The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Renewable Energy Faces Financing Challenges with End of Federal 1603 Grant Program

Bill Scanlon, NREL
July 03, 2012  |  9 Comments

The expiration of a federal grant program at the end of 2011 may make it more difficult and expensive for developers of certain kinds of renewable power projects to access private capital, a new report suggests.

That, in turn, may lead to fewer projects coming on-line.

"Our interviews with financial executives active in the renewable energy market suggest that the end of the Section 1603 Program of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act means that financing renewable power projects is about to become more difficult," said Michael Mendelsohn, an NREL analyst who co-wrote the report "1603 Treasury Grant Expiration: Industry Insight on Financing and Market Implications," with John Harper of Birch Tree Capital, LLC.

In the United States, the renewable power sector has benefitted from federal tax incentives and the availability of institutional-scale tax equity investors able to use the tax incentives. The incentives include income tax credits — production tax credits or investment tax credits — that can reduce taxes owed by a project investor as well as reduced tax obligations resulting from accelerated depreciation of project assets.

These tax benefits can represent a powerful incentive for private investment, but realization of these benefits is hampered by the complexity of monetizing their value, the illiquid nature of the investments and uncertainty about how long tax policies will last.

Most renewable energy developers lack sufficient tax liabilities to benefit directly from the tax incentives. Instead, the developers have created partnerships and other financial structures with large financial and other companies that can make use of these incentives.

During the 2008-2009 financial crisis, tax equity investors largely withdrew from the renewable energy project financing market. The number of tax equity investors willing to make new investments decreased from about 20 to five.

"Industry experts told us that tax equity was almost unavailable for all but the largest and highest quality projects," said co-author Harper. In response, Congress enacted the Section 1603 Program.

The Section 1603 Program, which expired December 31, 2011, offered project investors a cash payment equal to and in lieu of the 30 percent federal investment tax credit. The program freed many developers from having to rely on third-party tax equity investors to monetize the tax credits.

Interviews with industry participants led the authors to conclude that the Section 1603 Program provided multiple benefits to renewable energy projects, including: 

  • Increased speed and flexibility of project finance arrangements
  • Lower transaction and financing costs 
  • Stretched supply of traditional tax equity 
  • Support for smaller and new-to-market project developers and projects using innovative energy technologies, both of which previously found it more difficult to tap tax equity markets
  • Lower developer or project cost of capital as a result of the ability to use more debt

While impacts associated with the expiration of the Section 1603 Program are uncertain, the report says industry experts predict renewable power projects again will have to rely more heavily on external tax equity investors to obtain a portion of their financing. Several potential outcomes:

  • Less-established renewable power developers, especially those with smaller projects, could have more difficulty attracting needed financial capital and completing their projects. Tax equity investors are likely to focus on established relationships with proven developers and on larger projects.
  • Development of projects relying on newer or innovative technologies that lack extensive operational track records may be slowed because many tax equity investors are seen as highly averse to technology risk. 
  • Projects relying on tax equity financing likely will be more expensive to develop because of the transaction costs and potentially higher yields required to attract tax equity capital.

Section 1603 awards made to projects in all 50 states

Through May 2012, the Section 1603 Program had awarded $11.6 billion to almost 38,000 projects that added almost 17 gigawatts (GW) of new renewable electricity capacity. Since the awards are for 30% of the projects' eligible costs, the total value of the projects supported is about $38.6 billion. Section 1603 Program awards have been made to projects in all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and Washington, D.C. These projects have used a wide range of renewable generation technologies, including geothermal (92 projects), biomass (63 projects), and hydropower, fuel cell, and other technologies (176 projects combined).

Below is a U.S. map that shows the value of Section 1603 Program awards by state.

This article was originally published on NREL Renewable Energy Finance and was republished with permission.

9 Comments

Register To Comment
John Harper
John Harper
July 11, 2012
Dear jd-polk-81325:
The Treasury posts a list of all of the recipients and the amount of their grants at: www.treasury.gov/initiatives/recovery/Pages/1603.aspx. (If the link doesn't work, listing "1603 treasury grant" in a search engine should provide the site.) The data on the site today (7/11) is current through June 8th. The size of the grant and the recipient offer clues to the size of the entities that received the grant. They range from very small installations for on-site power generation to large utility-scale projects selling power to utilities. The tax grant, like the underlying investment tax credit, was available to all businesses, regardless of the location of the project, the size of the business, or the size of the project.
Regards, John
JD Polk
JD Polk
July 6, 2012
As I glance at the amounts per State...one must wonder...Tx, Cali, Illi are the top 3 recipients? Tx and Cali I understand, but Illi makes no sence... Oh yah? thats right? I forgot that is where the Pres is from and were Rob Emanuel is now Mayor of largest city... Has anyone looked @ exactly what size Business's actually got this grant Money? It was not the real Small Business men that actually create all the jobs.. like me... I would not be surprised that the lions share went to fortune 500 companies... NOW THAT'S THE AMERICAN WAY And that my friends is what is wrong with America?and of course congress will put it back Up for vote and will pass again and again the companies that really need it won't get it?...................... SolarManJD
Kevin McCurry
Kevin McCurry
July 5, 2012
Thank you for your response, I will ask the PACE PA for this area if the terms are negotiable and learn a little more about the program. My delima still seems to be the high costs associated with the installation. The rebates are there, the tax credit is there, but when all thats left to offset the costs are fuel savings the pay back lengthens and the impetus to go green is gone!
JSM @AltWatt
JSM @AltWatt
July 5, 2012
Kevin, the investors I am working with are looking for significantly larger projects than yours (not that your project is not noteworthy). Typically, tax equity investors are looking for large deals due to transaction costs and the fact that most entities that can use ITC are large ones. IMO, there is a hole in the market for connecting smaller entities with projects in the sub $1M range. I will keep an eye open for your needs though.
JSM @AltWatt
JSM @AltWatt
July 5, 2012
Based on the scenario of the above post, it would not make sense. However, PACE is not uniform. In San Francisco financing is negotiated on a project specific basis directly between the borrower and lender, and PACE is used to securitize the loan and bind payments to property taxes. This helps to alleviate some of the short term return requirements that owners/borrowers have who do not want to commit to owning the property for the lifetime of the system. https://commercial-pace.energyupgradeca.org/county/san_francisco/commercial_about
Kevin McCurry
Kevin McCurry
July 5, 2012
Is the PACE program really a smart choice for funding renewable energy projects? I do not think so! It leverages funding from Municipal bonds at a low interest rate (1.9%)and passes on financing at a rate that exceeds the private sector borrowing rates(7.99%). The interest paid to fund a renewable energy project negates any possible financial gain by the end user.
Kevin McCurry
Kevin McCurry
July 5, 2012
Hello jsm-altwatt, I am looking for funding/financing resources for solar thermal projects that range from 250 to 500k. Any suggestions? Kevin
JSM @AltWatt
JSM @AltWatt
July 5, 2012
I don't think Commercial PACE, at least as it is practiced here in Northern California, would have much impact. Tax Equity investors look for yields based on tax benefits, often employing short term partnership structures including 'flips.' Securitizing assets to a tax bill has some benefits, especially for debt investors, but probably not too important to tax equity investors. There has been lots of speculation on 1603 expiration creating a shortage of tax equity capital, but I represent some tax equity capital and there appears to be no shortage of willing investors for legitimate shovel-ready projects with signed PPA's at all. Bigger issues in California for more large scale renewables hinge on other factors most notable are permitting issues and off-taker demand. If anyone knows of any solid projects looking for large amounts of tax equity investment I can certainly help connect them to potential investors!
Frank McIntyre
Frank McIntyre
July 4, 2012
I'm wondering how PACE financing for commercial projects affects this dynamic.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets
  • 1
    Goldman Sachs to Invest $486 Million in Japan Renewable Energy
  • 1
    Outlook for US Energy Independence Gaining Confidence

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • The Stella Group, Ltd.
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • Rotork plc
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Stoel Rives LLP
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information