The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Vermont's Solar Deal: One Small State Makes a Big Solar Impact

Vermont has enacted a simple solar registration process that abolishes permitting, cuts time and has brought renewed vigor to solar power in the state.

Meg Cichon, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
March 19, 2012  |  12 Comments

So, you want to put solar on your roof. You're part of the 94 percent of Americans who think it's important for the nation to develop solar energy, as evidenced by the SCHOTT Solar Barometer, a nationally representative survey conducted by independent polling firm Kelton Research. You call several companies for quotes, and come to find out – a residential solar system is a bit more than you can afford, and your excitement to join the solar cause is diminished.

This may be an all-to-common situation for many in the U.S., which is why the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) established the SunShot Initiative. The program hopes to reduce the cost of solar installations 75 percent by 2020. Its ultimate goal is to make solar a more attractive and cost-competitive form of energy for those looking to go solar. According to Ramamoorthy Ramesh, the manager of the SunShot program, solar should be as easy to install on your house as buying a set of tires for your car – who wouldn’t agree with that? 

With this initiative in mind, Vermont legislators enacted a groundbreaking bill that streamlines the installation process for small-scale solar – including the elimination of time-consuming and expensive permitting. So, how much does the bill actually reduce the cost of solar?

It Costs How Much? 

Estimating the true cost of a residential system can be difficult to pin down. According to John Farrell of Energy Self-Reliant States, the installed cost for residential solar was $6.40 in 2011, which means that the installation costs of a typical 3-kW system would be about $19,000. 

“Even if we pick one of these, it’s difficult to compare apples to apples, because grid electricity is priced in dollars per kilowatt-hour of electricity, not dollars per Watt. Enter ‘levelized cost,’ or the cost of a solar PV array averaged over a number of years of production,” explains Farrell. “For example, a 1-kW solar array installed in Minneapolis for $6.40 per Watt costs $6,400.  Over 25 years, we can expect that system to produce about 30,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh), so the ‘simple levelized cost’ is $6,400 divided by 30,000, or about $0.21 per kWh.”

So what does permitting contribute to these costs? Aside from time, a recent report produced by SunRun estimated that permitting adds roughly $2,500 to the cost of an average residential installation. The report went on to speculate that streamlined permitting could make solar affordable for 50 percent of American homes. Experts at the SunShot initiative agree – they estimate that 40 to 50 percent of costs come down to “soft” costs like permitting, zoning, metering, financing and arranging a grid connection. According to a SunShot release, “That means consumers are now paying more to generate electricity from rooftop systems — an average of 18 cents a kilowatt-hour, according to the Department of Energy’s calculations — than they would for conventional energy purchased from a local utility.” 

Addressing the Issue 

Legislators set out to establish a streamlined registration process and trash the headache-inducing permitting procedures. “There is a fiscal and environmental urgency for Vermont to move off fossil fuels and toward sustainable sources of power,” said Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin in a statement.

The new law states that utilities must approve systems 5-kW and smaller within 10 days of receiving a registration form and certificate of compliance with grid connection requirements. Before the law was enacted, solar applicants would need to receive a certificate of public good (CPG) from the Vermont Public Service Board, which would then determine if the project met environmental standards, was reliable and of economic benefit. In all, it was a 30-day process. If the project raised concern, it was to be resolved through a public hearing.

“It should be a national priority to cut unnecessary red tape and costly permitting for small renewables.  Cutting out unnecessary costs will help us both meet our urgent energy needs and make domestic solar more competitive,” said David Blittersdorf, president and CEO of Vermont-based AllEarth Renewables in a statement.  “We’ve had the Department of Energy, U.S. Senate offices, state governments, and local installers all calling to ask about how we took this simple, common sense step.”

The bill also included other beneficial measures to move renewable energy adoption along. For example, it requires Efficiency Vermont and the Department of Public Service to create incentives for biomass heating systems, enhance the PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) Program that allows homeowners to lease clean energy over time while reducing upfront costs, and expands utility energy efficiency measures. 

Small Steps Toward Grid Parity 

Many hope that this innovative legislation will spread throughout the country to stabilize and reduce the cost of solar. The SunShot Initiative hopes that laws like Vermont’s, and its own solar initiatives, will bring the cost of solar-generated electricity down to 6 cents per kWh by 2020. According to the Initiative, this price point will hopefully create solar adoption that will add up to 18 percent of the country’s electricity generation by 2030.

According to Dr. Ramesh, it’s all about reducing soft costs, “And as you have more deployment, you have more innovation, and this will invariably bring down hardware costs.” 

12 Comments

Register To Comment
Andrew Savage
Andrew Savage
April 16, 2012
Aleope-- Agree this changes the finances, however, cutting out the soft costs associated with installation will help work in tandem with technology improvements to drive down the cost of a customer's system, making the value of RECs less and less important. That's where the industry (and government) needs to go. Thanks for your comment.
Alfred Shaw
Alfred Shaw
April 15, 2012
What Vermont is doing is great but when we in Pennsylvania have a coal loving governor it is unlikely we will ever come into the 21 century. I have a system that functions well but the solar credits have dropped from $300 to $25 and unlikely to get back anywhere close to where they were. This makes it a tough sell to the small individual user.
Chris Storer
Chris Storer
April 14, 2012
I applaud Vermont in taking a State-wide stance on PV energy. I would like to add that as having a new grid-tied PV system on my home in Texas, I think that the Northeast is still in the dark ages in providing incentives. My local power utility is a coop that provided a large grant to home-owners who participated in their Solar program.
My 4.1KW system cost after their grant and Federal tax incentives is approximately $4500. The coop grant is $10,000 and the tax credit will be close to $1600.
The whole point is that energy providers make out very well "buying back - seemingly a steal" energy that is produced by homeowners. Why should they not provide an up-front incentive to the people who are putting in the home-sized energy sources?
These utilities actually charge end-users more for selecting to consume Green-produced electricity.
If this co-op can allow a Texas homeowner to install a system for $1 a watt, why can't more utilities help out in the same manner?
Alfred Shaw
Alfred Shaw
March 23, 2012
The post#5 by Mr Farren is well taken however in my post#5 I stated the township where I live charged $1200 for A permit. They hired an inspector who I was with when he inspected the finished system. He spent no more than five minutes on the job, just looked up from the ground to it on the roof and said it looked good to him. His only comment was a label on a box by one of the meters had arrow pointing incorrectly. If this is the typical inspection then I would take my chances and not have to get a permit.
Gillian Ream
Gillian Ream
March 22, 2012
Hi - Great news! Do you know what bill this is in the Vermont house/senate? I'd love to showcase it as a policy example here in Michigan. Thanks!
-Gillian (regionalenergyoffice.org)
Andrew Savage
Andrew Savage
March 21, 2012
Meg, A great summary of Vermont's program. While Vermont already had an innovative state-wide permitting system, from a political/legislative perspective, this wasn't as hard as it may seem to accomplish. And, my feeling is that it could be replicated at the state, municipal or other local level as well if a community was committed to solar.

Andrew

AllEarth Renewables, Williston, VT
Paul Farren
Paul Farren
March 21, 2012
If I understand correctly, this law eliminates permits? That is not a good idea since we are dealing with up to 600 Volts DC and that is potentially lethal for unexperienced amateurs, not to mention the possibility of fires from electric faults if best engineering practices are not adhered to. Also, we must be sure the system is safe and properly designated for fire and rescue personnel. Don't get me wrong, I am all for self installation and freedom to install, I am just concerned that there may be no supervision over safety practcices. Even when permitting is in place and systems are installed by skilled installers; often mistakes are made that are caught by the permitting process.
Alfred Shaw
Alfred Shaw
March 20, 2012
Solar installers should come clean when selling solar systems. I found out afterward that the state rebate I received was subject to federal taxes which GroSolar, the solar company that sold me the system failed to mention. Now the company that bought GroSolar, Solar City when asked about this just kisses it off by saying consult your tax attorney, How many others have found out this after the fact. If the government really wants to promote solar for residences they should make state rebates non taxable. Also the township where I live charged $1200 for the permit another ripoff. These sort of things will haunt solar for years if not corredted.
Shane Lahousse
Shane Lahousse
March 20, 2012
PV works today. My 5kW PV system installed in my backyard running today cost $3.75/watt to install when I acted as general contractor. I've attached a breakdown of costs:

Material Labor Subtotals
Trench and Footings $661 $1,550 $2,211
Mounting $1,826 $735 $2,561
Panels/Inverter $8,168 $8,168
Electrician $986 $3,520 $4,506
Subtotals $11,641 $5,805

Grand Total $17,446

My return on investment with avoidance of $0.22/kWh electricity is 6.5 years (includes the 30% federal tax credit). Solar works today.
Wayne Dederick
Wayne Dederick
March 20, 2012
Bill, I hope to be self installing a PV system this year. I am installing a ground mounted fixed system on a P/T rack and I expect my cost to be about $2.50/w. May I ask what state you are in and what panels you selected ?
V. Bruce Stenswick
V. Bruce Stenswick
March 19, 2012
Solar is the answer. Now, what's the question? What problem are they trying to solve? To me, the issue to address is climate change. Solar certainly has it's part in solving that issue. For northern tier states, they should first address home heating. It could be biomass, or super-insulated houses and electric resistance heat. I am biased towards ground source heat pumps married to carbon-free electricity. If Vermont is like Minnesota, there are a few issues. First, there are not enough installers, so they over-charge. Second, there are not enough well-drillers, so they over-charge. Third, you still have the loop field. I would suggest two things, first use a PACE mechanism to fund the loop field. Second, require contractors to give an itemized billing so that homeowners can see how much these guys are making and put a bit of pressure on them. I have a ground source heat pump and buy all of my electricity from our local "WindSource" program. I am also in the process of super-insulating much of my house.
William Fitch
William Fitch
March 19, 2012
Reducing by 75%... that is a stiff goal. The panels are expensive but buy no means the whole basket. The Copper wiring and the Aluminum racking are two big dollar hitters. All the electrical infrastructure besides the Copper wire, NOT counting the inverter, is expensive as well. Bought a circuit breaker, AC disconnect box, combiner box equipped, on and on with the misc electrical parts, lately. Add that to the AL racking and copper wire plus inverter and you are at 2/3 the cost of a grid tie PV system, not counting labor. SO a 75% reduction on total cost... I don't know how..... My PV I am doing myself now, will probably come in GROSS TOTAL at 27K$ for 9.1 KW tracking with backup, around 3$ a Watt total. The panels are about 1/3 of that cost. SO, even if the panels were FREE, that would only be a 33% cost reduction on my system... and I have NO LABOR cost for the on site part of the install!!!
SO, 75% hummm.....

.....Bill

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Meg Cichon

Meg Cichon

As associate editor of RenewableEnergyWorld.com, I coordinate and edit feature stories, contributed articles, news stories, opinion pieces and blogs. I also research and write content for RenewableEnergyWorld.com and REW magazine. I manage...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 13
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Johnson Controls, Inc.
  • North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners
  • Festo
  • marcus evans
  • Renewable Energy Corporation
  • Unirac, Inc.
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • SolarEstimate.org
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information