Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Operation Sustainability: U.S. Military Sets Ambitious Environmental Goals

By Michael d'Estries, Contributor
January 30, 2012   |   3 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

3 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 3
February 1, 2012
The War Department budget is a little over one trillion dollars/year. If we cut the War Departments budget by %50 we would still have a War Department much larger than the War Departments of all other countries combined so we could still wage war on them and come out the "victor".

Now imagine what we could do with 500 billion dollars per year.

Millions and millions of solar panels installed on individuals households that free them from utility bills, rather than barracks roofs or bare ground at War Department bases that were obsolete and useless on VE and VJ day 67 year ago.

Millions of homes upgraded to energy efficiency rather than using bio diesel to fuel multimillion dollar jets that never get used because a 19 year old sitting in Arizona with a modified XBox can incinerate Pakistani's remotely with a drone.

Millions of low energy,low income housing units built, rather than 30,000 square foot mega mansions just outside Washington DC, payed for by the millions stolen from the War Department budget borrowed from China.

I would think 500 billion dollars could easily replace all lighting in the US with high efficiency LED's.

We certainly can use some better lighting. Perhaps the War Department Cock Roaches will scatter and die once a bright enough like of truth is shown on them by those who see most of our military as just high cost welfare for the %1 and a possible death sentence for those foolish enough to get involved in organized insanity better known as war.
Comment
2 of 3
February 2, 2012
Maybe not everyone likes where all of the DoD's money is spent, but if they're willing to spend a large chunk on renewables then we should all cheer. I say kudos to the DoD's efforts to prove less fossil fuel consumption makes us a safer, more secure nation. It's very easy to see we should not be pouring money into regions of the world that want to harm us just because we need the gas. If a greener military also makes us a cleaner, more self-sustaining energy nation, then we should all be on board.

There are other clean energy innovations the military can put to use to make some major fossil fuel cuts. Check out Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion, creating endless clean power out of the temperature difference in shallow and deep water. It could be a real energy game changer for tropical installations. Lots more on OTEC, and how some countries are already putting it to use at The On Project.

http://www.theonproject.org/?utm_source=renewableenergyworld&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=mscomment
Comment
3 of 3
February 8, 2012
An interesting article.
If things happen as planned , then it would be a revolution.
However, the most important challenge will come from the USA itself. I just hope that those in power do not choose costly green technologies over easily available and sustainable green technologies.
For sake of argument, lets assume that the DOD does choose the most optimal and sustainable and cheap technology, the question then arises , how will the oil-auto industry react to it and subsequently those who get elected by their support ?
The fallout may not be merely within the boundaries of USA. Lets say if there is not need for oil at all, how will the situation be handled in the persian gulf ?

The USofAmerica is the land of the free and the brave, but ... energy wise , when will the USA be truly independent ?
Thomas Friedman might be happy to read this article.

With so many superior learning institutes available, If someone conceptualizes and makes on an aeroplane engine that does not run on fossil fuel, then it will solve 70% of the problem ?
If german navy can operate a submarine that have engines/propellers that purely operate by sophisticated fuel cells then is it so difficult ?

While Ships are sailing the oceans , is it to difficult to run a fold-able and portable windmill on the oceans that will generate electricity on the ships and help propel it if required ? ....

my two pence .. hope for a greener world.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

RES Offshore European Wind Energy Association Rittal Corporation Magnum Energy Inc. Growth Energy The Interstate Renewable Energy Council Conergy Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters