The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Debate Continues in Germany over Cost to Ratepayers for Renewable Energy Incentives

Stefan Nicola and Tino Andresen, Bloomberg
October 12, 2012  |  7 Comments

German Chancellor Angela Merkel's decision to cap taxpayer subsidies for renewable energy is aimed at limiting the political fallout among voters from a surge in electricity bills due next week.

With the grid operators planning to announce an increase in the surcharge consumers pay for clean energy on Oct. 15, the government said it will extend caps on subsides for solarenergy to more technologies including wind and biomass. The plan is designed to contain the rising costs of scrapping nuclear power.

Consumers in Europe’s biggest economy face an extra 59 euros ($77) on their power bills next year as the annual adjustment to the surcharge probably will climb 47 percent, the nation’s BWE wind lobby said today. Rising energy costs are adding to pressure on Merkel’s coalition to cushion the blow by reining in public support for renewables before elections scheduled for the autumn of 2013.

“This is the stick the opposition will try to beat Merkel with,” William Pearson, an energy analyst at the Eurasia Group, said in an interview. “I expect rising power prices to be an issue for the next five years. They could turn into a real political problem if the economy stops growing.”

The proposals announced yesterday to reform the clean- energy subsidy system mark the most sweeping changes to Germany’s support mechanisms for renewables since the country adopted feed-in tariffs in 2004. Those rules granted renewable generators above-market prices for the power they produce and made Germany the world’s biggest market for solar panels.

‘Bothering’ Voters

Outlining his plans for a draft bill due next year, Environment Minister Peter Altmaier said the rise in power prices “bothers me, because it’s bothering the people.” He pledged help from the government.

“We knew from the start that the energy switch can’t be realized for free,” Altmaier told reporters. “However, I want to prevent costs that can be prevented.”

Merkel’s government, already preoccupied with tackling the debt crisis in the euro area, is struggling to justify the rising costs for consumers from her decision to phase out nuclear power and replace it with more expensive wind and solar plants. Merkel, seeking a third term, has signaled that the euro crisis and the energy overhaul will be her main campaign themes.

Support for shutting nuclear plants remains high, a TNS Emnid poll for N24 television showed yesterday. While 69 percent of voters said they’re behind the plan even with power prices rising, 81 percent said they expect the government to help alleviate the rising costs. TNS Emnid surveyed 1,000 people on Oct. 10. No margin of error was given.

Fukushima Overturn

For all the public backing, the original decision to abandon nuclear power was pioneered by the opposition Social Democratic Party and their Green allies under SPD Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. Both parties, whose plan was overturned by Merkel in 2010 then reinstated six months later after Fukushima, accuse Altmaier of mismanaging the task.

Merkel’s SPD challenger, Peer Steinbrueck, has meanwhile boosted the SPD’s approval rates since his nomination on Oct. 1, narrowing the lead held by Merkel’s Christian Democratic bloc to between 4 percentage points and 9 points in polls.

Germany, which gets about a quarter of its power from renewables, spent about 16 billion euros on clean energy technologies in 2011, according to the country’s four grid operators. The economic crisis is hurting developers by hampering access to financing and has prompted Spain, France, Italy and the U.K. to curb incentives for the industry.

Industry Cost

The German economy is at a disadvantage because subsidy costs are spiralling out of control, said the country’s BDI industry association. Companies will probably have to pay 4 billion euros to help finance the subsidies next year, said Markus Kerber, the head of the group.

The industry’s complaints are unfair, Hermann Albers, the president of the BWE wind lobby, said today. Exemptions for energy-intensive companies, low prices on power exchanges and leftover costs from 2012 are responsible for more than half of the new fee, he told reporters in Berlin.

Without reform of the subsidy system, another 175 euros would be added to domestic power bills by 2022, according to Frauke Rogalla, who is responsible for energy policy at the Federation of German Consumer Organizations, a consumer advocacy group.

“Costs will go up in the coming years because Germany bets on expensive offshore wind and is modernizing its power transmission system,” said Pearson at the Eurasia Group. “The problem is Germany has limited options as gas is expensive and coal unpopular. Under any government, prices would rise.”

The debate over power prices is short-sighted because Germany will save 570 billion euros by 2050 if it scraps nuclear plants, the Renewable Energy Research Association, a group of clean-energy research institutes, said on Oct. 10.

“The investments made now, at the beginning, will pay off within a foreseeable time frame and have a positive economic impact,” the group said.

Copyright 2012 Bloomberg.

Lead image: Power Lines via Shutterstock.

 

7 Comments

Register To Comment
ANONYMOUS
December 5, 2012
to john-nistler: the rise in costs for Germany's ratepayers IS entirely due to paying for the renewable FiT. I went there in June on a fact finding mission and came away with two significant facts that everyone needs to understand: first, the EEG, which is the charge levied on ALL ratepayers to pay for the FiT (except for large industrial customers who can apply for an exemption or "hardship provision", as it's called - i.e. Mercedes Benz, et al) has been increasing every year since the FiT was placed into affect. It has an accumulating affect - the more FiT projects, the greater the difference in total dollars between the market price for electricity and the FiT payments, the higher the EEG goes. Second, the investments needed in the distribution and transmission grids are significant. The Bundesnetzagentur, Germany's energy regulator, who we met with, is developing plans to get necessary transmission lines put into place to move wind power from offshore and onshore in the northern part of Germany to the rest of the grid. The estimated cost is 20 billion euros, but most likely will be higher. Guess who pays for that? This is primarily for moving renewable wind power north and south, not for fossil fueled plants. Being in the solar business at a utility, having personally managed over 20 MW of solar projects, and being responsible for handing out over 100 million of dollars of ratepayer money in incentives to date (thank you all for your unkind utility comments - try levying those same comments towards those who regulate utilities, those who are conveniently hiding behind the curtains and letting others take the brunt of criticism for their actions) I understand and support the movement towards a cleaner energy resource. But do try to get your facts right if you are going to expose your opinions to the public. And you know what they say about opinions…it would also be nice for the renewable energy mags to start exposing more of the real story...
Jessee McBroom
Jessee McBroom
October 25, 2012
Hello John. Shafalos' observation has not escaped many here in the US either. The 'Soft Costs' represent a significant portion of the solar energy projects costs here in the US as well. Look over you electric bill and or gas bill and determine just how much of that bill is actually spent per kw or therm and you will find it is an insignificant ammount compared to transport costs. There is a truely appauling disparity in there.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
October 15, 2012
'The EIA though does not report solar installations on private business or residences since a method for reporting small amounts of solar install (<10 kw) is difficult for the federal government to look at.' ... that's a convenient story but I don't buy it. Modern digital meters have network interfaces - collecting data is easy. Certainly, utilities have no problem presenting this data in the form of a bill including TOU rates, demand charges, solar credits, etc.. Nor does the EIA have any trouble identifying consumption on an itemized basis. In some jurisdictions, producers pay a production tax as well as a sales tax in which case one could hopefully trust the tax records. If it's 'hard', why not just have the meters send their data to google and pay them to sort it out - then they can produce an energy use and production overlay for their maps.
John Nistler
John Nistler
October 15, 2012
Shafflo, this is a very interesting point and also explains something that has puzzled me. In the USA, there is an active campaign by Natural Gas, Coal and Nuclear against solar power, even though the official grid tied solar produced is less then 0.1%.

The EIA though does not report solar installations on private business or residences since a method for reporting small amounts of solar install (<10 kw) is difficult for the federal government to look at. While some utilities such as CPS Energy of San Antonio welcomes small solar installations with open arms, other utilities try to pretend it increases overall costs. Austin Energy for one tried to use the claim that RE increased its costs but got caught last summer during the heat wave with charging their customers fuel surcharges in excess of USD$300 per month due to a lack of solar install.
Louis Shaffer
Louis Shaffer
October 15, 2012
Blaming renewables for energy prices is a red herring for sure. Energy companies all make money and most of the rate increase is for them to increase profits. In France, where most power is nuclear, the charges on the bill for energy are low - but the charges for taxes, services, misc. fees, and all kinds of other things bring the bill up to the same level per watt as Germany! And guess which company is one of the most profitable in the country year in and year out. The source power is not the problem with energy costs, it is the lack of any real competition due to the nature of how energy companies were governmetn monopolies for so long.
Allen Gerhardt
Allen Gerhardt
October 13, 2012
Germany's investment is paying off quickly. The cost of keeping nuclear power was seen to be more expensive than abandoning it, for society at large. Those who own nuclear power facilities have a different point of view, not concerned with the cost to others. That calculation on cost was the reason nuclear power is being phased out.
http://www.renewablesinternational.net/german-investments-in-re-already-peaked/150/537/56594/

http://www.renewablesinternational.net/renewables-payback-7-billion-euros-in-2011/150/537/56285/
John Nistler
John Nistler
October 13, 2012
And so the battle begins. With Germany already obtaining 25% of its power generation from renewable energy and with solar PV prices continuing to drop, the Nuclear and Coal industry is out in force to try to blame any cost increases on renewable energy.

What they fail to understand is by continuing to raise electric charges the utilities continue to encourage solar power adoption.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • HelioSage
  • Planet Solar Inc
  • Festo
  • Green Power Conferences
  • DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability
  • OnGrid Solar
  • Sol Systems LLC
  • Admirals Bank
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information