The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Biogas Technology: "Cow Power" Catching On in US

Bruce Dorminey, Contributor
April 04, 2012  |  22 Comments

Print

For years, third world ranchers have been using methane from manure to run electrical generators down on the farm. This clean-burning biogas is not only a good local fuel in countries with little or no infrastructure, now even countries like the U.S. are reaping energy from this foul-smelling source.

Some 80 percent of the estimated 160 biogas energy projects in the U.S. are currently installed on dairy farms, which then combust the gas to generate electricity.  The combined installed capacity of all dairy farm projects is nearly 60 MW.

It’s a complicated process. First the farms have to facilitate both the production and collection of biogas in anaerobic digesters.  These are processing systems that allow methanogenic bacteria to feed on the manure’s natural acids in a very oxygen-depleted environment.  In turn, the bacteria both generate methane-rich biogas and reduce the manure’s foul odor by as much as 90 percent.  

After collection from storage systems such as covered lagoons — akin to large swimming pools very nearly brimming with manure — this gas is usually piped to an electrical power generator.  

Although a large portion of the U.S.’ biogas energy projects are found in New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Wisconsin, they represent only a fraction of the estimated 8,000 farms out there that could support some method of biogas energy production.  By some estimates, the total electrical capacity of all these farms could range as high as 1,600 MW.  But that's still only a fraction of the U.S.' current electricity needs.

To date, Vermont has been a standout.  Since 2002, Central Vermont Public Service, the state’s largest utility, has delivered over 47 million kWh of local “Cow Power” to some 3 percent of its 160,000 customers.

Dave Dunn, an animal scientist with the Vermont utility, says that while its cow power customers are mostly homeowners, they also have 200 non-residential customers, from a gas station to a brewery to Green Mountain College in Poultney.  The college now gets about half of its monthly electricity (100,000 kWh) from the utility’s biogas energy program.

Dunn says the 10 farms that currently are part of the cow power program have a total estimated capacity of 3.5 MW.  All of this energy is fed back into the electrical grid.  On average, Dunn says a 1,000 cow dairy has a capacity of some 250 kW.  That’s enough cow power to provide the electrical energy for as many as 250 Vermont homes. As a result, biogas power now makes up 10 percent of the utility’s current energy mix.  

“This is really last year’s solar energy and a way to store solar [carbon] energy in crops that a cow doesn’t fully utilize and is excreted and turned into biogas,” said Dunn.  “We’re using about a fifth of all cow manure in Vermont.”

But the program is still not a panacea for the farmer.  After grants, the farm still has to pay for more than half the cost of an average $2 million dollar digester project, which would usually be amortized over a 10-year period.  However, gross income from biogas energy for a 1000-head farm averages only $300,000 a year, about 7.5 percent of a dairy’s total gross revenue.  Given that the life expectancy of a given system runs only about 20 years, biogas energy installation is not without financial risk. 

“Because dairy farming profits vary quite drastically with the price of milk, it’s hard for farms to invest in something other than their primary business,” said Dunn.  “Becoming an energy producer is not typically what farms think about doing.” 

Barring conversion to electricity, another likely scenario for biogas energy production involves cleaning the gas to meet commercial standards and pumping it into a nearby natural gas pipeline.

A project underway in western Wisconsin is trying to do just that.  Agri-Waste Energy, Inc. Of St. Paul, Minnesota, has already successfully demonstrated delivery of biogas from an Emerald, Wisconsin dairy into an existing natural gas pipeline.   

The next step is installation of two separate digesters on farms in western Wisconsin.  Bob Zwald, co-owner of Bomaz farms in Hammond, will allow Agri-Waste Energy to build and own a digester on his 1000 cow dairy.  From there, the gas would be extracted and sent through a pipeline before being directed into a commercial natural gas network. 

“Now our manure is stored in a clay-lined pit and injected into the soil as fertilizer,” said Zwald.  “Agri-Waste Energy would pay us a stipend for extracting the biogas and afterwards we would still be able to use the manure.” 

The Agri-Waste project, expected to cost several million dollars, may see fruition next year, when it is expected to begin producing an estimated 1000 dekatherms of methane gas daily. 

Even while agricultural manure holds promise, there may be even more biogas energy potential from food waste than manure. 

Dunn says that ice cream, yogurt, cheese, waste milk and anything else that has a sugar, starch or fat component all have great biogas energy potential.  

“In the U.S., what’s yet to move forward with [biogas energy] is leftover consumer waste,” said Dunn, “stuff from cafeterias, restaurants and grocery stores; the old doughnuts, the leftover steak and mash potatoes on somebody’s plate.”

But that could also be changing.  Since 2011, the University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh has been operating a $3.5 million digester that uses a combination of agricultural waste, yard waste, supermarket waste — even waste from the campus food court.  When the digester goes into full production in April, it should process some 8,000 tons of organics annually providing as much as 10 percent of the university’s electricity needs.

As Becky Larson, a bio-waste engineer at the University of Wisconsin in Madison points out:  “We’re at the cusp of finding a way to make these biogas energy systems profitable,” noting that she expects the biogas market to be pushed along by the continuing emphasis on sustainability; high costs of competing energies; and concern over reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Image: Dudarev Mikhail via Shutterstock

22 Comments

Register To Comment
Lawrence Carroll
Lawrence Carroll
June 4, 2012
DavidWHouse, most of those (I hope) who have experience with humanure are well aware of the need for thermophilic composting - or any heating to kill pathogens - and your point is an excellent one! Thus, on an institutional level where human wastes are added to animal waste for methane extraction, the solution(s) should be easy. Either use some of the methane extracted to heat the leftover, methane-free effluent to kill the harmful bacteria, or use passive solar methods.

Those who have experience with solar "box" ovens are well aware of how hot the chambers in these devices can get. The popular "global sun oven" easily gets over 350 - 450 degrees, which is hotter than what is needed to kill harmful bacteria. Thus a chamber designed like one of these cheap, easily-made sun cookers - but scaled up many times over - could (for free) "cook the shit" and render it harmless in a very short period of time . . . ! :)
william hughes
william hughes
June 3, 2012
If the electricity is generated by a diesel engine or special biogas engine powering a generator, the waste heat from the engine can be used to heat the large quantities of hot water used in the dairy farm and even in an adjoining milk processing facility. When this is done, the whole process approaches about 70% efficiency
David House
David House
April 17, 2012
Bruce,

Yes, I realized that the article did not deal with humanure, but several of those who commented seemed enthusiastic about it...

Differences with animal manure? Adding human wastes to a digester turns all the effluent into a biohazard, basically, because so many parasites and pathogens complete their life cycle from soil to mouth. The easiest way to make the effluent safe as it comes from the digester is to engage in thermophilic digestion, or terribly long retention times at mesophilic temperatures.

Thus parasites and pathogens are the issue therewith, but as regards the biology otherwise, there is no great difference. Humanure provides the least biogas per "animal unit" of any critter from which the manure is commonly made into biogas, and as you know, most of the municipal sewage worldwide is handled by AD.

Regarding AgSTAR, right on the home page it says that "U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's AgSTAR Program is a voluntary outreach and educational program that promotes the recovery and use of methane _from animal manure_." (Emphasis added.) There are two people (last I talked with them) who run the program, and they maintain that they simply do not have the resources to expand the definition of the digesters that interest them.


David
Bruce Dorminey
Bruce Dorminey
April 17, 2012
David, thanks for your comment above. Offhand, I can't confirm exactly how AgSTAR collects their statistics; you may be correct about the silage issue. That said, this article did not deal with the issue of biogas from solid human waste. From my understanding, there are totally different challenges to reaping the benefits of biogas from solid human waste than biogas generated solely from Ag waste.
David House
David House
April 17, 2012
Bruce,

The article says that "Some 80 percent of the estimated 160 biogas energy projects in the U.S. are currently installed on dairy farms..."

I assume that this figure comes from the AgSTAR data, but if so, it is useful to realize that AgSTAR only searches for or lists _manure-fed_ farm digesters-- that is, not even all _farm_ digesters-- and certainly not "all" US biogas projects.

For example, the large digester at Stahlbush Island Farms is not and will not be listed by AgSTAR, because it is exclusively fed plant matter (silage from the crop wastes from the better part of their 5,000 acre operation).

Regardless, that paltry figure contrasts with the situation in Germany, where there are reported to be over 6,000 farm-scale digesters, remembering that Germany has about a third of the US population.

We have a long way to go in exploiting this resource.

Also, as regards humanure, some previous posters may not realize that the wastes from one adult will only produce about a cubic foot of biogas a day, providing ~600 BTU, which is about the equivalent of the energy either of us generates just sitting quietly for an hour. Not a whopping lot.

David House, author "The Complete Biogas Handbook", www.completebiogas.com
Dr.Jay Sampat MD
Dr.Jay Sampat MD
April 17, 2012
Haase energy in Germany has been a pioneer in installing bio gas plants all across Germany, Spain, Malta etc. Although they use corn in Germany, one of the plants installed in S.Africa uses tomato waste to produce energy. These are containerized and easy to assemble in any given place.See http://www.haase-energietechnik.de/en/Products_and_Services/Energy_Systems/
In India there is a small company which installs small bio gas plants.See http://www.biotech-india.org/.
As Mr.Haridas Rao mentioned above, small steps taken by individual home owner will go a long way to decrease the demand for fossil fuel.
Currently we are in the process of incorporating solar thermal and bio gas to produce food for every day use and to be self sufficient.
Rick Engebretson
Rick Engebretson
April 8, 2012
Dr. Nellore, your co-digestion concept is very interesting.

Soil enhancement and carbon sequestration with biochar is discussed. Certainly, composting of biomass is discussed. But I have not heard of scientific efforts to optimally blend for biogas, nutrient, sterilized carbon, water retention, and waste handling before. Thanks.
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
April 7, 2012
Study on renewable biogas energy production from cladodes of Opuntia ficus indica by Elias Jigar, Hameed Sulaiman and Araya Asfaw and Abraham Bairu(ISABB Journal of Food and Agriculture Science Vol. 1(3), pp. 44-48, December 2011) revealed:
Cladodes, which is a plate like section of Opuntia ficus indica, were characterized for their physical properties, total solids (TS) and volatile solides (VS) and they were assessed in five combinations with or without cow dung for their suitability to biogas production in 2.8 L triplicate batch digesters. The highest total biogas yields were obtained from T5 (75% Cow dung: 25% Cladodes combination) as 14.183 L followed by T1 (cow dung alone) as 13.670 L (0 .022 m3/kg) and the lowest was from T2 (Cladodes alone) as 6.176 L. The percentage of methane gas obtained from the experiment for treatments T1, T2, T3 (50% cow dung: 50% cladodes), T4 (25% cow dung: 75% Cladodes) and T5 were 66.33, 53.16, 63.84, 52.1 and 69% respectively. Among all treatments, T5 was found to produce high methane percent of the biogas. Treatments (T1 and T5) that have a C:N ratio within the range of 20 to 30 were found to perform better in biogas yield and methane production than those that are not. Statistical test showed that the biogas and methane content of the gas produced by T5 vary significantly at 0.05 level except with T1 and T3 which means the biogas and methane content of the gas produced by T1 and T3 were comparable with that of T5. The experimental findings further showed that the composition of methane for all treatments were within the range of 50 to 70%. The finding further revealed the suitability of the substrate as a supplement feedstock with the conventional cow dung for biogas production and if suitable materials for co-digestion, such as manure, are not available, Cladodes can be digested alone.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
April 7, 2012
Very interesting development on Biogas production in US.

But obtaining Animal dung in large quantities in a decentralised way is difficult. But some plants offer promise in biogas production.

There were efforts to utilise Water Hyacinth(Eichhornia Crassipes) in combination with animal dung to produce biogas. But Biogas from Opuntia offers promise especially in developing countries since Opuntia can be grown under a variety of Environmental conditions.

Biogas from Opuntia:

A source of renewable gas and fertilizer
Structure of the proposed process
1st step: Production of biomass (Opuntia)
2nd step: Process of the biomass into biogas trough anaerobic fermentation
3rd step: Process of the digested material into fertilizer
The potential of Opuntia Biomass for energy production in semi-arid areas
100 to 400 tons of biomass/ha/year
1 ton Opuntia biomass = 50-60 m3 of biogas = 300-360 kWh of gas
30 000 to 140 000 kWh per ha
150 to 400ha necessary for 1MW electrical capacity
High efficiency in water & fertilizer use
Reduced risk for farmers of crop failure due to high drought tolerance
No competition with food crops on arable land as it can grow on degraded land.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore (AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Lawrence Carroll
Lawrence Carroll
April 7, 2012
Here are a few pictures on Flickr from an NGO (Sustainable Harvest Int.) of one of their biogas digesters. They've been building (or helping build) these for years in Central America. The process appears much simpler than that described in the article, but the methane is generally only used for cooking (conserving firewood).

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sustainableharvest/44891684/in/photostream/

Of course, methane gas can be "harvested" from many, many sources (including that which already bubbles up in the ocean) and used as a source of energy . . . (duh).

I certainly agree that humanure is probably another great source!!!
Gary McCallum
Gary McCallum
April 6, 2012
So true, humanure is paradoxly both infinate and expanding. It gives one hope!
Penelope Gray
Penelope Gray
April 6, 2012
Add humanure into the equation and we could power the universe!
Bruce Dorminey
Bruce Dorminey
April 6, 2012
Scott, up top, thanks for pointing this out. A correction has been made. Regards, Bruce
Matt Karber
Matt Karber
April 6, 2012
Biogas has a wide variety of good, useful possibilities. With some alteration of the chemistry, it's possible to produce hydrogen instead of or in addition to methane. The hydrogen could then be processed through a fuel cell to generate electricity more efficiently than a conventional generator. Also, new research has found that some bacteria substantially increase their hydrogen production in a cell where a small electric current is supplied in addition to the waste material. As far as profitability is concerned, all aspects of the process, including selling the remaining, post-process solids as fertilizer, must be considered.
Rick Engebretson
Rick Engebretson
April 6, 2012
Yet another benefit is than anaerobic microbiology is mostly incompatible with aerobic microbiology. Untreated waste is a serious disease concern, especially when antibiotics are used in livestock production.
David Hynes
David Hynes
April 6, 2012
*the liquid substrate is approx 20% more fertile that traditional agricultural slurry which can offset the cost of expensive fertilizers for the farmer
*the solid remainder can be sold as a fuel source, or as compost.
*another outlet for the liquid substrate is, to allow the growth of 'algae farm'(needs to use the thermal energy from the AD process) resulting algae in-turn can be fed into the digester...in essence having an never ending cycle of feed stocks for the digester
* one tonne of methane gas equates to almost 20 tonnes of carbon dioxide. this has a major knock on benefit to reduce the effects of climate change.

as for the issue of deforestation..these plants should only be built on existing farms....and at least a farm with an AD plant is far more beneficial to the environment/climate than the traditional farm due to the greenhouse gases saved from capturing and using the methane gases
Christopher Minott
Christopher Minott
April 6, 2012
A couple of other points regarding CowPower

- it almost completely removes the smell, when the left over material is spread on fields as fertilizer it no longer is a problem for neighbors
- the leftovers can be sold for additional profits
- can also be used as bedding for farm animals saving money as well for the farm.
- some farms have learned how to power their equipment from the process as well.
- reduces possible environmental damage from leaking manure ponds as well as reduces air quality issues associated with large-scale farming manure storage.
Kim Hanna
Kim Hanna
April 6, 2012
Sounds like some business opportunities in this and reducing methane gas is a plus. There are other negative environmental impacts though to cattle farming (like deforestation for farms)and of course the negative aspect for the animals when slaughtered. A recent Treehugger poll shows over 50% respondents think eating meat is "unethical"..
David Hynes
David Hynes
April 6, 2012
AD plants for large farms is a no brainer, even if the farmer has to pay for over half the capital costs.All the farmer has to do is charge a gate fee per tonne and start to accept waste food sfrom local restaurants, stores, waste companies ..... then the this can be a very profitable business indeed. We are doing this already in a 1.5MW AD plant in Ireland...and we had to pay for ALL the capital costs...
Haridas Rao
Haridas Rao
April 6, 2012
We can supply, train local home owner, and erect bio gas plants in every US citizens homes costing only less than US$ 1500/ unit, utilizing the ORGANIC FOOD WASTES from homes, and will be sufficient enough to meet a modest home energy needs fully. If any one interested kindly contact me at = hrd369@gmail.com. Gives out METHANE GAS without much smell, only about 2 kg of food waste per day is enough to make it going for long times and provide gas to the household.
With Regards
Haridas Rao
Rick Engebretson
Rick Engebretson
April 5, 2012
About 20 years ago someone wanted me to evaluate a dairy manure methane system in Minnesota. IIRC it was a small herd and they intended to use a steel tank and car engine. So we advocated recycling plastic into cylinder sections that could be mass produced, shipped, and assembled to any size (and dis-assembled). The windmill and corn ethanol advocates had a fit and this capability has been buried in concrete since. Really just a basic septic tank with significant energy return and greenhouse gas capture.

Improves waste handling, fertilizer, clean air and water, livestock health, besides the energy recovered. Seems like civilized people would want it.
Scott Hoiland
Scott Hoiland
April 5, 2012
I think your numbers are off. If 1600 MW was 10% of the USA's electricity needs, that would mean the entire country requires 16,000 MW or 16GW of electricity--which I don't believe is the case.

From my understanding, the USA has around 1.3TW or 1300GW of electricity installed to meets it's needs. Even if the average capacity of that installed electricity is 10% that equates to 130GW -- still not close to the 16GW needed above to make the 10% assertion true.

Unless I am missing something here?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Bruce Dorminey

Bruce Dorminey

Bruce Dorminey is an award-winning science journalist who is a former Hong Kong bureau chief for Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine and a former Paris-based technology correspondent for the Financial Times newspaper. However, he...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 8
    Country-Based Action to Achieve Universal Access to Energy
  • 3
    From the Sea to the Pump: Is Kelp a Viable Biofuel?
  • 2
    Sir Richard Branson unleashes Plan B for the planet
  • 1
    Renewable Energy Investments Shift to Developing Nations

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Rotork plc
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Green Power Conferences
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information