The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Head of BOEM Details Offshore Wind Challenges, Key Strategies

Steve Leone, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
June 20, 2012  |  29 Comments

Tommy Beaudreau has just one energy-related photo hanging in his otherwise sparse Washington office.

It’s of a sprawling — some would say majestic — offshore wind farm. But as the director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), this isn’t a reflection of where’s he’s been. Rather, it serves as an inspiration for what he wants to accomplish.

In addition to BOEM’s broad oversight of oil and gas leasing, Beaudreau’s office is in charge of setting the stage for America’s offshore wind industry. But it’s been slow going, and the U.S. is still awaiting its first offshore development. The picture he looks at every day is of an offshore wind farm off the coast of Denmark, and it’s become a guiding light of sorts for the first head of a department created less than two years ago.

BOEM has been busy since its 2011 creation as it works to administer Department of the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar’s Smart from the Start initiative to methodically create a vibrant offshore wind industry. Beaudreau relayed the status of the program and spent some time hearing from those in the fledgling American offshore wind industry during a recent stop at the Energy Ocean International conference just north of Boston.

While many in the industry lament the slow course being taken off the coastal waters of the Atlantic, Beaudreau assured attendees of the conference, which included those in the even more nascent wave and tidal industries, that the offshore program is of vital interest to the Obama administration.

In fact, when BOEM was launched, it came during the tense aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Even then, said Beaudreau, he was told by Salazar “under no uncertain terms” that BOEM’s renewable energy program was one of the top two or three priorities for the entire Department of the Interior.

“He said he wanted BOEM to lead and promote the development in an aggressive way but to continue doing it in the right way,” said Beaudreau.

Salazar wanted BOEM to be aggressive because offshore wind has already proven itself to be a technologically viable resource in the shallow waters of Northern Europe. That’s brought lots of investment and lots of industry to places like the United Kingdom, which sees itself as taking a lead in the growing global industry.

The waters off America’s Atlantic coast have the potential to be a 1,000-gigawatt resource — and the same is true for the much deeper waters off the West Coast where developers are waiting for floating technology that would open up that region.

The sheer size of the resource and the proven track record in Europe has clearly pushed offshore wind up the administration’s to-do list. But to get there, BOEM has had to lay much of the foundation for an industry eager to get started.

How to get there has been a painstaking process filled with what Beaudreau calls “chicken-and-egg problems.”

“Who should make the first move? How will the leasing process fit with DOE funding and state incentives? How will generation fit with transmission? How will commercial realities fit with long-term investment and the construction generation cycle for these projects? How will leasing fit with wind farm configuration and emerging and evolving technologies?”

It’s a lot to deal with for an industry that won’t have the luxury of ramping up with smaller projects before building the behemoths that give it the most favorable economics. So the industry is gearing up to go from zero to 60 in a short time span even as those most affected by these giant developments learn about their potential impacts.

“How do we fulfill that potential, how do we get there?,” said Beaudreau. “There are a lot of exciting opportunities out there. There are lots of visionaries, a lot of entrepreneurs, a lot of true believers and no shortage of skeptics and naysayers as well.

“Sometimes when you look at [the obstacles] it can be overwhelming. But the key is not to be paralyzed by all the issues but rather maintain enthusiasm.”

Beaudreau offered some key points that could help some of these projects get to open water.

  • Bring stakeholders together early on. This is a key point that has derailed many projects, and sent others on the slow detour of litigation. Beaudreau suggests meeting early and often with those who could be most impacted by a project — people like environmental leaders, state task forces, Native American groups, nearby residents and those dependent on the fishing industry. This can be an arduous process, he said, but getting that early buy-in helps ease the time and costs of getting a project off the ground.
  • Build confidence between states and the industry. Many states are vying to become manufacturing and installation hubs that will serve an offshore industry. Displaying unity and having a common vision can help rally even greater support from taxpayers and potential employees.
  • Beaudreau said his department needs to get leasing rights into the right hands. By that, he means that the department needs to consider how motivated a developer is before granting the rights to a pre-designated offshore wind area. “Once these leases are issued, then they need to diligently pursue them. We’ll help where we can. We can help make sure that these opportunities don’t lie fallow.”

29 Comments

Register To Comment
ANONYMOUS
July 13, 2012
Wind turbines do not provide the energy needed to supply sufficient needs. They just keep building bigger ones without any increase in energy supply. Yes keep building offshore so that sea life is affected and it is the dreaded infrasound that is causing deformed calves being born, yolkless eggs, low milk production, animals running around in circles, people being sick (peer-reviewed evidence to support this and now cases where people are suing and being successful because of the noise issue (Davis versus Fenland UK, Quinn versus AGL Aust. and many more in courts now with plenty of evidence the wind industry is not exactly correct with their quotes of dBas. Japan is having a moritorium, Canada is having investigation of noise, A town in New Zealand has rejected a complex because o the noise problem. There are far better forms of renewable energy if you research and why is it that in the Middle Ages without factories, cars, aircraft and other CO2 emission causing agents the weather was far warmer than now as Greenland was just that "green" and the UK grew grapes.
Marie Burton
Marie Burton
July 13, 2012
There should be no subsidies then there would be fast disappearing companies in the wind industry. After all it has years and years to become viable and has not. It seems they build bigger and bigger turbines and have the hide to call them farms instead of industrial complexes. Try living near them for a while and enjoy the noise, shadow flicker and destruction of the environment not to mention birds, bats and fauna. After thei use-by date you are left with rusting turbines which look absolutely disgusting littering the landscape as they are too expensive to remove and cannot be used for scrap.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
June 28, 2012
Cliff, however you cut it, wind subsidies abound. One you mention: 'You'd think that decade-old litter would have been picked up ' -- what de-commissioning bonds do wind 'farmers' set aside? That means including removal of the 100 cu meter foundations on land and all sea cables, ties, etc? Nukes pay per kW installed for their de-commissioning, which, for next generation nukes will be a minor issue. But, since you want to raise misinformation, Price-Anderson is a deal, not a waste, as wind deals are... www.stanford.edu/group/siepr/cgi-bin/siepr/?q=system/files/shared/pubs/papers/briefs/policybrief_jan02.pdf We realize you're invested in the wind biz, while some of us are not invested in anything bust science & engineering facts. By the way, wind killed 2 workers this past year in Calif. Nukes 0, just like all their years before.
Cliff Goudey
Cliff Goudey
June 28, 2012
Alex, You are right, blade failure used to be a problem in early machines until progress was made in their design and techniques of manufacture. You'd think that decade-old litter would have been picked up by now or are you trying to be funny? With respect to maritime liability, these installations will be charted much like aides to navigation and O&G facilities. You are confused on who would be suing who in the event such installations are run into by a careless mariner. Further evidence is wind farms have no problems with underwriting whereas nukes require the federal Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act which indemnifies the nuclear industry against liability claims and made the US taxpayer liable for damages over a set amount. However, it's absolutely necessary, as these radioactive time bombs are fundamentally uninsurable.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
June 28, 2012
So Cliff, the latest US DoE estimates for windmill-ship collisions is 1.23/year off our eastern coast, if Cape Wind is built. Those are "rather minor events" each 10 months? Might want to do an honest check with an insurer. Those mongo cruise ships carry quite a few folks who know good lawyers. In any case, >10% of all the generation offshore is lost in transmission/conversion -- that's how much $ not earned? And, since nukes average >90% full output hours, vs maybe 35% for wind, what's that missed opportunity cost of the missing 55% (minus the 10% transmission) loss? I know, an inconvenient truth. Wind/wave has no usefulness in a world with local solar. No, I'm wrong -- it has usefulness to those getting subsidy $ from us taxpayers & ratepayers. Sorry. Maybe the wind 'farm' doen near San Diego would qualify for your 3-Mile Island odd analogy -- most of its machines are sort of working. Much of its land is covered with broken blades. And, oops, yeas, even though it hobbles along at a fraction of original power, it still gives 10% of that to waste loss in transmission. Here's what wasting lots of land & transmission gives us in CA... www.caiso.com/outlook/SystemStatus.html Here's what local solar is giving us more & more each day... http://solarguard.solarcity.com/kiosk/solarguard.aspx?ID=0D78F69A-E95F-4BF3-A060-821341E8E933
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
June 28, 2012
J-Davis, on windmills in hurricanes -- feathering is meaningless, except when the neighbor down the block comes out to check his yard after the storm and finds pieces of your windmill there, and exclaims: "I wonder if he feathered it?" ;]
Cliff Goudey
Cliff Goudey
June 27, 2012
Alex, do you mean the 'Macondo', the 'Three-mile Island', or the 'Fukushima' equivalent of wind? I'm afraid you are confusing technologies. Sure, things fail offshore all the time. But with a wind turbine there is no oil spill, no dead sea life, and no need to evacuate the population due to radioactivity. These units are quite insurable and failures, even complete failures, are rather minor events. So, when do you start your normal proselytizing about thorium reactors?
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
June 27, 2012
Welll don't get me wrong, I think its "possible" as is anything in theory. but you have to as you say balance economy with wisdom gadgets and gizmo's. A solid gold toilet seat is a good example of what not to do. NOW let me get all your opinions on the old slow moving dutch windmill idea (has about 10 hp i think, running a generator, i "think" because the vanes are so large that it takes only a little wind to run it. what would happen if one were built , could it power a house (Lessee, a 5hp will power 5000 watts so 10hp should power 10,000 watts and since wind "can" unlike solar run 24 hours, a person could run his electric meter backwards at night in summers (actually have kind of a micro power business which actually pays him back his costs and maintenance... mount on tower over roof, slow moving larger vanes are spring loaded so that as wind speed increase (ie hurricanes) it auto-feathers until it locks back.. (user would then unlock the vanes after hurrican passes ? ) 2 or more generators could be connected mechanically back to back in-line to insure phase angle is constant or opposit e to get 220v 2 phase ? Please Give me your ideas.. and opinions, please thanks doublebatterylife
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
June 27, 2012
Aw, don't worry, the first significant event will price insurance out of the ballpark, and we'll finally be done with the wind scam, on water anyway. ;]
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
June 26, 2012
The significant wave height of 18.5 meters (61 feet) is particularly interesting, according to Rosenthal. "The giant 29 meter (95 feet) waves fit well with this statistically," a good laugh is worth $5 anytime .. but really I would be very careful how I built a ocean wind farm.. one freak wave or group of waves, *the article says they came in groups and pounded them for 12 hours"; could wipe out most constructed wind farms, then again what about the occasional Tsunami ? Time will tell.
Cliff Goudey
Cliff Goudey
June 26, 2012
j-davis, you make me laugh. Check out: http://www.elephantjournal.com/2011/11/biggest-wave-ever-surfed-in-europe-video - - - - - - - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvAtNlNi08c - - - - - - http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/monster-waves-vessel-measures-record-ocean-swells-a-408953.html - - - - - - - A regular mill pond, ehh?
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
June 26, 2012
Cliff , that is very impressive. But also I haven't heard of any hurricanes in europe lately either... time will tell. You'll like this site too. http://www.4coffshore.com/windfarms/windfarmsNews.aspx seems to say the idea works. I would still say maintenance of cables to shore shifting debris on ocean floor and huge waves in hurrican (cat 5) storms might be something to plan for.
Cliff Goudey
Cliff Goudey
June 26, 2012
j-davis, that was a movie, and even if real, waves such as what was portrayed tend to break as they approach shallow water. Before saying offshore wind turbines are impossible, I suggest you check out: http://www.ewea.org/index.php?id=203 where we read, "A total of 1,247 offshore turbines are now installed and grid connected in European waters, bringing total installed capacity to 3,294MW, spread across 49 wind farms in nine European countries." A total of 150 GW of offshore wind projects are in various stages of planning.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
June 26, 2012
Dave-Fisher, There is tremendous power in the waves, and alot more beneath the surface in ocean currents. I think that studies show these currents are somewhat predictable (similar to the prevailing winds IE africa to south america and new england to england, etc). Water wave/current turbines are already in service in some areas as prototypes, just have to be perfectly water tight and corrosion resistant, (cars in carports near oceans are rusted out in just a few years for example and thats not even in the water).
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
June 26, 2012
Cliff, have you ever seen the movie "The Perfect Storm" / its hard to believe that an ocean wind farm could survive those kinds of waves resembling a giant 200' wall of vertical water? Thats why I said what I said, i agree feathering and locks will help on land based systems but when the whole platform is almost vertical it seems very dangerous and very high maintenance, which is why I suggested submerging until wind dies down to non-dangerous levels. You also might look at the dutch methods, they use very slow moving very large vanes and about 12 vanes instead of 3 most use, the advantage is it gets power out of lower wind speeds, slower moving vanes are also less dangerous and less costly to make (high speed vanes can break off and go sailing up to 2 miles away killing/breaking anything in their path), so for a pittance, the dutch large slow moving vane system "MAY" be a solution for low wind areas, just hook up a generator and you are in business. In fact the future could be that every normal sized house could have one built into the roof to get everyone off the grid, saving the nation from the bankruptcy to the Opec arabs and USA traitors (IE T. Boone Pickens/Texaco Ceo who bought 15 min recharge nimh battery from GM in 1999)
Cliff Goudey
Cliff Goudey
June 26, 2012
j-davis, offshore wind turbines are designed for the conditions you mention. They feather their blades, lock their rotor, and hang on. You are correct about the potential of wave farms, however few of today's technologies are submerged and instead are aimed at capturing energy at the surface and therefore must contend with storms. However, waves are not as consistent as you suggest with a seasonal kW/m variation of eight fold from summer to winter on the US west coast.
Cliff Goudey
Cliff Goudey
June 26, 2012
Anonymous, your attempt at political satire simply came across as an uninformed comment - I'll read more carefully next time. There is no question that BOEM's predecessor (MMS) was in bed with O&G (literally and figuratively) but the organization has been reorganized (twice now) and the result is supposed to be more accountability and stronger oversight. Time will tell. Regarding their process related to wind, as long as such projects are treated under NEPA in the same way as a polluting project (what NEPA was aimed at) the permitting will be protracted. Congress could fix this but present political dysfunction will not allow.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
June 26, 2012
Wave farms are already below water level (safety from hurricanes) and waves have much more energy per ccm than wind anyday, and waves are active 24/7 not just when the wind decides to blow, so you get energy all the time. Another one : Sterling engine; works on difference in temperature, (search it before you naysay), FORD built a sterling engine car that got much better mpg (propane)but they "said" they didn't like it because it took 21 seconds to power up, who can' wait 20 secs? (real reason is because they are also heavily invested in oil/gas.
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
June 26, 2012
Very few patents are viable, for example what do you do with a wind farm when the hurricanes come? (maybe cause them to submerge to safetly below water level? that means everything has to be completely waterproof and salt corrosion proof). I'm not saying its no possible but feasibility has to include economically maintainable. It would be easier to put massive solar arrays in nevada, with sun tracking (one sun tracking system uses no energy from solar panels; passive). doublebatterylife
ANONYMOUS
June 24, 2012
Cliff_Goudy, I'm sad that you did not appreciate my attempt at political satire. The pathetic reality of the BOEM is that they are just a political animal that provides no benefit for US citizens. Their claimed mandate is "....an agency in the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) responsible for managing development of the nation's offshore resources in an environmentally and economically responsible way...", but they are anything but that. Take the 2010 BP oil spill situation as an example. They provided zero "management" oversight before the spill and took no "responsibility" after the fact. As for their offshore wind project "oversight", the five projects under their review have been stalled since 2009. The BOEM is entirely useless.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
June 24, 2012
JD, get rid of "people who treate women like dirt " -- you mean the entire House GOP? Maybe the VA, WI & MI GOP legislators? ;]
Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis
June 24, 2012
They just keep delaying, because most of DEMGOP congress is heavily invested in gas/oil. They are greasy oily people.. don't expect help from this congress , VOTE EM ALL OUT < start over wth single term limits and outlaw lobbying .. how can that happen,,, DEMGOPS have to unite in to a third party... start now, time is wasting while they transfer your grandchildrens inheritance to the arabs (opec, muslim, islamic, shari law people who treate women like dirt ).
Atanacio Luna
Atanacio Luna
June 23, 2012
DrAlexC, Please accept my apologies for my dyslexic paternalism, and impatience with religious overtones both on the market and environmental sides, which are not opposites but both incorrect. The essence of science, friendship and business are mutual respect; this is my intention. Pluvinergy will lead markets to environmental improvement and replacement of fossil and fissile fuels. We agree that command and control of the energy sector is unnecessary.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
June 23, 2012
Puvial, "the comment including the smiley face, seem counter-productive and dishonest. Although the content may have some validity, this cynical habit of speech looses the meaning of your iplicit argument." -- maybe type more slowly & proofread? Otherwise, I don't get what you're saying. You have a business interest, apparently. I'm just concerned with facts.
Atanacio Luna
Atanacio Luna
June 22, 2012
DrAlexC, With due respect, the comment including the smiley face, seem counter-productive and dishonest. Although the content may have some validity, this cynical habit of speech looses the meaning of your iplicit argument. Do you mean to say that the government should not grant special help to developing industries? Uranium based nuclear is a mistaken investment of Taxpayer dollars to build a war technology into energy technology but at a huge monetary, environmental, and loss of truth cost. Thorium based nuclear is the more economically and environmentally valid technology. So the US tax dollar should not have been misspent on uranium nucs. I'm sure this is not what you meant. Insinuation is not only dishonest and unclear it is tiring, and wasteful of truth value. Thanks for understanding my frustration. I concur in questioning the wisdom of large-wind on cost and environmental grounds becasue there are better solutions, which Pluvinergy is actively developing.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
June 22, 2012
Keep those taxpayer/ratepayer subsidies coming! So thousand or so top-line windmills offshore of NC can meet 125% of its demand without killing many birds or sinking many ships in bad weather? Cool. One nuke plant on 100 acres could do same, and not be losing >10% of all generated power in transmission & conversion. Oops, another subsidy. ;]
Tom Henkel
Tom Henkel
June 22, 2012
Recent studies of the wind resources off the North Carolina coast indicate that offshore wind farms could satisfy about 125% of the current NC electric power demand. Furthermore, if these are located about 12 miles offshore, the winds are pretty steady 24/7, so this wind power can satisfy baseload electric power. Finally, this region does not have impacts on migratory birds, whose paths are located closer inshore and farther out to sea. Offshore wind farms are a win-win proposition for both people and birds!
Cliff Goudey
Cliff Goudey
June 22, 2012
Great comment, Anonymous. It tells us a lot about you. The irony of what BOEM is preaching is that they are same agency that oversees the offshore oil and gas industries under a system that provides no meaningful public input or any review based on science. Beaudreau seems more worried about sites lying fallow (what sites?) than the 10 years it took for Cape Wind to get permitted under the present process.
ANONYMOUS
June 20, 2012
Wow. I wasn't aware that a federal agency called the BOEM even existed. The agency name itself is a bit ironic considering that it is part of the US Dept. of the Interior. Think about it for a second, aren't the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans part of the US territorial exterior? Not to mention the name of the program, "Smart from the Start". Just how smart are you really if you can't tell the difference between an interior and an exterior?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Steve Leone

Steve Leone

Steve Leone has been a journalist for more than 15 years and has worked for news organizations in Rhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia and California.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • US, Australian Companies Taking Giant Steps for Global EGS Geothermal
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 10
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 2
    Marine Life Unhindered by Offshore Wind Farm, Study Says

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • marcus evans
  • Canadian Clean Energy Conferences
  • Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut)
  • SolarInsure, Inc.
  • Alternative Matters
  • 3TIER
  • Intertek
  • ExxonMobil Lubricants & Specialties Europe
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information