than 10 miles away from this location. Why isn't the Sierra Club and other demanding that the turbines be shielded instead of supporting the wind companies??? It is their charter. Instead, they've taken the political cop out.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 7, 2013
http://www.drecp.org/documents/index.html#eval
Please go to the first pdf file called Primary features of DRECP.

The plan for the only desert in the United States is to put wind and solar plants throughout the desert. Perhaps someone can explain how this helps our atmosphere from heating up more and has any semlance of sustainability. The numbers of acres of the most sensitive habitats in this entire country will be gone forever. What is the purpose? So Californians can drive electric cars and infrastructure to continue to implant ourselves into every corner of this state. We're no different from the monsters in War of the Worlds, sucking everything dry and leaving it in ruin.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 7, 2013
@garyrich2000 These strikes are primarily surrounding a hill that is Silver Queen Mine. You can look this up yourself on google earth and even see the thousands of wind mills if you zoom in. Search for Mojave, CA. The place is Camelot Road and Silver Queen. It's nearly impossible to film the strikes because the individual wind farms are gated and inaccessible. There are 8500 wind turbines along the Tehachapi Mountains and southern Sierra. I can't imagine why the designers of this equipment didn't bother to design protective shielding over the equipment. Instead, what is occuring is that companies are applying and granted permits for 'Takes' of endangered species for 30 years, convince distant electricity users that they're environmentally friendly which they are not and change the North American Treaty, Endangered Species Act and CEQA (Calif. Environmental Quality Act.) Here is a youtube video of NextEra moving a America's national bird, the bald eagle and the nest. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtF6TUYfj8c
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
February 7, 2013
With 1GW of coal vs 1GW of wind, it would be interesting to see how many permanent middle income jobs are sustained after construction is finished?

My instincts tell me that wind has many less decent permanent jobs and have little motivation to at least bring an equal number indirectly to match coal's job creating capacity both directly and indirectly. The politicians have limited power to do this on their own and would need conscientious investors to see the value of maintaining a steady customer base over the long term.
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
February 7, 2013
@sandy
You say you have a solid lead of 10 hawks dying everyday?
Then get it posted on You Tube with regualar updates.
Such a windmill should be disabled if found to really kill that many hawks. However, you might keep in mind that your solid lead may either not represent the whole of the industry or failed to take measures that other locations have done. Best to address your solid lead and don't let up until something changes it. At least that way you give the wind industry the benefit of the doubt and sincerely accept a threshold of losses that is in balance with sustainable wildlife. Zero tolerance is too extreme and not realistic. One reason for this is the unmeasured respiratory premature deaths to birds from burning fossil fuels and other hidden fatalities.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
February 6, 2013
Traditional farming is brutal on the environment-yours and mine. With this said, I attended a Kern County Board of Supervisor hearing where an attorney representing almond growers and many farmers addressed the Board about serious contamination of their wells caused by fracking below their orchards. One farmer had lost 40 trees recently. Testing showed the water contained thousands of times the chlorides and other chemicals. In paraphrase, the Supervisor spoke and said let's not give the oil companies the impression we're not business friendly to them.

The point here is whether it's coal, fracking, primitive experimental wind turbines or industrial solar plants, it's time to step back and take a serious look at the future of our planet as a unit.

This is a tall order considering that the robber barons in banking, big gas and oil the renewable energy scam own the whitehouse, sit in the seats of Congress, run our military and all banking. The government legislators we elected to run government works for them, not the sovereign people any longer. Environmental laws have been gutted. Instead of companies leading our world toward sustainability and reversing the heating of our atmosphere that they caused, they're drilling, fracking, contaminating our water and air. They are monsters that are commiting treason and should be treated as perpetrators, brought up on criminal charges and be subject to capital punishment.
Gary Richardson
Gary Richardson
February 6, 2013
@protia
Gee I suppose the farmers who contaminated wells wouldn't have been blamed for that if they continued to support dirty energy?
Shame on them for trying to do something right even if others accuse them of hypocracy!
;]
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
November 10, 2012
It's interesting that Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife filed a lawsuit to halt the North Sky River Project in the Kelso Valley/ Jawbone area in the Southern Sierras in 2011. To touch on their political voice, Sierra Club promotes wind turbine generators, fully congnizant open blades will be spinning in the open air in most sensitive forests, migration routes, draining wetlands to water down roads and making concrete by setting up local batch plants. All it takes is to read the biological portions of any EIR to read that nesting birds are booted off the land as soon as the chicks can fly. What is not described is that birds that return to those nesting spots are chopped up causing mass extinction of avian, bat and bug species even butterflies. The aforementioned wind park will be 21.3 sq. miles of cut and filled pads, 10% roads and uninhabitable. Does any of this qualify as 'green'? I don't think so. The truth is that banks are buying operational wind parks pulicly or privately sold as investment to the private equity fund market.
Jim Andre
Jim Andre
November 10, 2012
Sierra Club is in bed with Big Wind and Big Solar, and no longer in bed with Mother Earth. Renewables need to not destroy the earth, they need to be of technology that is green and sited appropriately. The Sierra Club has taken a pro-industry path that is "anything but coal". A national environmental group should be promoting decentralized generation of solar, and conservation....and population control. Those measures are far better alternatives to Big Wind avian-loppers (many of these projects supported by the Sierra Club are located in pristine wildlands such as Spring Valley in eastern NV). Sierra Club's endorsement of Big Solar on pristine public lands as part of it's "beyond coal" campaign signifies it's deviation from the mission of it's founders - bulldozing carbon-rich desert soils and ecosystems rather than endorsing rooftops, parking lots and already degraded lands. The Sierra Club, when lobbied by Salazar, made the choice to abandon it's mission and instead support destruction of our public lands NEEDLESSLY. It's not a decision between coal and renewables. What would John Muir say to this? When will Siera Club realize that it's a decision between earth-killing big corporate renewables vs effective renewables located instead on degraded lands? Perhaps when it's Board of Directors is not comprised of corporate energy political hacks.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 8, 2012
Lois. I guess wind turbines are so valuable that now conservations groups support stomping the Endangered Species Act into the ground.
"Alta Wind Power Development, LLC, the Project Proponent, is proposing a Lot Line Adjustment between two adjoining properties to transfer 0.01 acre, the relocation and conservation of Bakersfield cactus (Opuntia basilaris variety treleasei), and the construction of three additional turbines in a small area of desert tortoise habitat in the area known as the California Highwind Energy Projects (CHiPs) Infill (hereafter "the Project" or "the Infill
Project"). The CHiPs Infill area is located immediately adjacent to and in some cases surrounded by the AOCM Project. Kern County rezoned the CHiPs Infill properties to allow wind energy development in 1999, 1983 and 1982 (under Mitigated Negative Declarations). The CHiPs Infill properties also include two 80-acre parcels of U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)-administered land, for which a right-of-way (ROW) was granted in 2008 and amended in 2010. Since the CHiPs Infill lands were rezoned for wind energy (WE), species protected under the California Endangered Species Act have been identified on certain portions of the CHiPs Infill lands. The 2009 EIR evaluated impacts from wind development on listed and special-status species and imposed mitigation measures to reduce those impacts. This Addendum evaluates the potential impacts of the Lot Line Adjustment, the relocation and conservation of Bakersfield cactus, and the construction of three additional turbines in a
small area of desert tortoise habitat – work which will be constructed concurrently with the Alta-Oak Creek Mojave Project—and imposes on that development applicable and appropriate mitigation measures as identified in the 2009 EIR. The CHiPs Infill wind energy development consists of 42 WTGs, generating up to 65 MW of electricity, on approximately 1,420 acres of land, for a nominal output of up to 65 MW."
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 7, 2012
lois. Exactly where do bird deaths in other industries fit into collisions with wind turbines??? What is this, a case of...us too, but we do it less than the other guy? It's just plain nonsense logic.

As for coal, may I refer you to National Wildlife Federation, February/March 2012 entitled Conflict at Powder River and the embattlement to stop a coal mine.

My expectation from a conservation group is zero tolerance for death of our fellow species, nothing less.
Lois Moore
Lois Moore
October 7, 2012

Hello Mary Anne
First let me say that I do not agree with the previous comments. Your commitment to the Sierra Club’s beyond coal project is not only critical to our environment but key to the United States moving beyond fossil fuels through the use of alternative energy like wind energy. In answer to the first commenter, these turbines are significantly different from the ones placed at the Tehachapi Pass in both design and type of location. Comparing the two is both a disservice to the issue of bird strikes and the placement of wind turbines in an ecologically sustainable manner. As to the number given of 10-20 hawks being killed on a daily basis, I find this number not only bogus and unfounded but a serious misrepresentation to the issue.
Replacement of Coal fired power plants is critical to our environment and as Wind has grown so has the study of the effect of direct drive turbines on bird populations. These direct drive turbines move much slower than those of previous designs. This means they are much easier for birds to avoid and have a greatly reduced affect. I am concerned about bird strikes; however with that said I would counter that so is the wind industry and the transforming to better technology has lessened the bird strikes from direct drive turbines significantly. In other word the new types of turbines are greatly reducing bird strikes.
Finally in closing let me pass on two statistics that have been backed up by peer review in several case studies. In the United States the amount of bird deaths from transportation is estimated at over 1 million a year and 3 million a year from buildings with reflective coatings on the windows. While the estimate for wind turbines is estimated at 31,500 mostly from turbines using non-direct drive technology. As I have said any bird deaths are important, which is why we in wind energy are working to eliminate those deaths.
Lois Moore
President Environmental Power & Water Generation
Colleen Plummer
Colleen Plummer
October 4, 2012
Sierra Club is not only promoting industry, I'm told by two state representitives, it (along with other carpet-baggers) has come to my state buying petition signatures to place a proposal on our ballot this fall attempting to force our energy policy into our state constitution. No other state has done this. I am a very progressive thinker, but I ask, why now and why is it out of state entities coming to Michigan flooding our airways with propaganda $ promoting this? Are we your guinee pigs? If this is a good thing, why aren't the companies who are paying for 91% of the $$$ being used to push this doing it in their own states... California and New York???? AND... Where was the Sierra Club when the wind farm in my backyard was being sited? It's right in a major north American migration flyway. We have endangered species living near these turbines. The government and energy company aware of this. We contacted the Sierra Club to help us protect them. SILENCE... We have contaminated well water caused by the very farmers who are promoting "clean energy". WHERE A YOU? We've been in a recession in Michigan for over 10 yrs. Why are you promoting jobs in my state now??? I notice California has all kinds of municipale bankruptcies happening. Isn't California one of your 'trophy' states the Sierra Club has had the most influence in their policy making?? Sierra Club was respected at one time.. No more.. You support issues without finishing your homework and without fully understanding the negative consequences on ALL LIFE.. It's all gone to your heads and you can be proud of the fact that YOUR now part of the problem. You've forgotten who took you to the dance.. SHAME ON YOU...
El Rucio
El Rucio
October 4, 2012
Coal use dropped because consumption of electricity dropped from 2006 to 2009 (though both have risen again since then) and natural gas use has risen, thanks to fracking. The Sierra Club should return to protecting the environment instead of lobbying for industry.
Penny Melko
Penny Melko
October 4, 2012
Mary Ann. It boggles the mind that anyone representing the Sierra Club would support open bladed wind mills. Your club has fallen off the angel wagon. I live in the Tehachapi Pass where there are no more birds, thanks to the ignorance of groups with big names and big mouths on subjects they know nothing about. Read avian studies in any eir sometime. I have a solid lead that 10-20 hawks collide with turbines in a single spot in Mojave every day. Multiply 10 times 365. Boo on Sierra Club.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Mary Anne Hitt

Mary Anne Hitt

Mary Anne Hitt is director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal Campaign, which is working to eliminate coal's contribution to global warming and repower the nation with clean energy.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 9
    Country-Based Action to Achieve Universal Access to Energy
  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 2
    Is the IRS Considering Solar REITs?
  • 2
    Sir Richard Branson unleashes Plan B for the planet

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Renewable Energy World Asia
  • AltE
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Greenpower Capital
  • Richardson RFPD, Inc.
  • 3TIER
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information