The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

NREL Thinks Big at Wind Technology Center

David Glickson, NREL
March 30, 2012  |  8 Comments

Print

The Front Range environment at the National Wind Technology Center (NWTC) is harsh. The winds — the very reason the NWTC is there — have little mercy. The frigid cold of winter gives way to the baking sun of summer. Yet in the midst of this difficult landscape, the future of wind energy grows bigger and stronger thanks to the work being done by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) NWTC and its industry partners.

Findings from a recent reportPDF by analysts from NREL and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory indicate that further technology improvements will be critical to increasing wind turbine efficiency and lowering the cost of wind power development in the future. Research at NREL's NWTC is leading the way.

The most noticeable change at the NWTC in recent years is the addition of multi-megawatt wind turbines used for a wide variety of R&D activities in collaboration with industry partners.

Giant Turbines Tower over the Landscape

The most noticeable change at the NWTC in recent years is the addition of four multi-megawatt wind turbines to be used for a wide variety of research and development (R&D) activities in collaboration with industry partners. The most recent of the four new turbines, a Gamesa 2.0-megawatt machine (see inset), was installed at the site in late 2011.

"The addition of these four modern megawatt-scale machines has been truly transformational for our center," said Fort Felker, director of the NWTC. "Not just in the physical landscape, but in the depth and relevance of the research that is going on here. It's changed the way industry thinks about us in the sense that now the work we are doing is directly relevant, clearly impactful, and immediately beneficial to them."

Each of the four turbines is a test apparatus with unique attributes. For example, the Siemens 2.3-megawatt turbine at the site has extensive instrumentation and structural load measurement capabilities in the blades, nacelle, and down the tower all the way into the underground foundation beneath the turbine. This allows researchers to connect the entire path of unsteady loads caused by turbulence in the wind to better identify where improvements will directly lead to more efficient turbines and lower-cost wind energy.

Crews lift a blade assembly onto the nacelle of Gamesa's G9X-2.0-megawatt turbine at the NWTC. The Gamesa G9X-2.0 turbine is the latest addition to the collection of multi-megawatt wind turbines at the NWTC.

Large Turbines Need Large Components

The next sizable step into the future of wind energy is an expansion of the dynamometer testing capabilities at the NWTC. The new dynamometer facility scheduled for completion this summer will dramatically expand the capability of NREL and its industry partners to verify the performance and reliability of wind turbine drivetrain prototypes and commercial machines.

The new facility is capable of testing drivetrains up to 5.8 megawatts — large enough to test virtually any land-based turbine for the foreseeable future — and will employ a non-torque loading capability that is dynamically variable. This means researchers will be better able to simulate conditions a turbine might experience in the field.

"These new capabilities will make this a special facility, the finest of its kind in the world," Felker said. "Instead of just putting a steady load on a test article, we'll be able to better simulate dynamically variable loads that it would see in the real world."

It Takes Big Blades to Energize Big Turbines

NWTC Director Fort Felker speaks at the groundbreaking ceremony for the new dynamometer expansion project. When finished, the facility will have a 5.8-megawatt capacity.

As turbines have grown, so have the blades required to capture the wind for them. Turbine blades have grown so much, in fact, that the NWTC, with its landlocked location, cannot effectively work with the largest blades because they are difficult to ship over land.

To solve this, NREL has partnered with the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center to develop a world-class large wind turbine blade testing center in Boston, Massachusetts.

The Wind Technology Testing Center (WTTC) offers a full suite of certification tests for turbine blades as long as 90 meters and is designed to help the wind industry deploy the next generation of onshore and offshore wind turbine technologies. NREL staff on site provides technical expertise and testing hardware at the facility.

The WTTC is located on an existing deep water port so that large blades can be shipped by boat to the site, allowing it to test the largest wind blades in development for both onshore and offshore use.

NREL's Steve Hammond, director of the Computational Science Center, and Kenny Gruchalla, senior scientist, discuss a 3D model of wind plant aerodynamics that shows low velocity wakes and the resulting impact on downstream turbines.

Huge Brains, Huge Computers, Huge Ideas

Another significant development for NWTC researchers has been access to high-performance computer resources now available for wind science and technology development.

A challenge in the wind industry has been how to tackle the interactional aerodynamics that occurs within wind farms, where large numbers of multi-megawatt wind turbines are placed together. The wind turbulence in the wake of upstream turbines interferes with the downstream turbines, which leads to higher structural loads and fatigue damage on the downstream turbines — resulting in increased maintenance costs and adding to the overall cost of wind energy.

NREL is taking on this problem using next-generation modeling capabilities that will allow researchers to use computer simulations to assess individual turbine performance as well as turbine-to-turbine interactions. The simulations will use RedMesa, NREL's 180-teraflop supercomputer.

"To date, there has never been a scientific analysis and simulation tool that allows us to tackle this problem. We've broken that barrier," Felker said. "It's a transformational capability, and we're really excited about it."

This work will create a better understanding of wind farm performance and will allow future wind developments to be designed in ways that will minimize this impact, from altering the layout of the turbines to more advanced engineering concepts such as using differently designed turbines in downstream locations as compared to those upstream. The result will be wind farms that are more efficient and less costly to operate, leading to less expensive wind energy.

A Big Future Ahead for Wind Energy

NWTC researchers are keeping their eyes on the future and how the center's increased capabilities will advance wind energy deployment at the lowest possible cost. Effectively working with industry partners is an important piece of this puzzle.

"We're very proud of the dramatic increase we have had in the depth of our partnerships with industry. That has been a tremendous success for us over the last few years," Felker said. "It has made us much better connected with the wind industry in terms of knowing what is important to them and how we can help them and be a key partner in their success."

The next logical step is to look offshore. Offshore wind resources allow for the deployment of even larger turbines that could not be considered for use on land.

"In the future, we're going offshore," Felker said. "Our biggest challenge and opportunity in the future is that as the U.S. begins to develop an offshore wind industry, all of the R&D skills and testing capabilities that we have developed can be brought to bear in the offshore world."

Images: Dennis Schroeder, NREL

This article was originally published on NREL.gov and was republished with permission.

8 Comments

Register To Comment
Drew Devitt
Drew Devitt
April 10, 2012
"In the future, we're going offshore," Felker said. "The next logical step is to look offshore".
But what he is studying is not going to help. The wind over shallow water near shore is only marginally better then wind on land and is fraught with NIMBY and environmental issues, not to mention the Jones Act, supply chain issues and the cost of sea floor foundations.
Floating structures further out, beyond the horizon are needed. Horizontal axis turbines don't lend themselves to floatation, a 400 ton nacelle 400ft above sea level is naturally unstable. This is the way we have always done it is not a good enough reason to fight Mother Nature. Vertical axis turbines with low centers of gravity and an aerodynamic system based on sailboat technology would be cheaper and faster to build, fast to install, could be temporarily sunk or reefed in the face a hurricane, towed back to the yard for service, and have the potential to put more Americans to work faster. It is not as efficient at 14m/s wind speed but floatation puts it in wind with twice the energy and much better capacity factors. The deep water also makes energy storage methods practical.
It is painful to continually hear our Government representatives talk big about how the US can "leap frog" the Europeans and Chinese when they are pursuing the same technology with smaller budgets. "Smart from the Start" is a bad joke. If you want a game changing technology, you need to start to play a new game. We went to Moon, we can design floating wind turbines that don't fly in the face of Nature.
Drew Devitt
Drew Devitt
April 10, 2012
"In the future, we're going offshore," Felker said. "The next logical step is to look offshore".
But what he is studying is not going to help. The wind over shallow water near shore is only marginally better then wind on land and is fraught with NIMBY and environmental issues, not to mention the Jones Act, supply chain issues and the cost of sea floor foundations.
Floating structures further out, beyond the horizon are needed. Horizontal axis turbines don't lend themselves to floatation, a 400 ton nacelle 400ft above sea level is naturally unstable. This is the way we have always done it is not a good enough reason to fight Mother Nature. Vertical axis turbines with low centers of gravity and an aerodynamic system based on sailboat technology would be cheaper and faster to build, fast to install, could be temporarily sunk or reefed in the face a hurricane, towed back to the yard for service, and have the potential to put more Americans to work faster. It is not as efficient at 14m/s wind speed but floatation puts it in wind with twice the energy and much better capacity factors. The deep water also makes energy storage methods practical.
It is painful to continually hear our Government representatives talk big about how the US can "leap frog" the Europeans and Chinese when they are pursuing the same technology with smaller budgets. "Smart from the Start" is a bad joke. If you want a game changing technology, you need to start to play a new game. We went to Moon, we can design floating wind turbines that don't fly in the face of Nature.
WWW American Offshore Energy Com
Anne van der Bom
Anne van der Bom
April 7, 2012
mike holly,

It is good for you to question the price of technology. Yes, new technology is always more expensive. At first.

But apply the same scrutiny to exisiting fossil-based generation technologies and you will see that they are not free of subsidies either.

The most egregious example is coal power with high soot and mercury emissions. It is a fantasy to think the atmosphere is a free sewer. And what are the costs of all the hundreds or perhaps thousands of square km of landscape destroyed by mountain top removal mining practices? Zero dollars? A billion? A hundred billion?

There is definitely a PRICE difference between wind and other technologies. But price is merely an artifact of our economic system. Therefore it is wiser to look at the COST instead.

Adding everything up, wind power is actually cheap. And it's getting cheaper every day.
Drew Devitt
Drew Devitt
April 5, 2012
"In the future, we're going offshore," Felker said. "The next logical step is to look offshore".
But what he is studying is not going to help. The wind over shallow water near shore is only marginally better then wind on land and is fraught with NIMBY and environmental issues, not to mention the Jones Act, supply chain issues and the cost of sea floor foundations.
Floating structures further out, beyond the horizon are needed. Horizontal axis turbines don't lend themselves to floatation, a 400 ton nacelle 400ft above sea level is naturally unstable. Why fight Mother Nature? Vertical axis turbines with low centers of gravity and an aerodynamic system based on sailboat technology would be cheaper and faster to build, fast to install, could be temporarily sunk or reefed in the face a hurricane, towed back to the yard for service, and have the potential to put more Americans to work faster. They not as efficient at 14m/s wind speed but floatation puts them in wind with twice the energy and much better capacity factors. The deep water also makes energy storage methods practical.
It is painful to continually hear our Government representatives talk big about how the US can "leap frog" the Europeans and Chinese when they are pursuing the same technology with smaller budgets. "Smart from the Start" is a bad joke. If you want a game changing technology, you need to start to play a new game. We went to Moon, we can design floating wind turbines that don't fly in the face of Nature.
American Offshore Energy Com
ANONYMOUS
April 5, 2012
mike-holly-

The real LCOE for commercial wind is very difficult ascertain. It's definitely not 4 cents/kWh, but I'd estimate it's also not quite the 20 cents/kWh you note. The basic problem with determining real LCOE lies in the fact these numbers are greatly influenced by the initial capital cost per kW of the turbine, the lifetime maintenance costs of the turbine, and the productivity of the turbine. In all respects, new turbine designs are much more cost effective than older designs. The situation is also made more complicated by the fact that cost models are based on turbine lifecycles of up to 20 years. A turbine put in service in 2012 will be nowhere as efficient or reliable as one put in service in 2020.

As for the contribution of NREL towards wind turbine technology development, I think the author overstates things. While NREL and DOE have made contributions, most of the real progress has come from the commercial sector.
Mike Holly
Mike Holly
April 2, 2012
The only way wind power can be cost effective is by misrepresenting the costs and benefits. The utilities are reporting they can purchase power for only 4 cents per kWh from wind developers, even though the total costs are closer to 20 cents.

Cost projections from the Energy Information Administration indicate wind power costs are over 10 cents per kWh. The difference can be largely explained by tax shelters, including the PTC (2.2 cents), federal MACRS accelerated depreciation (2 cents) and state accelerated depreciation and other exemptions (1 cent). There are also benefits hidden in confidential utility contracts.

In addition, the EIA doesn't even include full transmission costs imposed on ratepayers. The Lawrence Berkeley National Lab reports transmission costs for wind power are triple those of other generation sources and about 23% of the average cost of wind projects, which amounts to another 2 to 3 cents.

But the lack of any credible integration studies is likely the biggest problem. If backup from inefficient natural gas peaking is required total costs are increased by about 6 cents per kWh. Moreover, the combination will use as much natural gas and emit as much carbon dioxide as just using more efficient combined cycle natural gas generation without wind power.
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
March 31, 2012
Excellent report on NREL efforts on Big Wind Turbines and its future plans. NREL is known for its great research and capabilities in the Renewables.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
chris gibbons
chris gibbons
March 30, 2012
An interesting report indeed.
Agrion is hosting an upcoming event entitled, Macrotrends in Critical Resources & Vital Energy Assets: Making Money and Leaving a Legacy on April 17, 2012 in New York City. Together with a panel of experts, audience members will participate in a lively discussion on the subject. Check it out here:
http://www.agrion.org/sessions/agrion-int-Macrotrends_in_Critical_Resources_Vital_Energy_Assets_Making_Money_and_Leaving_a_Legacy.htm

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 4
    Women in Power – It’s a Natural Fit
  • 4
    Renewable Energy in Myanmar: Not Just Clean, It’s Necessary
  • 2
    Sir Richard Branson unleashes Plan B for the planet

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • SolarEstimate.org
  • Prudent Living, Inc.
  • AEG Power Solutions
  • Delta Rigging & Tools
  • Blue Sky Energy, Inc.
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • Midwest Renewable Energy Association
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information