The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Abound Solar Halts Thin-film Production

Steve Leone, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
March 01, 2012  |  17 Comments

Abound Solar, once heralded as an emerging player in American solar manufacturing because of its aggressive plans for growth and its strong Department of Energy backing, took a major step backward this week when it announced it was shutting down production of its first generation thin film modules and that it was temporarily laying off 180 employees from its Colorado facility.

In 2010, Abound closed on a $400 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy that would be used to triple capacity at its 65-MW Longmont, Colo., facility and to build a new 640-MW facility in Tipton, Ind., an area that was hit hard by the economic downturn.

In an interview in July, company officials were hopeful that the Indiana facility would come online by 2014. In a press release, the company said it “still has long-term plans for a Tipton, Indiana manufacturing facility once production of its next-generation modules begins. The company anticipates having an update on a Tipton facility build-out in mid-2013.”

It remains unclear whether the temporary shutdown of the Colorado lines will impact the scale of the Indiana facility, and whether DOE backing would remain intact. The company did say it has drawn out $70 million of the total loan amount to date, and that it continues to work closely with the DOE.

As far as the Colorado plant, the company is working to make equipment changes necessary to launch its higher-efficiency module, and that it hopes to resume production by the end of the year. A message left with Abound Solar for more details was not immediately returned.

For Abound, its overriding goal and its reason for pushing for the DOE loan guarantee, was its desire to compete with thin-film leaders, especially industry giant First Solar. Over the summer, company executives were saying that the only way for small start-ups like themselves to compete with the big players, both in thin film and crystalline silicon, was to achieve scale. With this week’s news, it appears that for Abound reaching scale has taken a backseat to market pressures.

A lot has changed since the summer when Abound was touting its expansion plans and even more has changed since the company first entered into the DOE loan guarantee process.

Today, the thin-film industry in general is struggling mightily under the weight of low-cost crystalline silicon modules coming from China. Even First Solar, which like Abound produces cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film modules, is having its share of troubles.

“If the market leader in thin film CdTe is having a hard time, a start up with domestic manufacturing and low utilization rates is going to be struggling even more,” said Robert Lahey of Ardour Capital Investments. “It’s hard to find a thin-film competitor that is weathering the storm right now. For the foreseeable future, the thin film players will continue to struggle as they face competition from silicon manufacturers.”

Among the problems facing thin-film manufacturers is a competitive rooftop market, especially in Europe, that is currently being dominated by crystalline silicon modules. “We’re having a good year in ground mounted systems, but I don’t know how many super-sized projects are out there,” said Lahey.

Thin film’s recent troubles may have some in the industry wondering about the future of that technology. But Abound’s decision to halt production is likely to have mainstream political implications as well.

The Solyndra bankruptcy has been widely used by Republicans as a measure of the viability of all cleaner forms of energy. The recent news by Abound is likely to reignite that message, especially in the context of the 2012 Presidential Election.

“The fact that $70 million has been drawn down won’t be in the headlines,” said Lahey. “The headlines will be $400 million. I definitely see more negative headlines, despite the fact that the loan program is a success. Eighty percent [of the loan guarantees] went to power generation projects. The focus was not on domestic manufacturing programs. But it’s a tough environment right now in D.C.”

That wasn’t always the case. In fact, when the DOE awarded the loan guarantee to Abound Solar, it looked like a good bet. Unlike Solyndra, which even at the time relied on an innovative but risky technology, thin film already had proven itself in the marketplace, a factor that likely influenced the DOE’s decision to back a loan to Abound.

“If you go back two years, First Solar was the absolute jewel of the solar sector,” said Lahey. “They never missed earnings; they never had inventory; their panels were going out the door in Germany, Italy, Spain and France; they were making headway in the U.S. on the project development side; and silicon cost more than double what it costs now.”

It’s a far different PV landscape today. And many companies are quickly shuffling to face the new realities.

17 Comments

Register To Comment
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
March 6, 2012
@byronhead

"Use all the energy you want as long as the source doesn't continually pollute."

A statement such as this, if not spoken in jest, clearly illustrates why our chances of ever having a rational energy policy are not good.

Stupidity is a permanent malady suffered by many.

Ignorance is easily cured with a good dose of knowledge assimilated through reading, thinking and study.

What you do with your free time from here on out will determine your level of desire for a cure.
Donald Mayfield
Donald Mayfield
March 6, 2012
Like the coffee shop lighting change, I had a similar experience here in Austin at a store selling household furnishings. I did not change the bulbs for them. However, I was motivated to do some math on the savings:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgTAnbzgW6n9dHZLUlZZSzhSS213T3hNMDMzV25zZVE#gid=4

See the sheets 'Light Bulbs Compared' and 'Light Bulbs'.
Donald Mayfield
Donald Mayfield
March 6, 2012
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgTAnbzgW6n9dHZLUlZZSzhSS213T3hNMDMzV25zZVE#gid=4
Donald Mayfield
Donald Mayfield
March 6, 2012
I had a similar experience to the coffee shop lighting change. It was a store in N. Austin selling home furnishings. I didn't offer to change the bulbs, but was motivated to do the math done here (see link) and to mention the savings to one employee.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgTAnbzgW6n9dHZLUlZZSzhSS213T3hNMDMzV25zZVE&hl=en_US#gid=4

In the sheet 'light bulbs' and 'light bulbs compared'. I used the info from www.bulbs.com for comparing incandescent to more efficient bulbs and include pricing information.
bibliotheque sandy
bibliotheque sandy
March 6, 2012
Kindly Enable the Acquisition of Solar/Light-Energy to the MULTITUDES on the Ball of Earth to make It - More Conducive to Living - by All Forms of Life. And Your REACH (products + education + sales) can - Enable the - New Living Beings - to be Happier Daily. Thanks for all your EFFORTS so far. Votre - bibliotheque / sandy
Byron Head
Byron Head
March 6, 2012
Lovely analysis......but renewables is all about the air, water, ground pollution...STUPID.....before we get all the light bulbs changed we will have killed ourselves by killing the planet

Use all the energy you want as long as the source doesn't continually pollute.

The California Dept. of Toxic Substances Control,DTSC an EPA agency, spends $160 million each year MONITORING NOT REMEDIATING 900,000 acres in California that are "TOXIC"....meaning DEAD...for any use.

How many politicians does it take to change a light bulb? I guess all of them.
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
March 5, 2012
@achap

I would suggest you do a little research beyond Home Depot before commenting any further on performance or cost of LED's.

There is an entire world of LED technology and applications beyond the token displays of very inferior LED's sold for mass consumption at Home Depot and what is available when getting serious about lighting.

Also you mention "half the light output"
My question would be "half the light output of what"?

The office I'm working out of has 4 LED's in cans overhead
When I ask visitors on a daily basis to guess their power consumption based on light output their estimates are always off by a factor of 7 or 8 times.

When I tell them they are only 6 watts each they are amazed.

Of course they are even more amazed with the new replacements
Same light output plus dim capable and can even change color and only draw 3 watts at full output.

OH! And in commercial quantities they are under $25

Not surprised you cannot find these in Home Depot

BTW if I remove one after hours of operation they are barely above room temperature. Try that with even a CFL. That is if it has not already burned out.

Jeremiah did not donate anything but knowledge and awareness. Had he been so inclined his out of pocket would have been about $200 total.
Andy Chapman
Andy Chapman
March 5, 2012
No argument about efficiency upgrades but it was generous of Jeremiah to donate $500 worth of LEDs to the cause. 18W LED's are selling at Home Depot for ~$50 each and have half the light output.

With conservation you cut the number of PV's you need to install.

Sam's point was to change building codes to require PV on new construction or remodels and if you're going to go that far than include other LEED style efficiency standards for insulation, lighting, appliances et al. With luck the FTC wil sanction China and take a little of the pressure off the industry giving it a chance to survive.
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
March 3, 2012
My friend doing the lighting upgrades told me about him stopping into a small cafe for breakfast in the Bay Area one morning.

As he sat down he looked up at the lighting (he can't go anywhere without checking out lighting now) and noticed that there was a total of 11 lights in the ceiling.All incandescent. When the 'waitress' took his order he discovered she owned the cafe. San Francisco gives an almost instant rebate for installing efficient lighting.A rate per watt between what you removed and what you installed and generally the lights ends up being free. He made her an offer to replace all the bulbs if she gave him $5 and a free breakfast.As she prepared his eggs and pancakes he went to the car,got some bulbs and then grabbed a ladder from her storage closet. By the time his meal came the bulbs were changed and he was ready to eat. First thing the cafe owner stated when she came out from the kitchen was 'well the lights look allot better and brighter even if they don't save allot of energy. That's when he told her that he had just replaced 11 150 watt 'flame throwers' consuming 1650 watts with LED's consuming under 200 watts. Needless to say she was very happy not just for how much money she saves but also the fact she won't have to get up on a ladder and change a bulb for the next 10 years.She planned to replace all her bulbs at her apartment.

Jeremiah said he could have walked for hours up and down the streets of San Francisco and do essentially the same thing he just did in the old cafe. He's even seen more modern buildings filled with the same lighting you would have seen just after San Francisco installed electric lighting. Just before an earthquake that destroyed half the city. Engineers and architects learned some lessons that day on proper building techniques. So why has it taken a century to begin seeing incandescent bulbs and other poor lighting as just as dangerous and destructive as poor construction practices?
bruce gladstone
bruce gladstone
March 2, 2012
More kudos for Larry. We need to take a holistic approach, including real numbers! , as we move ahead with the clean energy build out. At a residential level, I wonder how many customers have really considered LED lighting. I have just bought 4 of the 40W bulbs at Lowe's for only about $12 each. Even before LEDs, my electricity bill is so low that PV installation is justifiable for altruistic reasons, not economic.
Sam Salamay
Sam Salamay
March 2, 2012
I totally agree that efficiency "first" is the key. Less solar would be needed and the costs drop dramatically. Companies such as Digital Lumens has the commercial and warehouse solutions. Simple processes begin with energy audits. Once the appliances, lighting and Hvac systems are tweaked, PV and solar thermal finalizes the total package to achieve an environmentally responsible scenario. Incentives "abound" (lol) for efficiency measures and I would certainly love to work for a company that possesses the skills to "do it all," from audits to solutions, to financing, with the mandates provided from our lawmakers.
Chuck Kurnik
Chuck Kurnik
March 2, 2012
Their plant is based in Longmont, CO (as am I), and here's what our local paper had to say:

http://www.timescall.com/business/local-business/ci_20064321?IADID=Search-www.timescall.com-www.timescall.com

"Abound, which manufactures thin-film photovoltaic solar modules, made the cuts because it is abandoning work on its first-generation module and switching to a next-generation module that will be much more efficient, Abely said, adding that company officials hope most of the cuts are only temporary."
Mike Moore
Mike Moore
March 2, 2012
I firmly believe large scale consumption reduction through efficiency upgrades coupled with micro scale PV/Wind generation is the most viable solution to sustainable energy solutions. Great points, Larry.
Frank Berry
Frank Berry
March 2, 2012
Larry above is "head-on"...we should have mandates for reducing the outputs needed first...have incentives for companies to change over...antequated lighting structures...change over to lighting that mimicks natural light...it saves energy...the employees will appreciate it...the management 'bean counters' will certainly appreciate the cost savings too....then go to PV, wind, etc.

Why not tackle the load first...then cut that overhead by moving into sustainables?
Bruce Karney
Bruce Karney
March 2, 2012
Hi Larry, I like your point about negawatts, but I think the manpower for rooftop PV is about the same as for your lighting retrofit. A 400 kW PV system in the Bay Area will produce about 600,000 kWh/year (that's 1500 kWh/kW). If all 17 workers spent 20 days on the project that's 340 person days. Installing 1.18 kW of PV per person per day isn't a barn-burning pace for a project of that size.

But $.40/watt certainly beats $4.00/watt, so Efficiency wins by a factor of 10, even though it's a tie on the "green jobs" front.
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
March 2, 2012
I have been in the Renewable's industry for over 40 years and continue to promote and advance it.

But!

Having just seen a spreadsheet produced by a leading lighting retrofit company ,outlining in clear detail the massive reductions in kwhr consumption they achieve by installing hundreds of thousands of advanced lighting solutions around the country, my enthusiasm for what Amory Lovins calls "Negawatts" has just taken a big leap.

Just one example in the San Francisco Bay area

Converted a commercial facility from metal halide,T5 and T8 and sodium to advanced LED?

How about an annual reduction of over 600,000 kwhrs in lighting load.
This reduction was achieved with a crew of 17 retrofitting over a four week period and required a simple one page city permit.

With incentives and rebates at far lower rates than given for PV their installed costs came out to less than 40 cents/watt installed and operating.

Now for all of us in the PV installation world crunch some numbers on what it would cost for a PV installation in San Francisco to generate 600,000 kwhr's per year.
And just what would be required in terms of red tape,engineering and man power to achieve this.

I'm not dissing PV but advanced lighting certainly is the 'unsung hero' in the 'reducing non renewable energy consumption' world.

If I were King there would be no PV installation incentives until a facility tackles its lighting loads

Now this same company is attacking the massive energy waste involved in the HVAC world. Looks like allot of low hanging fruit there also.

Couple this with a massive increase in EV's on the road and we may be on the road to real progress in saving energy.
Sam Salamay
Sam Salamay
March 2, 2012
Our feeble minded lawmakers support oil and gas because it lines their pockets. Every new and refinanced mortgage should include an option to solarize which will spur growth and sustain the industry. A special discount for US product should also be implemented. If the people could vote on this measure, it would pass easily. Why not use the internet to rally us to have a say? We finally have the supply so why not support its use.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Steve Leone

Steve Leone

Steve Leone has been a journalist for more than 15 years and has worked for news organizations in Rhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia and California.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Demand Energy
  • Brightergy
  • 2GreenEnergy.com
  • Ambient Technologies, Inc.
  • North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners
  • Northern Lights Solar Solutions
  • Magnum Energy Inc.
  • GoGreenSolar.com
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information