Sign-In  or  Create a Free Account
Sign-in with:
 
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
 
Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Offshore Use of Vertical-axis Wind Turbines Gets Closer Look

By Stephanie Holinka, Sandia National Laboratories
August 8, 2012   |   14 Comments

Do you like this news?

 
 
14 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 14
August 8, 2012
I developed very attractive off-shore use vertical axis wind and water(river, tides, waves) device that allows more than double kinetic energy utilization, compare to currently used solutions including lift devices. I am having trouble to break judgement that vertical axis solutions less effective. Even my tests results do not change their view. Design patented and available for licensing. Cheers to people in Sandia, have a look in my solution which will allow off-shore wind to become subsidy free.
Comment
2 of 14
August 8, 2012
This sounds very interesting. It is similar to other programs that I have seen out there. I hope that this becomes more popular in the future. Solar Investments are a key element to creating a green electricity grid.
Comment
3 of 14
August 9, 2012
Wind speed increase with height. 20% higher wind speed double energy harvest. This means that most of the wing area of a a vawt is useless. The angle of attack for a vawt is variable, which means that most of the time it is suboptimal.

A key reason for going offshore is that the wind speeds are higher and more constant and especially so in higher altitudes.

A vawt designed to deliver with high capacity factor would also require a very talle construction, which despite the rigid structural strength will pose great challenges. If they are to catch winds as high as large offshore hawt this would require 3-4 times longer wings, which is not very easy to produce, transport, assemble or installing.

Offshore cost are burdened by particularly high initial investments in the required ships, cranes, transformer stations and grid etc. All the innovations and investments in these technologies are beginning to pay of and the price is expected to drop and the price of electricity generation at sea is expected to close in on the cost of electricity generation on land.

In hawt's each wing is pitch controlled and in coming versions the optimization of pitch will even be dynamic along the entire length of each wing with morphing wing design.

In Denmark vawt advantages have been discussed and explored theoretically, and in both UK, Norway and Sweden it has been explored recently in prototypes.

The Northsea is very rough. The highest waves recorded were about 40 meters and 20 meter waves are frequent so floating constructions are probably a tough challenge.

The general belief is that the vawt design should be investigated but also that the classic Danish design still has some mileage left.
Comment
4 of 14
August 10, 2012
There is the more efficient combined turbine. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSzRQPcJzV8 This turbine fundamentally differs from existend and approved. In similar prototypes the same concept is realized: This is the creation of artificial whirlwind with ascending streams. I.e. everyone try to create the artificial analogue of a natural whirlwind. And in this variant is not created a artificial ascending whirlwind, but two whirlwinds collide inside the turbine. Also rotate the turbine internal pressure. The prototype of the submitted turbine is the vertical propeller for windgenerator. Lack of such propellers is their small efficiency. As 1/3 blades rotate against a wind and 1/3 more stays idle. And in the submitted turbine work is made with all blades. (Fig. 1) This effect is reached by that between vertical blades (2) of the turbine horizontal propellers (3?) and (3b) are (free or rigidly) located, which force air in space between blades. Such horizontal propellers can be a more. Between these propellers in the center of the turbine is placed a turboexspander (3) which will acquire capacity of forced air. It is possible the variant without a turboexspander, but it will be less effective. The raised pressure inside the turbine presses on all blades and detander equally and forces them to rotate. As these blades are located to internal pressure under a sharp corner. Thus work is made with all blades. Hence capacity of this turbine in 3 times more than usual. Different variants of an integrated turbine are possible - with different vortex effects. http://technogeo.ucoz.com/load/the_combine_aero_hydro_turbine_and_propeller/1-1-0-2
Comment
5 of 14
August 10, 2012
There is another way to design HWT's by mounting two turbines on a horizontal "cross" tree. A similar design exists for tidal current turbines ("Marine Current Turbines")and the advantages are that it can be hoisted and lowered for installation, maintenance and servicing and reduces the costs of installing a tower-I.e. two turbines on a singe tower with a single grid connection.
Comment
6 of 14
August 10, 2012
This is a very useful article - there is indeed a need for renued interest in the vertical axis concept [historically known as "Horizontal rotors"] as no one technology can be utilized in every situation or environment.

Consider designs such as the Finnish - "Helical rotor design" - as developed by Windside Oy. and additionally by Shield-Jaspira.
These helical rotors offer greater robustness and ease of manufacture and are suitable for the marine environment both under water for utilizing tidal or other flow currents and above water.

Their performance cannot directly be compared to the now traditional 3-7 MW 3 or 2 bladed off-shore wts - however cost savings and therefore increased "efficiency" are obtained in several other possible ways.

Further interested in this field may kindly also search for some of the vertical axis papers and ideas of Prof. Salter from Edinburgh in Scotland and also in a previous article of mine "Stealth Wind Turbines" - ReFocus Magazine March-April 2002
Comment
7 of 14
August 10, 2012
I think these efforts from Sandia National Laboratories are steps in the right direction. I see comments from people that just criticize the idea of offshore VAWT based on pure engineering concepts. The matter of the fact is that in order to drastically improve the "economic effectiveness" of Offshore wind, we need to thing outside of the box of not only traditional HAWT but also traditional land based VAWT. The Eggbeater turbines, first implemented in my part of the world as a large turbine (www.eolecapchat.com/) is an old approach that has not found much commercial success in been replicated. I would suggest Sandia looks at modern advanced solutions specially designed for offshore such as see (http://seatwirl.com/) . Also, one of the ways to decrease costs off-shore would be to optimize the cost of the expensive cables that link to the land connection. In addition to the wind energy, floating offshore turbines can use wave energy in several ways. For example, Ecotricity's Seamills (http://www.ecotricity.co.uk/our-green-energy/our-green-electricity/and-the-sea/seamills) could be combined in the design of the bottom part of the VAWT. I can also see one more way to optimize off-shore wind turbines. The structural elements of the VAWT (rotor blades, tower..) can easily be coated with CIGS Solar Thin-film using modern BIPV processes, using marine grade cabling. Floating solar is has been deployed and tested in over a dozen places in the world from Asia to Europe to the California to New Jersey (even in harsh cold winter conditions) – see http://www.boatingindustry.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=774:poralu-marineinstals-a-floating-major-solar-park-in-new-jersey&catid=99:archived-stories&Itemid=475. Thin Film has the advantage of working better with diffuse solar energy and therefore to catch more of the energy reflected from the water surfaces. Finally, the $/kW installed cost is less important than Life cycle $/MWh & ROI!

Frederic Pouyot
gpeks.com
Comment
8 of 14
kwh
August 10, 2012
Noteworthy that it is mentioned that a Darius has only the upper portion of it's blades 'producing' due to higher winds thereat.

Consider that a HAWT has only 1/3 of it's blades producing thereat
at any one time, whereas Darius has all of the upper portion on each and every blade, producing from the 'high end' all the time.

Seems always 2 blades, but perhaps someone can explain why no more than 2 blades are used.
Comment
9 of 14
August 10, 2012
Darius rotor has two blades for two reasons: 1) that there is possibility for stoppage in some pos. for three blades when two blades of three have size of back surface twice bigger than blade that does the work. 2) construction of rotor actually use for torque creation only 1/3 of flow swept area. My FLOW ENGINE design can use 3 - 4 blades with zero resistance on the way back and both rotors blades rotating in opposite direction in the same swept area and actually utilizing almost 100% of flow swept area delivering double rpm and allowing 2.5 times more energy from swept area than lift rotor and considerably outperforming lift turbines with all advantages vertical axis turbines. See on car roof four blade version for wind.
Comment
10 of 14
kwh
August 10, 2012
Arov, please inform either a 'site', or photo, of your invention.

Thank you.
Comment
11 of 14
August 11, 2012
Answer to kwh
Info about FLOW ENGINE Canadian Patent 2,689,739 in CIPO data base or
www.windtech-international.com/articles/flowengine principle only
or picture on my photo on car roof or email pips.arov@bellnet.ca
Comment
12 of 14
August 13, 2012
With all the comments about only the top part of the blade producing power, I wonder if there are designs that don't go all the way to the base but have the rotors starting higher up.

I imagine the seagulls would appreciate that!

Also, can 3 or 4 blades be used to deal with the problem of variable torque?
Comment
13 of 14
August 13, 2012
There is a limit in size to Vertical axis Wind Turbines. Though there were efforts to promote Darrius VAWT in the past, the size was limited to KW.

Offshore Wind Turbines make sense when the turbine size is big both from economic and technical point of view.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Comment
14 of 14
August 13, 2012
VAWT 1Mw of my design will be 85m dia and 20m height @ 12.5 m/s is it goog or bad ? ***Compare: 1Mw my pressure engine 1 cu.m size, excluding generator size, @ 50m ocean or lake depth expected to deliver.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

SMA America, LLC EnergyDreams LLC 3TIER Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Upsolar US Solar Institute GoGreenSolar.com
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters