The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? ×

Offshore Wind: Making an American Industry, Part 1

Northeastern states taking the lead in the race to build the country's first offshore wind farm.

Steve Leone, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
May 11, 2012  |  10 Comments

Positioned between the affluent of Martha's Vineyard to the east and the well-heeled of The Hamptons to the west, Block Island has always been more of a casual paradise, a place for blue collar workers to make summertime memories and sea-loving residents to enjoy the solitude of the other three seasons.

The island mentality has rarely been defined as cutting edge, preferring instead the ideal of self-reliance. The island, though, has long had a problem. Gone are the days when timber and native peat powered the homes of the earliest settlers. For generations, the island has had to look to the mainland to help power its placid lifestyle.

It’s become a central issue for isolated residents, but until recently those on the mainland never fully appreciated the laborious path needed to bring electricity to the island. On schedule, truckloads of diesel fuel drive into the belly of a passenger ferry where they are shipped 12 miles to port. From there, the trucks are unloaded and they go make their deliveries. Then, it’s back to the mainland — once again on the back of the ferry.

With electricity rates that have hit as high as 60 cents per kilowatt hour — about five or six times higher than the national average — Block Island finds itself vulnerable to the volatile nature of oil prices, especially during the summer months when peak load on the island quadruples to about 4 megawatts (MW).

While Martha’s Vineyard and Cape Wind have garnered the most headlines — and the most vocal protests — for an ambitious 454-MW wind farm that has federal approval in the heart of Nantucket Sound, Block Island has moved ahead relatively quickly, at least as far as American offshore wind projects go.

A recent Rhode Island Supreme Court ruling upheld a signed power purchase agreement (PPA) with National Grid. The developer, Deepwater Wind, is hoping for final permits to clear as soon as the end of this year or early in 2013. If that final hurdle is cleared, blades could be spinning three miles off Block Island’s south shore by 2014.

And that would be a first for the American offshore wind market, which has stacks of reports detailing its vast potential but zero installations that will help the market draw international players to the region. Cape Wind has led this battle for years, and it is still in position to become the first large-scale project in coastal waters. But it’s been a long haul of objections, lawsuits, federal rulings and negotiations for PPAs. The project has agreements in place for three-quarters of the power it would produce, and now it is working toward securing the financing needed to begin construction in 2013. On that pace, Cape Wind would start producing power by 2015.

By then, the U.S. offshore market would be even farther behind Europe, which is quickly developing into a manufacturing — and power-generating — force. By the end of 2011, Europe already had 1,371 turbine in its waters totaling more than 3,813 MW, more than 2,000 of which were in the UK. There’s even been recent milestones reached with two full-scale grid-connected floating turbines.

The First One In

All new industries have a first, and it’s been a race of sort to get “wet steel.” The Block Island project is small by most standards, though it’s quite large measured by Block Island’s power needs. The project, which started as an eight-turbine, 28.8-MW wind farm in 2008, has morphed into a five-turbine, 30-MW project that will utilize 6-MW Siemens offshore wind turbines that have just recently reached the market. Transmission lines will feed from the project site to the island, which will then be connected to the mainland grid. The project itself will represent about 1 percent of the state’s power capacity. So even though the prices determined by the PPA — 24.4 cents per kWh in its first year with slight increases each year after that — are far higher than those coming from natural gas and nuclear resources, the average customer can expect to see monthly bills go up between $1 and $3.

But to measure the importance of the first offshore wind project by size or PPA would miss the entirety of what the burgeoning offshore wind industry is working to achieve. The Block Island project is sizable, and yes, it will certainly be visible to those on the island’s south shore. But in governor’s offices from Maine to Virginia, the real goal is to create a new and vibrant industry, one that would be based on the East Coast and one that would build manufacturing and fuel innovation. Like the shipyards and ports that helped make the East Coast an economic hub, an offshore wind industry based on maritime tradition hopes to cash in on the promise of clean energy.

Europe is about a decade ahead in this respect. It has taken slow, methodical steps as it builds out with bigger turbines in deeper waters. The American wind industry hopes to use the European knowledge base as a springboard to massive-scale projects that push the edge of existing technology.

This is in some respects already being done with Deepwater’s Block Island project, which will go in 100 feet of water, a deep dive even by European standards. The real advantages, though, will come when large-scale projects are achieved. That’s the goal of governors across the Atlantic seaboard. That’s the goal of the federal departments that are trying to clear the way for such projects. That’s certainly the goal for Deepwater Wind, which is vying for a federal lease 25 miles off the Rhode Island and Massachusetts shore for a project that could use 200 turbines and surpass 1 gigawatt in scale. Such a project would be many times larger than even the biggest installed wind farm in Europe.

“It’s frustrating [seeing what Europe is accomplishing], but there’s also an opportunity because of it,” said Jeffrey Grybowski of Deepwater Wind. “Because of the investment they’ve made, a huge supply chain has been built and innovation has been set up. The U.S. can now proceed with large-scale projects because of the legwork that was done in Europe. Now, even a moderate pace of building will attract infrastructure and manufacturing.”

Wind Areas Up for Grabs

Deepwater Wind is among a handful of companies hoping to secure a federal lease in the area south of New England, which is prized for the strong consistent winds that made the waters the longtime home of the international America’s Cup sailing race. The area is just one of many swaths of open water that have been or are under consideration to become designated as potential wind farm sites. These federal lease sites already include large areas off the coasts of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia. The Department of the Interior’s self-dubbed “Smart from the Start” initiative aims to streamline the siting and permitting process by creating wind energy areas that would help serve some of the major population centers of the East Coast.

From the federal government’s point of view, the potential is too great to ignore. The initiative hopes to calm the bureaucratic waters in pursuit of an end goal of 10 GW of offshore wind by 2020 and 54 GW by 2030. The scale is just one part of the story. The obvious concern for those in and out of the industry is the cost of electricity. The DOI’s goal includes this as a fundamental part of its modeling, and if its goals are reached, offshore wind prices would be more than competitive enough to spark further investment. The department is looking to get consumer costs down to 10 cents per kWh by 2020 and 7 cents per kWh by 2030. Getting there will require some steady navigation.

Check back Monday for part two of this feature. 

10 Comments

Register To Comment
Chris Kapsambelis
Chris Kapsambelis
May 29, 2012
Bob:

Here is what my engineers tell me:

Denmark has gained their high level of penetration because they are able to export excess wind energy to Norway and Sweden who can store energy in pumped-hydro plants and sell it back to them when they need it. They sell low and buy high. Denmark is unique and not easily repeatable anywhere else.

Bridging the future development of energy storage with natural gas still only leads to a penetration level of about 25%., and until or if an environmentally suitable energy storage sytem is developed we will be stuck with a grid that is dependent almost exclusively on a single fuel source. So much for diversifying the grid to all of the above!

In the meantime, in the absence of utility scale storage we will be stuck with a bridge system that generates almost as much carbon as if we ran on natural gas alone, and probably more than twice as expensive.
Bob "The Clean Energy Guy" Mitchell
Bob "The Clean Energy Guy" Mitchell
May 29, 2012
Chris: While no country as achieved a 30% penetration level for wind (Denmark is close with 28%), there should be no reason that with beefing up the grid to better transmit power from greater distances, that levels above 30% cannot be effectively and efficiently achieved.

That's not to say that it will be easy, but it can be done.

In the long run it is reasonable to expect that utility scale storage systems will be developed that will enhance grid operators ability to incorporate high levels of wind into their systems. In the mean time, natural gas can be used to bridge us to the time that we won't need it. As I mentioned above, such a hybrid system isn't perfect, but half a loaf is better than no loaf at all!

I don't know about what those engineers are telling you, but one of the up sides of natural gas as a peeker/leveler fuel is that it ramps up quickly and can even be made quicker by pre-heating the water via solar thermal technology ~344 TWh of electricity and gas still producing about 1/2 of the carbon emissions of coal, I don't see any way that they could be right.

Bert: To answer your question, there are currently 83 countries in the world that utilize wind power to commercially generate electricity.

The science and the math have been around for generations and the technology is only getting better. Also, the energy payback from a wind turbine is only about 3 - 4 years (depending upon which study you look at).

There's a reason that world wide adoption of wind has been growing at double digit rates...that's because it works and it's cost effective! When you consider the external costs of fossil fuels (approximately 120 BILLION dollars per year)wind is a bargain!

Bob "The Clean Energy Guy" Mitchell
Gerard Vaughan
Gerard Vaughan
May 29, 2012
Question. Who is investing whose money in so-called Windfarms when it is clear that their money will never be returned by the farms themselves, but only by subsidies from the energy sources they blatantly purport to replace, or avoid !
So-called "Turbines", to supply energy to anything, must include an Alternator. It is a simple fact that turbines and alternators have opposite "economies of size". A system using one of each will therefore have a cost per watt, or per square metre, which bears a necklace - catenery - shaped relationship to physical SIZE. Yes, Size matters. A lot !. The lowest cost is the sizes where the T costs about the same as the A. This occurs at around .3 to 1m diameter, and that is a simple and inescapeable - but not widely known ! Fact. Doubl;e the size and replace 4 and the T-bill will double but the A-bill will halve, in my experience. There are 3 other major facts which account for why the current bad jokes are about 40 times the cost per watt as compared to a serious design. A serious design can provide 5 or 10 - possible a little more - percent of its cost, per annum, and therefore such a system will grow without energy from other sources
Chris Kapsambelis
Chris Kapsambelis
May 17, 2012
Free:
The studies you refer to are doubtless based on computer modeling which depend on assumptions. I am referring to calculations based on actual operational data from grids with significant wind energy penetration.

Also there is a penetration limit related to wind's capacity factor. As the penetration factor approaches the capacity factor about 30%, the rest of the grid will need to be supplied only with flexible power from natural gas. At times of minimum demand the grid would be powered almost entirely from wind with firming support from natural gas turbines running under partial or no load.

Some engineers claim that running the grid on natural gas alone could be done with enough increased efficiency to avoid as much carbon emissions as with the combination of wind and natural gas.
Bob "The Clean Energy Guy" Mitchell
Bob "The Clean Energy Guy" Mitchell
May 17, 2012
Anon: $0.60/kW-hr is the price of electricity on block island, where they are burning diesel fuel to generate electricity. This isn't the case in most other places in the US.

Geno: You've hit the nail on the head. We don't really have an energy problem or a food problem, we have a population problem! The bad thing about that is we as a species seem to have little ability to reign in our population growth. Really similar to a cancer cell, if you think about it???

So, while I agree with you that we need to seriously address population, it really doesn't seem very likely that we will. In the mean time, harvesting energy from the wind is by far one of the cleanest, safest, and environmentally friendly way to power the needs of the people that are here.

Gene81 and ChrisKapsambelis: I have done the research! While wind energy isn't perfect, as I said above, it's by far one of the cleanest,safest and environmentally friendly way to produce electricity.

Gene, your statement that wind increases CO2 emissions is simply wrong! Multiple studies, done by independent, objective sources have consistently showed that wind turbines 'pay' back their energy inputs in less than 4 years of operation; most of the time less.

Regarding the need for backup during periods when the wind isn't blowing, this is a true statement. However, the intermittent nature of wind can be engineered around by beefing up the grid so that energy can be transported from where the wind is blowing. Also, just as a hybrid car reduces the need for gasoline, a wind turbine with backup lessens the need for that backup fuel. In essence, half a loaf is better than no loaf!

On top of that, we are getting very close to utility scale energy storage and when we get the kinks worked out, the need for fossil fuel backup will be lessened.

Bob 'The Clean Energy Guy' Mitchell
Chris Kapsambelis
Chris Kapsambelis
May 17, 2012
If misguided Europe wants to commit economic suicide by forcing 4 times as expensive, intermittent, variable, and valueless wind energy on their people, fine. Hopefully, our system of governance is strong enough to avoid such stupid mistakes.

A recent MIT symposium on the integration of wind energy on the grid has exposed the very high cost for the overblown benefits claimed by the wind industry.

The race to develop wind energy is a race to the bottom. Let Europe win!
Marie Burton
Marie Burton
May 16, 2012
Not content with destroying land now its thw ocean and sea creatures. These are industrial turbines being built larger because they cannot supply the electricity needed but they still add to CO2 emissions and rising costs due to the fact they need backup from some other source e.g. coal, gas etc. There are far better ways for renewable energy but definitely not wind. DO THE RESEARCH doont take my word for it.
Gene Masters
Gene Masters
May 16, 2012
I thought America had loads of space so why need to go out into the seas - oh yes because America is filling up with people just like everywhere else.
We need population restraint and consideration as a society rather than just destroying yet another natural environment with yet another technical short term solution.
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
May 13, 2012
With long coast US can go in for offshore wind farms in a big way.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
ANONYMOUS
May 13, 2012
I'm a bit confused.

If utility power rates along the NE coast are as high as $0.60/kW-hr, and offshore wind power can currently be produced for less than $0.20/kW-hr, then why would the $0.02/kW-hr federal PTC be such a big deal, as many claim? Even if the federal PTC were 10 times that amount, losing it would still seem to make offshore wind development along the US NE coast hugely profitable.

Please tell me what I'm missing.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Steve Leone

Steve Leone

Steve Leone has been a journalist for more than 15 years and has worked for news organizations in Rhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia and California.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 5
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School
  • 5
    Ireland Keen to Hit 2030 Renewable Targets, Says EU Ambassador

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Navigant
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Second Wind Inc.
  • Blue Sky Energy, Inc.
  • Active Communications International
  • Everblue
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • Admirals Bank
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information