Sign-In  or  Create a Free Account
Sign-in with:
 
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
 
Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Oklahoma's Wind Power Development Strategy

Do you like this magazine?

 
 
10 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 10
September 5, 2012
"[The] bulk of the new jobs are now in manufacturing."

No surprise. See http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=OK01F and http://www.tax.ok.gov/it2011/511CR-11.pdf

-------------------------

Credit for Manufacturers of Small Wind Turbines

Oklahoma manufacturers of wind turbines with a rated capacity of between 1 kilowatt (kW) and 50 kW are eligible for the credit if they agree in advance to allow their production and claims to be audited by the Oklahoma Tax Commission. They must also be able to show that they have made economic development investments in Oklahoma over the period of time for which the credit was claimed that exceed the amount of credit claimed.

The turbine must incorporate advanced technologies such as new airfoils, new generators, and new power electronics and at least one unit of each model must have been installed for testing at the US-DOE National Wind Technology Center.

The credit amount varies based on the turbine's square footage of rotor swept area. It was $25.00 per square foot produced in 2003, $12.50 per square foot produced in 2004, and $25.00 per square foot produced each year from 2005-2012 (except during the moratorium; see below). The credit is transferable during the ten years following the year of qualification.

Tax credit moratorium: No credit may be claimed for any advanced small wind turbines manufactured during the period of July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2012, for which the credit would otherwise be allowable. This credit may be claimed for tax year 2012 and subsequent tax years, for advanced small wind turbines manufactured on or after July 1, 2012.

-------------------------

It is the only subsidy for wind-related subsidy I know of that is tied to actual turbine production. A $25/ft2 of rotor swept area (RSA)comes to $78,000 for a 50 kW turbine with 3120 ft2 of RSA, or $1,560 per kW of capacity. That's, what, about 1/3 to 1/2 the selling price?
No image available
Comment
2 of 10
Anonymous
September 5, 2012
GREAT MORE WIND ENERGY PLANNING BASED ON HOT ADN DRY TORNADO WIND PATTERNS

SPARE PARTS FACILITES WITH 40 JOBS OVER 5 YEARS TO SUPPPY 7,000 MW OR MILLON WATTS PER YEAR N THE QUE

BY THE TIME THE GREEN PEOPLE GET FINISHED WITH THIS THERE WILL BE OVER 280,000 JOBS CREATED IN EACH STATE FROM OKLAHOMA TO MEMPHIS
Comment
3 of 10
September 5, 2012
Interesting, according to this directory ...

http://windustry.org/news-and-resources/resources/wind-energy-companies/directory?taxonomy_vocabulary_17_tid%5B%5D=187&taxonomy_vocabulary_16_tid=113
.
... despite the subsidy, Oklahoma is home to only one wind-turbine manufacturing company, Bergey Windpower (www.bergey.com). Have they missed some other ones?
No image available
Comment
4 of 10
Anonymous
September 5, 2012
I'm curious as to the expected cost of production - i.e. what will the customers end up being charged per kwh? Every single Wind Farm project that I have seen has produced energy at a cost over twice that compared to normal (i.e. coal, natural gas, nuclear) production methods. If someone has made a breakthrough - GREAT - but let's hear about it - where are the numbers?!
Comment
5 of 10
September 6, 2012
Good post.
Oklahoma has 1,301 square miles of water, and more coastline than the Atlantic and Gulf together and as such great scope for offshore windfarms.


Wind generation potential

According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the contiguous United States has the potential for 10,459 GW of onshore wind power. The capacity could generate 37 petawatt-hours (PW•h) annually, an amount nine times larger than current total U.S. electricity consumption. The U.S. also has large wind resources in Alaska, and Hawaii.
The U.S. Department of Energy's 2008 report 20% Wind Energy by 2030 envisioned that wind power could supply 20% of all U.S. electricity, which included a contribution of 4% to the nation's total electricity from offshore wind power. In order to achieve this, however, significant advances in cost, performance and reliability are needed, based on a 2011 report from a coalition of researchers from universities, industry, and government, supported by the Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future. Obtaining 20% from wind requires about 305 GW of wind turbines, an increase of 16 GW/year after 2018, or an average increase of 14.6%/year, and transmission line improvements.
In addition to the large onshore wind resources, the U.S. has large offshore wind power potential, with another NREL report released in September 2010 showing that the U.S. has 4,150 GW of potential offshore wind power nameplate capacity, an amount 4 times greater than the country's 2008 installed capacity from all sources, of 1,010 GW.

For the first 4 months of 2012 the electricity produced from wind power in the US amounted to 51 terawatt-hours (TW•h) or 4.1% of all electric power. This represents a 21% increase over the same period last year.

Put the WIND to WORK: To get inexhaustible, pollution-free energy which cannot be misused.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore (AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Comment
6 of 10
September 6, 2012
"Oklahoma has ... and more coastline than the Atlantic and Gulf together"

Funny post! Are you counting rivers and farm ponds as "coastline"?

Coastline matters for wind projects for three reasons:

-- No land-rental fees.
-- Stronger winds.
-- Space.

Many non-navigable water bodies are owned by private individuals, corporations, municipalities, or the state. They would likely charge rent if somebody wanted to set up a wind turbine in their pond or lake.

The winds, except on the biggest lakes (of which there are few) are unlikely to be much stronger than they are over dry land.

If you measure the length of the lakes on a small enough scale -- i.e., counting all the tiny indentations -- the length of Oklahoma's "coastline" might be long enough to stretch to the moon. But for the purpose of installing large wind turbines, what matters is how many you can fit within a given space. And that's highly unlikely to more than could fit along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts.
Comment
7 of 10
September 6, 2012
Here in Massachusetts, the home of the first offshore wind farm, Cape Wind, we have discovered that the wholesale price of offshore wind energy is more than four times the going rate.
Comment
8 of 10
September 6, 2012
so sick of using my taxpayer dollars to fund this nonsense. VOTE NO SUBSIDIES AND EB THE PTC! If Oklies want wind pay for it themselves and quit stealing from me and th rest of the Americab taxpayers. Make the BIG WIND CORPS pay their fair share--NO TAX CREDITS OR GRANTS1
Comment
9 of 10
September 6, 2012
All the numbers in here for $/kWh are very low...$0.009 and 0.007/kWh are $9 and $7/MWh, which is way too low (lower than the cost of gas or coal fired generation by a factor of at least 3). And the quote for purchasing 100kWh blocks of power for $1.72 doesn't add up to me either, since this would translate to $1.72/MWh.

Can anybody help clarify? I'm not particularly educated on utility retail pricing. Maybe it's $0.009kWh over the regular retail price?
Comment
10 of 10
JHB
September 7, 2012
Sherry Hellmuth talks a lot of sense when she tells the US to stop this wind turbine nonsense. The cost of these monstrosities is outrageous, which is why the price of clean electricity is four times the going rate of dirty electric. The powers that be know fully well that there are hundreds of renewable energy patents lying on the shelf which are far superior to the existing "windmills" that the world is throwing money at, but for reasons unknown to me they just will not deviate from these pathetic toys.
Can anyone throw any light on this way of thinking. Are Governments
not interested in making this a fossil fuel burning free world????
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With over 57,000 subscribers and a global readership in 174 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine covers industry, policy, technology, finance and markets for all renewable technologies. Content is aimed... more »

 

Sharryn Dotson

View Sharryn Dotson's Profile
About: I am the online editor for Power Engineering magazine and a contributing columnist to Renewable Energy World North America magazine. I enjoy learning more about... more »

Advertise With Us

Solar Electric Power Association Apricus, Inc. Solar Site Design Solar Power International 2013 Richardson RFPD, Inc. groSolar Solaire Generation
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters