The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Into Thin Air: The Disappearance of Dozens of Chinese Solar Companies

Ucilia Wang, Contributing Editor
July 11, 2012  |  45 Comments

Print

The bankruptcies of roughly two dozen U.S. and European photovoltaic manufacturers have framed much of the story about an oversupply of solar panels and crashing prices over the past year. What's less known is the impact on the PV manufacturing industry in China, where over 50 companies also have closed, said John Lefebvre, president of Suntech Power's American operations, during Intersolar in San Francisco on Wednesday.

The consolidation trend is working its way through the ranks of lesser-known Chinese solar manufacturers while the top companies in China are gaining greater market shares, Lefebvre said. The shakeout within China’s solar industry isn’t surprising, though many Chinese companies, unless they are publicly traded, don’t announce their closures or other big changes to their operations. In comparison, about a dozen U.S. manufacturers and "several" European companies have met the same fate, Lefebvre said. 

No one can predict how many solar manufacturers anywhere in the world will disappear into thin air as a result of this ongoing oversupply problem. The glut will likely persist for the next few years, according to GTM Research, which is expecting 59 GW of solar panels being produced to meet 30 GW of demand for 2012.

Taiwan alone has the capacity to produce 10 GW of solar cells, Lefebvre pointed out. Taiwanese cell makers have seen an uptick in business as a result of a pending trade complaint that would impose duties on solar cells made in China and exported to the U.S. To skirt the duties, many Chinese companies have said they would buy solar cells in Taiwan and assemble those cells in their factories in China or elsewhere.

Just today, Germany-based Centrotherm, which sells factory equipment for making solar cells and panels, filed for bankruptcy.  Last week, Abound Solar, a cadmium-telluride solar panel maker in Colorado, filed for bankruptcy. Also last week, General Electric said it was suspending an effort to build a 400 MW factory to make cadmium-telluride solar panels because solar panel prices have tumbled more than 50 percent since early 2011.

While many companies are closing factories, still many more are building new production lines. Some of them are startups that need to reach certain manufacturing scale to compete, and they include copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) thin film makers Stion and SoloPower. Some major players also are expanding production because they believe the oversupply is a short-term malady. Canadian Solar is looking at building a 700 MW factory to roll out a new technology that will push its efficiency to around 19 percent, said Shawn Qu, Canadian’s CEO, during a panel discussion at Intersolar on Tuesday.

“There is a good chance that we will make this move. It’s tough for me as a CEO to make that decision at this time in the industry,” Qu said. He added that his company won’t likely sell solar panels with those advanced cells in the U.S. market because of the trade complaint against Chinese silicon solar manufacturers.

The U.S. Commerce Department is investigating the trade complaint, which was filed by a coalition led by SolarWorld, and has issued preliminary decisions to impose duties. The department plans to issue a final decision in October this year.

45 Comments

Register To Comment
william payne
william payne
July 26, 2012
NiMH battery capactiry is impressive if voltage is not a major concern.

http://www.prosefights.org/nmgco/intervene/hearing/hearing.htm#leds

NiMH batteries work poorly in digital cameras where voltage is important, we've discovered.
ANONYMOUS
July 26, 2012
RE: nimh large format battery for EVs.
I read that Ovonics Battery went Chapter 11 on Feb. 12, 2012. BASF bought the assets the next day for just over $50m. Does anyone know what BASF is doing with the NiMH large format battery technology? Are they even selling to indoor vehicles (think forklifts)... much less road worthy EVs?
william payne
william payne
July 15, 2012
Google 'aboulghasem zirakzadeh' for the rest of the story.
william payne
william payne
July 15, 2012
Masoud Pascal agha shhab ishon ba u kar daran ! :))

Anyone underatand?
http://home.comcast.net/~bpayne37/index.htm#pascal2
Vasuki Nag
Vasuki Nag
July 15, 2012
We don't seem to mind oil cartels. However, as soon as solar energy became affordable for many, tariffs are heaped on solar components which will stifle the growth of solar energy. Which way, do we want our world go?
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 14, 2012
BIllp37: Good comment ! thanks ! I know Harbor Freight also has the 45 watt solar Panels (heavy glass enclosed silicon types), it took 4 to cover top of our golf cart, and then one more for front awning (servest to block sun from drives eyes as well as produce juice, thinking to put a back awning on as well to block sun from back side and also produce juice. COST: $149 for 45 watts, they also give you a charge regulator box, and also an electric l2v light to get you started, and a slant stand to put the panels on if you want to just set them in the yard, you have to buy your own battery (for cheap thrills, get the walmart marine battery $65). But don't expect to run your golf cart on them,, it will charge it up but it takes 2-3 days.. on the other hand,, if you use these panels , you can keep adding more panels as your system grows, use a self synchronizing inverter to hook to any outlet in your house (it auto synchs phase and hz, ) and you have a batteryLESS system that uses the GRID as a battery, so if/when your sys is big enough you get a check from power co every month .. makes your meter run backward IFF you use less than you produce. SO for a 1000w system you will need 20 kits (approx), at $3000 approx, and 4 250w SelfSynch Inverters at $250 each or another $1000, making a 1000w system only $4000, for 3000w system pay approx 12,0000.. and you WILL run your meter backwards at least part of the time. PRO's cheaper DIY NO EXPENSIVE BATTERIES NEEDED !! CONS... it may not always be sunny... etc.. which is why a WINDMIL with big "old" Dutch style format would give you the 10hp you need to simply run a generator PRO's: huge slow moving blades are not as dangerous and fast moving high speed types, and can glean more power out of less wind because of increase sail surface area and they are easy enough to "feather" (meaning in a storm it reduces sail are exposet to wind and eventually locks the windmill if a real hurricane shows up), you also generate 24/7
william payne
william payne
July 14, 2012
Harbor Feight now has shelf space devoted to solar charging of batteries. And Pacific Hydrostar solar water pumps.

http://www.prosefights.org/nmgco/intervene/hearing/hearing#chargers

Solar works great if paired to low load requirments, we've learned after several years of study.

Solar may not work well when paired with high load requirement such as electric clothes dryers.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 14, 2012
Check out InventPeace.com for more info (links are there to see who /how they did the oil price fixing. IE Texaco/Chevron operate the plants that GM built to build the large format NIMH magic 15 minute recharge battery that is still in the 1998 Rav4 EV to this day and running well, but they only produce a limited amt and if you call there they really don't even have a sales office???? same for the only other plant in USA, in CT , no sales dept.. they are very afraid of an investigation !! Take the Olive Branch at InventPeace come check it out.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 14, 2012
First you should know big oil is smart, they know how to make it look like they are trying... big displays that work for the photo opportunities and then amazingly are off line most of the time, with no real impact on the energy situation. IE Texaco T. Boone Pickens bought the NIMH 15 minute recharge electric car battery from GM (why?), as part of the insidious deal to get rid of the electric car, GM agreed for tons of money to scrap all their electric cars (GM's electric car EV1 could go 70mph for up to 150 miles and then recharge in only 15 minutes!!! wow !!! Rave review car was recalled (they were all lease cars only for a reason) first taken to desert location, crushed, then chipped into little bitty pieces. The only one that escaped is still running fine on original batteries as are the toyota Rav4 EV electric cars on original batteries to this day !!! If there are no conspiracies who killed JFK, Lincoln, Ceasar, etc. yeah you got the point.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 14, 2012
IMHO: We desperately need the low cost high performance panels that the chinese can provide, why: because the USA is quickly being bankrupted as is europe by illegal price fixing by the oil mongers... after the emergency is over (gas is back to the 50 cent /gal it would be if they weren't price fixing, then we can approach helping USA factories build alt energy.. goto inventpeace.com for more info on who/how, they did it.
Drive Slower and save 20% -30% on your gasoline bill.. it will help reduce prices .
Amazing coincidence: for last 2 elections in a row, the price of gas has dropped significantly (check gasbuddy.com/charts for exact info (2008 July it was over $4.10/gal AVERAGE with spikes over $5.00/gal bushw year, they lowered the price right before nov in an effort to help oil monger candidates (muppets for Super Rich), and distract public away from high gas price issues. Now they are doing it again. ?? pattern ??
Johan Buys
Johan Buys
July 14, 2012
In case not apparent from my post above:

The module manufacturers that are failing (China or elsewhere) are failing due to a matter of 20c or 30c per watt. Having been closely involved, I know exactly what the sustainable selling prices for both thin film and c-Si are : over $1.30/watt. This is after they've invested at minimum $3m/MW in capex and probably a further $1m/MW in rampup losses and working capital. If the article's claim of 50GW capacity is halfway correct at say 25GW then we're talking $100 billion of capital invested. For what - 5% margins??

End consumers in the US see prices at $6.80 per watt residential rooftop. Don't argue, that's from California database of almost 20,000 installations. 4kw solar rooftop residential systems install at under $2.65 per watt excl battery storage, and at $4 per watt including 6 hour storage capacity. (grid reliability is a huge issue in my country) Where is the extra 400c per watt going in the US? To some guys with a sum total investment of a few utility trucks? Greed? Incompetence? Consumer stupidity?

In our market we have no capital subsidy and no FIT for smaller systems, though there are FIT for about 3,800MW now. The same crap happened in the subsidized market. I can install EPC turnkey 200kw open field systems for $2.10/watt inclusive all systems to export power to the grid at 11kV. The public documents of the 3,800MW of FIT subsidized projects claim total cost of over $4/watt. Possibly the same thieves that do projects in in the US???

Something is very broken in the supply chain below the module manufacturers and I look forward to the day that most of them say enough and take out the greedy and incompetent - like FSLR did. It's the only chance the manufacturers have. FSLR is 100% correct when they say they will only take part in markets where PV works without any subsidy.
Amet Kianin
Amet Kianin
July 13, 2012
Bill Marcus< Well said and I agree with you 100%
Johan Buys
Johan Buys
July 13, 2012
Imagine open field PV installed full turnkey without a dime of subsidy at either capital level or subsequent FIT: $2.10/watt on a 200kw project.

Imagine rooftop residential / commercial PV of 4kw installed WITH 6 hours of battery standby installed for under $4/w. no capex subsidy, no foreseeable FIT.

Above are my realities.

Now imagine demand if this were your reality. 500GW in 2014?

I write this from a tiny "third" world country where installers do not extort $6/w rooftop prices (without any storage) because you seem to let them by way of distortive subsidies combined with apparent greed and/or gross incompetence...
Bill Marcus
Bill Marcus
July 13, 2012
Actually Sanyo did not go out of business, they moved all their US, and Mexico factories back to Japan. Because in Japan they get double the amount for a panel, so they figured why sell here for less money.

Solon didn't go under in AZ, they moved their factories back to Germany, and now they just sell to large Industrial installs.
Joel Davidson
Joel Davidson
July 13, 2012
Exaggerating the multi-billion dollar solar industry's growing pains has become a journalism cottage industry. Since Solyndra's September 2011 bankruptcy, there have been thousands of stories about dozens of solar companies going out of business. You say over 50 Chinese companies have closed but name none. Instead, you list German Centrotherm and US Abound Solar. I searched the news for bankrupt or closed factories or divisions and found Solar Trust of America, United Solar, NovaSolar/OptiSolar, Solar Millennium, Evergreen, Q-Cells, Konarka, Scheuten, Hoku in Hawaii, Sanyo's Los Angeles wafer fab, Schott and 7 German companies (Odersun, Solon, Global Solar, Sovello, Soltecture, Solarhybrid, Inventux). Have I missed any closings? If one includes Solyndra (proforma for right-wing politicians), the list of recent closures is less than 2 dozen. Meanwhile, over 3 megawatts of PV are being installed every hour of every day.
Bill Marcus
Bill Marcus
July 13, 2012
Our Government is not trying to keep Chinese panels out of the U.S., but luckily they did something smart for once. The Chinese government is subsidizing the factories there so they can sell their panels so cheap. They want to put factories in other parts of the world our of business. We have been installing Solar for 18 years, long before it was popular. We refuse to install panels from China, they are cheap for a reason, and we care about our customers.

Just like every other product in the world, there are well made, high efficient panels. And a lot of cheap junk out there.

These Tariffs will help to level the playing field.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
July 13, 2012
@Peter: Thank you for providing solid references. It is refreshing to see someone use credible sources instead of investment brochure statistics or advocacy blog stories. I looked at the IEA subsidy data you discussed. It is speaking about only 37 countries (of over 200 in the world) and of which the chief offender is Iran. These are not OECD countries. No one would argue with you that Iran is not a free market country. All of the states whose only major cash product is petroleum subsidize consumption in their own countries. That is the nature of a rentier state. Now back to the USA. The grand annual total of financial assistance to US oil and gas in subsidies and tax breaks in the EIA report I cited totaled--wait for it--$2.8B. This is a far cry from the $40B figure that the disinformation artists pander about. Meanwhile, the subsidies for renewables totaled $14.7B. If you go to the DOE loan program website (https://lpo.energy.gov/?page_id=45.) you will see that Green subsidies to date total more than $34B. With a $16T debt, we should end all subsidies. BTW, I said oil subsidized the federal government, not oil companies (though an argument could be made), and at $6 a barrel in revenue, I find that a hard point to argue against, regardless of what they spend it on. I try to be very careful with facts and to be as 'ingenuous' as possible.
Peter Lynch
Peter Lynch
July 13, 2012
Steven - you are correct to put it into total dollars - and when you do, according to IEA it is VERY significant number compared to the TOTAL renewable subsidies worldwide of $44 Billion in 2012.
Fatih Birol, chief economist at the IEA, estimated that consumption subsidies in 2012 would be $630 billion,
http://www.iea.org/weo/quotes.asp. An additional estimate of $100 billion in annual production subsidies is
cited in the report commissioned by the G20 and prepared by OECD, OPEC, World Bank and IEA Study November
2010. Abstract available at: www.iea.org/files/energy_subsidies.pdf.
Steven Graff
Steven Graff
July 13, 2012
@Cliff-claven, no quibble with your numbers. But perhaps the better way to slice them up would be to look at subsidies in total dollars rather than per barrel, since oil is by far the largest source of energy. Further the taxes on gasoline are paid by the consumers not the oil companies, so it is a bit disingenuous to imply oil (companies) "subsidizes" the government. On top of this much of this tax at the pump goes to pay for infrastructure in the form of roads and transportation improvement which ultimately result in increased consumption of gasoline. In other words, in addition to the direct incentives and tax breaks, the military cover for extraction and transport, oil companies benefit from consumer taxes paying for market expansion.

My original point being the blather about "capitalism" resulting in oil as king is just that. There is no free-market capitalism in the wild, oil is still not standing completely on its own two feet despite record profits. The history of nearly every mainstream technology includes a period of government nurturing of some kind and the choices being made today are as much political as they are economic.
Roy Browning
Roy Browning
July 13, 2012
Many people believe that solar is being hit hard due to the influence of big oil. Well, big oil has invested heavily in solar so that is a complete fallacy. Many people believe that Chinese solar "manufacturers have disappeared overnight, that is true only in the sense that those remaining actually manufacture the devices, most of those "disappeared" did not actually manufacture, they just brokered and made wild claims. As for the Chinese solar quality, one simply has to look at the warranty costs and the failure rate of the panels to answer that and the answer is not a pleasant one for sure.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
July 13, 2012
@Steven: Thanks for bringing up subsidies. Here are the facts: All fed gov subsidies and tax breaks for crude oil total a microscopic 27 cents per barrel of oil energy delivered, or less than 1/2 cent per gallon. On the other hand, the Feds tax gasoline at 18.4 cents a gallon and diesel at 24.4 cents a gallon. This actually nets the Federal government $6 per barrel of crude in revenue from consumers--oil subsidizes the federal government. Meanwhile the Feds do in fact subsidize biofuels at $10.46 per barrel of energy equivalent, wind energy at $31.33 per barrel, and solar at $59.60 per barrel. These numbers come from a report by the DOE specifically prepared at the request of Congress. Big oil would love for all the subsidies and tax breaks to stop and to level the playing field on taxes for all forms of energy. (source: 1. Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2010. Energy Information Agency, July 2011.; 2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 'Estimated U.S Energy Use in 2010: ~98.0 Quads.' Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2011) Please challenge me about green jobs next.
Steven Graff
Steven Graff
July 13, 2012
@cliff-claven and @bruce-cox, your comments ring a bit hollow when fossil fuels continue to benefit from significant tax payer subsidies several hundred years into their production. It is hardly free-market capitalism at work when there are direct and indirect subsidies from the government to oil and coal companies. I have yet to see an honest accounting of the cost of military protection to get oil out and safely transported to commercial markets, but the economics would change drastically if private oil had to reimburse governments for the associated costs. Sure there is capitalism at play, but it is crony-capitalism. There are political favorites here, and at present it is old-line fossil fuel money that fills the election funds in the US. Once fossil fuel companies carry the full economic weight of their product (exploration, extraction, refining, delivery, and environmental clean-up) without a single subsidy, tax-break or government protection then we can talk about the natural order of things in a capitalist system. Until that time, alternative energy is just as deserving, if not more so for its ability to create energy independence, new jobs and the potential environmental benefits, of economic incentives to drive research and deployment.
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
July 13, 2012
Vasuki July 13, 2012
Dr. Jagadeesh's comment that "Solar PV is a far cry in Countries like India" is untrue. Today, middle class people in India have enough wealth that in medium size cities, average apartments cost 20-30 Lakh Rupees ($150,000) and individual houses cost 40-80 Lakh Rupees ($400,000). Today in exchanges like Alibaba.com, we can buy high quality low cost solar PV systems for $2000-$3000 which is not a huge sum compared to the average cost of the houses or apartments (1% - 2% of the cost of the house). ……..
Reply to vasuki:
Vasuki, you are ignorant of Renewables origin and progress in India.
I am not denying the fact of the economic level of Middle income group in India. But what is lacking is POLITICAL WILL and PEOPLE'S PARTICIPATION. About 25 Years back itself Government of Andhra Pradesh enacted every new house should include SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEM in its plan. Has it ever been implemented?
The so called Solar Push(being highlighted under National Solar Mission) is because of subsidies. When once these subsidies are removed, what will happen to the Solar Industry? It happened in Wind in India from 100% depreciation it has been reduced to 85% and from Next year onwards to 15%.Infact any incentive should be linked to performance.
Today in Andhra Pradesh there are power cuts even in the month of December which was not there in the past. A lot of people purchased inverters to tide over power cuts. The power cut is so frequent in a day even the inverter is not charged fully! What would be the fate if we install Solar PV (with present low efficiency) and during cloudy and rainy days? Any system should have reliability. Hence my contention by far Electricity through Conventional systems is reliable (except during power shedding) and Renewables can only supplement but cannot REPLACE CONVENTIONAL POWER AS THE FORMER BEING INTERMITTENT.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore (AP), India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: Anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Vasuki Nag
Vasuki Nag
July 13, 2012
Dr. Jagadeesh's comment that 'Solar PV is a far cry in Countries like India' is untrue. Today, middle class people in India have enough wealth that in medium size cities, average apartments cost 20-30 Lakh Rupees ($150,000) and individual houses cost 40-80 Lakh Rupees ($400,000). Today, in exchanges like Alibaba.com, we can buy high quality low cost solar PV systems for $2000-$3000 which is not a huge sum compared to the average cost of the houses or apartments (1% - 2% of the cost of the house). Thus, rooftop Solar PV systems could soon provide low cost electricity on a large scale in a tropical country like India. The real problem is that India has clueless shortsighted political leadership and private sector has not realized the vast potential of solar energy in a power starved country like India. I am sure, with proper education, implementation of pilot projects and nationwide Feed-in-Tariff system, solar PV market will thrive in India.
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
July 13, 2012
ametis July 13, 2012

Love your comment Anumakonda, what has your comment go to do with the Price of Roast Beef


Reply to ametis:

Avoid eating ROAST BEEF!
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nelklore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Amet Kianin
Amet Kianin
July 13, 2012
Love your comment Anumakonda, what has your comment go to do with the Price of Roast Beef
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
July 13, 2012
Small applications of PV for lighting, Solar Water Heaters, Solar Driers, PV for Computers will be a boon in developing countries. Unfortunately the cost of production is still exorbitantly high. Unless the efficient solar PV and Thermal systems are available at an affordable price, Solar PV is a far cry in Countries like India. The hype given to Solar under National Solar Mission is only on paper and in practice it has its own teething problems.

On the other hand at local level Solar can find many applications. I am trying to market many solar gadgets like reading lamps which are dual powered, solar/USB mobile chargers, solar Globe for schoolchildren etc. Awareness on Solar has to be created from School level. Enormous energy can be saved by replacing Fluorescent lamps with reading lamps (with solar/USB and LED) especially among children for reading purposes.

Unfortunately in developing countries huge power is wasted in lighting, agricultural pumpsets,and wastage of water by traditional use of bucket bathing, inefficient piping system etc.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh
2/210 First Floor
Nawabpet
NELLORE- 524 002
Andhra Pradesh
INDIA
E-mail:anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/anumakonda.jagadeesh
Blog: http://www.drjagadeeshncda.blogspot.com
Phone: ++ 91 861 2317776
Mobile: +91 9490125950
Amet Kianin
Amet Kianin
July 13, 2012
If everyone is selling that same hamburger, you cannot compete on price alone, reality is the The Gravy train is derailed. It is now time to clearly define solar Technology and innovate. Educate the people that PV Photo Voltaic is not the Only solar. Clearly define that a fabricator who buys the parts and assembles are not true innovating manufacturers, these are the guys that are dropping like flies in the face of true challenges. Apple did not invent the mobile phone, they innovated and changed, offered a better product- this is what the industry needs.. At the end of the day SUNSHINE is free
Mitta RajaReddy
Mitta RajaReddy
July 12, 2012
There is a big demand in India for roof top applications. Many people are looking for individual standalone power system to support them for uninterupted power supply. Tap the market with right product and service.
william payne
william payne
July 12, 2012
Thursday July 12, 2012 11:28

http://www.facebook.com/shahab.mozaffari
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
July 12, 2012
PV is valuable because it is simple and scalable, both at the manufacturing and installation level. I am probably not the only person who is surprised by a global annual PV manufacturing capacity in 2012 of >50GW particularly when viewed from a 1998 amount of <200MW. It almost seems like a bubble but there are now hundreds of billions of dollars invested in factories and equipment all over the world. When a manufacturer goes bankrupt they usually are devoured by their competitors for pennies on the dollar. These failures are not like dot com stocks or subprime derivatives which sell vapor/paper to the greater fool. They have a real product that some people want and much of the third world desparately needs and is finding ways to pay for. Perhaps it is time to accept that solar PV, though born in the USA, has grown up, moved away and metaphorically joined the Peace Corps. We can hope it spreads all over the world and grows more sophisticated before we really need it to come back.
Peter Lynch
Peter Lynch
July 12, 2012
Kevin is correct - this is NORMAL. In the beginning of the auto industry there were up to 80+ cars companies and then finally "The Big 3".

Maybe this is happening to make way to new "unknown" innovations coming down the road...

U.S. policy is the same as it always has been with solar - creat uncertainty for investors and delay change.

Change happens in the U.S. (unfortunately) when we delay, wait for a catastrophic event (like nuclear plants in Japan) and then start yelling and pointing fingers and asking why has this happened....so sad....

It happened because we asked for it...and until we wake up history repeats....
JEFF BRAISTED
JEFF BRAISTED
July 12, 2012
In our local Pennslyannia paper there was an article about how the Dept of Transportation had based its long range funding on the continuing increase in vehicles purchasing gasoline in ever greater amounts yet the population continues to move out of the state in ever greater numbers. They blame the use of EV vehicles yet the largest use of them is the municipal departments, the purchase of higher MPG vehicles by the population and the decrease in the amount of commuting due to the lose of jobs so people are staying home more and not driving. So now the DOT says they did 2 more studies and have some 'Great' ides on how to save money by laying off more employees in these various municpal departments ie them not driving those EV vehicles plus raising more revenue by increasing fees and other various taxes to make up for the shortfall this yr of 3.5 billion dollars and by the end of the decade they need to find 7.2 billion dollars of funding for road and bridge repairs and replacement. So basicly the thought is to punish the citizens for trying to save energy and wear and tear on their vehicles by taxing and charging them more? But yet I see this same organization put up solar powered street lights and emergency telephone call boxes all over the highways? I watched 12 DOT employees yesterday standing around,sitting in their cars,drinking coffe,taking pictures of each other with a camera while 2 or 3 employees were actually actively working on the bridge project! They have been working on this bridge over the Delaware river for over a month and only have one lane done and the traffic backs up on weekends for miles.
Rich Barbarics
Rich Barbarics
July 12, 2012
Thanks to the glut panel/inversion prices, a homeowner DIY'er in NJ can now install a PV system that pays back in about 2 1/2 years... and it's a gravy train for another dozen years. Definitely a no-brainer economically if you can get the home equity loan and use a wrench. What's still needed is a good power storage concept to get off the grid completely - batteries aren't the answer. 'Off the grid' is, however, just around the corner. It doesn't need a 'miracle' technology ... it'll creep in based on common sense trial and error.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
July 12, 2012
@Chris-Newfield: "one group-think disaster to the next for my entire lifetime." That pretty much describes the "all of the above" green energy policy. All the overproduced PV material that will get "thrown away" represents a huge waste of the fossil fuel energy used to create it, as much as a waste of taxpayer money used to subsidize it. The day that solar energy capture devices can collect enough energy to manufacture themselves is the day they should be scaled up, and not before. That's how a free market works, and it weeds out groupthink fantasies with great efficiency.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 12, 2012
As said, congress in USA is trying hard to prevent low cost high performance chinese solar panels from entering USA, why: because they are in the pockets of the oil mongers who are bankrupting the USA (treason) to the OPEC (arab muslim islamics who purvey sharia law which in turn treats women like dirt, they recently executed some poor woman for some trivial crime)
Vasuki Nag
Vasuki Nag
July 12, 2012
It is myth that actual demand for solar energy is low. The problem of low demand exists because solar energy manufacturers have not targeted marketing to vast untapped markets. For example, India has chronic power shortages and frequent power failures. Lots of middle and upper income Indians have enough wealth and capital to install solar panels on their rooftops, even without any government subsidies. However, neither government nor the private sector have targeted this huge untapped market.

With the worsening global warming crisis, to indicate that we have over supply of solar capacity would be a mis-statement. What we need across the globe is low cost training in solar technology and entrepreneurship which would unleash low cost green power and reduce pollution around the world.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 12, 2012
oops. The Toyota Rav 4 EV (electric ) I am refering to were built in 1998,1999, some owners had to go to court to win the right to buy their beloved electric cars.. they won. Toyota later bought panasonic partly because panasonic had a licesne to build tne NIMH batteries, but they got sued by Texaco (T. BOONE PICKENS again), and had to pay millions, but now they are already all tooled up to begin production the day the patent runs out in 2014. YAY !!! Oil Mongers are sick and need help, bankrupting their own country for $$ is treason ! ! Even worse they made the arabs (Opec muslim islamic types very very rich, and western countries bankrupt, way to go BOONE !! )
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 12, 2012
Toyota Rav 4 EV (100% electric car) also had the NIMH large Format type 15 min recharge batteries, they are still on the road today with original batteries !! Toyota has said that if you manage the batteries within a certain % range of use, they may last a very very long time ! (40%-80% which is nice because after 80% the charge rate has to slow down to avoid overheating).
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 12, 2012
The suppression of the rave review all electric car battery (Nimh large format that was in GM'S 1998 EV1 could recharge in 15 min, go for up to 150 miles on only 14 batteries, and travel at 70mph).. texaco bought patent from GM in an underhanded deal in which GM agreed to recall all the ev1's, then crush and then chip into little bitty pieces all 1100 of them (brand new electric cars some of them), some people were arrested if they didn't turn in their lease ev1's. GOOD NEWS: The nimh large format battery patent expires in 2014... just 2 more years. Rumors are that it will solve 90% of USA commuting needs, plus since electric power is EVERYWHERE IN america (thanks to Edison and others), the electric cars can be recharging while you shop giving even more range, but really 15 min recharge is the time it takes to have a cup of ccffee so its in a way a moot point.. YAY! The oil monopoly is finally nearing its end of its pathetic legacy !
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
July 12, 2012
Never mind congress is blatantly trying to prevent low cost high performance chinese solar panels from entering the USA: why: its because congressional muppets Super RIch owners are in oil not alt energy! www.inventpeace.com for more info clik on international link
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
July 12, 2012
This situation is not confined to solar only.

Wind Industry in Denmark faced tough times in 80s because of over production not in line with demand. Fortunately demand for Wind turbines in late 80s and 9)s helped to sustain the wind business..
CEO of Vestas Wind Systems, the world's largest wind turbine manufacturer. Engel predicts the U.S. wind turbine market will drop a whopping 80% next year if the incentive vanishes as expected.
The PTC offers a 2.2-cent per kilowatt-hour benefit for the first 10 years of a renewable energy facility's operation. Engel says the American wind industry which experienced a depressed 2010 has been "very busy" in 2011 and 2012 as developers look to take advantage of the PTC.
Engel cites research from the American Wind Energy Association that shows the last time the PTC was eliminated in 2002 more than 75% of the wind market "disappeared from one year to the next." "It is very difficult to keep them employed if there is no market." Vestas currently employs 3.500 people in the U.S.; the company may have to slash its American workforce by nearly 50% if the market dives as far as expected. ( Vestas CEO: U.S. Wind Market Could Drop 80% in 2013, EBOOM Staff,ENERGYBOOM, June 12, 2012).
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Chris Newfield
Chris Newfield
July 12, 2012
Ideological self-confirmations aside, the result of the world's failure to sustain (environmentally essential) demand for PV installations means that half of PV capacity is being thrown away this year. That capacity was built with the expenditure of enormous amounts of money and human talent, and that is now being stripped out and probably lost. What we are also seeing is the destruction of PV manufacturing capacity even in a country like Germany that has carefully maintained its manufacturing ecosystem when English-speaking countries were moving their offshore. Even if one doesn't care about the jobs and know-how that aren't retained, and embraces oligarchical sector structure, there's little evidene that they are optimal. The U.S. auto industry has lurched from one group-think disaster to the next for my entire lifetime, as one example of a dubious one. It's also arguable that ICT added most of its value during the early decades of massive government research and procurement support in core fields like hardware engineering, coupled with original work being done all over the place, esp university labs, with no consolidating presence of dominant players. Much PV research is still in that stage, but unlike its ICT forbears is not getting that support. Finally, path dependency is more likely than effective survival-of-the-fittest social Darwinist selection: the QWERTY keyboard is one example of non-optimal lock-in, and they can be found in all industries. The current PV victims of not-so-creative destruction are 2nd and 3rd Gen thin film materials and processes, where the bankruptcies have hit hard, scaring off private capital perhaps for years. I'd like to see more creative thinking from insiders and policymakers about how to sustain research and manufacturing ecosystems so that they can accomplish the very difficult R&D this technology needs.

thanks for the reporting in this article
Bruce Cox
Bruce Cox
July 12, 2012
Capitalism works. The shake out will lead to a stronger global industry and wider adoption by consumers and businesses. Lower prices will attract more consumer demand.

Bruce E Cox CPA
http://solar-energy-today.blogspot.com/
Kevin Meyerson
Kevin Meyerson
July 11, 2012
Just like the early internet or automobile or other new industries - industry consolidation is inevitable.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Ucilia Wang

Ucilia Wang

Ucilia Wang is a California-based freelance journalist who writes about renewable energy. She previously was the associate editor at Greentech Media and a staff writer covering the semiconductor industry at Red Herring. In addition to Renewable...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 4
    Women in Power – It’s a Natural Fit
  • 4
    Renewable Energy in Myanmar: Not Just Clean, It’s Necessary
  • 3
    Big Apple Anticipates Solar Explosion for 2013

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Leybold Optics
  • Panasonic Eco Solutions North America
  • Northern Lights Solar Solutions
  • Alternative Matters
  • Sol Systems LLC
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • Photovoltaics World
  • Schletter Inc.
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information