The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, May 23, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Document Standardization: It's Not Just for Pencil Pushers Anymore

Travis Lowder, NREL
August 30, 2012  |  4 Comments

The U.S. renewable energy industries are persistently on the hunt for means of cutting down the cost of delivered energy. For example, in the case of solar, module costs have historically been the prize game. Although, now that modules are selling at bargain-basement prices worldwide, attention has shifted to "soft cost" components. And this is where document standardization — the creation of an industry-wide set of contracts, forms, permits, etc., required during the project development cycle — could pay some real dividends.

Currently, power purchase agreements (PPAs), site leases, requests for proposals (RFPs), permits, and the rest of the project paperwork is mostly drawn up on an ad hoc and per-project basis. Conducting the necessary due diligence for each of the myriad of counterparties, including utilities, financiers, regulators, and legal entities, is time consuming and costly for developers, even if they have larger project pipelines and the ability to aggregate these efforts. Standardizing each of these documents (while still allowing for local variations in laws, markets, and geographies) and making them available to developers for a flat fee could help to mitigate a number of these transactional expenses, headaches included.

The benefits of document standardization would extend beyond developers to span the value chain. From an insurer's perspective, if a project can furnish documentation that is standardized across the industry, then its risk profile could be easier to decipher and compare across other projects in its class. This could help to relieve some of the due diligence in the underwriting process and ultimately contribute to more affordable premiums.

From a financial standpoint, standardization could beget a host of benefits that go beyond direct cost reductions. Firstly, standardized PPAs, leases, interconnection agreements, and other contracts could clarify the project evaluation process for financiers and facilitate their investment. The transaction costs associated with securing financing can be burdensome, and relieving some of this friction in the early stages can have positive impacts throughout the development cycle. This could in turn provide some relief in the project's required equity yield, reflecting the reduced risk of investing in a stable product whose cash flows can be predicted based on a standardized pool of project data.

Lastly, standardization of project documents could lay a foundation for the securitization process, which requires an accurate assessment of risks to project cash flows over time. If all the necessary information is included in these contracts, and included in places where it is easily accessible to securities analysts and ratings agencies, then the market could be more amenable to trading a renewable asset-backed financial instrument of this sort.

To promote document standardization in the renewable energy industries, NREL's Strategic Energy Analysis Center's RE Project Finance Team has created a webpage to act as a sort of clearinghouse for the forms required in the development process. The collection houses a range of publicly available templates and samples including:

  • PPAs
  • RFPs
  • Interconnection agreements
  • Engineering, procurement, and construction contracts
  • Operations and maintenance contracts
  • Leases.

While this library represents only a small step, the aim is to keep the dialogue open while making readily available the resources that could hasten a standardization effort. If you have any documents that you would like to post, or to which you would like to direct our attention, please send us an email with your name, organization, and a brief description of the document(s). Please also include an attachment in the email or a link to the page where it can be accessed. Your participation is greatly appreciated.

This article was originally published on NREL Renewable Energy Project Finance and was republished with permission.

Lead image: Document stacks via Shutterstock

4 Comments

Register To Comment
F SC
F SC
September 3, 2012
- Having disorganized document requirements raises the cost for the developer, and ALSO for the government personnel reviewing the documentation. This problem can be fixed without spending government money, but saving money instead. Standardization AND simplification will reduce costs both for developers and also for the tax-payers paying wages to the reviewers.
-
- The biggest of these soft costs are the indirect soft costs (new term): the mentioned headaches and specially the uncertainty. Anyone who has taken economics 101 knows that uncertainty, aka. risk, is a HUGE cost and it is passed on to consumers.
-
- I have read news about a developer ceasing further work to attempt approval for a particular project, only after spending five years and 50 million dollars to ask our mother...er… our government for permission. Having to spend that kind of cash on uncertain outcomes will substantially decrease investment levels.
-
- THOSE COSTS ARE HUGE. As it stands today, it is just easier to go into the oil business. It is wrong. It is one of the stupidest things that the government is doing; and that is a mouth-full.
-
- I would love to read an article doing a comparative cost/timeframe analysis between permitting an open pit mine, an oil well and a concentrated solar power station.
Howard Johnson
Howard Johnson
August 31, 2012
I thought this had already been done. Sheeesh
ANONYMOUS
August 31, 2012
Over lawyering documents is a greater risk to projects than standardized docs losing value from lack of customization. Standardized docs should be based on efficient templates that can be easily customized at "main points". You will almost always pay a lawyer less to review/edit a doc than to write it from scratch.
Nigel Morris
Nigel Morris
August 31, 2012
Document standardisation has great potential for good and harm.

A risk of documentation standardisation is that in order to cover all the multitude of different variations in technology, vendors, financing, structure etc, the volume of each standardised document balloons out so that the benefits are lost in the added cost to all parties of filling in large sections that are not relevant to them.
The alternate downside is that standardisation shoehorns disparate projects into the same mold in order to achieve the streamlining benefits. But the cost is that readers then have to look at each answer far more carefully because the answers are more likely to be apples and oranges rather than easily comparable different grades of the same type of apple.
Standardisation is hard to do without losing large amounts of valuable information.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Travis Lowder

Travis Lowder

Travis Lowder is an Energy Analyst with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Project Finance Team. His research encompasses the U.S. renewable energy project finance market and financial policy, PV project risk management, PV asset...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Eaton
  • Admirals Bank
  • Everblue
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • Fairtrade-Messe
  • SolarFlairLighting.com
  • GoGreenSolar.com
  • RevoluSun
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information