The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, May 23, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Offshore Use of Vertical-axis Wind Turbines Gets Closer Look

Stephanie Holinka, Sandia National Laboratories
August 08, 2012  |  14 Comments

Sandia National Laboratories' wind energy researchers are re-evaluating vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs) to help solve some of the problems of generating energy from offshore breezes.

Basing their work on decades of wind energy research and experience, Sandia engineers are creating several concept designs, running those designs through modern modeling software and narrowing those design options down to a single, most-workable design for a VAWT turbine-blade. Results aren’t in, but the early favorite for further testing is the Darrieus design. (Illustration by Josh Paquette and Matt Barone).

Though VAWTs have been around since the earliest days of wind energy research at Sandia and elsewhere, VAWT architecture could transform offshore wind technology.

The economics of offshore windpower are different from land-based turbines, due to installation and operational challenges. VAWTs offer three big advantages that could reduce the cost of wind energy: a lower turbine center of gravity; reduced machine complexity; and better scalability to very large sizes.

A lower center of gravity means improved stability afloat and lower gravitational fatigue loads.

Additionally, the drivetrain on a VAWT is at or near the surface, potentially making maintenance easier and less time-consuming. Fewer parts, lower fatigue loads and simpler maintenance all lead to reduced maintenance costs.

Elegant in their simplicity

Sandia is conducting the research under a 2011 Department of Energy (DOE) solicitation for advanced rotor technologies for U.S. offshore windpower generation. The five-year, $4.1 million project began in January of this year.

Wind Energy Technologies manager Dave Minster said Sandia’s wind energy program is aimed at addressing the national energy challenge of increasing the use of low-carbon power generation.

“VAWTs are elegant in terms of their mechanical simplicity,” said Josh Paquette, one of Sandia’s two principal investigators on the project. “They have fewer parts because they don’t need a control system to point them toward the blowing wind to generate power.”

These characteristics fit the design constraints for offshore wind: the high cost of support structures; the need for simple, reliable designs; and economic scales that demand larger machines than current land-based designs.

Large offshore VAWT blades in excess of 300 meters will cost more to produce than blades for onshore wind turbines. But as the machines and their foundations get bigger — closer to the 10–20 megawatt (MW) scale — turbines and rotors become a much smaller percentage of the overall system cost for offshore turbines, so other benefits of the VAWT architecture could more than offset the increased rotor cost.

Challenges remain

However, challenges remain before VAWTs can be used for large-scale offshore power generation.

Curved VAWT blades are complex, making manufacture difficult. Producing very long VAWT blades demands innovative engineering solutions. Matt Barone, the project’s other principal investigator, said partners Iowa State University and TPI Composites will explore new techniques to enable manufacture of geometrically complex VAWT blade shapes at an unprecedented scale, but at acceptable cost.

VAWT blades must also overcome problems with cyclic loading on the drivetrain. Unlike horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWTs), which maintain a steady torque if the wind remains steady, VAWTs have two “pulses” of torque and power for each blade, based on whether the blade is in the upwind or downwind position. This “torque ripple” results in unsteady loading, which can lead to drivetrain fatigue. The project will evaluate new rotor designs that smooth out the amplitude of these torque oscillations without significantly increasing rotor cost.

Because first-generation VAWT development ended decades ago, updated designs must incorporate decades of research and development already built into current HAWT designs. Reinvigorating VAWT research means figuring out the models that will help speed up turbine design work.

“Underpinning this research effort will be a tool development effort that will synthesize and enhance existing aerodynamic and structural dynamic codes to create a publicly available aeroelastic design tool for VAWTs,” Barone said.

Needed: aerodynamic braking

Another challenge is brakes. Older VAWT designs didn’t have an aerodynamic braking system, and relied solely on a mechanical braking system that is more difficult to maintain and less reliable than the aerodynamic brakes used on HAWTs.

HAWTS use pitchable blades, which stop the turbine within one or two rotations without damage to the turbine and are based on multiple redundant, fail-safe designs. Barone said new VAWT designs will need robust aerodynamic brakes that are reliable and cost-effective, with a secondary mechanical brake much like on modern-day HAWTs. Unlike HAWT brakes, new VAWT brakes won’t have actively pitching blades, which have their own reliability and maintenance issues.

VAWT technology: A long history

In the 1970s and 1980s, when wind energy research was in its infancy, VAWTs were actively developed as windpower generators. Although strange looking, they had a lot going for them: They were simpler than their horizontal-axis cousins so they tended to be more reliable. For a while, VAWTs held their own against HAWTs. But then wind turbines scaled up.

“HAWTs emerged as the predominant technology for land-based wind over the past 15 years primarily due to advantages in rotor costs at the 1 to 5 megawatt scale,” Paquette said.

In the 1980s, research focused more heavily on HAWT turbines, and many VAWT manufacturers left the business, consigning VAWTs to an “also ran” in the wind energy museum.

But the winds of change have blown VAWTs’ way once more.

Sandia is mining the richness of its wind energy history. Wind researchers who were among the original wind energy engineers are going through decades of Sandia research and compiling the lessons learned, as well as identifying some of the key unknowns described at the end of VAWT research at Sandia in the 1990s.

The first phase of the program will take place over two years and will involve creating several concept designs, running those designs through modern modeling software and narrowing those design options down to a single, most-workable design. During this phase, Paquette, Barone and their colleagues will look at all types of aeroelastic rotor designs, including HVAWTs and V-shaped VAWTs. But the early favorite rotor type is the Darrieus design.

In phase two researchers will build the chosen design over three years, eventually testing it against the extreme conditions that a turbine must endure in an offshore environment.

In addition to rotor designs, the project will consider different foundation designs: Early candidates are barge designs, tension-leg platforms and spar buoys.

The project partners will work on many elements.

Another partner, the University of Maine, will develop floating VAWT platform dynamics code and subscale prototype wind/wave basin testing. Iowa State University will develop manufacturing techniques for offshore VAWT blades and subscale wind tunnel testing. TPI Composites will design a proof-of-concept subscale blade and develop a commercialization plan. TU-Delft will work on aeroelastic design and optimization tool development and modeling. Texas A&M University will work on aeroelastic design tool development.

“Ultimately it’s all about the cost of energy. All these decisions need to lead to a design that’s efficient and economically viable,” said Paquette.

Stephanie Holinka is a technical writer and media relations staff member at Sandia Labs in New Mexico. She specializes in energy R&D, homeland security, nonproliferation, physical security, materials protection and threat reduction.

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin company, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration. With main facilities in Albuquerque, N.M., and Livermore, Calif., Sandia has major R&D responsibilities in national security, energy and environmental technologies and economic competitiveness.

Lead image: Wind turbine via Shutterstock

14 Comments

Register To Comment
Anatoly Arov
Anatoly Arov
August 13, 2012
VAWT 1Mw of my design will be 85m dia and 20m height @ 12.5 m/s is it goog or bad ? ***Compare: 1Mw my pressure engine 1 cu.m size, excluding generator size, @ 50m ocean or lake depth expected to deliver.
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
August 13, 2012
There is a limit in size to Vertical axis Wind Turbines. Though there were efforts to promote Darrius VAWT in the past, the size was limited to KW.

Offshore Wind Turbines make sense when the turbine size is big both from economic and technical point of view.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Bob M
Bob M
August 13, 2012
With all the comments about only the top part of the blade producing power, I wonder if there are designs that don't go all the way to the base but have the rotors starting higher up.

I imagine the seagulls would appreciate that!

Also, can 3 or 4 blades be used to deal with the problem of variable torque?
Anatoly Arov
Anatoly Arov
August 11, 2012
Answer to kwh
Info about FLOW ENGINE Canadian Patent 2,689,739 in CIPO data base or
www.windtech-international.com/articles/flowengine principle only
or picture on my photo on car roof or email pips.arov@bellnet.ca
Ken Higgs
Ken Higgs
August 10, 2012
Arov, please inform either a 'site', or photo, of your invention.

Thank you.
Anatoly Arov
Anatoly Arov
August 10, 2012
Darius rotor has two blades for two reasons: 1) that there is possibility for stoppage in some pos. for three blades when two blades of three have size of back surface twice bigger than blade that does the work. 2) construction of rotor actually use for torque creation only 1/3 of flow swept area. My FLOW ENGINE design can use 3 - 4 blades with zero resistance on the way back and both rotors blades rotating in opposite direction in the same swept area and actually utilizing almost 100% of flow swept area delivering double rpm and allowing 2.5 times more energy from swept area than lift rotor and considerably outperforming lift turbines with all advantages vertical axis turbines. See on car roof four blade version for wind.
Ken Higgs
Ken Higgs
August 10, 2012
Noteworthy that it is mentioned that a Darius has only the upper portion of it's blades 'producing' due to higher winds thereat.

Consider that a HAWT has only 1/3 of it's blades producing thereat
at any one time, whereas Darius has all of the upper portion on each and every blade, producing from the 'high end' all the time.

Seems always 2 blades, but perhaps someone can explain why no more than 2 blades are used.
frederic pouyot
frederic pouyot
August 10, 2012
I think these efforts from Sandia National Laboratories are steps in the right direction. I see comments from people that just criticize the idea of offshore VAWT based on pure engineering concepts. The matter of the fact is that in order to drastically improve the "economic effectiveness" of Offshore wind, we need to thing outside of the box of not only traditional HAWT but also traditional land based VAWT. The Eggbeater turbines, first implemented in my part of the world as a large turbine (www.eolecapchat.com/) is an old approach that has not found much commercial success in been replicated. I would suggest Sandia looks at modern advanced solutions specially designed for offshore such as see (http://seatwirl.com/) . Also, one of the ways to decrease costs off-shore would be to optimize the cost of the expensive cables that link to the land connection. In addition to the wind energy, floating offshore turbines can use wave energy in several ways. For example, Ecotricity's Seamills (http://www.ecotricity.co.uk/our-green-energy/our-green-electricity/and-the-sea/seamills) could be combined in the design of the bottom part of the VAWT. I can also see one more way to optimize off-shore wind turbines. The structural elements of the VAWT (rotor blades, tower..) can easily be coated with CIGS Solar Thin-film using modern BIPV processes, using marine grade cabling. Floating solar is has been deployed and tested in over a dozen places in the world from Asia to Europe to the California to New Jersey (even in harsh cold winter conditions) – see http://www.boatingindustry.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=774:poralu-marineinstals-a-floating-major-solar-park-in-new-jersey&catid=99:archived-stories&Itemid=475. Thin Film has the advantage of working better with diffuse solar energy and therefore to catch more of the energy reflected from the water surfaces. Finally, the $/kW installed cost is less important than Life cycle $/MWh & ROI!

Frederic Pouyot
gpeks.com
John Furze
John Furze
August 10, 2012
This is a very useful article - there is indeed a need for renued interest in the vertical axis concept [historically known as "Horizontal rotors"] as no one technology can be utilized in every situation or environment.

Consider designs such as the Finnish - "Helical rotor design" - as developed by Windside Oy. and additionally by Shield-Jaspira.
These helical rotors offer greater robustness and ease of manufacture and are suitable for the marine environment both under water for utilizing tidal or other flow currents and above water.

Their performance cannot directly be compared to the now traditional 3-7 MW 3 or 2 bladed off-shore wts - however cost savings and therefore increased "efficiency" are obtained in several other possible ways.

Further interested in this field may kindly also search for some of the vertical axis papers and ideas of Prof. Salter from Edinburgh in Scotland and also in a previous article of mine "Stealth Wind Turbines" - ReFocus Magazine March-April 2002
Angus Campbell
Angus Campbell
August 10, 2012
There is another way to design HWT's by mounting two turbines on a horizontal "cross" tree. A similar design exists for tidal current turbines ("Marine Current Turbines")and the advantages are that it can be hoisted and lowered for installation, maintenance and servicing and reduces the costs of installing a tower-I.e. two turbines on a singe tower with a single grid connection.
Jacob Bitsadze
Jacob Bitsadze
August 10, 2012
There is the more efficient combined turbine. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSzRQPcJzV8 This turbine fundamentally differs from existend and approved. In similar prototypes the same concept is realized: This is the creation of artificial whirlwind with ascending streams. I.e. everyone try to create the artificial analogue of a natural whirlwind. And in this variant is not created a artificial ascending whirlwind, but two whirlwinds collide inside the turbine. Also rotate the turbine internal pressure. The prototype of the submitted turbine is the vertical propeller for windgenerator. Lack of such propellers is their small efficiency. As 1/3 blades rotate against a wind and 1/3 more stays idle. And in the submitted turbine work is made with all blades. (Fig. 1) This effect is reached by that between vertical blades (2) of the turbine horizontal propellers (3?) and (3b) are (free or rigidly) located, which force air in space between blades. Such horizontal propellers can be a more. Between these propellers in the center of the turbine is placed a turboexspander (3) which will acquire capacity of forced air. It is possible the variant without a turboexspander, but it will be less effective. The raised pressure inside the turbine presses on all blades and detander equally and forces them to rotate. As these blades are located to internal pressure under a sharp corner. Thus work is made with all blades. Hence capacity of this turbine in 3 times more than usual. Different variants of an integrated turbine are possible - with different vortex effects. http://technogeo.ucoz.com/load/the_combine_aero_hydro_turbine_and_propeller/1-1-0-2
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
August 9, 2012
Wind speed increase with height. 20% higher wind speed double energy harvest. This means that most of the wing area of a a vawt is useless. The angle of attack for a vawt is variable, which means that most of the time it is suboptimal.

A key reason for going offshore is that the wind speeds are higher and more constant and especially so in higher altitudes.

A vawt designed to deliver with high capacity factor would also require a very talle construction, which despite the rigid structural strength will pose great challenges. If they are to catch winds as high as large offshore hawt this would require 3-4 times longer wings, which is not very easy to produce, transport, assemble or installing.

Offshore cost are burdened by particularly high initial investments in the required ships, cranes, transformer stations and grid etc. All the innovations and investments in these technologies are beginning to pay of and the price is expected to drop and the price of electricity generation at sea is expected to close in on the cost of electricity generation on land.

In hawt's each wing is pitch controlled and in coming versions the optimization of pitch will even be dynamic along the entire length of each wing with morphing wing design.

In Denmark vawt advantages have been discussed and explored theoretically, and in both UK, Norway and Sweden it has been explored recently in prototypes.

The Northsea is very rough. The highest waves recorded were about 40 meters and 20 meter waves are frequent so floating constructions are probably a tough challenge.

The general belief is that the vawt design should be investigated but also that the classic Danish design still has some mileage left.
Stuart Watt
Stuart Watt
August 8, 2012
This sounds very interesting. It is similar to other programs that I have seen out there. I hope that this becomes more popular in the future. Solar Investments are a key element to creating a green electricity grid.
Anatoly Arov
Anatoly Arov
August 8, 2012
I developed very attractive off-shore use vertical axis wind and water(river, tides, waves) device that allows more than double kinetic energy utilization, compare to currently used solutions including lift devices. I am having trouble to break judgement that vertical axis solutions less effective. Even my tests results do not change their view. Design patented and available for licensing. Cheers to people in Sandia, have a look in my solution which will allow off-shore wind to become subsidy free.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • US, Australian Companies Taking Giant Steps for Global EGS Geothermal
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 10
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Wind Turbine Lubrication and Maintenance: Protecting Investments in Renewable Energy

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
  • SolarEstimate.org
  • Arena Solutions
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Navigant
  • Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut)
  • DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability
  • Associated Renewable
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information