Paul Hockenos, Contributor
March 06, 2012
|
25 Comments
"We are the energy transition!" read one of the many placards hoisted in the air at the Germany-wide "Stop the Solar Energy Exit" demonstration at Berlin's Brandenburg Gate on Monday. According to the event's organizers, 11,000 people were on hand for the protest against the Merkel government's energy policies.
The protesters and speakers from the three main opposition parties – the Social Democrats, Greens, and the Left Party – as well as the solar power industry, and several major trade unions accused the center-right government of undermining Germany’s historic Energiewende, or energy transition. In the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster, the government shut down half of its nuclear power plants and pledged to accelerate the country’s transition to renewable energies.
Yet, nearly a year down the road, there is still no overreaching strategy for Germany to meet the ambitious targets it set for itself, including having 36 percent of its electricity generated by green sources in 2020. Moreover, in recent weeks the government announced a draft law that includes hefty reduction in the subsidies that solar power receives from its Feed-in Tariff. A second element in the draft law shifts responsibility for the amount of renewable electricity eligible for support from parliament to the ministries. This has Energiewende proponents worried that investors will be subject to short-term ministry decisions that will undermine security of planning and financing of projects.
The moves triggered a storm of protest from the solar industry, members of which claim that the abrupt and steep cuts will endanger Germany’s aggressive solar energy development and jeopardize tens of thousands of jobs.
Günther Cramer, president of the German Solar Energy Association (BSW-Solar), kicked off the demonstration saying, “The goals of the energy transition can not be achieved when solar energy’s growth is strangled. The vast majority of Germans are in favor of an ambitious expansion of renewable energies and solar,” he said, referring to opinion polls. He demanded that the government, “Not disrespect the will of the people.” Only the giant energy companies will profit from a reduction in solar energy's capacity in Germany, he underscored. “We’re taking a piece of their market. That’s why solar energy is a thorn in their side.”
The demonstration, on a cold but brilliantly sunny day, had a strikingly different feel than the anti-nuclear energy demonstrations in recent years, the largest of which in Berlin last year drew nearly 250,000 people. At this event, the solar power industry and its workers turned out in full force. Some in their work clothes, others in t-shirts that read “Protect Solar Jobs,” they wielded printing-shop-produced posters and orange balloons. The demonstrators traveled to Berlin from across the country, even as far away as Bavaria and Denmark.
Likewise, the ample number of trade unionists present was exceptional. For decades the unions had been at odds with the concerns of the environmental and anti-nuclear movements, which they claimed was elitist and would cost jobs. Now, as the Social Democrats’ party leader Sigmar Gabriel put it at the demonstrations, the renewable energy industry provides people jobs in parts of the country where there hadn’t been any jobs at all. The goal, he said, was to double them, not to lose them all. "It’s not just about the solar industry,” he said, explicitly linking jobs to environmental concerns. “It’s about whether we’re going to make the Energiewende happen or not.”
Image: German home with solar power via Shutterstock
To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.
January 12, 2013
"The Feed in Tariff (FIT) that is used in Germany, Japan, China & 71 nations,
does not get any funds from public taxation therefore it is not a subsidy."
FITs ARE subsidies; the definition does not restrict subsidies to tax based funds. In particular, FITs are government mandated transfers of funds from one group of people to another group of people for a government designated purpose--that is a subsidy. Taxes are not the only possible funding mechanism for a subsidy and moreover they are not the worst because taxes are not as regressive as the funding mechanisms typically used for FITs. FITs typically generate funds by fees applied to all electricity consumers regardless of ability to pay; thus, funds are partly collected from poor pensioners dwelling in small apartments who are compelled to subsidize solar PV systems placed on the roofs of affluent home owners. Kangas claims to be a legislator writing FIT laws in CA; if true, perhaps he will find this characterization of his work disquieting. Perhaps he will even be prompted to seek honest work instead of attempting to promote government enforced transfer payments from the poor to the rich.
Kangas also writes: "This makes Germany the greenest nation on earth."
He might be interested to note that Germany has INCREASED its reliance on coal for electricity generation this year. Generation from coal increased from 43.1% to 44.7% over the last year. (See http://www.germanenergyblog.de/?p=11916#more-11916) The greatest progress in CO2 reduction is actually occurring in the US where cheap natural gas supplies are causing dramatic REDUCTIONS in coal-fired electricity generation.
Steven