19 Companies Urge Congress To Extend Wind Tax CreditA group of 19 leading companies has sent a letter to Congress asking lawmakers to immediately extend a key tax credit for wind that is set to expire at the end of the year. The diverse coalition of firms, which includes Ben & Jerry’s, Johnson & Johnson, Levi Strauss, Starbucks, and Yahoo!, says that raising taxes on the wind sector would be bad for businesses that buy large amounts of wind electricity. These companies join a very large bi-partisan chorus of renewable energy supporters asking Congress to give the wind industry some certainty and put the sector on a level tax playing field with the oil and gas industry, which enjoys billions of dollars in permanent tax benefits. Over the last year, the National Governor’s Association, County Commissioners, and numerous Republican politicians have all sent separate letters to Congressional leaders in support of extending federal wind tax credits for at least another year. Now this latest group of prominent companies is playing up another theme: Ending support for wind isn’t just bad for the wind industry, it’s bad for downstream non-utility companies that procure energy from wind:
These 19 leading companies are part of the Business for Innovative Climate & Energy Policy (BICEP), a project from the sustainability advocacy group Ceres. They say that failure to extend the wind credit will add new costs to businesses throughout the economy. Interestingly, far-right conservative groups aggressively opposed to raising taxes are the only ones coming out in opposition to the wind tax credit. Over last five years, wind has brought $20 billion of annual private investment to the U.S., according to the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). There are now 75,000 jobs across the country in wind manufacturing, operations, maintenance and education. However, a report from Navigant Consulting prepared for AWEA concludes that failure to extend the wind tax credit could result in up to 37,000 job losses in the coming year. This article was originally published on Climate Progress and was republished with permission. Lead image: Wind turbine in clouds via Shutterstock The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.
3 Reader Comments
|
Stephen Lacey
Recent Opinion & Commentary |
1 of 3
Government CREDITS essentially put the COST of whatever carries these credits ACROSS ALL TAXPAYERS, while only a small number benefit. The biggest problem is that WIND POWER IS NOT ECONOMICALLY VIABLE. Take Cape Wind in Massachusetts. The raw cost of power is roughly 2.3 TIMES the cost of power from "normal" utilities. The ONLY way they were able to sell their power is by having the State of Massachusetts REQUIRE ever increasing amounts of power be purchased from "renewable" resources.
It is easy to sugar coat the extra cost right now because the utilities are only required to buy a few percent, so the average utility bill only goes up $5-10 a month, but when the utilities are FORCED TO BUY 20% or MORE from renewable sources and that $5-10 raise goes up to $20-50 a month, you will hear the HOWLING from the rate payers, but it will be TOO LATE because Cape Wind WILL BE BUILT and the CONTRACTS WILL BE SIGNED.
People are like sheep, they don't READ THESE CONTRACTS or realize what's happening, they only hear the 30 second quip from the supporter or detractor so, in the long run, they get screwed.
Now, take in to account wind power WITH NO TAX CREDITS and see how expensive it will be! That 2.3X will go to 5x-10x and NOT ONE PERSON would buy it at that point.
Hell, at that point I'd start carrying batteries in to work and charging them there!