The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 25, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Flying on Woody Biomass and Camelina: Consortium Seeks Biofuel Answers

Bruce Dorminey, Contributor
August 21, 2012  |  17 Comments

Aviation remains as much a part of Washington State as its eastern dry-land agriculture or the rain-soaked forests on its mountainous western fringes. But only the alternative energy industry proposes to combine the three in a regional effort to create a green and renewable jet fuel (biojet).

Boeing, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force, Lufthansa and Finnair, among others, have all tested aviation biofuel mixes in existing aircraft for use as a drop-in alternative fuel source.  But two separate federally-funded $40 million efforts led by Washington State University and the University of Washington as part of the Northwest Advanced Renewables Alliance (NARA) are aiming to make biojet a regular part of the region’s aviation mix. 

NARA’s goal is to ramp up Northwest aviation fuel use to a maximum 50/50 mix of aviation biofuel and conventional jet fuel.  In the Northwest, NARA researchers hope to use both oil seeds and wood residues to fuel biojet production. 

“An absolute requirement is that this has to be a drop-in fuel,” said NARA Director Ralph Cavalieri, a biological systems engineer at Washington State University in Pullman.  “The availability of the biojet won’t be uniform worldwide, therefore, the engines will also have to operate on conventional jet fuel wherever they [refuel].”

Until aircraft propulsion technology radically changes, the aviation industry notably has fewer alternative energy choices than other modes of transportation.  Thus, biojet fuel derived from sustainable biomass is a crucial component of the aviation sector’s long-term strategy in both countering carbon taxes and going green.

Camelina, an oil seed in the same family as rapeseed, could help make this happen.  It is normally harvested dry with a wheat combine then crushed to squeeze oil from its seeds.  However, 70 percent of its original volume is leftover after crushing and is subsequently sold as animal feed, mostly for chickens or feedlot cattle. 

The plant’s economic prospects are brighter in dry-land agricultural areas because land values in eastern Washington and western Montana can accommodate low-value crops, unlike highly-irrigated farmland in Oregon’s Columbia River basin.

Camelina grown in the Northwest would likely initially be used to fuel aircraft at major area airports like Seattle-Tacoma, Portland and Spokane.

Steve Camp, a farmer in LaCrosse, Washington, has just finished his fifth harvest of some 300 acres of Camelina as part of his crop rotation for dry-land wheat. Until lately, he’s been extracting the oil to make his own biodiesel and selling the remaining leftover meal as animal feed.  Although he’s among only a handful of farmers in eastern Washington growing Camelina, Camp soon hopes to be selling at least part of his annual crop to make commercial biojet.

Even so, Camelina’s biggest challenge in becoming a viable biojet source is arguably its current tiny commercial market.  Because the oil seed plant is still being farmed in such small quantities, Camp says farmers can consider themselves lucky to get 20 cents per pound for the plant’s seeds.  

“People who want the Camelina seeds are going to have to pay the farmers enough to make it worth their while economically,” said Cavalieri who notes that Camelina to biojet conversion still remains in the pilot stages.

But, in truth, Camelina represents only one source component of a Northwest biojet market.  The rest will likely come from the Northwest’s remaining vast forests of Idaho, Washington, Montana, and Oregon in the form of wood biomass residuals. 

Such residuals are often left in slash piles for burning or otherwise sold for pulp.  But this raw forest biomass also has the added advantage of being less expensive to buy per ton than Camelina.   

Yet hurdles remain in converting the wood’s cellulose into sugars that can produce alcohol.  Although termites and certain types of fungi naturally produce enzymes that break down wood structure, in a commercial setting such enzymes are costly.  So, NARA researchers are working on various pre-treatment scenarios to make this enzymatic process more efficient; likely involving “cooking” forest biomass wood chips with chemicals. 

“With pulping you isolate the cellulose out of the wood,” said Michael Wolcott, a materials engineer at Washington State University in Pullman.  “But [to produce biojet] we don’t have to isolate it.  We just have to make it more accessible to [commercially-produced] enzymes which break down the carbohydrates into fermentable sugars.”

Cavalieri says Gevo, Inc. in Englewood, Colorado has a proprietary line of microbes that will ferment sugar and produce isobutanol (an alcohol) that’s readily converted into biojet and other products.

But there are no large scale plans to do so now.  One reason arguably involves lignin; the “glue” that binds a tree’s cellulose.  

“Lignin is difficult to break down and not useful for making the sugars that the microbes need to [produce] the alcohols that ultimately become jet fuel,” said Cavalieri.  “But because you’re paying for it as part of the weight brought into the processing plant, you need to convert it into something more valuable.” 

Thus far, softwood conifers like Douglas fir, Western hemlock, and Ponderosa pine, says Cavalieri, have been the most difficult to convert to biofuel.  That’s because typically some 30 percent of the softwoods are made up of lignin. 

“Softwoods are lower in carbohydrate content from which sugars can be produced,” said Wolcott.  “That means you have to develop a market for these non-fermentable materials.  We would use the lignin as a raw material to produce a component of thermoplastic and thermo-setting polymers.”

Once the wood conversion technology is fine-tuned, Cavalieri hopes that now shuttered portions of the Northwest’s pulpwood industry infrastructure can be “re-purposed” to produce biojet. 

While Colorado-based companies like Gevo and Zeachem are both separately working on forest biomass conversion to biojet technology, commercial production has yet to begin. 

But if the Northwest can find a way to being commercial biojet production from either oil seeds like Camelina or woody biomass, the benefits would likely ripple across the country and spur follow-on biojet development elsewhere. 

Today, commercial and military aviation in the Northwest use some 800 million gallons of fuel each year.  Thus, to meet a maximum 50/50 blend of biojet to conventional jet fuel would require at least 400 million gallons be derived from biomass.

Northwest Camelina is expected to eventually cover as much as half of that figure, with biojet from forest biomass projected to make up the needed annual remainder. 

Within two decades, Cavalieri envisions Northwest-produced biojet being able to meet the needs of the region’s aviation fuel market.  But beyond that, any future growth in Northwest biojet production will likely be heavily dependent on local forest biomass. 

Lead image: grape rapeseed via shutterstock

17 Comments

Register To Comment
william cormeny
william cormeny
September 1, 2012
Fed Ex and UPS are parking planes,while airlines are going bankrupt.
Shippers have decided they can no longer afford air freight.
Something should be done to create an alternative engine for airplanes.
Or, a wholesale shift from air shipping toward rail shipping might occur.So far the biggest breakthrough came through the emergence of the containership-railroad linkage.
There's no reason newly electrified railroads cannot carry the freight or passengers at a much faster rate.
If the subsidies for jet fuel were spent on nuclear or renewable fueled electric power plants we might eliminate the need for airborne machines.
Furthermore,far more efforts should be made to create windpowered or solar powered ships.These two ideas could combine to make a global economy more cohesive and cheaper.
ANONYMOUS
August 23, 2012
Nadia: You are not informed of the massive amounts of wood that is diseased and dying due to the Pine Beetle. We need to remove the dead forests and replace it with new trees, which can be done. The beetle infested wood can be used for making biofuels as well as electricity. There are new ways that biofuels can be made efficiently from wood and not cost atrocious amounts of money. Many companies such as ours have ways of doing what I have mentioned and are ready to enter the market but are having problems finding funding or are just entering the marketplace. You will start to see new innovations such as we have come to local communities very soon, be patient. Lastly our plants will allow for new jobs to be produced without replacing jobs and providing good pay for the areas that we go into.
terry bowring
terry bowring
August 22, 2012
Fletcher -michael comment on INEOS converting lignin into ethanol is accurate. Lignin extracted from wood via a solvent pulping process can also be converted into high value carbon fiber.ORNL are working on this process.once lignin gone all cellulosics can be converted to ethanol
MICHAEL FLETCHER
MICHAEL FLETCHER
August 22, 2012
On my blog at www.fuelsofthefuture.com, I described a company Ineos Bio on 8/6/2012 whose technology uses a biocatalyst that has the capability of converting the lignin as well into ethanol. Thus, in this process there is an efficient way to utilize the lignin.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
August 22, 2012
@jchristie: What you are hinting at above and most biofuel entrepreneurs outright dodge in their investment brochures is that ventures that use waste streams don't scale up. They can get decent returns at small scales if their inputs are true waste that doesn't require lots of pre-treatment, but the total energy recoverble from waste is a fraction of what went into generating that waste and is not nearly enough to provide all the primary power needs of the community generating that waste--that would be perpetual motion. The only way to scale up energy production from these technologies is to feed them cultivated raw material such as pulpwood, which requires huge land and energy and time inputs, and the economics are ruined by crashing upon the rocky reef of the laws of thermodynamics.
John Christie
John Christie
August 22, 2012
Cliff-Clavin
We need to step away from mega projects and massive distant manufacturing or generation....and think local. Pyrolysis driven H2 and green diesel can be produced economically at small scale; i.e. 500+ kw power generation and 20,000 L/day diesel. Remote communities will use local waste (municipal solid waste) or low cost wood residue rather than import the distant product. Electricity loses up to 70% of its original value in transmission and distribution, and we spend a liter of diesel to transport a liter of diesel to remote communities who are dependent upon diesel... up to now... Whether liquid fuel or electricity there are big losses in moving it so far. Remote communities face high costs of disposal so there is incentive to use it in their own back yard, and technology is now bringing in the solutions. Medium communities closer to home are wanting to be on their own grid, and will seek residues to enable that. Many small sites with access to significant supplies of cellulose can offset a lot of imported fuel or energy. When we see remote communities learning how to deal with their own waste, then maybe our large cities will figure it out, and then we've got a lot of renewable fuels production going on. The sum of all the 'small', 'medium' and all the 'big' is equal to 'everything'!!
Somewhat philisophical, but I think at least there will be some significant movement this way. If I were a big oil exec, I wouldn't be too worried yet, but sometime they should get in the renewables game...
william cormeny
william cormeny
August 21, 2012
UPS and Fed Ex no longer fly aircraft to Europe.This marketplace is drying up.Next on tap,the Transpacific routes.Speed is only essential if your economy is booming,and few if any reason can be given to continue expensive trips when the internet and locally trained executives with their computer robotics can fulfill almost any function.
Presently the relocation of factories back to the US will rapidly increase as there is no patent protection available in China,India,Southeast Asia,Africa or South America.
Aviation fuel will remain very expensive and airlines will only survive if they have their own fuel source and their own refineries. The Emirates fills this bill,and should be able to become the Pan Am of the modern world,despite the widespread efforts of national airlines to hold onto landing rights.
Thousands of trained pilots are available around the globe,and most will be let go during the next decade.
Containerized ships and far better rail travel will open doors to less invasive and faster transport.
It's foolish to think more fuel is needed when progress toward hybrids and electric powered trucks,cars,and buses is becoming the norm.Railroads may soon think about electrification as prices climb.
The answer for global warming and many other environmental problems continues to be in the nuclear industry and thorium produced power stations.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
August 21, 2012
@Jchristie: Forest residue is a one pass every decade or so pace of harvest--not enough power-density to hardly make it worthwhile, is it? Besides that, my understanding is that what wood and residue the lumber and paper mills are not using today is already spoken for by the power companies for co-firing in coal plants or pelletizing for overseas sales to Europe where the high prices are offset by carbon credits. The only hope of sourcing wood at the pace necessary for the super-scale pyrolysis operations required to make a dent in U.S. energy supply is to artificially cultivate millions of acres of pulpwood stands. Even then, that delivers one harvest every 20-30 years, with perhaps a thinning harvest in between. Any attempt to accelerate the pace requires artificial sources of hydrogen as fertilizer and hydrocarbons as agri-chemicals to augment the less than 2% efficiency of sunlight-to-biomass generation that photosynthesis provides and to protect the mono-culture from invasive species. If you let the sun do all the work, the harvest pace is dismal and the acreage requirements are obscene, but the EROI is good. If you accelerate the growth by adding hydrogen as fertilizer, you get quicker harvests and reduced acreage, but the EROI is way down and the price way up because of the extra energy inputs. As to hydrogen, you can either gasify it out as H2 or put it back in to enrich your bio-oil fuel, but the amount at the end is no greater than the amount put in at the beginning. After the initial forest floor waste is harvested, wood pyrolysis oil becomes the same attempt at perpetual motion as corn ethanol and algae biodiesel.
Bruce Dorminey
Bruce Dorminey
August 21, 2012
Re: David Carl comment above. Thank you for posting; the story has now been updated.
John Christie
John Christie
August 21, 2012
Many areas have excessive forest residue, some of it as free sawdust so it will be used first ahead of farmed cellulose. Its all a matter of place and circumstance. Advanced Pyrolysis can produce H2 in one stream and bio-oil in another, so no natural gas needed for hydrogenation, and 1 M3 of cellulose can yield 400 l of green diesel at $1.25/gal. Jet fuel would probably be economical, but not necessary as all the wood fibre converted to diesel will still not displace all the petro diesel consumed.
Lots of options emerging in feedstocks, transormation processes, and economic models. Most will find a place; some will not happen, but for sure the next 5 years will see a huge move to biomass for fuels, energy, and industrial chemicals....check this out to see where the biomass is....http://maps.nrel.gov/biomass
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
August 21, 2012
From the article: 'Cavalieri says Gevo, Inc. in Englewood, Colorado has a proprietary line of microbes that will ferment sugar and produce isobutanol (an alcohol) that's readily converted into biojet and other products.' The conversion of biobutanol into 'drop-in' hydrocarbon biojet fuel is about a 28-step process that takes months to accomplish in a batch process. The Department of Transportation paid UOP $11,000 a gallon last year to make 100 gallons of jet fuel from isobutanol for delivery this year. The Navy paid Albemarle $4,454.55 a gallon in February to deliver 55 gallons of jet fuel from 100 gallons of Cobalt n-butanol sometime this year. Neither of those prices include the cost of making the biobutanol via wood chip pyrolysis in the first place. This biobutanol fuel initiative is a strategy to exploit the Renewable Fuel Blending Standard (RFS) by getting a backdoor EPA ruling. On an MPG-corrected basis, corn ethanol today is still more expensive than premium gasoline ('AAA's Daily Fuel Gauge Report.' http://fuelgaugereport.opisnet.com/index.asp ). Even with all the crop subsidies and guaranteed markets, the companies pursuing non-corn 'advanced fuel' paths can't make any money. If they can get EPA/or Congress to accept biobutanol as an alternative to ethanol in the RFS, and increase the blending ratio to 15% or beyond (butanol is less hydrophilic and corrosive), then they might be able to make a profit. Of course it would send gasoline prices through the roof and still reduce mileage, and still accelerate fossil fuel usage and still increase greenhouse gas emissions and still trash huge tracts of the environment--but it would be 'green.' Then there might eventually be enough biobutanol produced to convert some to hydro-treated alchohol-to-jet fuel and maybe eventually reduce the price from $4,000 per gallon to maybe $100 per gallon, and everyone should be happy with that, right?
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
August 21, 2012
@nadia: thanks for pointing out the irony. Replacing one 2,300 MW power plant on a site occupying a fraction of a square mile with solar power requires 178 sq miles of PV solar panels (@ the same specs as the new $100M Nellis complex), 307 sq miles of wind farms (@ the average density of U.S. windfarms), or 2,818 sq miles of corn field @ the optimistic yield of 500 gal ethanol per acre). That is what the Nature Conservatory calls "Energy Sprawl" and it is not environmentally friendly at all. The cosmic scale of industrial and agri-business reclamation of millions of acres of natural biome wilderness required to make any significant dent in the 98 quadrillion BTUs of energy this country uses each year is unconscionable to anyone who truly cares about the environment. It may counter to conventional wisdom, but fossil fuels have the smallest environmental footprint per unit of energy delivered by far, and that is a key metric of risk that all forms of energy must balance against their benefit.
David Carl
David Carl
August 21, 2012
It is always funny when authors mix their units to try and make a point that is not there. Wheat at $8 a bushel is less than 14 cents a pound. Pricing is not the reason camelina is not widely grown as it fetches a price of 20 cents per pound, per the article.
Penelope Gray
Penelope Gray
August 21, 2012
Here in the northeast the "green and renewable" push is using our forests for producing biomass and wood pellets. This has accelerated the clear cutting and removes all the slash from the cut over areas, leaving nothing to replenish the soils or provide shelter for young seedlings. It's ironic that in our rush to create "green" alternatives we're destroying the one true green energy source we have; trees. As far as carbon sequestering and oxygen production, water filtration, erosion control and transevaporation, trees are the planet's powerhouse and yet we're cutting them down much faster than they can grow. Doesn't anyone else see the irony?
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
August 21, 2012
Oxford University study on agave-to-ethanol: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2011/ee/c1ee01107c
The results are awesome!:
"[...] the emissions of agave-derived fuel are estimated to stand at around 35g of CO2 per megajoule from field-to-wheel, compared to the 85g/MJ emitted when making corn ethanol."
Dr Tan and his colleagues found this energy balance is five units to one.
"This compares favourably to the highly efficient sugarcane, and to the less efficient corn as a source of biofuel. It also compares favourably to sugarcane-derived ethanol for its ability to offset greenhouse gas emissions, which we calculated at 7.5 tons of CO2e per hectare per year - taking into account the crop's complete lifecycle"



Agave's higher yield (65 annual tonnes of dry biomass per hectare per year, from year 3 on) and higher-quality of its lignocellulosic fibres make it the best feedstock on Earth for liquid biofuels production:


On an annual basis, one hectare of agave yields up to ten times the solid sugars of one hectare of sugarcane in Brazil, meaning ten times more ethanol/biofuels per hectare per year!

Read the following docs:

http://www.iadb.org/en/news/news-releases/2011-06-08/biofuels-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean,9403.html

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
August 21, 2012
Producing agave-derived biojet fuel is a great opportunity to supply alternate fuel. Two technological paths commercially available (Amyris and Gevo). Unlike cars, planes cannot use electricity as energy, and the market looks very promising

• 70 billion gallons of jet fuel are demanded every year, by commercial airlines.
• Biojet fuel certification of sugar-derived biojet fuel, most probable will allow a 50/50 mix between biojetfuel and fossil fuel.
• Amyris Brazil has scheduled a test-flight this spring, using sugarcane derived biojet fuel.

We could do the same, only using agave instead of sugarcane. Since agave is mostly fructose, some research is still needed, to adequate the technology, but it's feasible to produce glucose-butanol-isobutanol-biojet fuel from agave sugars.

Amyris Brazil is producing ethanol, biodiesel and biojet fuel from sugarcane's glucose They use a bacteria to convert glucose into biofuel. They are in the commercial-stage testing/assessing phase, with very promising results.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
e-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
August 21, 2012
To get the yield-per-acre necessary to make farming practical, biofuel crops must be grown as cultivated mono-cultures treated with artificial fertilizers (made from natural gas), and pesticides and herbicides (made from petroleum). This is as true of switchgrass, jatropha, and camelina as it is of corn. To make true hydrocarbon 'drop-in' fuels suitable for use in aircraft and by the military, the biodiesel esters and ethanol alcohols of biofuels must be 'hydro-treated' by pumping in more hydrogen (from natural gas) at the end. These hydrogen inputs from fossil fuel represent the majority of the combustion energy in the finished product, and this is why biofuels are, in the final analysis, just a very inefficient way of burning fossil fuel. All hydrotreated biofuels have a huge negative energy balance (deliver less energy than they cost to make) and that appetite for input energy is why their prices are so high, and why they can never cost less than the fossil fuel used to source the hydrogen. The economics follow the chemistry. The U.S. military is on the cutting edge of biofuel use and the lowest price they have paid for straight algae-based fuel is $61.33 a gallon from Solazyme last August. The fuel used for the Great Green Fleet was mostly Tyson chicken fat-based with just a hint of Solazyme algae oil. The purchase was 450,000 gallons for just over $12M which equaled $26.75 a gallon (don't be deceived by many who try to blend down the price--one gallon of biofuel displaces exactly one gallon of conventional fuel, no matter what the mixing ratio is). The stark choice facing the military today is whether to spend $2.30 a gallon on conventional fuel (current bulk contract price), $26.75 a gallon for chicken-fat, $59.00 a gallon for camelina or $61.33 a gallon for algae. Contrary to the implication of this article, Gevo (and Amyris) abandoned drop-in biofuel to focus on biobutanol, an industrial chemical 2X the price of ethanol they hope to get added to the RFS.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Bruce Dorminey

Bruce Dorminey

Bruce Dorminey is an award-winning science journalist who is a former Hong Kong bureau chief for Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine and a former Paris-based technology correspondent for the Financial Times newspaper. However, he...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets
  • 1
    Goldman Sachs to Invest $486 Million in Japan Renewable Energy
  • 1
    Outlook for US Energy Independence Gaining Confidence

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
  • RussTech Language Services, Inc.
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • The Stella Group, Ltd.
  • Rotork plc
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information