The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? ×

Geothermal Heat Pumps are Renewable and our Most Efficient HVAC Technology

Douglas A. Dougherty, President and CEO, the Geothermal Exchange Organization (GEO)
October 01, 2012  |  20 Comments

The question arises from time to time in building industry blogs about whether or not geothermal heat pumps (GHPs) are a source or renewable energy. GHPs, or ground-source heat pumps, don't fit neatly into any box, but suffice it to say that their appeal is for their efficiency AND the abundant renewable energy that they provide.

GHPs use the ground as a moderate temperature heat source during the winter and a heat sink during the summer.  They draw renewable (yes, renewable) thermal energy from the ground during the winter to heat buildings, and reject heat from buildings back into the ground in summer, thus replenishing the heat drawn from the ground during the previous season.

As for efficiency, it’s a lot easier to reject heat from the building to the ground (~55°F) compared to outside air that can be in excess of 100 deg. F on a hot summer day. And in winter, it’s easier to recover heat from the ground (~55°F) compared to outside air that can be <40°F. Consider the ground as a readily available renewable storage battery for heat that thin air (in the case of standard air-to-air heat pumps) simply cannot provide.

In his “Drill, Baby Drill" article author Eric Woodroof, Ph.D. says, “GHPs reduce the kilowatt-hours required for air conditioning. When you also consider that when a utility promotes GHP applications (for example as a Demand-Side Management method), the utility will have reduced demand during peak periods, requiring less generation plants and less pollution.”

GHPs do have higher installation costs than traditional air-to-air heat pumps, because of the cost of excavation for a horizontal system or drilling vertical boreholes (not “wells”) for closed loop systems for the pipework of the ground heat exchanger. They also require expert, qualified design and installation of the ground loop to achieve their full energy efficiency and savings potential.

But that ground loop is guaranteed to last over 50 years, posting a small fraction of life cycle cost. Indeed, in many cases it is projected that the ground heat exchanger will outlive the building it serves.

Woodruff provides an excellent analysis of GHP efficiencies, citing an example of a 5-ton air-to-air heat pump, “which would move 5 x 12,000 BTU/hour, which equals 60,000 BTUs per hour. If the air-air Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) is 10, that means we use ~6 kW every hour we run the air-air heat pump.  In contrast, a GHP would have a SEER of 20 during the summer, which means you would only need ~3 kW. Thus, the GHP reduces demand by ~3 kW, reducing emissions and helping the utility shave peak demand during the summer.”

“In the winter,” says Woodruff, “the SEER of the GHP drops from 20 to 13.65 (COP = 4), meaning that the unit will draw 4.4 kW to move 60,000 BTU/hour. 4.4 kW equals about 15,000 BTU/hr of input energy, with the remaining 45,000 BTU/hr coming from the earth. The total fuel/energy usage is still less than conventional sources (fossil fuels) because the GHP gets ~75% of the energy from the earth (~45,000 BTU/hr), which avoids fuel that could be going into a natural gas fired heater/boiler.”

Most people think of renewable energy as easy-to-measure electricity (kilowatts) for the grid. But GHPs produce renewable energy measured in BTUs that are consumed without the transmission grid.

In some states, renewable thermal energy (BTUs) produced by GHPs is now being recognized by governments as a compliance measure under state mandates requiring utilities to buy electricity from renewable power generators like wind and solar. Maryland and New Hampshire passed laws last spring recognizing GHPs as a renewable resource that qualifies for Renewable Energy Credits for utilities, just like wind and solar power.

Those credits are earned according to the electricity use avoided by GHPs compared to standard HVAC systems. New metering devices can measure the temperature differential (ΔT) of incoming and outflowing fluid through a GHP, then accurately count the number of BTUs produced by the earth. A simple conversion to kilowatts equals the renewable electricity equivalent production of GHPs.

Reduced energy use through the deployment of GHPs ultimately means less pollution from coal and natural-gas fired power plants.

According to Oak Ridge National Laboratory Buildings Technologies Research and Integration Director Patrick Hughes, Ph.D., “GHPs capture a distributed, thermal form of renewable energy that is available everywhere. GHPs use the only renewable energy resource that is available at every building’s point of use, on-demand, which cannot be depleted (assuming proper design of the heat exchanger) and is affordable in all 50 states.”

Regarding GHPs’ use of electricity, Hughes says, “Although GHPs consume electrical energy, they move 3 to 5 times more energy between the building and the ground than they consume while doing so.”

The distributed thermal renewable resource offered by GHPs is already at the load, unlike the vast majority of wind and solar power generation resources that require costly and difficult to site transmission lines. And with GHPs, Hughes says, “The renewable resource is available on demand, unlike wind and solar, which may or may not be available when needed.”

Given both the energy GHPs recover from the ground in winter, and its recycling of heat to the earth in the summer months, the thermal energy tapped by GHPs in indeed renewable. With proper system design and consideration of soils and other factors, GHPs have been proven to save from 40 to 70 percent on heating and cooling bills (including hot water heating).

Those numbers can only get better with new units now being manufactured that promise to deliver even more renewable energy from the earth. And collectively, GHPs offer a 24-7 / 365-days-per-year solution to intermittent renewable power production from wind and solar sources.  

GHPs can provide BOTH renewable energy AND dramatically raise the efficiency of our power grid while reducing energy consumption in buildings of all kinds in most locations around the country. 

Lead image: An installer places geothermal pipes in the ground via shutterstock.

20 Comments

Register To Comment
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 8, 2012
Hi: When you said Winter peaking, I took that at the single Geo unit level, not as a macro grid issue. From a big picture perspective I would agree. Hopefully that will change as people get out from under the control of O&G and the other conventionals...

.....Bill
bob freeston
bob freeston
October 7, 2012
Hi Bill at 18. Summer peaking is probably focused on urban AC. Take NYC, winter loads are oil based heating and hot water. Summer is grid based AC. In general, there is very little direct (electric strip) heating. I think it is generally oil, gas, wood in that order. Refrigerators also draw more in the heat. Best Bob
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 7, 2012
Hi: #15 I am surprised to hear you say Summer is the issue not Winter. You are even farther North then I am here in PA and Summer is a walk in the park more or less compared to Winter. I have a sister that lives in Saratoga, NY and the upstate NY HDD vs CDD are way heavy on the HDD side. Maybe at your location you have a "hot" spot going on, but I think for most up that way, Winter is the challenge, which is mostly the case in the NE USA do to ground temps VS air temps...

.....Bill
Adam Frey
Adam Frey
October 6, 2012
I feel like I'm a salesman for geo right now...I'm not used to having an outlet for my support of geo systems. haha. I wanted to let you guys know about the largest geo heating network in north america, if you dont know already (let me know if REW did an article already).

Ball State univesity has installed a campus wide geothermal heating and cooling system (see http://cms.bsu.edu/About/Geothermal.aspx). 3,600 Boreholes, 10,000 tons of cooling, 152,000,000 BTU/hr heating load.

There is also one up where I live in Canada at the University of Ontario's Institute of Technology (see http://news.uoit.ca/archives/2003/11/20031107_1.php.) It has 384 closed loop boreholes and we have cold winters.
V. Bruce Stenswick
V. Bruce Stenswick
October 5, 2012
Ground source heat pumps are great if properly sized. They are still expensive due to a shortage of installers and well-drillers. When I had my system installed 11 years ago the manufacturer recommended a 54,000 btu/hr system. The contractor came in and installed the next smaller size, 45,000 btu/hr. They could very well have installed the next smaller size, which was about 35,000 btu/hr. The Canadian Office of Energy Efficiency at one time recommended installing these systems to be 60%-70% of maximum load. They no longer have that on their website, but I think that was correct. They probably had complaints from people who tried to follow that advice and got a system that was too small. Heat loss calculations for a house are not exact. That being said, an installer really should aim for that. Suppose they had done that on my house, and put in a 35,000 btu/hr system. That actually would have been sufficient, but if it were not, I could pick one or two exterior walls, rip off the sheet rock, put out the fiberglass batt insulation, and spray foam it with closed cell polyurethane, and then the smaller system would be sufficient. The spray foam is just insurance in case the smaller system in not sufficient. I have a website, www.vbrucestenswick.com, that illustrates this. I am not in the heating industry, I have just made a hobby of studying these systems.
bob freeston
bob freeston
October 5, 2012
To Warren at 12 We don't have significant winter peaking here in upstate NY. It's almost all in Summer with AC loads. Heat pumps in one circumstance can significantly lower summer peak loads where they replace central air on retrofits. Power Cos. could help themselves by focusing commercial building subsidies for heat pumps on their weak areas. The AC load drops by about 50% in that circumstance.
I agree with Bill @13 that first you get the best insulation package. Everything then drops off.
Lee Calhoun
Lee Calhoun
October 5, 2012
@warren-mckenna
William-Fitch has a point about the thermostat warm up. After the first few weeks of living with the HP instead of the old oil boiler I figured out to just set the thermostat in the fall for a comfortable temperature and leave it until spring. Let the system, thermostat(s) and heat pump do their job without micromanagement on the part of homeowner. Thermal systems work best in a steady state mode and long run times for the heat pump add to the efficiency. It is a lot like driving an old 36 HP Volkswagon not a 1965 GTO.

And if you think it is inefficient to size the geothermal heat pump at the house load why would you go for the additional expense of an additional furnace. Instead just stage another heat pump or use a two stage heat pump. The big upfront cost of the ground source heat exchanger has already been made when you decided to install the GSHP so use it. My heat pump is a 2 stage with an outdoor lockout that prevents the second stage from coming on when the outside temperature is above a certain point. The ground heat exchanger (laying in the bottom of my pond) is sized for the total two stage capacity so when just one stage is running I get bonus efficiency. The house needs 59K BTU at 0 deg so I have two 3 ton compressors that will yield about 60K BTU when my entering water temp is 40 degrees. That is as cold as the field water gets. The all time record low temperature here is -12 deg and it rarely gets below -5 for an overnight low. I just let the house drop a degree or so on the 2 to 3 nights a year when it might get to -5 overnight. Those are the only times that a backup resistance heat should be on if the system is sized correctly, probably less than 24 hours per year.

I do have a Kw-Hr meter on the system and several years worth of data showing Kw-Hr usage per degree day
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 5, 2012
Hi: #12 Well, yes and no... I don't disagree with what you said in the way you said it... Put it this way, if a person is looking at energy efficiency, the production side is the last "thing" they should be looking at. Reducing overall load and load flattening are the first parts of an energy efficient "equation". Only after you have done all you can in that area, do you move on to generation. To say this another way, I would not put a geo unit in a leaky barn. So, if you have done the first part right, the difference in output per hour under the worst conditions should not effect the capacity that much that it would cause a huge increase in the unit or the ground heat exchanger. A half ton one way or another is not a big financial burden with the associated increase in the field. If one proceeds in this manner on the design side, elect res is not needed. The main reason elect res is added is not because the unit will not make it to set point, but that the unit, in the "eyes" of the mfg will not make it to set point fast enough. There is an expectation on the customer side that when the heat is "turned up", within about 20 minutes they should be where they want to be. This is more of a marketing issue than anything else. The geo might make it in 35 min, which is too long to meet the marketing expectation. All this is somewhat relative in terms of customer education and expectation. SO, it is easier to fire up an res element and satisfy the old time limits that people have come to expect from fuel based systems, rather than reeducate the populous in the field of patience as a virtue...

.....Bill
Warren McKenna
Warren McKenna
October 5, 2012
@Lee,
"If your system utilizes electric resistance backup more than a
couple hours a year it was not designed/installed correctly"

We have meters on about 30 residential units and I can tell you the resistance heat runs more than a couple hours a year and that is how they are designed. The facts don't lie!

GHP are very efficient with a COP around 3, so no argument they save energy. However if you look at the kW capacity needed to service the peak on the resistance heat portion we will still need peaking power to service them. If they were oversized to eliminate this their cost would rise 50%. A hybrid heat-pump with gas would be an ideal solution, but the premium for a 2nd furnace is still high. The most efficient unit would be a heat-pump with gas assist and these units are very cost effective in the rural areas and about 1/2 the cost of ground source.
chris eddy
chris eddy
October 5, 2012
Bob, the house with the $50k+ estimate is about 5800 sqft. The vendor was about 50 miles away where the geology is more amenable to trenching, but he had done a few systems in my general area. I think he said the same size system would be 15k less in his area, but it's been a while.

Note, we have the same problem with swimming pools here. Some people still get them but they cost a lot extra.

I'm a big fan of GHP. My heating and cooling cost runs a bit over $1k/year, had the quote come in at 35k (17k over the baseline system) I would have done it even though ROI would have been marginal.
bob freeston
bob freeston
October 4, 2012
Note-my electric resistance back-up is integral to the heat pump system and is a fairly small additional cost(I forget how much) and works automatically off the thermostat.
John Moes
John Moes
October 4, 2012
It was 35 years ago I designed an envelop-style solar heated church in Montana (where it can get very cold in winter and hot in summer) and we put in a water-air heat pump for backup and air conditioning. The on-demand water heater drew from the warm outflow from the heat pump. The well didn't count in the cost because we needed the well for our water supply anyway. The greenhouse didn't last but the heat pump is still going.
Lee Calhoun
Lee Calhoun
October 3, 2012
If your system utilizes electric resistance backup more than a couple hours a year it was not designed/installed correctly. Shoot, mine is a water to water system and there is no back up or supplemental heat of any kind. If an installer proposes the addition of a natural gas furnace (or other heat source) just run. He/she doesn't know what they are doing if that is the proposal.

With my own installation one contractor proposed the same kind of nonsense with a price tag in the 50K range. It was his way of telling me he was outside of his comfort/knowledge range and wanted to cover his behind incase something went awry. I put the system in myself for 16K and have not looked back.
bob freeston
bob freeston
October 3, 2012
The discussion above of heat depletion in late winter only applies to closed loop systems. I have open loop where it isn't applicable. The estimate above of $50 grand sounds very high unless the house is huge. Many places lack multiple installers where bidding exists. In those places people can just make up estimates. I use a figure of $10 to $12 per square foot and higher if vertical bores are involved. There are many variables after that, suburban or rural, new or retrofit, well or poorly insulated, good soil depth or rock etc. I was lucky, I'm drawing off an existing water well and dumping to a very large dry well. Some new construction can enlarge the foundation trench for horizontal loops. I do have electric strip backup, used some most winters but little last (mild) winter. I have mediocre (upgraded from poor) insulation. A building with good insulation shouldn't need electric back up. Also note the system is providing a large percent of my hot water during the heating season and free hot water when the AC is running in the summer.
chris eddy
chris eddy
October 3, 2012
Geo life cycle costs are not always lower. I wanted it for my current house but the quote was over $50k due to hard rock just below ground level. Earnings on the money I saved exceed my annual heating and cooling bill.
Adam Frey
Adam Frey
October 3, 2012
Also, don't forget that you cant outsource the jobs required to install a geo heat pump!
Adam Frey
Adam Frey
October 3, 2012
49-51% of the sun's energy is absorbed by the ground, thus horizontal systems are really stored solar units.

Life cycle costs of geo are lower than that of a natural gas system and keep in mind the efficiencies lost in having an air to air AC with a gas furnace (and having to purchase fuel and a new furnace before having to replace your heat pump. There are also pay as you save loans available, where the loan payments are less than the savings generated. (http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/EEC/Strategy/EEA/Documents/PAYS%20Document%20Jan%2028%202012%20-%20FINAL.pdf)(http://ecologyottawa.ca/2012/09/energy-retrofits-ecology-ottawa-talks-to-robyn-bresnahan/)
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 3, 2012
Hi: "Because of the electric resistant heat coil in all Residential GHPs they still require significant electric service and generation capacity." Ah.... NO. I do not have them installed and if the "field" is designed right you should not need them. There is allot of "short drilling" out there, only drilling as much as you can get away with which will run your loops at to cold a temp in winter. If more people understood the importance of not short changing the amount of pipe you have in the ground, electric res would not be need to be activated, which defeats the efficiency you did it all for in the first place...

.....Bill
Warren McKenna
Warren McKenna
October 3, 2012
Because of the electric resistant heat coil in all Residential GHPs they still require significant electric service and generation capacity. Most are sized to utilize the electric heat coils as temperatures drop and more so during the end of the heating season when the ground loops become saturated. A heat-pump over gas requires less up front investment, less of an impact on electric system demand, and offers a lower overall carbon footprint.
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 1, 2012
Hi: My SAHP horiz geo system is fantastic. One of the most overlooked aspects of Geo is their passive resistance to heat waves or cold snaps. Air based units no matter how efficient over all, suffer the extreme of a 100+ deg day(s) or the sub freezing Winter cold snaps. Geo units are completely insulated (Pun intended) from those environmental conditions. The Geo units only see the added load from the structure, and do not have to deal with the double edge sword of increased load on the deposit or acquisition side, which is when most air based units take a dive. It is amazing to me how someone could not think Geo units are renewable, driven largely by a renewable source. After all, it is the sun most of all that moderates the near surface temps. Deep Geo of course is a different story....

.....Bill

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Doug Doughtery

Doug Doughtery

Doug is President and CEO of the Geothermal Exchange Organization, the "Voice of the U.S. Geothermal Heat Pump Industry." GEO is a non-profit trade group that represents the political and business interests of its member companies across...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • US, Australian Companies Taking Giant Steps for Global EGS Geothermal
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 1
    Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief
  • 1
    EU Should Scrap Energy Subsidies to Fight Warming, Poland Says

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Maritime Geothermal
  • CleanEdison
  • Admirals Bank
  • Enerquip
  • Ambient Technologies, Inc.
  • BBI International
  • Geothermal Resources Council
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information