Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Run-of-the-River Hydropower Goes With the Flow

By Andrew Williams, Contributor
January 31, 2012   |   17 Comments
Providing a fairly certain baseload source of power, run-of-river hydropower could potentially be the renewable energy that utilities have been seeking.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
17 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 17
January 31, 2012
RUN OF THE RIVER--- THAT IS SMART ENGINEERING FOR POWER

WANT TO HIDE THE TURBINE ? MAKE IT A TOURIST ATTRACTION? MAKE A MOCKUP OF A MISSISSIPPI PADDLEWHEEL BOAT. GENERATORS WOULD BE DIRECT DRIVE TO TURBINES THAT WOULD BE THE PADDLES . THE UPPER SECTION OR UPPER DECK COULD BE A RESTAURANT.
THE "BOAT" WOULD BE PERMANENTLY ANCHORED AT THE SITE.
Comment
2 of 17
January 31, 2012
I think a floating device similar to the Pelamis would work on a river current. The movement of the current would move the segments back and forth and compress and retract hydraulic cylinders to convert the power of water flowing into useful energy. This type of device would be simpler than a wheel and less destructive and visualy out of site.
Comment
3 of 17
February 1, 2012
Pelamis is a Wave Energy Converter that moves up and down on waves in a snake like fashion. As the segments move, they compress hydraulic cylinders which converts the wave energy into electricity. This application could be applied to river currents with some modification to the design. Instead of up and down, the device would sway back and forth from the interaction of fins against the current.
Comment
4 of 17
February 1, 2012
Hi readers of this article,
I am inventor for new low head turbine design allowing to utilize 30-35% of river kinetic flow into electrical output (means that turbine flow swept area is capable to convert into electrical output with certain river flow speed. Max. mechanical energy utilization is about 60% for swept area). Design can be used as floating on platform or permanently installed. Performance tested in water tunnel. Expected equipment cost $5/watt. Can be used for river, tides, waves. Need opportunity to put it in water for any of applications above mentioned (at least 0.3 m/s flow speed is required for meaningfull output). Can any of readers provide this opportunity, no harm to fish and to river traffic problems, etc. The same design is used for wind
Email me: pips.arov@bellnet.ca
No image available
Comment
5 of 17
Anonymous
February 1, 2012
Andrew, you need to learn the difference between "Run-of-the-River" and "Low Head Hydro". Your article starts for one paragaph talking about ROR (medium to high head) and the rest of the article talks about Low Head Hydro. Why did the editorial staff not pick this up? There is no question of the ultimate benefit of both systems for U.S. and world power needs as, with contained cost of installation, hydro will out-perform Wind and Solar by a large margin without the need for subsidy to maintain artificial profitability. There is no hope for Wind and Solar until we get to $0.25 per kWh wholesale.
Comment
6 of 17
February 1, 2012
I may be building one of these vortex generators an an ornamental garden water feature,(no turban);
GRAVITATION WATER VORTEX POWER PLANT (GWVPP)
http://www.zotloeterer.com/our_company.php

The big plus is very low head, High O2, and biology-friendly
Comment
7 of 17
February 1, 2012
Sounds good. Won't work in California. We are removing Dams. We don't like anything in the way of the natural flow. Only allowable disruption to mother nature is to grow Pot. Sorry people, but thats the way California goes.... So will you in the future.....
Comment
8 of 17
February 1, 2012
Here's a good example of what your up against.

"I still say that CA would be better off divorced from the US. We have cutting-edge industry, food, oil, and top universities, ports, international trade, and Hollywood.

And we're a donor state. That means the feds are sending our tax dollars to states whose population are at odds with CA values and well-being.

Let the obstructionist repubs and religious nut-bags have the rest of the country. They're an international embarrassment anyway."



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/31/MNP11N107S.DTL#ixzz1lBStjemP
Comment
9 of 17
February 2, 2012
Buck

I thought "run of the river" was all about hydropower WITHOUT dams. So CA doesn't need to worry too much.

Maybe you should go easy on that weed, Buck.
Comment
10 of 17
February 2, 2012
Thanks to all responders to my comment.
There are several questions are sent directly to me, which could be of interest to all readers.
1. In-flow turbines (run-of-rivers) do not harm environment, they are usually up to 15kW, which is OK with individual users placing them on floating platforms or stationary, my is starting to produce meaningfull power with 0.3m/s, good addition to engine-generators. My design is 3-4 times better than any other vertical axis turbines. Design principle in my Canadian patent published by CIPO name Flow Engine as kinetic energy device.
2. Design allow unilization from 80% of flow swept area based on actual vanes surface and not based on lift properties as for propeller based devices. Overall efficiency 35% before GRID conversion and not 15% efficiency for mechanical (minus 25% for electrical) output as for propeller based turbines.
3. Thanks to many for offering sites for first installations which is most important. Estimated price range $5 per watt comming down to $2.50 per watt with 15kW (electrical). Do not forget that this is base energy and not intermittent. There no structural problems with speed up to 7 m/s as long output is limited. For low head hydro there is a solution, but should be tried, also looking forward to. No offers for tidal where I expect huge efficiency, also this is meaningfull solution for waves, much better than Pelamis mentioned above, but I envy their management team.
Anatoly
4. Thanks for a lot of proposals to use it for storm water, on exit from hydro turbines, as turbines for low head hydro, etc.
Comment
11 of 17
February 2, 2012
The principle of in-flow hydro power is not new. For an excellent illustrated description of the tethered "boat mills" and bridge mills common in Europe and China until the nineteenth century see Low Tech Magazine at

http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2010/11/boat-mills-bridge-mills-and-hanging-mills.html.
Comment
12 of 17
February 2, 2012
Sorry GraigB1, I guess I didn't get my point across very well. I think these and any other things to improve energy development are great. I just know that the Nuts around here will figure a way to stop it. Some disturbance in water flow affecting the insect growth, you name it. The greenies advocate it and then they stop it.
We had to pass a state law to allow PV on roofs. You can put up a 40ft street light or a Flagpole, but you can't put a little wind generator on a 20ft 'Tower' Go figure...
Comment
13 of 17
February 2, 2012
Answer to CraigB1,
Nothing is completely new, new means always to make old idea more efficient, less expensive or smaller in size, or, as in my case, get from the same water swept area 3-4 times more energy.
Old solutions such as water wheels are bulky, not efficient, etc. - as case with old wind turbines.
Comment
14 of 17
February 2, 2012
Buck

Thanks for that. I don't live in CA, so I'm not familiar with the problems you face. If the greens want alternative energy, they should let - at least small scale ones - go ahead.

Arov

Sure, you're right: it's just interesting to see an old idea (hydro power generator fixed to a floating platform) coming back in a new more efficient form. Do you have a picture of your turbine? And are there any working anywhere yet, even as pilot projects, or small-scale prototypes?
Comment
15 of 17
February 4, 2012
Hello CraigB1,
If you see photo on my reply (instead of my picture) it will give you design idea. Also Google 'Arov Flow Engine' or access CIPO Canadian Patents site for Arov Flow Engine. Designed and built prototypes for wind and water(river, tides, waves), principally new design, very inexpensive and efficient. Tested water turbine in water tunnel, wind in my lab. No support in Canada for this type of development, and my efforts in USA did not go anywhere. DOE does not understand anything that is different from propeller based turbine, even they are bulky, expensive, rated for mechanical output with dyno, etc. My efforts in tidal, where this design is most effective, in my case I do not have even chance to show advantages of my design, which will deliver at least twice more energy for tidal compare to lift designs. This is current state of alternative (compare to currently used) alternative energy solutions, articles about of this type of stories are absent.
Sorry for negative view.
Comment
16 of 17
February 5, 2012
The link was broke;
I love the Eco-services delivered by this design , and the vortex is just mesmerizing.
A video that gives you the sense of torque;
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news-topic/-power-plant/video-zotl-%C3%96-terer---worldwide-first-gravitation-water-vortex-power-plant_oo_mP18IXMo.html

http://www.zotloeterer.com/
Comment
17 of 17
February 5, 2012
dave-fisher: I am actually working on a Wave Energy Converter which can operate at any wave height and extract energy from both the up\9buoyancy) and down(gravity) movemnet of waves.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
 

Andrew Williams

View Andrew Williams's Profile
About: Andrew Williams is a freelance journalist based in Cardiff, Wales, UK. His work has been published in a wide range of publications including The Guardian, The ... more »

Advertise With Us

Black & Veatch Corporation HelioSage North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners UnThink Solar ClearEnergy Inc. Concepts NREC HUBER+SUHNER AG
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters