The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Displaced Tortoises for Solar in Mojave Roils Environmentalists

Ken Wells, Bloomberg
September 20, 2012  |  13 Comments

Print

It's a 106-degree Fahrenheit day in the Mojave Desert. Heat devils dance off chocolate-hued Clark Mountain on the horizon. Air-conditioned cars zip along Interstate 15 toward Las Vegas. And inside a chain-link pen covered to keep out predators are scores of rare, threatened, sand-colored desert tortoises. Their captivity helps show how complicated it is to combat climate change without collateral damage. The foot-long (30-centimeter) creatures are being removed from their burrows for a project to harvest solar energy in the California desert. Trucks groan down sunbaked roads, cranes pivot with 750-pound (340-kilogram) mirrors and mechanical post-pounders drive steel pylons into the packed desert floor, destroying their habitat.

Construction of such large-scale green-energy projects has splintered environmental groups. When concern over global warming was at a peak, national organizations such as the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council threw their support behind industrial-scale wind and solar installations on public land. Now some smaller conservationist groups object to what they consider an environmentally destructive gold rush.

“Of course we need to do solar, but it should go on rooftops or in appropriate places, not the pristine desert,” says April Sall, director of the Wildlands Conservancy in Oak Glen, California, operator of the state’s largest nonprofit preservation system. “We need to tackle warming — but not forget that there are other things at stake.”

Priorities Clash

The Mojave solar project embodies the clash of environmental priorities. The $2.2 billion installation being built by closely held BrightSource Energy Inc. of Oakland, California, is designed to power 140,000 homes without emitting greenhouse gases. But it threatens the tortoises. That’s why the Western Watersheds Project conservationist group of Hailey, Idaho, sued to stop it in a Los Angeles U.S. court. (For an interactive graphic of the project, click here.)

The 120-year-old Sierra Club, which calls itself “America’s largest and most influential” environmental group, also lobbied for changes to the project’s design to protect the tortoises. Yet the 1.4 million-member organization chose not to try to block the plant, says Barbara Boyle, a Sierra green energy specialist.

“Ultimately, we need to jump-start renewables to combat climate change, and large-scale solar has to play a big part in that,” Boyle says. However, as it became clear the project was rooting out many more tortoises than projected and as some California chapters urged action, the organization joined a coalition that sued the Department of the Interior in March to block another long-planned Mojave solar project that it says threatens wildlife.

Climate Change

Similar disputes are playing out elsewhere and show a growing concern among green groups and willingness to block large-scale solar and wind projects when the cost to wildlife and habitat seem to outweigh the benefits of fighting climate change. A surge in supplies of cheap, clean-burning natural gas has also begun to undercut demand for more costly green energy.

The green backlash against sacrificing habitat and wildlife to curb global warming parallels polls finding that the public rates climate change low on a menu of environmental problems and has doubts whether it can be fixed. In a March Gallup survey, the issue ranked last among seven environmental concerns, with just 30 percent saying they worried about it “a great deal.”

A Washington Post-Stanford University poll in July found that while most Americans believe the earth is warming, 60 percent said little could be done to stop it, and more than 70 percent opposed energy taxes to address it.

Lethal Blades

Near the northern Florida Everglades, the Audubon Society has fought a 200-megawatt wind farm on 10,000 acres (3,900 hectares) of private sugar land, saying its 475-foot tall turbines and spinning blades will form a death corridor for migratory birds and the endangered snail-eating Florida Kite. The project, proposed by closely held Wind Capital Group LLC of St. Louis, was approved by the Palm Beach County Commission and could produce energy for 60,000 homes, the company says. It still needs state and federal permits.

In the southern Sierra Nevada of California, Defenders of Wildlife sued in federal court to block the proposed North Sky River wind-power project. It would be built by NextEra Energy Inc., based in Juno Beach, Florida, next to an existing wind farm where turbine blades killed eight golden eagles this year.

The American Bird Conservancy accused the U.S. government in a lawsuit in Washington of suppressing information about the threat that wind energy projects pose to migratory birds and other wildlife. The government denied the allegation.

26 Projects

Including the Mojave project that is relocating desert tortoises, the Interior Department has accelerated construction approval for 26 large-scale solar plants on public lands since 2009, including nine that it cleared in August. The Obama administration has steered $9 billion in stimulus funds from the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to 23,000 solar and large-scale wind installations, according to the Department of Energy.

Conservationist and Native American groups sued to halt five other Mojave solar projects. The organizations argue that federal and state authorities conducted inadequate environmental reviews and failed to consult with tribes on sacred sites. The Bureau of Land Management, the solar companies and the state deny the allegations.

Dozens more solar plants could arise across the American desert West. A July BLM plan allocates 285,000 public acres to 17 solar zones. An additional 19 million acres — an area almost the size of West Virginia — may be approved for solar projects. The goal is to produce 23,700 megawatts, enough to power 7 million homes, according to the BLM. Solar power now provides less than 1 percent of U.S. electricity, amounting to 5,700 megawatts, or enough for about 1 million households.

Abandoned Mines

Conservationists say it is wrongheaded to rip up the public desert and destroy wildlife habitat when millions of already-degraded acres are available. The Environmental Protection Agency last year identified 80,000 to 250,000 abandoned mine sites that could be used for solar and other renewable energy projects, according to Janine Blaeloch, director of the Seattle-based Western Lands Project, a watchdog group.

Viewing Page 1 of 2

  • View All
  • Next Page

13 Comments

Register To Comment
ANONYMOUS
September 24, 2012
Interesting debate here.

I think LarryofGalaxy has the best points to make. In regard to his first post, I especially agree with his last two sentences.

What depresses me is how so many are overly impressed by the differences in the Democrat Presidents and the Republican ones. Under Obama the wars, rendition and torture that Bush initiated have escalated, and the drug war and the "war" against aliens have continued/increased as well. Bailouts for the wealthiest have continued and/or increased.

Yet, because Obama - in the tradition of past Democrat Presidents - is less insane in regard to items like alternative energy than most Republicans, he is regarded as something as a saint by his many supporters, when in reality he is just another largely spineless (to use Ralph Nader's word for him) Democratic president (as have been his white precedessors before him). While I certainly prefer him over Romney, there is really only a small difference between the two . . .

Fred Golden
Fred Golden
September 24, 2012
3500 acres is only about 6 or 7 square miles, compared to what - a desert in excess of 100 X 100 or 10,000 square miles? Even the freeways take up more than 10 square miles.

You are not talking about 10% of the desert is no longer going to support the turtles, they are only going to be in less than 1% of the land - actually less than 0.5% of the land.
Fred Golden
Fred Golden
September 24, 2012
According to a article in Home Power Magazine, not to many birds are found dead on wind project sites. It is much more likely for a farmer to find a old aged bird dead in one of their fields.

I think that birds avoid the strange long armed wind machines, that turn very slowly compared to the agility of a bird.

And the turtles are not smashed by the cranes, once the construction is done, they will go back to their normal lives, and live long and thrive! Even the Sierra club can understand they are not purposely killing the turtles. They are leaving them alone as much as possible, and taking great pains to avoid disturbing them.
Thomas M
Thomas M
September 23, 2012
john, I believe tortois' and turtles are cold blooded animals that need the sun to warm themselves and store energy, kind of like a solar panel. So I am not sure if shade is what they are after....
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
September 22, 2012
@anonymous

It's becoming more and more obvious that a person reads into something only that which they want to see

Reread my comments and think a bit about what I said and perhaps did not say (read between the lines in other words) and then repeat your question of "where are my priorities"?

I wrote to be somewhat 'thought provoking'

Are you provoked yet?

Building my first PV panel from scratch in 1976 then spending the next 33 years designing,selling,installing and using just about every form of renewable energy and energy conservation and you ask "where are my priorities"?

And just where are yours?
What's your track record like?

And by the way

You are willing to sacrifice the tortoise to keep your little bit of habitat as you like it?

And just what will you say when someone more powerful and more clever than you decides that he or she needs your bit of habitat to satisfy their desires in maintaining their version of the status quo.
Hmmmmmmmmm!
John Moes
John Moes
September 22, 2012
A given number of thermal units of sun light bake an acre of soil in a desert. The hot soil heats the air above it, contributing to global warming. It also evaporates ground water.
An acre of solar panels shades that soil and drains off the thermal units of energy to run air conditioners somewhere else. The soil must be cooler. The air above it must be cooler. Would it be cooler where the air conditioners are? There should be less evaporation of ground water, so more vegetation should absorb carbon.
Solar panels don't touch much soil, they only shade it. There is still plenty of soil for tortoises to burro in and it might be cool enough that they won't need to spend as much time in their burrows. They need water, so with the solar panels they'll have more. They might even thrive in the shade of solar panels.
ANONYMOUS
September 21, 2012
RE comment 6, this issue of not even allowing birds and bunnies and so many other creatures to have a place to live, simply because well placed finance wizards see the desert landscape and those rebates and tax welfare incentives just begging to be sucked up on fossil fuel mining and energy production sites, it begs the question: where are your priorities?

Activism against the solar and wind power industries on the bases of bird strikes and desert tortoise habitat both ignores the real problems facing avian and reptilian life, and heavily supports the fossil fuel industry. Such activism further dismisses the real and eternal issues of bird, animal, and reptile displacements and extinctions being brought about steadily by climate change caused by greenhouse gases emissions from burning fossil fuels.
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
September 21, 2012
I think about the multimegawatt hrs of energy just one friend of mine has saved in San Francisco by upgrading lighting and then I think of the hundreds of thousands and maybe millions of acres of roof top sitting naked without PV. I then imagine the millions of gas guzzlers prowling the highways and the multitudes of McMansions consuming endless amounts of energy. This issue of not even allowing a simple tortoise to have a place to live,simply because well placed finance wizards see the desert landscape and those rebates and tax welfare incentives just begging to be sucked up on solar farms,it begs the question; are we all insane?

We lock up thousands just for smoking a weed and invade countries and kill thousands while chanting freedom and liberty.

Of course we are insane.
ANONYMOUS
September 21, 2012
GeraldR (comment 3) fails to mention that fuel for a coal-fired power plant must be continuously mined elsewhere and transported to the plant over the 30-year period. Additionally, coal-fired power plants consume in excess of 700 gallons of water per megawatt-hour of electricity generated. So the footprint of a coal-fired (or other fossil fuel or nuclear power plant) necessarily must include at least the land use devoted to mining the fuel and accessing the water used to supply the plant. So GeraldR's numbers are hugely conservative in favor of coal-fired power plants, and do not do justice to the much larger disparity between the impacts of solar power and the impacts of fossil fuels for generating the same amount of energy.
Joanne Ivancic
Joanne Ivancic
September 21, 2012
And don't forget the land use change and habitat damage from conversion of agricultural/forestry land to suburban sprawl with paved roads, parking lots, and industrial, commercial and residential developments. Shouldn't time and effort go to protest this as well?
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
September 21, 2012
'This technology, known as concentrating solar power, or CSP, takes up less space and obstructs less ground than arrays of photovoltaic panels' fail .. consider the data. Ivanpah produces 28 MW/km^2 (of active area)while PV farms on similar ground range from 34 to 49 MW/km^2. Some PV farms go as low as 28 MW/km^2 but these are located on rough terrain with complex drainage features which couldn't even be used for a power tower plant. Thanks to environmental assessment, the actual site plans and production data are well known.
As for locating on abandoned mining sites, who's going to clean up the toxic waste and remediate these sites to a state where people who are not mining industry employees would be allowed to work?

The current list of existing and progressing large scale solar farms in the south west has an average land use (including protected viewsheds, watercourses and wildlife habitats) of 49.32 mi^2 per GWavg while the comparable coal plant has a 30 year land use of 53.67 mi^2/GWavg + 12 mi^2 for transport right-of-way - I leave it to the reader to consider the relative state of the land after use.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
September 21, 2012
Well said anonymous. One need merely to read the disclosures in environmental statements for solar farms and nearby coal power plants to see the enormous difference. While solar farms are designed to work with the terrain, preserving water courses and other sensitive land features, coal plants merely bulldoze the land and create artificial toxic ponds. Where solar projects include land set aside for wildlife habitat and wildlife conservation projects, coal plants have none. While solar projects include buffer zones and detailed consideration of impact on the sightscapes, coal plants don't even measure them. While solar farms have elaborate relocation schemes, coal projects merely backfill the burrows. Coal plants cause disease and death amongst nearby indigenous primates but where are the environmentalists?
It seems the current issue is that the so called environmentalists can't even get the data for population demographics right - doesn't say much about their ability to do fact-based thinking.
ANONYMOUS
September 20, 2012
Meanwhile in oil-and-gas-and-coal-patch Rocky Mountain states, many millions of acres of land have been scarified or sundered with explosives for developing oil, natural gas, and coal based energies. Of all acreage devoted to oil, natural gas, coal, solar, and wind power throughout this region, about 99.5 percent is devoted to oil and natural gas well pads and their access roads, pipeline and electrical transmission alignments, compressor stations, storage tanks, equipment warehouses, waste disposal pits, mines, and other infrastructure supporting the fossil fuel industry. About 0.5 percent of these lands are devoted to all activities associated with wind and solar power development.

If "environmentalists" are looking for relative impacts of different energy industries on the destruction of land and everything that lives on or under it, these estimates should give them a clear idea of where to prioritize their research and their resources.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 8
    Country-Based Action to Achieve Universal Access to Energy
  • 5
    The Coming Solar Electricity Transformation
  • 4
    How to Talk Renewables so Farmers and Landowners Listen
  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • US Solar Institute
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Prudent Living, Inc.
  • Planet Solar Inc
  • CivicSolar
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • Martifer Solar USA, Inc.
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information