The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Senate Democrats: Exclude Chinese Solar Panels From ITC

Steve Leone, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
May 15, 2012  |  34 Comments

Print

Two high-profile Senate Democrats introduced a proposal Tuesday that if passed would set domestic requirements on solar installations looking to qualify for the 30 percent Investment Tax Credit.

The proposed legislation from Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Sen. Charles Schumer of New York comes on the same week that the Department of Commerce is expected to make a preliminary determination on an anti-dumping tariff on panels coming into the United States from China. If illegal dumping is found, the new tariff would be added to the countervailing tariff that was already implemented to offset subsidies coming from the Chinese government. The latest ruling is expected to be announced on May 17.

Brown and Schumer’s proposal would require that 70 percent of the parts of a solar panel must be American made if the developer using that panel wishes to take the Investment Tax Credit. If the panel is shipped to be manufactured in the United States, then 50 percent of the parts would have to be American-made in order to qualify for the credit.

According to Sen. Brown’s office, the standalone legislation was just introduced today, so the wording of the bill has not yet been made public. Because of that, several key points are still unknown. It remains unclear how the 70 or 50 percent thresholds would be measured. Also, it’s uncertain whether a timetable for implementation would be set within the legislation and whether domestic requirements would be targeted only for panels coming in from China.

A vast majority of bills that are introduced never make it out of committee, and at this point it’s impossible to say what level of support it would have. But the timing clearly indicates that key Democrats are watching the U.S.-China trade case closely, and that perhaps they’re willing to eliminate the tax benefits that have helped the industry flourish in order to boost domestic production.

“We can’t trade our dependence on foreign oil for a dependence on Chinese-made solar panels,” Sen. Brown said. “We went from a solar trade surplus with China to a solar trade deficit in a matter of years. Ohio workers can compete with anyone in the world, but they deserve access to a level playing field. When the Chinese government provides direct export subsidies to its solar manufacturers, that’s not competing – it’s cheating. And it’s costing American jobs in solar manufacturing. The American tax code should not make matters worse by encouraging the purchase of Chinese-made solar panels. Our plan will ensure that American tax incentives support American solar panel manufacturers.”

“The federal government has to take China’s stranglehold on the solar power industry very seriously, and U.S. manufacturers must have every arrow in their quiver to fight back,” said Schumer. “This proposal is tough, but it’s needed to successfully counter China’s unfair trade practices. This hard-hitting plan will level the playing field for U.S. solar producers so that they can compete, create jobs and become a global leader in this rapidly-growing industry.”

While U.S. manufacturing dominated a young solar industry, China has emerged as a manufacturing leader during recent years. The country now manufactures about 60 percent of all solar panels, and it’s done so with strong government support. The U.S., meanwhile, manufactures about 6 percent of the world’s panels, though it remains vital source of many of the components that go into each panel and system.

When Ontario implemented its Feed-in tariff in 2009, a domestic manufacturing requirment was put in place prompting many companies to locate manufacturing plants in the region.

We'll add updates once details of the U.S. legislation are announced.

34 Comments

Register To Comment
ANONYMOUS
May 18, 2012
This isn't about money.
It's about global power and domination.
The Chinese dumping has not just nearly destroyed US panel manufacturing but also the Germans. The profits of the German manufacturers fell off a cliff in 2011 because of ridiculous undercutting by the Chinese.
Of course Chinese goods are cheap (and nasty and unreliable).
They have 19th century working and social conditions.
We could be as cheap as them too by throwing our 200 years of societal progress in the bin just to "make money" but then you'd be living in a third world 18th - 19th century social hell.
Oh yes, that's exactly where we're headed by transferring all our skills, technology and industrial capability to China, so we can swap places with them - we go back to third world pre-industrial status, China becomes the technological leader and we become China's vassals.
If that doesn't frighten you you'd better wake up.

China's strategy is simple - use the "money" we gave them to destroy our industrial and technical capacity, then they control it all and we have to kow tow to them. Mercantilism, the same strategy used by the British Empire and Colonial Powers.
And we let them do it in strategic fields as vital as wind power and solar panels - the new energy sources that make us free of fossil fuel, just to become dependent on China and her slave prison workforce in vile satanic mill environmentlaly poisoned 80 hour work week no health and safety suicide nets around the factories country.
Wonderful. How amazing it's so cheeep to make things in China - that then only last two weeks before they break.
Let China sleep for when she wakes the world will tremble - Bonaparte.
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 18, 2012
Hi WillWilkin we suffer in Denmark too. Our wind industry cannot keep up (still 25% of the global market but losing out fast). Our shipbuilding industry who were every bit as competitive as any and built the finest ships and largest ships was closed down right after the Emma Maersk class success because subsidized Korean and Chinese is cheaper.

Maersk owned the last great shipyard for new built ships but decided that they would rather stay competitive longterm than supporting local Danish workers in vain short term.

The glee is not there on my part but as you point out there is no one on the helm other than short term profit makers (and this include consumers).

Last year Nokia fired 1700 people in Denmark (US CEO) despite the fact that the Danish branch was highly profitable and has developed some of their best phones ever. This is equal to the situation if 85.000 high paid engineering jobs were lost over night in the states.

Right now the market leader in satellite phones Thrane & Thrane is about to be bought in a hostile take over.

Intel bought Giga to get their hands on the first and leading gigabit technology developed and built in Denmark only to close down operations.

Microsoft did the same to Navision.

I have been in a Danish company that was purchased by a British only to be discontinued despite the fact that our company was profitable from day one till the closing day.

I have also been in a venture backed company that was sold whereafter 23 people was laid of and the technology was transferred to Sweden.

ISS the greatest company in the world measured by number of employees was nearly transferred to UK last year.

Capitalism works this way to create wealth and it does get the job done.

I think that taxing chinese PV panels is a lame excuse for real action and not helping US employment - quite to the contrary in fact.
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 17, 2012
Now Jens I don't detect in you any sympathy for the American worker or for the long-term prospects of American manufacturing, including PV manufacturing. That's fine considering you don't live here, but your tone almost hints at glee in our problems, and whatever your exact feelings I don't trust your advice since the free trade ideology you advocate is contrary to what made our country rich and has lately proven itself destructive of our society. People are not just tools to be thrown away to chase profits around the world. Millions of people are being thrown away here by fat cats with zero loyalty to the country, preaching free trade.
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 17, 2012
I am not criticizing or blaming the Chinese or anyone other than the political leadership of the USA, which has been bought by Wall Street and the military contractors. In exchange for the corporate millions funding their campaigns they serve Wall Street which made billions exporting perfectly viable industries, and thereby our middle class way of life. Jens please do read some of Ian Fletcher's book, especially the chapter on the history of industrial development in the USA and Britain and every other developed country since, industrial policy and protective trade policies have always been integral to that development.

At this stage in Chinese development the interests of their elites overlaps greatly with the goals of developing their national economy in terms of infrastructure and encouraging key industries, especially those poised for 21st century growth and strategic importance in terms of high-value-added production. In the USA it has not been true for several decades that the elites care about the long-term prospects of the middle class and working class below them. I judge this by the trade and tax and financial regulation laws of Congress, as well as the stagnant middle class incomes for decades and the export of over 6 million mfg jobs and tens of thousands of factories, many of which are becoming brownfields while mass unemployment keeps in fear those who still have a job, likely for 18% less than they were making 4 years ago.
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 17, 2012
To John Cotten. If your information about the dubious quality of Chinese PV panels is correct then a simple and fair regulation of the market should involve an obligatory quality control performed by independent test organisations.

Do not make an enemy out of China if you do trade with them US could do just fine.

In the last five years Danish export to China has increased +20% annually and we have a positive trade balance.

All major Danish companies have established production in China and they are very popular with the local workforce. Those of my friends and family that speaks chinese and have worked there for years tells me about a growing middle class that despite of the lack of free press and the absolute power control in the hands of the communist party enjoys life more and more and have a positive expectation for the future.

The only way that everybody on the globe can increase and sustain wealth is by basing all production upon renewables. US could have been a leader in that transition but the support for renewables in US has been lukewarm.
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 17, 2012
Economy is the main driver for any house owner or power utility company when they decide on solar power.

Chinese PV producers produce approximately 60% of the PV panels worldwide whereas US panels producer produce approximately 6%.

These figures will only get worse seen from a protectionist viewpoint.

When I coin US solar panels as substandard I refer to their cost relative to quality.

Look at the figures and you will notice that consumers have voted.

Shell, BP, Sharp and many other companies who had the financial muscles and the global presence could have captured the market years ago and US government has had decades to decide whether they wanted a solar future.

China has made the decision easy - they are doing it whether or not oil giants or the US government want it.

And by the way Germany, Korea, Taiwan and Japan was also left standing when the PV panel manufacture train left.
John Cotten
John Cotten
May 17, 2012
I'm with Will on the comment substandard? Our company has spent 10's of thousands on testing and listing for our PV modules we build here in the US. Rumor has it that some Chinese PV's being sold here in the US are using counterfiet UL and ETL cert numbers, and have never been tested by the laboratories. I've seen vidoes of some of the companies testing methods and facilities, which are laughable.

The only reason the US Grid is outdated is we invented the thing. While China, India, and Brazil may have new grids, they still are very unreliable, brownouts and outages are a normal part of life in most areas that are not large cities, if they have power at all.

As far a China embracing capitalism and opening their markets, that is a joke for the most part. Who do you think most of these companies have partnered with, or who holds the purse strings for the national banks in China? The Communist Chinese Government. Their people are not free, the amount of capitalism being allowed in China is a matter of contol to let the population have something (material goods)so the government does not collapse like Russia did 20 years ago due to a social revolt. You talk about China like they are our friends, they are not. They are using our own economy to defeat us economically, and we the people are foolish and greedy enough to let them do it. We do not have even remotely open trade with China. Don't believe me, try to buy Chinese stocks on the stock market. Not availabe to western buyers. The government typically owns over 50% of all manufacturing, manufacturing investment and the companies.

So if you want to support a government that controls the people with very limited freedom, have them work 7 day weeks at slave wages so you can enjoy cheap solar, go for it. ME I perfer to have employees that earn a living wage, time to enjoy life, personal freedoms, and the opportunity to contribute to building a stronger, economically stable USA.
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 17, 2012
Substandard?
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 17, 2012
WillWilkin I like your insistence but question your wisdom.

Founding a scalable solar panel industry in USA cannot be done by forcing US consumers and small businesses to buy substandard US products.

GRID parity is within reach for PV and the prize down spiral is not going to stop there.

If you take a good look at the PV industry value chain there is lots of jobs and profits to be made besides producing panels.

And in the wider picture the entire power GRID needs a lot of smartgrid innovation in order to be able to encompass renewable energy and to secure US national security.

USA is the only industrialized country with an outdated GRID infrastructure that is exposed to solar flare, which could leave large parts of USA without electric power for month if not years with devasting worldwide consequences.

The success in China, India, Brazil etc. is not down to protectionism - quite contrary they were rotting away for decades until they embraced capitalism and opened their markets.

Their basis for success was and is an educated workforce.

Ignorance is very expensive for individuals and countries and USA scores very low on social mobility in OECD and high on teenage mothers because USA does not invest in middleclass kids.
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 17, 2012
We can and did start our solar install company on American manufactures. People are waking up to the deeper costs of exporting our industries to chase short-term cheap prices. As manufacturing, IT, software engineering, R^D etc have been offshored, the American middle class has been decimated. The opportunities for our children's future have been offshored, along with the local tax base and all the ripple jobs squelched as the corporations loyal to no country made billions, all under the free trade rules from the Congress they bought.
The wage and salary cost savings obtained by giving Americans' jobs to Chinese and Indians have enriched corporate CEOs, shareholders, and Wall Street at the expense of the middle class and America's consumer economy.
Leon Steward
Leon Steward
May 17, 2012
Sun2energy, this is a legit question. Are we not penalizing the Chinese in these bills for doing the exact same thing. Subsidizing American jobs on the labor of the Chinese people, when American PV installers gain wealth and start sucessfully companies because of the lower cost of PV and technological advances through Chinese manufacturing?
As I said, a legit question. I work with PV contractors. Blue collar, small buisness installers, and they have no complaints about the lower cost of Chinese modules that have provoked interest in PV as a viable option. Nor do their clients who can actually afford it now and see a reasonable ROI?
I'm not saying their aren't benefits of buying American, but I am saying when an American manufacture is leading this conversation he shouldn't be blind to his own bias.
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 17, 2012
From the interview with Ian Fletcher I linked above:

Libertarians simply don't know their history. Take out a $10 bill and have a look at the portrait on it. Alexander Hamilton, founding father and intellectual architect of American capitalism, was a protectionist, and protectionism was American policy from Independence until after WWII. The reality is that a blend of government support for economic growth along with vigorous market-oriented competition has been the American tradition from the transcontinental railroad to the Internet. Entire industries like semiconductors and aircraft were effectively launched by Cold War military industrial policy. Is it an accident that nations, like China, that still do this sort of thing are cleaning our clock right now?
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 17, 2012
The Brit is right. The US panel makers are doomed but the solar industry is at the verge of a historical boom. Do not through good money after bad money.

Since Adam Smith it has been a well-known fact that trade is good for economy and the protectionism kills economy.

If you dream of US companies on the forefront of the PV industry you need to ask yourself where are the production engineers, the tradition, the supply chain, the semiconductor industry etc. etc.

To get this infrastructure in place is a huge undertaking and US is starting form a very disadvantageous position relative to China, Brazil or India where the population is better educated within relevant engineering skills and ask lower wages.

More US youngsters decide to become lawyers and doctors than engineers so things does not appear to change for the better.

Steve Jobs wanted to produce in US but he had to think Apple first and Nation second.

You voted Cheney to office just when the ship was sailing in the PV industry, which was not a wise move if US renewable energy industry before fossil lobby influence was a priority.

The money spend on controlling oil sources in the middle east would have sufficed to secure a comfortable US lead in PV.

The US Iraqi embassy employ 15.000 people or roughly 5 times the number of engineers in Denmark working in the wind turbine industry.
Dave Stets
Dave Stets
May 17, 2012
Can we nitpick our way to a bright future?
It's been a long time since college and macroeconomics but the economy and energy are very complicate issues in our capitalistic society but for our children to have a bright future we need a comprehensive energy policy with short-term and long-term goals to get us there. And, hopefully we won't destroy the people who try to get us there.
BaBa Gates
BaBa Gates
May 17, 2012
For how long can the USA continue to subsidize the transfer of our wealth to China. At some point we will have no more wealth to transfer. What happens then?

As a tax payer I am adverse to being forced to subsidize Chinese jobs.

What do you think?
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 17, 2012
Wow Brit, can you get any more ideological and out of touch with reality? The whole history of industrial development in the USA and any other developed industrial country has been one of protectionism as part of a deliberate industrial policy.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-hughes/free-trade-doesnt-work-in_b_793593.html
John Cotten
John Cotten
May 17, 2012
John-Holder or others, please contact Alternative Energies Kentucky, LLC. Would love to have the chance to quote as an American PV manufacturer on your solar requirements.
John Cotten
AEK 859-236-7835
Yalani Camara
Yalani Camara
May 17, 2012
Petrol companies have subsidies, why not RE companies so they can be competitive at the international level.
Is that the truth?
Leon Steward
Leon Steward
May 17, 2012
I'm no Harvard grad, and I am a much greater lover of this country than mere 'enculturated nationalism' disguised as patriotism would boast of. I really believe keeping as much money within the community it takes from as possible. However..I think we need ' as Americans' to also hold to our historic moral worldview of honest and humble reflection even when it looks ugly, to draw from the historic precedent of liberty and innovation from which we were birthed. Flowing in all this patriotic dialogue, I can't help but notice an absolute ignorance of our 'whining'. The language of self pity and defeat sending us running to our government to balance the scale. It sounds too much like the ' 'exclusively positive policy' we see in public schools. A bunch of brats in need of a good old spanking being 'redirected' and positively challenged . Can any one else see that this has NOTHING to do with American jobs and everything to do with keeping the ever growing socialist government involved in 'trade' , which is by the way about as un-American as you can get.. We are so friken enculturated by the words we learn through strategic propaganda that we don't even realize the lack of logic in our reasoning. The involvement of government in buisness is never good for buisness. Never has been, and never will be. We should all be grateful for the unfair head start it gave to the industry and the cultural awareness it produced but it's time to drop the training wheels and ride the bike the rest of the way on liberty produced capitalism ( with intergrity and balance). We are never more 'Chinese' in our worldview then when we let government control our trade. This whole deal is all sounding like a mixed bag hypocrisy, with a denial of the contradictions. I could go on but I'll end with this statement; Make up your mind! Do you want grid parity or do you want higher cost American labor, because you cannot have both currently, without more of your tax dollars subsidizing it.
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 16, 2012
Well Jens I guess the choice is whether I care about my country or will just join the smash and grab that is wrecking it for short-term profits at the top. Your assumptions about the future of American manufacturing are based on continued Wall Street control of the government, which although highly likely, is too disgusting to accept. If enough people actually care then things can change. We care.
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 16, 2012
WillWilkin Chinese people improve standards of living in great leaps these years. People working in highly automated solar power production lines are educated and treasured workforce.

Do not imagine that they work under slave like conditions.

Next year US solar panel producers will trail even more hopelessly behind. Is it wise to sell products to your customers from companies that are threatened by extinction ?

Taiwan, Korea and Japan all have significant semiconductor production and used to be strong in solar power but they too are relocating production to mainland China.

Sharp who used to be number one in PV and number two in FPD cannot hold their ground. Much smaller and less funded US solar companies with less tradition, research capacity and market traction has to be absolutely brilliant, which is a label not many US solar companies deserve.
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 16, 2012
Well GreenSun, The future of our society is worth more than immediate thrift. Until the federal government begins to represent the people of the USA instead of the global corporations on Wall Street, our company Made In USA Solar LLC has our own trade policy. We are in the process of custom ordering fasteners from a local screw machine shop rather than pay 1/4 for taiwan imports. This stuff should be much cheaper they are stock items but set up is all the cost so we will buy a huge number of each piece. It is worth it to say that our company only installs materials MADE IN USA.
Glen Koedding
Glen Koedding
May 16, 2012
WillWilkin, I cant agree with you more --- We do need to make more in the USA! But, the Chinese government has invested heavily in automating these PV factories --- and from what i have been reading, labor is only a small fraction of the manufacturing cost. Again, there is a larger part of the economy at stake here --- if installers/integrators need to pay more per panel, what will happen to the installation market??? Will the consumer bear the price increase or will the market dry up??? Then we just killed two sectors with one set of legislation.
Will Wilkin
Will Wilkin
May 16, 2012
"Competing" with the near-slavery and pollution-friendliest countries of the world is not the way forward for US manufacturing. Its time our country adopted an industrial policy and a trade policy that brings prosperity and opportunity to our people once again.
John Holder
John Holder
May 16, 2012
I would prefer to sell "Made in the USA" panels but the US manufacturers won't give me the time of day. We operate in a niche market that requires custom made panels and go through 4 or 5 containers of product a year. I have been in contact with almost every US manufacturer asking them if they will build custom panels for us.

To a company, they all put you off and quit responding to e-mail and rarely (if ever) return calls. Some Chinese manufacturers will build whatever I want and stay in close contact with me through the whole process. Their customer service before, during and after the sale is unparalleled and their quality is second to none.

Those US manufacturers could take a lesson in customer service from the Chinese. If there is a made in the USA requirement, our company and its 9 employees would be forced out of business.
Glen Koedding
Glen Koedding
May 16, 2012
I am all for buying/installing products that are made in the USA. But, US Manufactures (and probably Union Labor) are not competitive in a "free market" --- even if China didn't subsidize the cost of their panels, i doubt that the US Manufacturers would be competitive. This is a dangerous point for solar installers and integrators... as we are constantly being pressured to reduce installation prices --- there just isn't anymore room to squeeze unless we start hiring un-documented/uninsured installation labor or outsourcing all of the administrative processing (that the state & local municipalities require) labor to India.

If this bill passes, we might as well kiss the short-to-medium term solar industry goodbye throughout the entire USA. Because if end consumers can't afford the installation --- there will not be any one to but the overpriced US panels.
ANONYMOUS
May 16, 2012
I like to see China dump some cheap heating oil to the US... No, really we should buy all the inexpensive solar panels we can from China and insure that we have a source of cheap energy for the future. We should use that savings to fund future research for more advanced technologies that will help us directly. Convert every school, university, hospital, government building, military base and commercial building to solar. Besides China already funds our national debt by buying all the Treasury debt so they might as well help with energy. We don't seem concerned that they are willing to buy our National debt at such low real rates - remember real low interest rates hurt all the mutual fund investors and fixed-income retirees and investors in the US! They might as well get cheaper energy in exchange!
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 16, 2012
Jim Starck good times will never return. There are no significant semiconductor production in US.

Solar cells require large investments and is a very tough business very much akin to the flat panel display business.

The US solar industry is inventive but they are never going to get ahead of the game unless they also can produce.

US skipped the window of opportunity when Clinton left office and oil prices slumped. At that time there were no chinese solar manufacturing industry and US could have leaped forward and have secured a strong position.

Anyway most blue collar jobs in the PV business is connected to marketing, installation and service.

Do you really want to spend tax payers money on subsidies that makes solar energy more expensive for millions of home owners and small industries and all the while prevent thousands of americans to get a job selling, installing and servicing price competitive chinese solar panels?

US solar power hegemony is just as likely as US flat panel display hegemony => it wont happen.

Do design, do research, do IPR on innovations, do building integration and you will see thousands of americans getting jobs directly in the solar business and more getting jobs due to the ripple effects in the US economy.

Coolsolarguy - US dumping is no worse than Chinese or German and vice versa. And if the chinese really are dumping PV prices then accept the gift.

The strange idea you have about the manufacture cost being higher than the sales price is not supported by any accepted analyst and anyhow thousands of companies run at a loss in some periods. What is happening is capitalism at work.
Michael Mayhew
Michael Mayhew
May 16, 2012
The 30% Federal tax Credit, isn't a tarrif, it's an incentive. The ARRA projects required made in US products to qualify, I don't believe that excluding Chinese modules, due to their dumping policies should be an issue to recieve the tax credit in the US. The price of PV has dropped below the cost of manufacturing the product. Excluding Chinese PVs should keep or manufactures in business until the Chinese gov stops subsidizin g their industry. Our installed costs in the US will still be a bargain.
Jim Stack
Jim Stack
May 16, 2012
We want to encourage manufactures to locate in the USA. A few have already folded so this is late but welcome. Evergreen solar was one of the best in the world and US located with string ribbon panels. Too bad this wasn't in time for them.

Sunpower is the best in the world with HQ in California but panels made in the Philippines. Don't cut them off until you give them time to locate in the USA for manufacturing. It's the cheap China panels we have to stop.
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 16, 2012
Get a grip.

US solar industry does not become competitive by selective subsidies.

US solar industry is more than panel manufacturers.

Panel down prize spiral has now entered the typical semiconductor down prize spiral and will continuously drop at least 20% for many years to come.

Do these senators really believe that US producers of solar panels should be able to prevent thousands of blue collar workers from having a job installing solar panels and millions of house owners from getting a fair prized solar installation.

Win the innovation race fair and square or leave the business. There are simply too many producers and they are not focused enough on running a tight ship so they cannot stay competitive.

US solar industry has a lot of valuable IPR but no real knowledge of how to set up multi billion semiconductor production as this type of industry left the country decades ago.

Foolish protectionism will only put a dent in the market.

If they want to mend US trade deficit they should campaign for a revaluation of the Renminbi so Chinese products become more expensive.
Christopher Meier
Christopher Meier
May 16, 2012
Is yingli solar required to pay a tariff to advertise Chinese panels in a banner at the top of this webpage?
Jay Gr.
Jay Gr.
May 16, 2012
Yeah, 'When Ontario implemented its Feed-in tariff in 2009, a domestic manufacturing requirment was put in place prompting many companies to locate manufacturing plants in the region.'...and then they realized that domestic content requirement is in violation of The North American Free Trade Agreement ('NAFTA').
So the U.S State Dept. filed a complaint, and Canada already knows Ontario is in violation, and will have to replace the 'Domestic Content Requirement' with a 'North American Content Requirement', (or no content requirement at all) to be in line with the NAFTA agreement WHICH THEY HELPED WRITE.
So in the mean time, they are using every stall tactic they can come up with to delay the official court decision, knowing full well they will lose.

So all this begs two questions: 1. How do these two Senators expect their 'U.S. parts only' domestic requirement law to stick? Can't they see their hypocrisy in all this?
2. How is it this dumb, blue collar joe (me) apparently knows more about federal trade law, than a couple of U.S. Senators? Can someone please explain this to me?
William Fitch
William Fitch
May 15, 2012
Hi: Yep, give tax breaks etc. to the 2.4T$ O&G industry, zero interest loans to the Nuclear industry, and pile taxes on the RE markets, more negatives to implement, etc. anything to slow down installs... Yes, our elected officials know who their DADDY is... and hide behind fair trade as an excuse... yes, yes, business as usual... I wonder if China was dumping petro or CH4 on the US if anyone would complain..

.....Bill

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Steve Leone

Steve Leone

Steve Leone has been a journalist for more than 15 years and has worked for news organizations in Rhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia and California.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 4
    Women in Power – It’s a Natural Fit
  • 4
    Renewable Energy in Myanmar: Not Just Clean, It’s Necessary
  • 3
    Big Apple Anticipates Solar Explosion for 2013

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Festo
  • Navigant
  • ReneSola
  • Active Communications International
  • Johnson Controls, Inc.
  • Solar Site Design
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • Reed Exhibitions
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information