The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

How Enphase Energy is Staying Ahead of Its Microinverter Competitors

Ucilia Wang, Contributing Editor
May 11, 2012  |  13 Comments

A year after the company outlined an attack plan to hold on to its lead in the microinverter business, Enphase Energy still reigns but is gearing up for a year when competitors plan to ship new models.

The California company shipped 292,000 microinverters, or 62MW, during first quarter of this year, said Sanjeev Kumar, Enphase’s chief financial officer, during a conference call with financial analysts last week. The company began shipping products to Europe late last year and has since pulled off an initial public offering, which it needed to raise money to stay ahead of competiton.

The California company launched its third-generation product last June and now has staff in China to work on deals with manufacturers to attach Enphase’s microinverters to their solar panels before shipping them to customers. Some panel makers already announced plans to do so, including Upsolar and Hanwha SolarOne, and the market should see these integrated solar panels this year.

“There is a rapid and industry-wide shift away from central inverters,” said Paul Nahi, CEO of Enphase Energy, during a conference call to discuss the company’s earnings last week.

Microinverters are an alternative choice to central inverters for converting direct current from solar panels into alternating current to feed the electric grid. Instead of pairing a central inverter with, say, a dozen solar panels, installers attach a microinverter at the back of each solar panel.

A microinverter not only does power conversion but also monitors the power output of each solar panel, and it can make tweaks to optimize each panel’s energy production. Enphase and other microinverter makers offer monitoring services to customers by crunching a heavy load of field data – 100 gigabytes everyday, Nahi said.  The technology is more commonly found in rooftop residential systems. Enphase said that the ability of its microinverters to improve the performance of solar panels more than makes up for their higher price tags.

A central inverter can do that, too, but because it is in charge of a bunch of solar panels, its calculations are influenced by the lowest-performing panels. If an array is partly in the shade, for example, then the optimal energy output of that entire array will be more on par with the output of the lower performing panels. Centralized inverters tend to cost less, and they have accrued more long-term field data to prove their reliability. 

Microinverters still occupy a tiny piece of the inverter market, and how well Enphase can expand its reach provides a good indicator of the technology’s adoption. The company, founded in 2006, began shipping microinverters in the summer of 2008 and has enjoyed a first-mover advantage.

Being first to the market, of course, wouldn’t mean much if a company isn’t able to market and sell its new technology effectively. Enphase doubled its first-quarter sales to $42.6 million, up 136 percent from $18.1 million from a year ago. It narrowed its losses to $10.2 million, or $5.97 per share, compared with $9.3 million, or $10.95 per share, from the first quarter of 2011. Shipment grew to 292,000 microinverters from 123,000 a year ago.

The U.S. remains a key market for the company. California represents nearly 30 percent of Enphase’s sales in the residential market and 19 percent in the light commercial market, Nahi said. Overall, the state makes up roughly a quarter of the company’s sales, he added.

Although the residential market is the segment where microinverters are thriving, its growing reliance on leases or power purchase agreements also has worked against microinverter developers.  Nahi acknowledged that providers of solar leases or power purchase agreements tend to shy away from microinverters because they add to the upfront installation costs.

While Nahi said his company is working on reducing costs, he also said Enphase doesn’t necessary have to be the lowest-cost provider to stay ahead of competition. He also noted that the big drop in solar panel pricing, while terrible for solar panel makers, is great news for installers. And that could help microinverter sales, he said. It'd be interesting to see whether installers and their project financing firms will be more willing to tag on the cost of microinverters now that solar panels are taking up a smaller share of the cost of an installation. 

Competition will heat up, though, as more companies enter the microinverter market. SMA Solar Technology showed off a microinverter last fall and said it would start shipping it this year. Power-One introduced its own version last year. SunPower announced plans to package microinverters from Texa-based SolarBridge Technologies to its solar panels. Aside from SolarBridge, companies that make only microinverters include Enecsys from the United Kingdom. 

13 Comments

Register To Comment
Solar Trader
Solar Trader
November 10, 2012
We are an installer based out of Pickering Ontario and have installed over 1000 Enphase units. We have only had 1 failure immediately after installation which Enphase took care of quickly. We had installed the Enphase Enlighten monitoring system for that job and a technician from Enphase was able to diagnose the problem remotely from their head office and replace the defective inverter. We have never had a problem since. I believe Luis is interested in seeing the going rate for these units to end users so here is a link http://www.solartrader.ca/Enphase_Micro_Inverters.
Peter Sommerfeld
Peter Sommerfeld
September 10, 2012
I'd like to know if/when Enphase is coming out with an inverter that's > 215W. With people installing 260 W panels in good inclination, isn't there a need for this?
John Hammiller
John Hammiller
September 2, 2012
I have 18 Enphase inverters on my roof. In less than 3 years I have had to replace two of them and now a third has failed. This seems like a high failure rate to me.
Maury Markowitz
Maury Markowitz
August 9, 2012
12 Enphase on my roof, zero failures in 2.5 years. Of the hundreds I've installed I've had one fail.
John Schaefer
John Schaefer
August 9, 2012
I like the theoretical idea of microinverters for all the standard reasons. But in the case of enphase their reliability is apparently overstated. In the first two years I've had 5 out of 9 fail. Location is coastal California, where temperatures are not high. Fortunately enphase has good customer service. They fixed three by downloading new software (but why wasn't that software in the original equipment?) and replaced two promptly with new units. Empirical data don't support an MTBF of 300 years.
ANONYMOUS
May 21, 2012
I like the idea of microinverters, but not the reality. First, putting electronics in a high temperature environment (behind panels) is bad practice. The best claim 300 years MTBF, but if you do the match, that means multiple failing modules in only a few years. Given the effort to get up on a roof and change a panel out, it does not seem very cost effective. I think there is a place for them because of all the known advantages, but would only want them on installation where access is very easy. And that is assuming they are cost competitive including the efficiency - and they have room to go before that will be the case.
Maury Markowitz
Maury Markowitz
May 17, 2012
"they are more exposed to the extremes of weather than central inverters"

I don't think this is an actual problem. The M215 is, quite literally, a solid block of epoxy tightly wrapped in a solid aluminum shell. Meanwhile the Power-One or SMA is mostly empty inside. Of the two, I would posit that micros are *far* less susceptible to basic weathering events.

And sure, the temperature differences might sound wild, but only if you consider them using the wrong scale… electronics respond to absolute temperature, not an artificial scale we invented to be easy to remember. My roof goes from about 260 to about 310 Kelvin over the course of a year, a change of about 20%, and much less day-to-day. Doesn't sound so worrying by that measure, does it?

"high failure rates up in Canada"

I've installed hundreds of these in Canada, and our failure rate is 1. We have also installed a small number of string inverters (always smaller in number, because there's only one per system) and our failure rate is 1. Meanwhile our panel failure rate is 3. My experience is typical, and there are well over 1000 Enphase systems in Ontario (more than California). I don't have any complaints about Enphase's QA or DOA rates, and their service was *amazing*.

As I noted in my blog post, I'm much less interested in the *failure rate* as I am in the *expected lifetime*. Those two are *not* related in any direct fashion.

On the other hand, I will point out that Enphase boxes "complain" a lot, sending their owners lots of emails about very minor issues that sound worrying.
Jay Gr.
Jay Gr.
May 17, 2012
Though I have sold many microinverters, they do have an inherent problem: they are more exposed to the extremes of weather than central inverters, since they are typically mounted on the roof with the solar panels. Some of the field installers I talk to on a regular basis are reporting high failure rates up in Canada & in the northeastern states, places where the weather tends to see more extremes of both cold and heat. One of them told me that over 90% of their service calls are to replace malfunctioning microinverters.

Central inverters on the other hand, are usually mounted in more protected areas, like inside a garage or shop. All electronic components will last longer when not exposed to temperature extremes.
So I guess the challenge now is for microinverter manufacturers to make their products more 'hardy', able to take the extremes that nature can dish out... without malfunctioning.
Jeremy Hufft
Jeremy Hufft
May 16, 2012
Yes Luis, feel free to contact me at jeremy@tophatenergy.com for more info, but the Enphase M215 system is usually about $.35/watt more than the central inverter systems, depending one what central inverter and how the system divides into the enphase wiring system with 17 per feedback breaker. Only 1 energy mgt unit is needed for the system so they do tend to get more economical moving from say a 2.5 kw to a 7kw system.
Luis Mendes
Luis Mendes
May 15, 2012
Could anyone tell me what is the final customer price of these microinverters? Thanks. Luis
Maury Markowitz
Maury Markowitz
May 14, 2012
When people ask about the price I point out some of the more obvious things - the M215 has two MC4's and one of those T-cables, while the Power-One three-phase I just hung has four MC4's. So Enphase has to divide that fixed cost over 215 watts, and P1 gets to do it over 10,000 watts.

As a result, all the fixed costs are nasty in the micro, and there's not much you can do about it "up front". What you can do is build *lots* of them to drive your BOM costs down and get efficiency into the line. But haven't they had a chance to do that already? Or maybe they're just waiting for the SMA's and P1's to come in and then slash the prices...
D Rees
D Rees
May 14, 2012
I'm with you, Maury, and I'm a big micro fan with a bunch of them on the roof and would buy them again over central inverters, but the high price compared to central inverters definitely reduces sales.

Enphase needs to figure out how to reduce the price with a road to profitability to make it long term. Losing $10M/quarter despite doubling sales doesn't inspire long-term confidence. But I'm sure they know this already, I just have to wonder what they have hidden up their sleeves to make this a reality.
Maury Markowitz
Maury Markowitz
May 14, 2012
The introduction of the M215 was Enphase's chance to demonstrate that it could scale production so that costs would become competitive. The per-unit price appeared to do this at first glance, but once that terribly expensive cabling system is factored in the price is almost the same per watt as the older M190.

During that same period of time, the price of string inverters fell dramatically Right now on a per-watt basis you're looking at prices points at least 1/3rd lower, and perhaps as much as 1/2.

Yes, I'm fully aware of the advantages of the micro concept - I have them on my roof - but the change in pricing over the last two years has rendered much of this advantage moot.

I've written long-form on this if anyone is willing to slog through it:

http://matter2energy.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/the-great-microinverter-debate/

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Ucilia Wang

Ucilia Wang

Ucilia Wang is a California-based freelance journalist who writes about renewable energy. She previously was the associate editor at Greentech Media and a staff writer covering the semiconductor industry at Red Herring. In addition to Renewable...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 55
    Energy Expert Predicts Solar Could Upend Major Utility in California on Price
  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Solar Power International 2013
  • Blue Sky Energy, Inc.
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • Fairtrade-Messe
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Parker Hannifin - Precision Cooling Systems
  • Unirac, Inc.
  • CleanEdison
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information