The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

A Rush to Innovate Silicon Solar Technology

Ucilia Wang, Contributing Editor
July 31, 2012  |  38 Comments

It wasn't so long ago when some solar company executives – particularly those in the thin film business – dismissed the idea that innovation could still thrive in the world of crystalline silicon technology. The silicon technology was getting cheaper and factories were getting larger, and its dominance seemed unshakable, at least in the short-term. Why would anyone invest in new materials or production processes?

Turns out, a lot more can be done to chip away at the manufacturing cost. This is especially true when silicon technology companies are eager to set their products apart in a market that’s got way too many same-same solar panels.

“There is a real sense now that the crystalline silicon process flow, which has been fairly mature and undifferentiated, is headed for a change,” said Shyam Mehta, senior analyst at GTM Research, during a webinar on the photovoltaic market outlook on Tuesday.

Mehta rattled off some of the technologies that are being developed or employed: select emitters, cast monocrystalline ingot, backside passivation. Silicon wafers will become thinner than the 200-micron variety that is commonly used today. All these technologies are meant to reduce material costs and improve the amount of sunlight that solar cells can convert to electricity.

It’s not as if solar companies all of a sudden woke up and decided they needed to take risks and experiment. Some of these new materials and factory equipment have been under development for some years and are only now good enough to make their debut in the market. Others were technologies that weren’t developed as stand-alone products. Instead, their makers had intended to keep them in-house for making solar cells and panels for sale. Startups that have modified their business plans along the way included Twin Creeks Technologies (thin wafers), 1366 Technologies (low-cost wafers) and Calisolar (purified metallurgical silicon; the company changed its name to Silicor Materials).

Innovalight also morphed from a solar cell maker into silicon ink developer. It signed up a bunch of manufacturers that used the ink to improve their cells’ efficiencies.  DuPont bought Innovalight last year but didn’t’ disclose the purchase price.

The troubling imbalance of supply and demand that has plagued the PV business over the past year and a half is prompting PV companies to accelerate new technology development. Or they are trying. Solar cell and panel makers who in the past used standardized equipment are all looking for ways to boost the efficiencies of their products, whether through in-house R&D development or technology acquisitions. Suntech Power made a big deal about a process to create a hybrid wafer that produces more efficient cells. Canadian Solar boasts of a new technology that can collect more light, and its CEO is weighing whether to build a 700 MW factory to produce solar cells with the new technology.

With all these new technologies coming onto the market, we can expect cheaper and cheaper solar panels for many more years to come, right? The cost of making solar panels fell to around $0.96 per watt in 2011 for vertically-integrated factories in China, home to the heaviest concentration of silicon solar panel makers, GTM said. The cost will likely fall to $0.64 per watt before this year is over and reach $0.47 per watt in 2015. 

38 Comments

Register To Comment
bill shockley
bill shockley
August 17, 2012
j-davis, one more thing.

It's true that GM scammed the world in destroying LA early-century mass-transit and I believe they tried to do the same with NiMH and the EV1.

This is unfortunate for Ovshinsky believers because it adds to his con-man arsenal. A con-man leverages truth to sell the lie.

Ovshinsky was definitely a genius. A genius ends up being judged by his faithfulness to the truth. Judge for yourself.
bill shockley
bill shockley
August 17, 2012
j-davis, NiMH and amorphous silicon are not the same technologies but they both use amorphous materials which was Stan's life love and specialization. He found a way to nano-engineer before it was a buzz-word. He was a smart man but ego-driven and self-deceived. This is reflected in the people who idolized him.

Yes. You can't believe it. Crystalline silicon has 3X+ the efficiency of amorphous silicon (at least, the type produced by UniSolar). Because of the added area and installation cost of amorphous the value proposition has turned from bad to negative.

The fact that you're astounded by the value equation of crystalline means that you haven't done the math in a long time. You were Ovshinsky cool-aid-drunk.

But your mistakes are honest ones. I can tell because you are sincerely interested in the value of the SunPower panel. Welcome to the real world.
John Nistler
John Nistler
August 7, 2012
@j-davis. Sorry, that is a heck of a stretch. Unisolar specifically mentions amorphous silicon for their long ribbon commercial applications called Powerbond, their power shingle products specifically indicate patented UV stabilized polymers. http://www.uni-solar.com/products/

Do you have the patent numbers associated with Ovshinsky's solar shingle approach? A search on Stan Ovshinsky as inventor delivers no patents on USPTO.

@Efried, not sure about costs per say, but typically the cost per watt is high due to low efficiency of UV stabilized polymers. Even when you have three different solar junctions, the efficiency is typically low. I have never read of a polymer based solar shingle or panel able to obtain better then 6 or 7% efficiencies. It also should be noted that UV stabilized does not mean you have no polymer breakdown. In my past experience, polymers continue to outgas under heat and high UV even after curing which leads to breakdown of the electrical circuit. Historically, hard films or semiconductor devices have been preferred for this reason.

Note that my company offers a 17% c-Si panel. But I recognize that the new DOW solar shingle offering beats us hands down for residential asphalt roof replacements. We still do flat roof commercial installations, but I will not enter the residential market due specifically to Dow offerings unless we just came up with such a great idea that we would risk it. We have never taken Unisolar seriously, it would be too high of a risk to install their shingles while I would be willing to put the DOW CIGS solar shingles on my own roof. I have also never taken the Google spay on solar shingles seriously also. Completing a electrical circuit for solar requires that the cells are isolated and properly wired to obtain current and voltage strings.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 7, 2012
SOLAR BOY: I just called your co that has the solar shingle panel/ for sale? A guy answered and said its 'Not important' who is in charge of the liquidation of UNI-SOL/ECD, and hung up on me?
Thats exactly the same type of behavior that UNI-SOL/ECD and the only 2 NIMH factories gave us when we called them. (sure wish someone would buy our US Patent 6570340 so we could go be missionaries, ours gets 2x more energy out of ordinary dry cells such as AA, C, D etc).
IF ANYONE KNOVVs or has contact to OBAMA please ask them to look into this obvious suppression and deceptive practice of buying and then bankrupting, no liquidating working factories that make great solar panel/shingles etc that could save USA from further bankruptcy ! THANKS
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 7, 2012
John-Nistler:

Transcript : http://www.pbs.org/saf/1506/resources/transcript.htm

Video: Skip to minute 17 via bar at bottom of the screen (dble clik on minute 17 and it'll go there) http://www.blinkx.com/watch-video/scientific-american-frontiers-hydrogen-hopes/eq6zw6U1fv6MpAh7c5IWsQ

From 2005 documentary on Scientific American
' ALAN ALDA (NARRATION) Today the solar energy business is booming, with billions of dollars being spent on solar panels to make electricity. Almost all these so-called photovoltaic systems employ cells made from delicate and expensive crystals of silicon. But from the very beginning, Stan and Iris Ovshinsky had a radically different kind of solar device in mind. Here in a huge factory filled with machines Stan mostly invented himself, photovoltaic panels are made not from silicon crystals but multiple layers of the exotic metallic alloys the Ovshinsky's use in all their creations. Turned out literally by the mile, these solar panels soak up more sunlight than conventional cells — and are far more forgiving.'
NOTE : phrase ' MULTIPLE LAYERS OF EXOTIC METAL ALLOYS' (NIMH is a metal alloy isn't it? , I recall Ovshinsky said that he used the Nimh in many of his inventions and I recollect he referred to solar panel/shingles; he had a machine that could make them 6 at a time 1.5 miles long, super light (unlike heavy glass enclosed Si types). and super lo cost. But 'you know who' bought him out and drove ECD co directly into bankruptcy !
SO IN SUMMARY: in 2005 Ovshinsky gave us the solution to energy , and congress let it be suppressed and undermined. VERY SAD STATE OF AFFAIRS! OIL/gasoline is bankrupting us all, what's left for the grandchildren? : learning Arabic and being forced to become Muslim? (OPEC gets the lions share of the illegally price fixed oil/gasoline revenues, and OPEC is mostly Arabic Muslim Islamic who treat women like dirt).
You can thank all the traitors in the govt and lobbyists for Super Rich !
E Fried
E Fried
August 7, 2012
@john tell us more about that. My research on the Internet has shown that the triple approach to harvest energy from sunlight fails because of manufacturing cost. May be also UV-stabilized transparent covers are more expensive than glass. So from those to problems I would judge this attempt to go for the mass power market as a full failure. For the military and some backpackers however the solution is great..
John Nistler
John Nistler
August 6, 2012
@j-david, the only comments I have seen about the Ovshinsky solar cells is that they are UV-stabilized polymers designed to cover a wider spectrum of sunlight using three separate polymer pairs or junctions. Nothing about using NIMH in the solar cells. If you have a website or document to the contrary I would be interested in reading about it. Since it was first announced in 2006, nothing more has happened with it. In 2006 when I read up on it, they were about a 6% conversion efficiency. If you have information indicating real costs and efficiencies, it would be worthwhile to look at.
Salvador Tarin
Salvador Tarin
August 6, 2012
Hi, j-davis,
I just sent you an e-mail with pix of the golf cart. I also sent you another e-mail with youtube site with my solar stuff. I hope you like it. We have been doing those things by not thinking "it cannot work, not in a million years" but "what if it worked??"
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 6, 2012
Chava-Tarin:
So you're 315 Watt panel cost $600 and gives you hoW many Watts? send jpg pic to InventPeace@aol.com.
Are you saying that you can run on 600 Watts poWer? if so that means you are running on only 600W/48v = 12amps? thats interesting if true. What speed are you able to maintain constantly With that 600 Watts . Maybe you are not taking into account that the batteries are already charged and that the solar panels are really just helping, not actually charging the batteries at all really hile running.. When stationary, yes it Would charge the batteries but at probably only 12amps Which Would take hours of time. please advise. thanks.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 6, 2012
john-nistler : No you are misinformed: NIMH is a battery type that is for sure and probably the best one out there right now as extolled by the fact that all the hybrids use em instead of Li-ion (tesla recently canceled its factory in mexico and they use li-ion ; not saying that is reason but it sure looks fishy).. INHO: Li-ion can not take the day to day beating.
But also the SOLAR Shingles invented by Ovshinsky use NIMH also as the principal active substance of the shingle/panel, they can be used either as shingles to keep rain out and provide electricity or as just a regular solar panel either use is fine.
John Nistler
John Nistler
August 5, 2012
@j-davis: NiMH (Nickel Metal Hydride) are battery cells not solar cells. The new DOW solar shingles made with tempered glass and CIGS technology at 12% efficiencies at ~ USD$0.896 per watt is an interesting asphalt shingle roof scenario. By eliminating special racking requirements this would significantly reduce potential wind damage, extra weight and balance of system costs. It does appear that a special backing needs to be laid under the shingles. It would be interesting to know what the overall system costs are.
Salvador Tarin
Salvador Tarin
August 5, 2012
Sorry,41 pounds is the weight, not the size, of course. The only add-on is the charge controller, Morning Star, of the appropriate charging capacity for the panel. Other than that, merely connect panel to charge controller, and charge controller to the 48-Volt batteries, and that's it. While golfing, do not leave the cart in the shade, but in full sunlight. 90 watts is very little using up so much space. I tried normal solar panels from China, and all I could get were 200 watts (4 50W panels), and all sapace was used up. The price is about $600 U.S.
Salvador Tarin
Salvador Tarin
August 5, 2012
You can visit http://www.posharp.com/spr-315-wht-solar-panel-from-sunpower_p1062987557d.aspx in order to find a dealer. If you have an e-mail, I can send you a pix of the golf cart (with me driving it)The size of the panel is 41 pounds, so it's not too much. Width is 41 inches and length is 61 inches, so it nicely fits on top of the average golf cart. If you can give me your FB username, you can have access to my FB; the pix of the cart is there, along with my home's solar power installation. However, visit the above site first, you'll get all specs there. And yes, 315 watts, not 31.5 nor anything else.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 5, 2012
Chava-Tarin:
I really find it interesting on 2nd thought that your golf car can even hold up a 315w panel... our EZ-GO is "covered fully" even adding front and back solar panels used as front and back "visors" just to get to 90w. That would mean your panels are at more than 3 x more efficient ?? Does that make sense? Maybe you meant 31.5 w or 31.5 volts ? 90w = V x Amps = 30 x 3amps for ~ 30v motor; if motor is 50 - 100 amps you are only getting 306% of needed juice to run on. With 315w solar = ~30 x 10, you still only getting 10 amps (still not enough to run on?) ... please advise. thanks. Need pricess on solar panels.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 5, 2012
SolarBOy:
" Back in 1995 a varied group of people worked on Solectria's sedan sized car for ATdS - a car using the large format batteries you speak of. We got 373 miles on a single charge, ".
Thats alot of miles on one charge ! So you are admitting indirectly that the electric car works very well. Yes NimH Large format (suppressed by Texaco) batteries charge to 80% in 15 minutes.. but thats really quite good, (the 20% rest of the charge is at a reduced amp rate to prevent overheating.. and will take 3-5 hours ); but because of the unique Nimh Features, you don't have to ever do the extra 20%.. as the Nimh actually works best for LCY (life cycle years of use) between 40% and 80%... so its great ! !
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 5, 2012
Chavis-Tarin:
I noticed a tremendous lack of pricing information on the website? I bet a group of interested parties could group together to get a pretty good discount on a large order direct from china.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 5, 2012
Chava-Tarin,
thanks. BTW: what did yours cost.. any add ons needed, costs? thanks.
Salvador Tarin
Salvador Tarin
August 5, 2012
Dear j-davis, the company is at http://us.sunpowercorp.com/homes/products-services/solar-panels/ you will see several models there, ours is 315-watt. There is also some info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunpower .
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 4, 2012
Sounds like the same run -around as usual.. if they really interested in selling they'd be calling us.. !!


Hilco Streambank has been retained to sell the intellectual property for Energy Conversion Devices and its subsidiary Solar Integrated Technology. The patent portfolio is described in executive summaries posted on slideshare, see links below. They encourage interested parties to submit offers on the portfolio(s) they might have interest in and to allocate value among the patents they would like to acquire. They will also be providing access to a data room where technical information pertaining to the patents will be stored. Once it is assembled and opened they will be granting access to interested parties.
Please contact Matt Helming, or Gabe Fried, in the Hilco Streambank office with any questions.

Hilco Streambank
97 Chapel St, 3rd floor
Needham, MA 02492
781-444-4940

http://www.slideshare.net/Streambank/ecd-unisolar-ip-asset-summary
http://www.slideshare.net/Streambank/ecd-fuel-cell-ip-summary
http://www.slideshare.net/Streambank/ecd-bioreformation-hydrogen-production-summary
http://www.slideshare.net/Streambank/solar-integrated-technologies-inc-ip-summary

Good luck.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 4, 2012
Chava-Tarin: please tell us here to get the 315 solar panel.. cots? thanks.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 4, 2012
John NISTLER: Its moot since NIMH solar panesl are alot more efficient throughout the 12 hour day AND are light lbs.. Si can't match that !! Do you like heavy solar Si glass enclosed panels delicate and easily broken, or robust light NIMH that can even have holes drilled in them and still produce electricity !! think about maintenance over the long haul.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 4, 2012
SOlar-boy reeves:
" Buying up patents is not only common, but there is a whole business strategy to patent slight variations all around a new idea so that the idea can not be improved on. Patent issues are not news to anyone, and should not be seen as 'conspiracy'."
SO YOU ADMIT IT>> and it IS conspiracy... you sound like a lobbyist for TEXACO !
John Nistler
John Nistler
August 4, 2012
j-davis, in regards to your comments about c-Si or a-Si not working well in early morning or late evening, not quite a true statement. Antireflective coatings on the glass covers is quite common now and reduces the reflection at low angles (non-perpendicular) while increasing the amount of light at solar noon that gets to the solar junctions. It is true that any fixed solar panel including shingles produces less power then tracking systems. But the advantage that solar shingles have over panels which are now being designed to be used as roof components is not existent.
Salvador Tarin
Salvador Tarin
August 4, 2012
Dear J. Davis, we do have a 48-volt golf cart running on solar, with just a 315-watt SunPower panel on its top (if fits nicely)and a Morning Star charge controller. It works all day on the green without ever recharging from the utility. I know, if you use low power panels you would have to wait several days to get it charged. These SunPower panels are really efficient.
Steven Reeves
Steven Reeves
August 3, 2012
Hilco Streambank has been retained to sell the intellectual property for Energy Conversion Devices and its subsidiary Solar Integrated Technology. The patent portfolio is described in executive summaries posted on slideshare, see links below. They encourage interested parties to submit offers on the portfolio(s) they might have interest in and to allocate value among the patents they would like to acquire. They will also be providing access to a data room where technical information pertaining to the patents will be stored. Once it is assembled and opened they will be granting access to interested parties.
Please contact Matt Helming, or Gabe Fried, in the Hilco Streambank office with any questions.

Hilco Streambank
97 Chapel St, 3rd floor
Needham, MA 02492
781-444-4940

http://www.slideshare.net/Streambank/ecd-unisolar-ip-asset-summary
http://www.slideshare.net/Streambank/ecd-fuel-cell-ip-summary
http://www.slideshare.net/Streambank/ecd-bioreformation-hydrogen-production-summary
http://www.slideshare.net/Streambank/solar-integrated-technologies-inc-ip-summary

Good luck.
Steven Reeves
Steven Reeves
August 3, 2012
Buying up patents is not only common, but there is a whole business strategy to patent slight variations all around a new idea so that the idea can not be improved on. Patent issues are not news to anyone, and should not be seen as 'conspiracy'. I am aware of the EV1 and Panasonic batteries, having designed and built, from ground up, dozens solar cars and EVs. The EV1 did not recharge in 15-minutes (I still have a partial battery pack from those cars from when we profiled them in the lab). Many exciting patents are expiring soon and/or have just. You'll find that many people who worked on great tech a decade or two ago will 'suddenly' come out of the woodwork as those dormant patents expire. Running a fan with one of those Uni-Solar 'modules' does not mean much - that load is not the same as my heat-pump HVAC system. You can go and look at the datasheets on those 'modules' and see power per unit area and calculate the efficiency. They were 1/3 the power compared to cSi and slightly more. In the last year that changed, they became 1/4 the power and three times the price. As did many other thin-film technologies - hence the failure of those companies. Even concentrated solar of all forms costs more now and projects are being abandon for glass-based modules. I am more interested in what I call generational PV, and that needs glass front and back and better encapsulant to fully protect the solar cells from the elements. NO plastic front/back sheet can protect as well, thus a product like Uni-Solar is not going to be generational. We are not going to improve our world by thinking about 'me, me, me' - we need to be building PV that my grandchildren will still be using while they raise their kids. I am walking the walk, and with technology without conspiracy.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 3, 2012
Yes I forgot, the ovshinsky (UniSol/ECD ) solar shingle can be made 1 mile long according to the documentary in the factory shown. They shingles are not as efficient as Si in direct sunlight but they are alot more efficient in indirect light (such as rainstorms), so they outperform Si over 12 day, early mornings and evenings are not very good with Si. The shingles can be rolled into giant rolls I think I saw as wide as 3-4' or cut to order to resemble conventional asphalt shingles. And yes they are very good at keeping out rain !
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 3, 2012
chava_tarin : It takes our ~90 watt solar roofed EZ-go golf cart about 2-3 days of sitting in sun to recharge full charge , but of course a person doesn't always need a full charge either, and the solar roof and sun awning seems to limit sulfation in lead acid batteries as well, win - win. The fully covered solar roof probably only provides about 3% of the 50-100 amps needed to run on (approx), but then again it gives it a boost and also is an emergency electricity storage and "trickle" source of electricity; in other words we could probably run the house on the 7.2kwh battery pack 6 batteries x 1200wh each) for a couple hours full blast.. or just use minimal energy for fridge and tv for maybe 6 hours (just guessing here).
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 3, 2012
TO: Steven-Solarboy-Reeves,
Please give me the contact where I can get the price of the ovshinsky solar panel/shingle patent to purchase it? (they probably made it for sale but at such a high price (as they did to NIMH battery) that no one can afford it. Write to InventPeace@aol.com thanks.
Re: your comment: " If it did they would still be in business."; is not accurate. GM has admitted they used to buy Trains, and trolleys (interurbans) and put them into bankruptcy in order to increase sales of cars. Same thing about 15 min to 80% of full charge NIMH batteries; if not so then "WHY" did they agree to crush, and then chip the 1100 EV1 rave review electrics which were used with HOME chargers (using 220v) to itty bitty pieces? There was conspiracy just as real as who killed Lincoln, its very common in business to undermine your competition. Heck the oil minister of Saudi Arabia admitted on TV that the Super Rich routinely do such things as buy up resources and patents to prevent competition. If you watch the "Alan Alda" documentary that I posted somewhere on this site about the solar panel/shingle you'd see that it works in a drenching downpour to run a fan.
They also show how he can make the super lightweight solar panels and even drill 12 holes in one and it doesn't miss a beat ! ! NO heavy glass, etc.. You can't do that with Si technology. ALSO Panasonic which did have a license for medium size nimh, before the oil monsters realized how good the NIMH battery was, started building the large format ones and had an army of lawyers on their backs within days of Texaco finding out about it, they got sued and lost and had to pay the traitorous Texaco (T. Boone Pickens and the like) millions.. 2014 is when nimh patent runs out.. Toyota had bought Panasonic partially for that reason that Panasonic had the license they needed to produce large nimh batteries. NOW please tell me that all is an illusion? These traitors are masters of the Scam !
ANONYMOUS
August 3, 2012
India will be largest user of Solar Power after it reached the cost of 0.33 dollar per watt and people will buy it and install it withour recourse to loans or subsidies . Estimated requirement is 1,00,000 MW of solar power panels As soon this happens Solar will not have a stop any where. They will install it without batteries to run their daily activities. And once batteries get cheap and reliable This installation will take place as fast as you can imagine
RICHARD GAUGHAN
RICHARD GAUGHAN
August 2, 2012
I think this 'rush' is more like an awareness on the part of the executive suite of the importance of a process that's been going on continuously for decades. It's kind of like the singer who toils away for 20 years, producing albums, going on tour, grinding it out, and then is 'discovered' overnight. As far as the singer is concerned, the career has been a long-term endeavor. As far as the record company is concerned, the singer just appeared. Silicon innovation has been a necessary and integral part of the business for as long as there's been a business. A few more thoughts at http://mountainoptical.com/ScientificSeen/photonics/a-rush-to-innovate-silicon-solar-technology-renewable-energy-news-article/.
Steven Reeves
Steven Reeves
August 2, 2012
j-davis, having bought a lot of Uni-solar's assets on auction a few months ago, I know that if you truly believe in those patent portfolios, you can buy them right now. They are for sale and it is not a secret. The company selling them wants everyone to know - especially people who think they are of value. I professionally do not think they are of value. The aSi technology is way to low in efficiency, and the market hype of better at low light and better at high temp just does not pan out to make a difference. If it did they would still be in business. Plus, it costs way too much make those solar shingles. I have a graduate degree in Solar Energy Engineering, so I pretty much know the ends and outs here. Most educated professionals saw Uni-Solar's demise coming long ago. Those stick-on modules will not seal your standing seam metal roof from rain, they are just not designed for that. This is just another product that GM (ECD\Uni-Solar to you and I) wanted to tout.

Back in 1995 a varied group of people worked on Solectria's sedan sized car for ATdS - a car using the large format batteries you speak of. We got 373 miles on a single charge, but not the so-called '15-minute' charge. While it is true that many battery technologies can accept a bulk charge in "15 minutes", this is NOT a full charge and not a regular charging scheme. There is no secretive hidden reason to this or method to charging. While working at the UMass battery lab, I/we built chargers and profiled all current battery types to optimally charge them. There are plenty of published papers on this and plenty of products on the market to make the chargers. But nowhere near enough voltage and current at most charging locations - that is your limit. You and I do not have enough power at our homes right now to make those chargers a regular marketable item. Plus, that is just the bulk charge it is not the finish charge. That "15-minute" idea is meant to get you back home on the long haul, not for everyday.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 2, 2012
oh yes, I forgot to mention the Ovshinsky solar shingle can be used as a solar panel just as easily without being on a roof and is so lightweight you can hold it with just your little finger. While technically not quite as high an efficiency rating as silicon types , it actually out performs the silicons types because it can use indirect light much more efficiently (whereas silicon types require direct sunlight to operate ); thus over a 12 hour day sun up to sundown this ovshinsky ECD/UNI-SOL panel/shingle is a much better choice for both lightweight and higher overall performance over 12 hour day.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
August 2, 2012
Thankfully the Texaco/Chevron suppressed patent for the NIMH Large format" type electric car battery that can recharge in 15 minutes (WOW) will run out in 2014 ... then we can have cheap , high efficiency , long life, quick recharge electric cars .. FINALLY. the monopoly on illegally price fixed gas/oil is slipping FINALLY.
Amazingly the same inventor (Ovshinsky) also invented a SOLAR panel that is so lightweight, and actually produces power even on cloudy rainy days, that can be used as a roof shingle , thus protecting your house from rain and also producing great amounts of electricity. The co ECD was bought out by "you know who" via a 3rd party front co. and instantly driven into bankruptcy, when we called and asked to buy some shingles..they didn't even have a sales dept, and gave us confusing "telephone musical chairs) type of response passing us from one office to another and then either disconnected or to a message machine. The now bankrupt co and patent, will probably be suppressed as was the NIMH battery for the next 12 years until finally the patent runs out. Oil monster/traitors are using these techniques to keep oil high priced, which is bankrupting the USA. The co name is now UniSol/ECD. WHY IS THERE NO INVESTIGATION ?
Salvador Tarin
Salvador Tarin
August 2, 2012
If solar panels can really be improved as to efficiency and cost, it would be possible to use solar fueled cars, at least the small ones.
John Nistler
John Nistler
August 2, 2012
The DOE in funding the PVMC for $60 Million also tends to believe that c-Si still has a lot to offer. Present production c-Si solar cell efficiencies are at 20%, up from 19% a few months ago. 17% efficient panels at reasonable prices are already being obtained - moving to 18% in a few months.
ANONYMOUS
August 2, 2012
I believed that Silicon has unique state and despite of thin film technology continues its progressive in mass production.
we should focus on silicon optimization and improve efficiency.
ANONYMOUS
August 1, 2012
Now lets discuss whether subsidies for PV producers are more clever than taxes on fossil fuel for pushing renewables...

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Ucilia Wang

Ucilia Wang

Ucilia Wang is a California-based freelance journalist who writes about renewable energy. She previously was the associate editor at Greentech Media and a staff writer covering the semiconductor industry at Red Herring. In addition to Renewable...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 13
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Motech Industries, Inc.
  • Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
  • EU PVSEC (European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition)
  • North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners
  • Intersolar
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Associated Renewable
  • Arena Solutions
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information