The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 26, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Battlefield: Georgia – Who Is Allowed To Sell Solar Energy in the Peach State?

Vince Font, Contributing Editor
October 03, 2012  |  16 Comments

In a state that has been teeming with solar resources since the beginning of time, it's ironic that a fight to seize upon that great, untapped resource is only now taking place. In a recent study performed by the University of Arizona, Georgia ranked in the top three U.S. states most capable of harnessing that abundance of solar to not only create clean energy, but to also create new jobs and dramatically increase state and local revenue. Yet to date, that potential remains far from full realization. But if a certain Atlanta-based startup gets its way, it may only be a matter of time before the first giant leap is taken.

That company, Georgia Solar Utilities Inc (GaSU), aims to become another utility in the state and sell power to customers through Georgia Power. GaSU recently put a proposal before the Georgia Public Service Commission to take advantage of the Peach State’s massive solar potential, bringing the possibility of new jobs and a richly desired diversification of the state’s energy portfolio. The proposal, which was submitted on September 20, lays out GaSU’s plans to develop an 80-MW solar PV farm and sell power directly to consumers. If approved, the project may eventually expand to 2 GW of solar PV capacity by the year 2016.

Standing in the way of GaSU’s efforts is a 30-year-old law that essentially gives Georgia Power a fully legal monopoly on providing utility services throughout the state. In order for GaSU’s bid to be successful, an amendment to the Georgia Territorial Service Act of 1973 would be required.

According to experts, GaSU could go forward and build the 80-MW farm without intervention of the public service commission and existing law would even compel Georgia Power to purchase the resulting energy but only at the cost of its lowest wholesale electricity rate.  Instead, the start-up would like to sell power directly to customers who would be billed by Georgia Power, very similar to the way natural gas is sold in Georgia.  GaSU would pay Georgia Power for the use of its transmission infrastructure and then share profits with its customers in the form of rebates, resulting in lower utility rates over time.

Meanwhile, in a move that might be construed as an attempt to secure its position as the state’s premier supplier of solar energy, Georgia Power has proposed the creation of the Georgia Power Advanced Solar Initiative (GPASI). Under the initiative, which was proposed to the Public Service Commission on September 26, Georgia Power will pledge to acquire 210 MW of solar power capacity between now and 2015. Currently, Georgia Power has a modest solar portfolio totaling 61.5 MW. The plan would have the newly-formed GPASI adding 60 MW per year through large-scale competitive bids, with the remaining 10 MW being added through distributed solar programs available on the residential and small business level.

Rhone Resch, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), said Georgia Power’s idea is a good start, but also indicated that it is not enough to truly take advantage of Georgia’s vast solar resources. “Georgia Power’s initiative demonstrates that solar is a trusted and reliable energy source and has an important role in achieving fuel source diversity,” Resch said in a statement. “However, more needs to be done for Georgia to become a true leader in solar and to build a sustainable solar market in the state.”

Resch may be referencing the fact that solar leasing companies are also currently unable to operate in the state of Georgia under the same Georgia Territorial Service Act of 1973. Last February state Senator Buddy Carter proposed and then withdrew an amendment (SB 401) that would allow small businesses and homeowners to lease solar systems from third parties under PPAs. Experts say that he withdrew the bill after learning that Georgia Power had influenced some of his “yes” and “maybe” votes to "no."

The prevailing opinion that’s led some to conclude that Georgia Power may not be interested in statewide efforts to expand the use of solar energy is bolstered by a report released by Green America in 2011 titled “Leadership We Can Live Without: The Real Corporate Social Responsibility Report for Southern Company.” The report gave Georgia Power’s parent, Southern Company, an “F” for its heavy reliance on coal and nuclear power, as well as for the company’s overall output of air and water pollution.

Speaking to the two initiatives now before the Georgia Public Service Commission, Resch added, “Important policy decisions lie ahead. It’s vital that the Georgia Public Service Commission allow both centralized and distributed solar generation to fulfill a larger role in the state’s energy mix.” Resch called the Georgia Power proposal “limited” and said “distributed solar must be allowed to grow at a rate higher than 10 MW per year in order to create a truly sustainable market and jobs across the state.”

“In addition, the state needs competitive rules and standards for connecting to the grid as well as policies to allow for other solar providers to participate in the market,” he said.

According to GaSU, the Georgia Public Service Commission is evaluating the GaSU plan and the Georgia Power plan right now and an answer from staffers is expected within the next two weeks. While Georgia Power has so far been able to block proposed changes to legislation, it’s not inconceivable that concessions may be made in an effort to boost Georgia’s sagging jobs market. Recent estimates by the Georgia Department of Labor place the state’s unemployment rate at 9.2 percent, more than a full percentage point ahead of the national jobless average of 8.1 percent.

Lead image: Panoramic view from Brasstown Bald, the highest natural point in the state of Georgia via Shutterstock.

16 Comments

Register To Comment
Kenneth Hunt
Kenneth Hunt
February 11, 2013
Let us not forget that this is a government for the people by the people. We as Georgians need to choose our own representatives that have a track record in the community for looking out for the people instead of voting for people that we know nothing about. This is how the monopolies rule.
Howard Johnson
Howard Johnson
October 7, 2012
Informative article but what is Georgia doing to promote rooftop solar? Rooftop solar being defined as that available for the residential homeowner, the end user? Are the universities and public schools putting lots of panels on their buildings? Are state tax credits available for these consumers? I would like to know. Allowing another energy provider does not help the end user. Please correct me if I am wrong.
ANONYMOUS
October 5, 2012
I'm not one for big business in most cases, but to be honest, a SUCCESSFUL controlling power in solar may be just what renewables need to get the ball rolling. Yes, free market jobs are great on a small scale, but the main competitors, for all renewables, not just solar, are the oil companies. In an ideal world, people would support who they felt deserved more business, but this is not an ideal world. This is a world where, either you get big funding from big people, or big funding from government. There aren't thousands of local gas companies, there are less than 10 successful ones that control everything. We need to back the biggest competitor in solar we have, and carry that to being our biggest fighter against non-renewables. It's just not efficient otherwise.
ANONYMOUS
October 5, 2012
What exactly does it mean when a solar generation company sells electricity directly to customers? The article merely says "GaSU would pay Georgia Power for the use of its transmission infrastructure and then share profits with its customers in the form of rebates, resulting in lower utility rates over time." However, solar power is intermittent and cannot meet the full needs of any customers--this is distinct from a deregulated natural gas market where individual vendors can supply the full needs of specific customers. Is GaSU going to be allowed to assume that their customer's consumption occurred during only the times they produced electricity? That would not be a reasonable approximation. A key feature of electricity service is a stable supply and this requires Georgia Power to include expensive peaking power in their energy mix. Why should a vendor of intermittent power be permitted to "sell" directly to customers when they don't supply the guaranteed power the customers actually buy?
Steven
Fact Checker
Fact Checker
October 5, 2012
No deregulation in happening by recognition of GaSU...that's a strawman. Also, have you not read the GaSU filing? GaSU pays the incumbent utilities their "lost" profits. So shareholders will be very happy unless they are David Koch!
David Carl
David Carl
October 5, 2012
A little history for those quick to say the monopoly power of Georgia Power should be revoked. Georgia deregulated the sale of natural gas in 1998. The winter of 98 - 99 was a very cold one in Georgia. People's gas bills rose because they used more and the base price of gas increased nationally due to the cold weather. To this day people in Georgia claim deregulation caused their gas bills to rise, not the weather. That mind set will need to be changed before another politician will be willing to suggest deregulating a utility in Georgia.
ANONYMOUS
October 5, 2012
'keeps profits fr solar in Geogia in ratepayers' pockets' - since when did the Southern Company become non-profit? Seems like they're in business to make money for their shareholders, mostly not Georgians. A good part of ~$1.6B/a dividends don't end up in Georgia. They could reduce rates today and still make money tomorrow. No cover story needed. Is there some specific economic theory that suggests monopoly is better than free market?
ANONYMOUS
October 5, 2012
THOSE OF US IN SOTH LA WHO WERE LEFT HOMELESS AND POOR BY KATRINIA AND IN A 2007 SPEECH BY US SENATOR BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA JR AT LEES 500,000 WHO VOTED AGINST USING THE STAFFORD TO REBULD THE SOUTHEAST LA INCLUDING NEW ORLEANS IN EFFECT DOWNGRADED ALL OUTSTANDING FHA LOANS TO .25 CENT ON EVERY DOLLAR.

ACCORDING TO MY FEMA FLOOD ICC ADJUSTER I WAS AT LEAST 75% DAMAGES ACCORDING TO MY ELEVATION CERTIFICATE.

THE STATE HIRED ICF AN OUT OF STATE CONTRACTOR TO WHO THREW OUT ALL ICC MARKINGS LEFT BEHIND BY THE FIRST RESPONDERS AND HIRED LNO LOCALS WHO AMKE OBSERVATIONS ON WATER LEVLES ONE EYERAR AFTER TH STORM

I ACTUALLY HAVE A ROAD HOEM TAKE WITH A BLACK AND WHITE DOCTORED UP TO REDUCED THE WATER LEVEL FROM 6 FT TO 3 FT

FEMA THE STATE OF LOUISIANA AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAVE COPY OF THE PHOTOS IN HAND BECUSE I MAILED IT IN UNDER MY FEMA INSURANCE CLAIM FROM MY NEW ADDRESS.


PS CHECK THE CNN RANDI KAYE INTERVIEW ON MY FRONT PORCH WHCIH AFTER KATRINA THE WTER WOUKD HAVE BEEEN 3 FT PLUS OVER HEADS WITHOUT MOVING


I STRONGLY SUGEST IF STRONGLY SUGGEST WANT TO BE A CUSTOMER OF GA SOLAR COMPANY GGET A NIGHT JOB

ACCORDING TO ATT U VERSE ACCOUNTS UNDER FIBER OPTICS THE BATTEY PACK LIFE IS 12 HOURS ONLY TH MAC LAP TOP CLAIM 7 HOURS THE WIRE LESS KEYBOARD AND MOUSE TSHT COME WI THE MAC DESK TOP MOUSE LASTS FEW DAYS DEPENDING ON USE

AGAIN BUYING BOTH 4 MONTHS APART MAKES MORE SENS THAN BUNDLING TOGETHER UNDER THE WINDOWS FORAMT OTIONS
Timothy Mcbride
Timothy Mcbride
October 5, 2012
Atlanta has some serious water problems, with so many other bigger fish to fry.... Regulating who can sell sunshine or tap into the same should not even be on the table.
Christopher Lee
Christopher Lee
October 5, 2012
This parochial stuff probably gets too much space on what should be an international website.

However, it does serve to demonstrate that the powers that be in a supposedly advanced country have no idea at all how urgent the situation is - for the health and safety of their own children.
Fact Checker
Fact Checker
October 4, 2012
I see there are comments and thoughts that draw readers away from the main issues. Georgia Solar Utilities has set up a structure to creare rate reductions and are volunteering to become regulated to insure that ratepayers recieve an estimated $15b over the next 40years. This, unlike PPAs keeps profits fr solar in Geogia in ratepayers' pockets. PPAs send the profits to wealthy investors. Finally, do you not realize that all solar construction and materials has a Georgia Preference! For the first time ever MAGE and Suniva will have an advantage in the State they are in. A fix that is thoughtful and puts ratepayers first should be praised for finally happening for the Citizens of Georgia. Read their PSC filing wwwGaSolarUtilities.com and they are keeping info current on facebook www.facebook.com/GeorgiaSolarUtilitiesInc
Gordon Gunn
Gordon Gunn
October 4, 2012
"Let's let monoply take its rightfull place in the pantheon of the free market economy. According to Ben Franklin, the free market is the bellweather of democracy."______________Anybody know where we can find one? ;^)
ANONYMOUS
October 4, 2012
The 'government shouldn't pick winners and losers' stumpers should be all over this.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
October 4, 2012
Let's let monoply take its rightfull place in the pantheon of the free market economy. According to Ben Franklin, the free market is the bellweather of democracy.
Steve Fortuna
Steve Fortuna
October 4, 2012
Just what GA needs - another BPU regulated monopoly with its attendant corruption, cronyism and administrative overhead bypassing the local solar installation market. I see how Suniva and Mage could be desperate enough to be talked into sponsoring this boondoggle - but the EASIEST and MOST PERMANENT solution to solar adoption is the IMMEDIATE REPEAL of the Territoriality Act of 1973. It costs nothing and will creating a solar market by opening up the state to investors who could own or lease solar assets to the public. You want good clean SOLAR JOBS? The answer is open markets - not another state protected monopoly. For this to happen you'll have to actually fight the GA Power lobbyists and vote in clean energy friendly legislators and BPU members. GASU is another well-connected, BPU friendly, politically savvy group of 'good ol' boys', not rank and file green energy citizens and electrical contractors who would benefit most from a healthy solar market. This says nothing about STATE INCENTIVES - GA Power us happy sending ratepayer money out of state to buy coal but won't put that money to work locally, supporting the local economy and cleaning the ever smoggier air. Never seen a company so laser focused on short-term returns at the expense of long term security and business viability. Adapt or die, Southern Company. The state can no longer afford your byzantine, protectionist, reactionary coal leaning possibilities.
ANONYMOUS
October 4, 2012
This sounds like a great story line for the Atlanta media to dig their teeth into. Mr. Resch needs to wage a media war with Georgia Southern and expose it's cronies in the legislature and beyond.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Vince Font

Vince Font

Vince Font is a professional freelance writer specializing in the fields of renewable energy, high tech, travel, and entertainment. Read his blog at www.vincefont.com or follow him on Twitter @vincefont.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • OnGrid Solar
  • Apricus, Inc.
  • Conergy Inc.
  • Green Power Conferences
  • Admirals Bank
  • Photovoltaics World
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information